Jul. 26 at 6:07 PM
$WLGS The thing is (and it's an IMPORTANT thing, or shall I say "worthy of observance") is that all of these facts/factors of
$171M in contract wins etc, were the same when
$WLGS was struggling in the
$0.03s
$0.04s
$0.05s and crazy resistance @
$0.06/07 yet it took a pump artist like @ZackMorris and his followers to stimulate enough volume to provide enough liquidity/momentum to propel the shares to nearly
$0.15
Since that pump (which had absolutely nothing to do with WLGS fundamentals or the company issuing a much requested shareholder update to vet these contract awards), the PPS has retraced down to
$0.072 support due to active note conversions, warrant exercisions and profit taking/or stops being triggered.
The company is a valid company yet REFUSES to be transparent. Evidence of this occured on Friday where they requested
$TROO to not name Wang & Lee as the "existing shareholder" and instead hid inconspicuously in the shadows of an SEC filing.
Why?