Dec. 24 at 8:44 PM
$WRD The table below compares three common ways OEMs are approaching ADAS today. On the surface, the differences can look subtle. In reality, each model reflects a very different view on who should control the stack, how much flexibility is worth paying for, and where long-term risk should sit.
So where does WePilot 3.0 deliver clear, practical advantages, and where those advantages come with real trade-offs? I'll highlight the areas where WePilot stands out versus supplier-led vision stacks (e.g. Mobileye) and fully vertically integrated OEM approaches (e.g. Tesla FSD) and where its architecture gives OEMs more room to adapt over time rather than locking decisions in too early.
Note: Global ADAS market forecasts cluster in a wide band, roughly 57 to 72 billion by 2030. Its practical TAM is not the full ADAS number, but also bigger than the pure software number, because OEM contracts often bundle software, integration, validation support, and compute alignment.
