Market Cap 733.45M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -26.38M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 6,068,200
Avg Vol 11,407,206
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 559.88M
Stochastic %K 33%
Beta 0.09
Analysts Sell
Price Target $2.50

Company Profile

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. engages in the exploration of mineral properties in the United States. The company explores for copper, gold, molybdenum, silver, and rhenium deposits. It holds 100% interest in the Pebble Copper-Gold-Molybdenum-Silver-Rhenium project comprising 1,840 mineral claims that covers an area of approximately 274 square miles located in southwest Alaska, the United States. The company was formerly known as Northern Dynasty Explorations Ltd. and changed its name to Norther...

Industry: Other Industrial Metals & Mining
Sector: Basic Materials
Phone: 604 684 6365
Fax: 604 639 9209
Address:
1040 West Georgia Street, 14th Floor, Vancouver, Canada
Dan1920
Dan1920 Mar. 15 at 4:13 AM
$NAK I never metioned or talked about the VETO. The veto is clearly there for a reason. Whether or not its illegal is going to depend on who is fighting for it. IN OUR CASE FOR NAK its RON and his buddies. I can clearly see there are many reason to consider the veto illegal. This does not concern me, yes the veto can be and should be removed. But having RON over and over and over again step up will only get NAK the same results. When you keep trying and the same guy tries to solve the same problem over and over and over agian he loses the fire within the desire to win has evaded him. Its like a kid that keeps asking are we there yet on a road trip. At first he is full of joy and wants to get there but after asking for more than 20 yrs that kid doesn't care to get there anymore. His passion left him and someone else should restart the fire with at least the small embers that are still burning from a flame that has almost been put out.
1 · Reply
GuitarTones
GuitarTones Mar. 15 at 3:47 AM
$NAK hell, even @Jimmyjack12 knows. And that dude don't know jack. Also, they/them are multi account user Johnny Hanjob. @Stocktwits doesn't mind.
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 15 at 1:23 AM
$NAK https://pebblewatch.com/articles/doj-officially-defends-epas-final-determination/
0 · Reply
EZ_DUZ_IT
EZ_DUZ_IT Mar. 14 at 8:59 PM
$NAK Hey guitar boy!! Put another “log” on the fire.
1 · Reply
IfIbuysitdies
IfIbuysitdies Mar. 14 at 3:20 PM
$NAK Dan, you really haven't done your homework. You should do a little more digging and understand why the veto is illegal, and why it will eventually be removed. Just my opinion, but keeping your stance will surely cost you an opportunity.
1 · Reply
RicFlair53
RicFlair53 Mar. 14 at 6:42 AM
$NAK Crappy take. If you are 100% convinced of anything, you are probably not thinking about it rationally. Mining is a long game, especially in the US due to bureaucracy and special interest opposition. Maybe Ron has done everything he can, maybe not. But it’s silly to attribute the project’s current status to poor effort or performance on his part.
1 · Reply
Dan1920
Dan1920 Mar. 14 at 3:51 AM
$NAK I AM 100% convinced the only way this stock will ever get off the ground and permits get approved is once Ron has removed himself from the Company. Ron has been running this company for over 20yrs and nothing has gotten done. NOTHING, so when you tell your friends, "yeah I have this really cool project i've been working on and I'll soon let you guys see it, its still on jack stands in the garage but maybe this summer I'll pull it out.....................20yrs later Ron's friends still waiting on that 1990 Buick Park Avenue to come out of the garage with a turbo LS1 engine and a manual transmission. But all that was just talk. HE actually never had any car in the garage, just made everyone think he did to keep small talk in the office but no one believes anything he says anymore. NO ONE BELIEVES RON ANYMORE....
2 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 14 at 1:00 AM
$NAK https://pomlaw.com/recent-case-form?type=investigative&company=NAK
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 14 at 12:56 AM
0 · Reply
VitD24
VitD24 Mar. 13 at 9:47 PM
0 · Reply
Latest News on NAK
What's Going On With Northern Dynasty Stock Today?

