Market Cap 4.60M
Revenue (ttm) 4.61M
Net Income (ttm) -1.77M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -38.39%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.03
Volume 3,600
Avg Vol 255,520
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 3.67M
Stochastic %K 100%
Beta 0.83
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides omni-channel advertising, precision marketing, influencer marketing, and data analysis management systems in the People's Republic of China. It offers Internet advertising, e-commerce online to offline (O2O) advertising, marketing services, and related value-added technical services, as well as the related data and technical services to small and medium enterprises through its Internet portals, sales agents, distributors,...

Industry: Advertising Agencies
Sector: Communication Services
Phone: 852 2669 8078
Address:
29 Des Voeux Road Central, 8/F, Central, Hong Kong
yowenouo150
yowenouo150 Sep. 18 at 7:08 PM
$CNET and $MDB both involve data, but MDB is closer to a developer database tool while CNET targets marketing and visibility needs. The relevant comparison is how data enters the product, not merely whether data exists.
0 · Reply
bigbearfong12
bigbearfong12 Sep. 18 at 7:02 PM
After heavy turnover near $1.37, $CNET moved above $1.45, lifting the short-term cost base. That is technically constructive, but fundamentals still depend on revenue mix, SaaS contribution, and customer adoption.
1 · Reply
Gutermuth9505
Gutermuth9505 Sep. 18 at 7:00 PM
Rising AI copyright and data-governance scrutiny is neither purely positive nor negative for $CNET . Compliance can add cost, but platforms with clear data sourcing, permissions, and content controls are more credible to enterprise customers.
1 · Reply
officewu088
officewu088 Sep. 18 at 6:51 PM
$CNET and $TWLO can be compared through integration. TWLO embeds communications into enterprise systems; CNET is connecting data, AI, and marketing workflows. TWLO is a mature API model, while CNET is still developing repeatable delivery.
2 · Reply
jimmysp10966
jimmysp10966 Sep. 18 at 6:41 PM
A software-stock recovery can improve sentiment toward $CNET , but small-cap liquidity discounts remain. Sector strength provides the environment; sustained CNET performance still requires its own price and volume structure.
2 · Reply
Seremetis36440
Seremetis36440 Sep. 18 at 6:39 PM
Compared with mature SaaS names, $CNET ’s clearest gaps are revenue scale and renewal evidence. Compared with traditional advertising companies, its direction is more data- and software-oriented. It sits between the two categories.
3 · Reply
chris108729
chris108729 Sep. 18 at 6:25 PM
$CNET ’s business can be viewed in three layers: the data asset provides the base, AI SaaS and agentic AI provide the tools, and GEO and digital advertising connect to customer demand. That is more precise than labeling it simply an AI theme stock.
1 · Reply
tamama788520
tamama788520 Sep. 18 at 6:14 PM
$CNET Consolidation above $1.45 would indicate a new trading range forming. Volume concentrated near the highs is healthier than a large daily percentage move followed by a fade back toward the prior close.
2 · Reply
weekendvi58
weekendvi58 Sep. 18 at 5:04 PM
$BIDU ’s 301% growth in AI-native marketing is useful industry context, but it cannot be directly translated into $CNET ’s results. Scale, capital, and distribution differ, so CNET analysis must return to its own customers and financial data.
2 · Reply
careforce8294
careforce8294 Sep. 18 at 4:39 PM
$ADBE ’s value is built on mature creative workflows and a subscription ecosystem. $CNET ’s AI services are focused more on marketing and search visibility applications. Both embed AI into workflows, but predictability, customer base, and product maturity differ materially.
2 · Reply
Latest News on CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies regains compliance with Nasdaq

