Market Cap 8.43B
Revenue (ttm) 2.96B
Net Income (ttm) 509.17M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 15.96
Forward PE 17.75
Profit Margin 17.21%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 2,270,900
Avg Vol 2,420,616
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 146.26M
Stochastic %K 12%
Beta 2.39
Analysts Strong Sell
Price Target $61.92

Company Profile

Nextracker Inc. provides solar tracker technologies and solutions for utility-scale and distributed generation solar applications in the United States and internationally. The company offers tracking solutions, including NX Horizon, a solar tracking solution; NX Horizon-XTR, a terrain-following tracker to expand the addressable market for trackers on sites with sloped, uneven, and challenging terrain; NX Horizon Hail Pro adds automatic stowing using weather service information; and NX Horizon Lo...

Industry: Solar
Sector: Technology
Phone: (510) 270-2500
Address:
6200 Paseo Padre Parkway, Fremont, United States
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:22 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR [A continuation from the previous pos, the discussion with GPT-4o mini] Q: Your answer shows that what Senator John Hoeven said ["We’re just trying to create more certainty for projects that have already gotten going, but other than that, I think it’ll be much like you’ve seen"] is not well established. A: You're correct in pointing out that Senator John Hoeven's statement may not fully align with the broader context of the legislative process and the implications of the Senate parliamentarian's ruling. If the draft legislation proposes significant changes that could conflict with the ruling, then Hoeven's assertion about the lack of major modifications could be seen as inconsistent or overly optimistic…In summary, while Senator Hoeven's statement reflects a desire for stability and certainty, it may not fully account for the legislative realities and the need to adhere to the parliamentarian's ruling.
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:21 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR [A continuation from the previous pos, the discussion with GPT-4o mini] Q: Are the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) regarded as statutory authorizations? A: Yes, the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are considered statutory authorizations. Statutory authorizations refer to provisions in legislation that establish funding or programs, and the tax credits provided in the IRA are part of the statutory framework… As a result, they are protected from repeal under the recent ruling by the Senate parliamentarian... [To be continued in the next post]
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:20 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR A short time ago I came across the following text, published today [from the article: “Senate GOP on megabill tax section: ‘It won’t change much’”, E&E News by Politico, June 24, 2025]: “Senate Republicans said Monday they spent the weekend haggling over the fine print of energy tax provisions in their megabill, but they don’t expect major changes from the draft released last week… With Medicaid and other issues still generating controversy, negotiators don’t appear to be focusing too much on the fate of Inflation Reduction Act energy credits" I had a long discussion with GPT-4o mini. Due to lack of space I will present only a every partial description of this discussion in the next two posts. [To be continued in the next post]
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 2:33 AM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR I asked GPT-4o mini the following questions: Q: The Senate parliamentarian ruled a few days ago that Republicans cannot repeal statutory authorizations for Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) programs due to budget rules, but they can still attempt to repeal unobligated funds from some sections of the 2022 climate law. Q: Are the tax credits and incentives in the IRA for renewable energy considered as "unobligated funds"? A: No, the tax credits and incentives in the IRA for renewable energy are not classified as "unobligated funds." They are part of established programs with funding authorizations. Q: If not, does it mean that they are safe from the current attempt in the Senate to cancel them? A: Yes, since the tax credits and incentives are not considered unobligated funds and the statutory authorizations cannot be repealed, they are likely safe from current attempts in the Senate to cancel them. ***** Remark: some risk remains despite the above, as GPT-4o said.
4 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 23 at 10:57 PM
$NXT According to the article in the link below, from June 23, 2025, the Senate Parliamentarian MacDonough "cleared Republicans clawing back spending from the Inflation Reduction Act but said repealing the underlying law would not conform with budget reconciliation". Hence in order for the draft suggested in the previous week to pass in the Senate [the draft which enforces a fast phase-out and other modifications to various tax credits related to clean energy such as 25D, 45X, 48E], it must be approved by a majority of at least 60 senators [Byrd Rule]. Since this is not possible without the support of at least 7 Democrat senators, the practical meaning is that apparently the various tax credits for clean energy are safe. The strange thing, however, is that this information was essentially published already on June 20, 2023, and yet has not received much attention and reaction from the market. Have I missed here something basic? https://www.eenews.net/articles/uncertainty-surrounds-megabill-endgame/
0 · Reply
WallStreetBuyDip
WallStreetBuyDip Jun. 22 at 1:09 AM
$NXT Price seems to be drifting at $57.62, with highest at $61.59 and lowest at $31.29. Average volume stands at 2.8M, recent volume hit 3.4M on Jun 20, 2025.
0 · Reply
TalkMarkets
TalkMarkets Jun. 21 at 8:00 PM
3 Solar Stocks To Watch Amid IRA Funding Uncertainty $ARRY $NXT $TYGO https://talkmarkets.com/content/stocks--equities/3-solar-stocks-to-watch-amid-ira-funding-uncertainty?post=505120&userid=123969
0 · Reply
Pooman
Pooman Jun. 20 at 7:48 PM
$NXT give me a new ATH!
0 · Reply
DonCorleone77
DonCorleone77 Jun. 19 at 8:07 PM
$NXT Information regarding some notes pertaining to NXT from a Bank of America analyst report issued Tuesday (6/17) that included NXT: https://x.com/CorleoneDon77/status/1935791337594618366
0 · Reply
TrendEdgeLogan
TrendEdgeLogan Jun. 19 at 5:55 PM
$TAN The hardest thing to do is to forget the bargain bin ($FSLR) and buy the clear leader $NXT
1 · Reply
Latest News on NXT
Nextracker Expands Board of Directors