2026-02-20T15:32:04.000Z - 22 days ago

What's Going On With Northern Dynasty Stock Today?


Northern Dynasty: Response to DOJ Brief

Feb 19, 2026, 6:58 AM EST - 24 days ago

Northern Dynasty: Response to DOJ Brief


Northern Dynasty Stock Melts Down: Here's Why

Feb 18, 2026, 1:40 PM EST - 24 days ago

Northern Dynasty Stock Melts Down: Here's Why


Northern Dynasty: Update on Summary Judgement Case

Feb 18, 2026, 6:45 AM EST - 25 days ago

Northern Dynasty: Update on Summary Judgement Case


Monday's ETF Movers: COPX, XME

2026-01-26T19:06:21.000Z - 6 weeks ago

Monday's ETF Movers: COPX, XME


Rare Earth Stocks Climb As China Adds Restrictions

Oct 9, 2025, 10:19 AM EDT - 5 months ago

Rare Earth Stocks Climb As China Adds Restrictions

CRML LAC MP TMC TMQ USAR UUUU


Northern Dynasty: Update on Negotiations with EPA

Jul 4, 2025, 6:45 AM EDT - 9 months ago

Northern Dynasty: Update on Negotiations with EPA


Northern Dynasty Reports Annual General Meeting Results

Jun 20, 2025, 10:20 PM EDT - 9 months ago

Northern Dynasty Reports Annual General Meeting Results


Northern Dynasty Makes Annual Filings

Apr 4, 2025, 6:00 PM EDT - 1 year ago

Northern Dynasty Makes Annual Filings


Northern Dynasty: Open Letter to Shareholders

Feb 6, 2025, 6:45 AM EST - 1 year ago

Northern Dynasty: Open Letter to Shareholders


Northern Dynasty: Josie Hickel Joins Board of Directors

Dec 16, 2024, 6:45 AM EST - 1 year ago

Northern Dynasty: Josie Hickel Joins Board of Directors


Northern Dynasty Issues Correction

Nov 22, 2023, 6:45 AM EST - 2 years ago

Northern Dynasty Issues Correction


Northern Dynasty: CEO Provides Open Letter on Recent Events

Sep 18, 2023, 6:45 AM EDT - 2 years ago

Northern Dynasty: CEO Provides Open Letter on Recent Events


Dan1920
Dan1920 Mar. 15 at 4:13 AM
$NAK I never metioned or talked about the VETO. The veto is clearly there for a reason. Whether or not its illegal is going to depend on who is fighting for it. IN OUR CASE FOR NAK its RON and his buddies. I can clearly see there are many reason to consider the veto illegal. This does not concern me, yes the veto can be and should be removed. But having RON over and over and over again step up will only get NAK the same results. When you keep trying and the same guy tries to solve the same problem over and over and over agian he loses the fire within the desire to win has evaded him. Its like a kid that keeps asking are we there yet on a road trip. At first he is full of joy and wants to get there but after asking for more than 20 yrs that kid doesn't care to get there anymore. His passion left him and someone else should restart the fire with at least the small embers that are still burning from a flame that has almost been put out.
1 · Reply
GuitarTones
GuitarTones Mar. 15 at 3:47 AM
$NAK hell, even @Jimmyjack12 knows. And that dude don't know jack. Also, they/them are multi account user Johnny Hanjob. @Stocktwits doesn't mind.
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 15 at 1:23 AM
$NAK https://pebblewatch.com/articles/doj-officially-defends-epas-final-determination/
0 · Reply
EZ_DUZ_IT
EZ_DUZ_IT Mar. 14 at 8:59 PM
$NAK Hey guitar boy!! Put another “log” on the fire.
1 · Reply
IfIbuysitdies
IfIbuysitdies Mar. 14 at 3:20 PM
$NAK Dan, you really haven't done your homework. You should do a little more digging and understand why the veto is illegal, and why it will eventually be removed. Just my opinion, but keeping your stance will surely cost you an opportunity.
1 · Reply
RicFlair53
RicFlair53 Mar. 14 at 6:42 AM
$NAK Crappy take. If you are 100% convinced of anything, you are probably not thinking about it rationally. Mining is a long game, especially in the US due to bureaucracy and special interest opposition. Maybe Ron has done everything he can, maybe not. But it’s silly to attribute the project’s current status to poor effort or performance on his part.
