Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 26,500
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund (“ETF”) that attempts to achieve two times (200%) the daily percentage change in the share price of the underlying security by employing derivatives, namely swap agreements and/or listed options contracts. The fund is non-diversified.

skeetly
skeetly Dec. 11 at 2:31 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX Sanity Check & MIZUHO BS PUMP ATTEMPT cont. Cash Runway — Does $450M–600M Actually Last Until 2030? Let’s look at basic numbers. Rigetti’s quarterly cash burn (last few years) is typically: $12–20M per quarter, or $48–80M per year But here’s the issue: ⚠️ Burn increases BEFORE revenue does As quantum companies scale: More specialized hires Fabrication, cryogenics, hardware costs Cloud scaling costs Partnerships requiring investment R&D accelerates before monetization If Rigetti wants to hit 1,000 qubits by 2027, their burn rate must increase, not stabilize. ⚠️ $450–600M sounds large, but over 5–6 years it's nothing At $60–80M burn annually (likely conservative for scale-up): $450M / $75M ≈ 6 years of runway $600M / $75M ≈ 8 years of runway But that assumes flat burn, which is unrealistic if they attempt the scaling Mizuho assumes.
0 · Reply
skeetly
skeetly Dec. 11 at 2:26 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX Sanity Check & MIZUHO BS PUMP ATTEMPT (Qubit Count, Fidelity, Timelines) Mizuho is assuming Rigetti hits: 150+ qubits by 2026 1,000+ qubits by 2027 ~99.8% two-qubit fidelity ⚠️ Problems with This Assumption 1. Their prior timelines have slipped multiple times. Rigetti’s qubit and fidelity improvements have historically been incremental, not exponential. 2. Scaling qubits is not linear — error rates compound. Superconducting architecture suffers from: Crosstalk Decoherence Scaling complexity Wiring/cryogenics bottlenecks IBM publicly publishes multi-year roadmaps and still adjusts timelines; Rigetti doesn’t have IBM’s engineering budget, staff, or infrastructure. 3. Competitors are much further ahead. IBM already showed 1,121 qubits (Condor) in 2023. Google demonstrated major algorithmic progress. Amazon Braket and Microsoft Azure Quantum aggregate multiple architectures. Rigetti is nowhere near the leaders — and the gap is widening, not closing.
0 · Reply
phantomtrader75
phantomtrader75 Dec. 11 at 12:55 AM
$RGTI $RGTI what the bulls don’t realize sadly and what we have been warning them is that retail is now dumping on them and we’ve all covered our short positions amd any measly pops tomorrow will be shorted with a lot of vigor. You have 5 minutes to cut your losses… $RGTX
1 · Reply
EingeLTrade
EingeLTrade Dec. 10 at 5:39 PM
Buying some $RGTX $RGTI
1 · Reply
skeetly
skeetly Dec. 9 at 1:37 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX heads up, likely breakdown potential on RGTI increases below 27.50 IF we do so on high volume. Why? On multiple timeframes (1m → 15m → 30m → 4h) we can see... - Price bounced here - Buyers defended here - It aligns with VWAP / trendline interactions - It sits just above the neckline region of the prior breakout So... If broken with HIGH volume: ➡️ Momentum shifts aggressively to sellers ➡️ Stops get triggered ➡️ Algorithms flip from liquidity-taking to liquidity-providing ➡️ Bid depth thins out ➡️ The path of least resistance becomes DOWN ✔ 1st target if/when this plays out 27-27.12 ✔ 2nd target 26.25 - This is extremely important because: - It is the major prior support - It is a TPO HVN (high volume node) - It’s a structural shelf on the 4h chart Bulls must defend this level or the trend weakens significantly. ✔ 3rd target (if selling accelerates): 24.80 – 25.00
1 · Reply
iEstocks
iEstocks Dec. 9 at 12:29 PM
$RGTI They split $RGTX last night.
2 · Reply
RealDealDenis
RealDealDenis Dec. 9 at 11:16 AM
$RGTX this just has a 4 to 1 split
0 · Reply
J05hua
J05hua Dec. 5 at 5:30 AM
$RGTX will be get another chance at $90?
0 · Reply
CassandraTwit
CassandraTwit Dec. 4 at 6:14 PM
It's beginning to look a lot like Short Squeeze $IONQ $RGTI $RGTX $QBTS🎵🎶
0 · Reply
ccioli90
ccioli90 Dec. 1 at 1:46 PM
$RGTI ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ $RGTX
1 · Reply
Latest News on RGTX
RGTX: Taking Advantage Of The Quantum Computing Momentum

