Mar. 11 at 2:14 AM
The attachment compares
$SLNO 7-year analyst consensus revenue estimates to the same 7-year revenue forecasts prepared by the management/BOD of 15 comm'l-stage peers that exited via M&A. The table is sorted lowest cumulative 7-year revenue forecast to highest (with M&A exit valuations noted).
Analysts forecast SLNO to generate more revenues over the next 7-years than GBT, RETA &
$FOLD mgmt/BOD forecast for their products post acquisition. The 3 were acquired for enterprise values of
$4.8 to
$7.0B.
SLNO generated 98% gross profit margins in FY25. All 3 peers forecast a lower gross profit margin on their product sales.
If analysts forecast SLNO to generate more cumulative revenues over the next 7 years, does this suggest SLNO would be worth roughly the same as GBT, RETA & FOLD in a hypothetical M&A exit (assuming SLNO analyst consensus revenue estimates were credible)?
This is a question for SLNO related investors. This is not investment advice.
$RYTM $XBI $IBB