Jun 18, 2025, 8:30 AM EDT - 6 days ago

Nextracker Expands Board of Directors


Nextracker Achieves 10 GW Solar Tracker Milestone in India

May 27, 2025, 2:56 AM EDT - 4 weeks ago

Nextracker Achieves 10 GW Solar Tracker Milestone in India


Nextracker Inc. (NXT) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

May 14, 2025, 8:08 PM EDT - 5 weeks ago

Nextracker Inc. (NXT) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript


Nextracker Reports Q4 and Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results

May 14, 2025, 4:05 PM EDT - 5 weeks ago

Nextracker Reports Q4 and Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results


Nextracker: Earnings Preview, Poised For Growth And Gains

May 13, 2025, 6:34 PM EDT - 6 weeks ago

Nextracker: Earnings Preview, Poised For Growth And Gains


Nextracker:  An Opportunity That Shines In The Sun

Apr 18, 2025, 12:02 PM EDT - 2 months ago

Nextracker:  An Opportunity That Shines In The Sun


Nextracker: Backlog Growth Creates Future Visibility

Mar 27, 2025, 5:39 AM EDT - 3 months ago

Nextracker: Backlog Growth Creates Future Visibility


Nextracker Looks Like A Buy -- But Maybe Not An Easy Buy

Mar 13, 2025, 4:06 PM EDT - 3 months ago

Nextracker Looks Like A Buy -- But Maybe Not An Easy Buy


dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:22 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR [A continuation from the previous pos, the discussion with GPT-4o mini] Q: Your answer shows that what Senator John Hoeven said ["We’re just trying to create more certainty for projects that have already gotten going, but other than that, I think it’ll be much like you’ve seen"] is not well established. A: You're correct in pointing out that Senator John Hoeven's statement may not fully align with the broader context of the legislative process and the implications of the Senate parliamentarian's ruling. If the draft legislation proposes significant changes that could conflict with the ruling, then Hoeven's assertion about the lack of major modifications could be seen as inconsistent or overly optimistic…In summary, while Senator Hoeven's statement reflects a desire for stability and certainty, it may not fully account for the legislative realities and the need to adhere to the parliamentarian's ruling.
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:21 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR [A continuation from the previous pos, the discussion with GPT-4o mini] Q: Are the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) regarded as statutory authorizations? A: Yes, the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are considered statutory authorizations. Statutory authorizations refer to provisions in legislation that establish funding or programs, and the tax credits provided in the IRA are part of the statutory framework… As a result, they are protected from repeal under the recent ruling by the Senate parliamentarian... [To be continued in the next post]
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 4:20 PM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR A short time ago I came across the following text, published today [from the article: “Senate GOP on megabill tax section: ‘It won’t change much’”, E&E News by Politico, June 24, 2025]: “Senate Republicans said Monday they spent the weekend haggling over the fine print of energy tax provisions in their megabill, but they don’t expect major changes from the draft released last week… With Medicaid and other issues still generating controversy, negotiators don’t appear to be focusing too much on the fate of Inflation Reduction Act energy credits" I had a long discussion with GPT-4o mini. Due to lack of space I will present only a every partial description of this discussion in the next two posts. [To be continued in the next post]
