U.S. Minimum Volatility Vanguard ETF VFMV

$127.70 -0.23 (-0.18%)

Valuation

Market cap
—
Revenue TTM
—
Net income TTM
—
P/E (trailing)
—
P/E (forward)
—
Profit margin
—
Debt to equity
—

Trading

Volume
2,766
Avg volume
—
Day's range
$127.70 – $128.36
Shares out
—
Stochastic %K
—
Beta
—
Analysts
—
Price target
—

Price

Company profile

The fund invests primarily in a group of U.S. common stocks that together are deemed by the advisor to have the potential to generate lower volatility relative to the broad U.S. equity market. The portfolio will include a diverse mix of companies representing many different market sectors and industry groups. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's assets will be invested in securities issued by U.S. c...

Show more

The fund invests primarily in a group of U.S. common stocks that together are deemed by the advisor to have the potential to generate lower volatility relative to the broad U.S. equity market. The portfolio will include a diverse mix of companies representing many different market sectors and industry groups. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's assets will be invested in securities issued by U.S. companies.

Phone
6106696295

Latest news

Stocktwits

VickieWaldron193 Feb 21, 7:38 AM
$VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF reduces drawdowns. Upside is limited. Defensive equity allocation.
0 replies
PenkeInvesting Nov 9, 12:57 PM
I found you an Overbought RSI (Relative Strength Index) on the daily chart of Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility. Is that bullish or bearish? $VFMV #RsiOverbought #BATS
0 replies
PenkeInvesting Aug 31, 9:19 AM
I found you an Overbought RSI (Relative Strength Index) on the daily chart of Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility. Is that bullish or bearish? $VFMV #VFMV #bats #tradingsignals #technicalanalysis
0 replies
macroaxis Mar 16, 12:29 AM
$VFMV - Is potential growth retracing? https://www.macroaxis.com/target-price/VFMV #stocks #earnings
0 replies
OldManGrumble Feb 18, 1:11 PM
$VFMV, I like minimum volatility funds.
0 replies