Jan. 29 at 8:09 PM
$CPRX
Part 1:
Regarding the two Motions in Limine that were filed by Catalyst, I suggest you do not give much attention to them. Although I can only see the titles of the two Motions because I do not pay for a PACER subscription, the titles are sufficient to show that the evidence Catalyst is seeking to not have admitted during the trial does not pertain directly to the substantive nature of the suit - the validity of the patents. It is common for a party to not want evidence to be used in a trial that is not built on a solid foundation of accuracy. So, evidence that has not been independently authenticated is suspect.
It would be prudent not to let the decision by the judge on these two Motions cause you to believe the judge is leaning in any particular way - for or against Catalyst or Hetero in this lawsuit. The decision will strictly relate to what the law says about the admissibility of the evidence that Hertero wants to use, not to the underlying validity of the patents.
