tievLeaf
Oct 8, 6:09 AM
$IONQ
Honestly, I struggle to see why IonQtards are pumping this so hard lol. Superion 256 has reached only EARLY hardware milestones and fabricating a 256-qubit chip and trapping ions isn't the same as demonstrating a reliable 256-qubit computer. Make no mistake retards.
Its 99.99% two-qubit gate fidelity headline doesn't prove that performance holds across the entire system, especially during simultaneous operations. It is still 0 logical qubit (lol) and it's entire roadmap is a marketing fest full of buzzwords that Darpa folks love.
The BIGGER questions still remain: can IonQ scale without losing fidelity, demonstrate meaningful logical qubits with real error correction, and achieving fault-tolerant computing at a commercially viable cost like
$INFQ is capable of doing.
Make no mistake IONQTards, DARPA Stage C means IonQ gets the "OPPORTUNITY" to prove its roadmap, not that its technology has already been validated. Now release the floodgate of IONQTARDS.
$QNT $RGTI $QBTS
1 replies