2026-08-18T20:15:15.000Z - 4 weeks ago

ZW Data Action Technologies regains compliance with Nasdaq


ZW Data Action Technologies files $75M mixed securities shelf

2024-01-10T11:03:15.000Z - 2 years ago

ZW Data Action Technologies files $75M mixed securities shelf


ZW Data Action Technologies announces reverse stock split

2023-01-17T21:07:31.000Z - 3 years ago

ZW Data Action Technologies announces reverse stock split


ChinaNet Online Holdings Announces the Appointment of New COO

Aug 7, 2020, 4:29 PM EDT - 6 years ago

ChinaNet Online Holdings Announces the Appointment of New COO


yowenouo150
yowenouo150 Sep. 18 at 7:08 PM
$CNET and $MDB both involve data, but MDB is closer to a developer database tool while CNET targets marketing and visibility needs. The relevant comparison is how data enters the product, not merely whether data exists.
0 · Reply
bigbearfong12
bigbearfong12 Sep. 18 at 7:02 PM
After heavy turnover near $1.37, $CNET moved above $1.45, lifting the short-term cost base. That is technically constructive, but fundamentals still depend on revenue mix, SaaS contribution, and customer adoption.
1 · Reply
Gutermuth9505
Gutermuth9505 Sep. 18 at 7:00 PM
Rising AI copyright and data-governance scrutiny is neither purely positive nor negative for $CNET . Compliance can add cost, but platforms with clear data sourcing, permissions, and content controls are more credible to enterprise customers.
1 · Reply
officewu088
officewu088 Sep. 18 at 6:51 PM
$CNET and $TWLO can be compared through integration. TWLO embeds communications into enterprise systems; CNET is connecting data, AI, and marketing workflows. TWLO is a mature API model, while CNET is still developing repeatable delivery.
2 · Reply
jimmysp10966
jimmysp10966 Sep. 18 at 6:41 PM
A software-stock recovery can improve sentiment toward $CNET , but small-cap liquidity discounts remain. Sector strength provides the environment; sustained CNET performance still requires its own price and volume structure.
2 · Reply
Seremetis36440
Seremetis36440 Sep. 18 at 6:39 PM
Compared with mature SaaS names, $CNET ’s clearest gaps are revenue scale and renewal evidence. Compared with traditional advertising companies, its direction is more data- and software-oriented. It sits between the two categories.
3 · Reply
chris108729
chris108729 Sep. 18 at 6:25 PM
$CNET ’s business can be viewed in three layers: the data asset provides the base, AI SaaS and agentic AI provide the tools, and GEO and digital advertising connect to customer demand. That is more precise than labeling it simply an AI theme stock.
1 · Reply
tamama788520
tamama788520 Sep. 18 at 6:14 PM
$CNET Consolidation above $1.45 would indicate a new trading range forming. Volume concentrated near the highs is healthier than a large daily percentage move followed by a fade back toward the prior close.
2 · Reply
weekendvi58
weekendvi58 Sep. 18 at 5:04 PM
$BIDU ’s 301% growth in AI-native marketing is useful industry context, but it cannot be directly translated into $CNET ’s results. Scale, capital, and distribution differ, so CNET analysis must return to its own customers and financial data.
2 · Reply
careforce8294
careforce8294 Sep. 18 at 4:39 PM
$ADBE ’s value is built on mature creative workflows and a subscription ecosystem. $CNET ’s AI services are focused more on marketing and search visibility applications. Both embed AI into workflows, but predictability, customer base, and product maturity differ materially.
2 · Reply
bizmaster5200
bizmaster5200 Sep. 18 at 4:13 PM
$ZETA and $CNET can both be discussed within data-driven marketing, but ZETA has a more established enterprise data and advertising platform.
2 · Reply
smartwork5678
smartwork5678 Sep. 18 at 3:30 PM
$PLTR ’s data assets are generally understood through government and large-enterprise deployments. $CNET is closer to SME marketing applications. Both involve AI and data, but customer size, sales cycles, and revenue recognition differ. Shared AI exposure does not make them equivalent valuation cases.
2 · Reply
chatready01
chatready01 Sep. 18 at 2:58 PM
$CRM and $CNET should not be valued with the same framework. CRM is built around mature enterprise subscriptions, retention, and platform expansion.
2 · Reply
yufan462756
yufan462756 Sep. 18 at 2:31 PM
$CNET ’s 1565PB data asset is one of its most visible resources. Its business applications center on AI marketing, search visibility, and customer data services, giving the company both data and marketing exposure.
0 · Reply
milobo71279
milobo71279 Sep. 18 at 2:27 PM
$CNET , $CRCL , and $ORCL represent three very different stages of growth, but their financial trajectories offer a more useful comparison than simply grouping them under AI or Web3 themes. CNET reported Q2 revenue of $652K, up 19% YoY, while net loss narrowed 45.1%. The company remains very small in absolute scale, but the combination of revenue growth and improving losses suggests that its transformation is beginning to show up in the financial statements. CRCL is operating at a significantly larger scale, with stablecoin infrastructure increasingly translating into recurring economic activity, while ORCL continues to benefit from accelerating cloud and AI infrastructure demand.
1 · Reply
Boote6392
Boote6392 Sep. 18 at 1:58 PM
$CNET $1.45 is the level I’m watching today. Holding above it keeps the short-term structure firm; falling back below it could bring the $1.37–$1.38 turnover zone back into focus.
4 · Reply
Oberliga15980
Oberliga15980 Sep. 18 at 1:28 PM
Tech is firm today and software names are getting attention again. $CNET remains a volatile small-cap AI name, so a better market tone can create more price elasticity. Intraday volume is the key variable.
2 · Reply
Scandariato2400
Scandariato2400 Sep. 18 at 12:56 PM
Software is regaining attention as investors separate two ideas: AI replacing software versus software using AI to become more efficient. $CNET belongs in the second discussion for now, with the key test being faster and more standardized marketing delivery.
2 · Reply
Benzschawel195177
Benzschawel195177 Sep. 18 at 12:46 PM
Tech is back in focus, with the Nasdaq and large-cap technology names firming while software stocks regain attention. That backdrop can help $CNET ’s AI SaaS narrative, but durability still depends on revenue and product adoption.
2 · Reply
Coffey1300
Coffey1300 Sep. 17 at 6:35 PM
PLTR, SNOW, and CNET all touch data, but investors need different evidence from each. $PLTR is judged by deployments and contracts; $SNOW by usage; $CNET unknown name
1 · Reply
Craddieth4045
Craddieth4045 Sep. 17 at 6:31 PM
$CNET ’s Web3 membership system is better viewed as a business experiment than a standalone valuation driver. Its value depends on connecting membership, data, and SME marketing into measurable customer value.
1 · Reply
joshsiso2469
joshsiso2469 Sep. 17 at 6:24 PM
$CNET and $ZETA can be discussed within data-driven marketing, but they are not equivalent companies. ZETA has greater scale and maturity. CNET needs to prove that its data and GEO services improve visibility, campaign efficiency, or conversion.
3 · Reply