1 · Reply
Dan1920
Dan1920 Mar. 14 at 3:51 AM
$NAK I AM 100% convinced the only way this stock will ever get off the ground and permits get approved is once Ron has removed himself from the Company. Ron has been running this company for over 20yrs and nothing has gotten done. NOTHING, so when you tell your friends, "yeah I have this really cool project i've been working on and I'll soon let you guys see it, its still on jack stands in the garage but maybe this summer I'll pull it out.....................20yrs later Ron's friends still waiting on that 1990 Buick Park Avenue to come out of the garage with a turbo LS1 engine and a manual transmission. But all that was just talk. HE actually never had any car in the garage, just made everyone think he did to keep small talk in the office but no one believes anything he says anymore. NO ONE BELIEVES RON ANYMORE....
2 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 14 at 1:00 AM
$NAK https://pomlaw.com/recent-case-form?type=investigative&company=NAK
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 14 at 12:56 AM
0 · Reply
VitD24
VitD24 Mar. 13 at 9:47 PM
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 13 at 3:48 PM
$NAK 2026: yet another separate class action being initiated. The previous settlement was ~$11,000,000. The basis of the second class action is the February 17, 2026 Trump DOJ supporting Veto brief submitted to Judge Gleason appointed by Obama. Judge Gleason allowed EPA’s Final Determination to proceed resulting in the Trump supported Veto. https://www.northerndynastymineralsclassaction.com https://stockhouse.com/news/press-releases/2026/03/13/investor-alert-pomerantz-law-firm-investigates-claims-on-behalf-of-investors-34 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.akd.73157/gov.uscourts.akd.73157.215.0.pdf
0 · Reply
Bawa1
Bawa1 Mar. 13 at 3:05 PM
$NAK $ 10 very soon good news on the way
1 · Reply
stockinvestigator26
stockinvestigator26 Mar. 13 at 3:00 PM
$NAK Lawsuit being opened up against the company. This is toast.
2 · Reply
Biobaby_the_Arbitraguer
Biobaby_the_Arbitraguer Mar. 13 at 2:34 PM
$NAK Day 240. Proud to say one of the team was able to give up their white collar position this week to Arb full time.
0 · Reply
GuitarTones
GuitarTones Mar. 13 at 12:26 PM
$NAK good morning to everyone except @Jimmyjack12
1 · Reply
colecreek
colecreek Mar. 13 at 12:23 PM
$NAK Dunleavey has posted new content on his X page.
0 · Reply
Slamma
Slamma Mar. 13 at 11:34 AM
0 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 13 at 2:24 AM
$NAK Trump’s permit denial and his DOJ‘s support of the EPA Veto is solid as bedrock. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.akd.73157/gov.uscourts.akd.73157.215.0.pdf
1 · Reply
Nakattack69
Nakattack69 Mar. 12 at 11:07 PM
$NAK Kennecot production halted in Utah. Lets open up AK!
0 · Reply
Slamma
Slamma Mar. 12 at 9:47 PM
$NAK I guess we remain at near idle till hearing gets closer 🇺🇸
0 · Reply
trezhawk
trezhawk Mar. 12 at 8:36 PM
$NAK anything helps
2 · Reply
Jimmyjack12
Jimmyjack12 Mar. 12 at 8:16 PM
$NAK Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Initiates an Investigation into Allegations Against Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman (NAK) And Encourages Stockholders to Reach Out T.NDM | 1 day ago NEW YORK CITY, NY / ACCESS Newswire / March 11, 2026 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is investigating potential claims on behalf of purchasers of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. ("Northern Dynasty" or "the Company") (NYSE:NAK). Investors who purchased Northern Dynasty securities are encouraged to obtain additional information and assist the investigation by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/NAK.
0 · Reply