Oct 15, 2025, 12:27 PM EDT - 2 months ago

RGTX: Taking Advantage Of The Quantum Computing Momentum


Rigetti's Quantum Leap Powers ETF Momentum

Sep 23, 2025, 5:39 PM EDT - 2 months ago

Rigetti's Quantum Leap Powers ETF Momentum

RGTI RGTU


skeetly
skeetly Dec. 11 at 2:31 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX Sanity Check & MIZUHO BS PUMP ATTEMPT cont. Cash Runway — Does $450M–600M Actually Last Until 2030? Let’s look at basic numbers. Rigetti’s quarterly cash burn (last few years) is typically: $12–20M per quarter, or $48–80M per year But here’s the issue: ⚠️ Burn increases BEFORE revenue does As quantum companies scale: More specialized hires Fabrication, cryogenics, hardware costs Cloud scaling costs Partnerships requiring investment R&D accelerates before monetization If Rigetti wants to hit 1,000 qubits by 2027, their burn rate must increase, not stabilize. ⚠️ $450–600M sounds large, but over 5–6 years it's nothing At $60–80M burn annually (likely conservative for scale-up): $450M / $75M ≈ 6 years of runway $600M / $75M ≈ 8 years of runway But that assumes flat burn, which is unrealistic if they attempt the scaling Mizuho assumes.
0 · Reply
skeetly
skeetly Dec. 11 at 2:26 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX Sanity Check & MIZUHO BS PUMP ATTEMPT (Qubit Count, Fidelity, Timelines) Mizuho is assuming Rigetti hits: 150+ qubits by 2026 1,000+ qubits by 2027 ~99.8% two-qubit fidelity ⚠️ Problems with This Assumption 1. Their prior timelines have slipped multiple times. Rigetti’s qubit and fidelity improvements have historically been incremental, not exponential. 2. Scaling qubits is not linear — error rates compound. Superconducting architecture suffers from: Crosstalk Decoherence Scaling complexity Wiring/cryogenics bottlenecks IBM publicly publishes multi-year roadmaps and still adjusts timelines; Rigetti doesn’t have IBM’s engineering budget, staff, or infrastructure. 3. Competitors are much further ahead. IBM already showed 1,121 qubits (Condor) in 2023. Google demonstrated major algorithmic progress. Amazon Braket and Microsoft Azure Quantum aggregate multiple architectures. Rigetti is nowhere near the leaders — and the gap is widening, not closing.
0 · Reply
phantomtrader75
phantomtrader75 Dec. 11 at 12:55 AM
$RGTI $RGTI what the bulls don’t realize sadly and what we have been warning them is that retail is now dumping on them and we’ve all covered our short positions amd any measly pops tomorrow will be shorted with a lot of vigor. You have 5 minutes to cut your losses… $RGTX
1 · Reply
EingeLTrade
EingeLTrade Dec. 10 at 5:39 PM
Buying some $RGTX $RGTI
1 · Reply
skeetly
skeetly Dec. 9 at 1:37 PM
$RGTI $RGTZ $RGTX heads up, likely breakdown potential on RGTI increases below 27.50 IF we do so on high volume. Why? On multiple timeframes (1m → 15m → 30m → 4h) we can see... - Price bounced here - Buyers defended here - It aligns with VWAP / trendline interactions - It sits just above the neckline region of the prior breakout So... If broken with HIGH volume: ➡️ Momentum shifts aggressively to sellers ➡️ Stops get triggered ➡️ Algorithms flip from liquidity-taking to liquidity-providing ➡️ Bid depth thins out ➡️ The path of least resistance becomes DOWN ✔ 1st target if/when this plays out 27-27.12 ✔ 2nd target 26.25 - This is extremely important because: - It is the major prior support - It is a TPO HVN (high volume node) - It’s a structural shelf on the 4h chart Bulls must defend this level or the trend weakens significantly. ✔ 3rd target (if selling accelerates): 24.80 – 25.00
1 · Reply
iEstocks
iEstocks Dec. 9 at 12:29 PM
$RGTI They split $RGTX last night.
2 · Reply
RealDealDenis
RealDealDenis Dec. 9 at 11:16 AM
$RGTX this just has a 4 to 1 split
0 · Reply
J05hua
J05hua Dec. 5 at 5:30 AM
$RGTX will be get another chance at $90?
0 · Reply
CassandraTwit
CassandraTwit Dec. 4 at 6:14 PM
It's beginning to look a lot like Short Squeeze $IONQ $RGTI $RGTX $QBTS🎵🎶
0 · Reply
ccioli90
ccioli90 Dec. 1 at 1:46 PM
$RGTI ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ $RGTX
1 · Reply
BillyMcMc
BillyMcMc Nov. 24 at 7:46 PM
$RGTX down a cool 85% in a few weeks hopefully noone was holding on way down
0 · Reply
MikeCaymanTrades
MikeCaymanTrades Nov. 22 at 9:56 PM
$RGTX - If this doesn't hold 50.00 much lower.
0 · Reply
MikeCaymanTrades
MikeCaymanTrades Nov. 20 at 2:58 AM
$RGTX watching for over 100.00
0 · Reply