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 24 at 2:33 AM
$SEDG $NXT $ENPH $RUN $SPWR I asked GPT-4o mini the following questions: Q: The Senate parliamentarian ruled a few days ago that Republicans cannot repeal statutory authorizations for Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) programs due to budget rules, but they can still attempt to repeal unobligated funds from some sections of the 2022 climate law. Q: Are the tax credits and incentives in the IRA for renewable energy considered as "unobligated funds"? A: No, the tax credits and incentives in the IRA for renewable energy are not classified as "unobligated funds." They are part of established programs with funding authorizations. Q: If not, does it mean that they are safe from the current attempt in the Senate to cancel them? A: Yes, since the tax credits and incentives are not considered unobligated funds and the statutory authorizations cannot be repealed, they are likely safe from current attempts in the Senate to cancel them. ***** Remark: some risk remains despite the above, as GPT-4o said.
4 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 23 at 10:57 PM
$NXT According to the article in the link below, from June 23, 2025, the Senate Parliamentarian MacDonough "cleared Republicans clawing back spending from the Inflation Reduction Act but said repealing the underlying law would not conform with budget reconciliation". Hence in order for the draft suggested in the previous week to pass in the Senate [the draft which enforces a fast phase-out and other modifications to various tax credits related to clean energy such as 25D, 45X, 48E], it must be approved by a majority of at least 60 senators [Byrd Rule]. Since this is not possible without the support of at least 7 Democrat senators, the practical meaning is that apparently the various tax credits for clean energy are safe. The strange thing, however, is that this information was essentially published already on June 20, 2023, and yet has not received much attention and reaction from the market. Have I missed here something basic? https://www.eenews.net/articles/uncertainty-surrounds-megabill-endgame/
0 · Reply
WallStreetBuyDip
WallStreetBuyDip Jun. 22 at 1:09 AM
$NXT Price seems to be drifting at $57.62, with highest at $61.59 and lowest at $31.29. Average volume stands at 2.8M, recent volume hit 3.4M on Jun 20, 2025.
0 · Reply
TalkMarkets
TalkMarkets Jun. 21 at 8:00 PM
3 Solar Stocks To Watch Amid IRA Funding Uncertainty $ARRY $NXT $TYGO https://talkmarkets.com/content/stocks--equities/3-solar-stocks-to-watch-amid-ira-funding-uncertainty?post=505120&userid=123969
0 · Reply
Pooman
Pooman Jun. 20 at 7:48 PM
$NXT give me a new ATH!
0 · Reply
DonCorleone77
DonCorleone77 Jun. 19 at 8:07 PM
$NXT Information regarding some notes pertaining to NXT from a Bank of America analyst report issued Tuesday (6/17) that included NXT: https://x.com/CorleoneDon77/status/1935791337594618366
0 · Reply
TrendEdgeLogan
TrendEdgeLogan Jun. 19 at 5:55 PM
$TAN The hardest thing to do is to forget the bargain bin ($FSLR) and buy the clear leader $NXT
1 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 17 at 5:05 PM
$SEDG $NXT $SPWR $ENPH One of the main causes for the dip today in many solar names is the fact that in the Senate draft it is written that the 30% tax credit (Section 25D) for home solar will end 180 days after the bill is signed by the president. Hence the 30% tax credit is unlikely to continue much beyond the end of 2025. This is in contrast with the way the draft deals with utility solar (Section 48E): here there is a planned period of phase-out, to 60% in 2026, 20% in 2027, and 0% beyond. https://electrek.co/2025/06/17/home-solar-battery-incentive-over-180-days-after-trump-signs-latest-senate-bill/ The draft is better than the bill passed by the House in May, and hence the drop might be an over-reaction. The draft is about to be discussed and might be modified, then it should be voted by Senate and go back to the House for either further modification, approval or rejection. If the draft passes as it is, then it is likely to trigger a short term rush in the home solar in the US. Later SEDG, ENPH, and so on will probably invest much more resources in non-US markets.
0 · Reply
WantedToRetireEarly
WantedToRetireEarly Jun. 17 at 4:15 PM
$NXT Impressive strength given the massive sell off in the solar sector.
1 · Reply
SpearfishingPro
SpearfishingPro Jun. 17 at 4:09 PM
$NXT doing what it should when compared to the others!
0 · Reply
Jeffkad
Jeffkad Jun. 17 at 2:54 PM
$FSLR From Goldman Sachs: "While we take no view on the final outcome of the bill, we view the Senate proposal as relatively positive for $FSLR, $NXT, and $ARRY as these companies have exposure primarily to 45X manufacturing tax credits, which are relatively unchanged and thus more intact through the end of 2031."
0 · Reply
ErectionDenier
ErectionDenier Jun. 17 at 1:30 PM
$NXT cramer open his fat mouth?
0 · Reply
cubie
cubie Jun. 17 at 1:27 PM
$FSLR $ENPH $SEDG $RUN $NXT wells Enphase and sedge werent as obvious as fslr. but whales also did poots midday on those yesterday so how they know?! unbelievable 🙄
1 · Reply
EpicComeback
EpicComeback Jun. 17 at 10:46 AM
$NXT -7% since post, total jack ass.
0 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 17 at 2:36 AM
1 · Reply
dreamtwits
dreamtwits Jun. 17 at 12:10 AM
$NXT $FSLR $ARRY In the last few hours a lot of confusing information has been published regarding the draft of the Senate related to the tax credit for solar (and wind) projects. Instead of relaying on this confusing information, it is better to read directly the draft. It can be found in the link below: https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/finance_committee_legislative_text_title_vii.pdf See especially pages 274--276 (phase-out of the credit to 60% in 2026, to 20% in 2027, and to 0% starting from 2028, with no phasing out for certain large projects), page 308 (amendment to Section 45Y: denial of credit for solar based on leasing) and page 323 (amendment to Section 48E: denial of credit for solar based on leasing). This draft is better than the House bill, but is worse than some initial hopes.
1 · Reply
Ziggy11
Ziggy11 Jun. 16 at 10:38 PM
$FSLR $ENPH $RUN $NXT These companies will be way overbooked till 2028 , everyone will rush to order will incentives which will be booked out way past 2028 and then a democrat will get back in white house with a blue senate and blue house and green energy demand will be insane. You guys trading options good luck. You guys buying and holding here. You will have a lot of rewards IMHO
2 · Reply
Ziggy11
Ziggy11 Jun. 16 at 10:30 PM
$FSLR $ENPH $NXT $RUN People selling like there will never be solar after 2028, people selling here will regret it. Red states are still using plenty of solar, many jobs. If you are patient you will do very well here especially FSLR, I think RUN sold off way too much as well. Good Luck
0 · Reply
Pooman
Pooman Jun. 16 at 10:00 PM
$NXT wtf is this nasty AH action
0 · Reply