Market Cap 694.44M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -247.30M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.23
Volume 3,185,100
Avg Vol 1,417,376
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 82.57M
Stochastic %K 99%
Beta 0.74
Analysts Strong Sell
Price Target $12.86

Company Profile

Replimune Group, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company, focuses on the development and commercialization of oncolytic immunotherapies to treat cancer. The company's proprietary oncolytic immunotherapy product candidates are designed and intended to activate the immune system against cancer. Its lead product candidate is RP1, a selectively replicating version of HSV-1 that expresses GALV-GP R(-) and human GM-CSF for a range of solid tumors. The company is also developing RP2 that express a...

Industry: Biotechnology
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 781 222 9600
Address:
500 Unicorn Park Drive, Suite 303, Woburn, United States
Merlintrader
Merlintrader Apr. 5 at 9:03 AM
$REPL https://www.merlintrader.com/repl-tvtx-grce-april2026-pdufa/
0 · Reply
ScopeDeskElite
ScopeDeskElite Apr. 5 at 8:57 AM
$REPL biotech company Replimune.
0 · Reply
PensionPulse
PensionPulse Apr. 5 at 3:06 AM
$IOVA This post is right but why do Baker Brothers and RTW own a big chunk of $REPL?
4 · Reply
Chuck9987
Chuck9987 Apr. 4 at 5:16 PM
$REPL as an iova investor I am honestly seeing how both companies are making strides to help patients live a better quality of life..lets remember someone you love could need these treatments..let's cheer the success of bothcompanies and keep revolutionizing cancer treatment.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:51 PM
$REPL Profit from large move in EITHER direction (neutral/volatility play) → Buy CALLS + PUTS together (long straddle or strangle) This is the classic “buy calls and puts” approach for a binary catalyst where direction is uncertain but magnitude is expected to be large. You profit from any swing > total premium paid (needs 40–60%+ move in either direction to overcome high IV and crush).
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:43 PM
$REPL While FDA decisions on resubmissions after a CRL carry inherent uncertainty (especially when the original pivotal data came from a single-arm study), the targeted addressing of prior concerns, alignment with an ongoing confirmatory trial, and the clear unmet need in a life-threatening condition collectively tilt toward a plausible path to approval on the April 10, 2026 target date. This remains a regulatory binary event with potential for extension or advisory committee input. In summary, the investment carries high risk—suitable primarily for portfolios that can tolerate substantial near-term volatility or outright capital loss. The April 10, 2026 decision represents a pivotal inflection with clear potential for material re-rating (positive) or de-rating (negative), driven predominantly by regulatory interpretation of existing evidence rather than new clinical data. Investors should weigh position sizing accordingly and consider the possibility of post-PDUFA dilution.
1 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:38 PM
$REPL Commercial and manufacturing readiness: Replimune has stated that commercial supply is already produced and the commercial organization is prepared for rapid engagement with key accounts if approved. This level of preparedness is typical when a sponsor has high confidence in a positive outcome following productive FDA engagement during review. Favorable risk-benefit profile with no new safety red flags: The combination has shown a manageable safety profile consistent with oncolytic viruses and PD-1 inhibitors (primarily local injection-site reactions and expected immune-related events), without the agency citing major toxicity issues in the CRL or subsequent communications.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:37 PM
$REPL Ongoing confirmatory evidence and regulatory signals: FDA meeting minutes indicated that the randomized Phase 3 IGNYTE-3 trial (currently enrolling 400 patients with overall survival as primary endpoint) could potentially support approval. The company has reported encouraging durable response data from the combination (e.g., objective response rate 33–34% with median duration of response approaching 2 years in relevant cohorts), which aligns with the need for meaningful clinical benefit in this setting.
1 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:36 PM
$REPL Prior complete response addressed through targeted resubmission: The initial July 2025 CRL focused primarily on the open-label Phase 2 IGNYTE trial not being deemed an “adequate and well-controlled” study for substantial evidence of effectiveness (due to heterogeneity in the patient population and lack of a clear control arm for isolating RP1’s contribution), with no safety concerns raised. The resubmission provided additional data and analyses to directly respond to these points, and the FDA formally accepted it as a complete response under a Class II timeline, confirming the filing was review-ready.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:35 PM
$REPL Unmet clinical need in a refractory population: Patients with advanced melanoma who progress after PD-1 inhibition have limited effective options and face rapid disease progression with poor prognosis. RP1, an oncolytic HSV-1 viral immunotherapy, is designed to selectively replicate in tumor cells, lyse them, and stimulate a systemic anti-tumor immune response that can synergize with checkpoint inhibition like nivolumab. This mechanism addresses a genuine therapeutic gap where new, tolerable options are urgently needed.
0 · Reply
Latest News on REPL
Replimune to Present at Two Upcoming Investor Conferences

Mar 2, 2026, 8:00 AM EST - 4 weeks ago

Replimune to Present at Two Upcoming Investor Conferences


Replimune Provides Update Following Type A Meeting with FDA

Sep 18, 2025, 9:15 AM EDT - 7 months ago

Replimune Provides Update Following Type A Meeting with FDA


Replimune Announces Type A Meeting Scheduled with FDA

Sep 2, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 7 months ago

Replimune Announces Type A Meeting Scheduled with FDA


Replimune Group: The Prospects For FDA Approval After Rejection

Aug 7, 2025, 10:08 AM EDT - 8 months ago

Replimune Group: The Prospects For FDA Approval After Rejection


Why Is Replimune Stock Trading Lower On Monday?

Aug 4, 2025, 12:43 PM EDT - 8 months ago

Why Is Replimune Stock Trading Lower On Monday?


Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

May 22, 2025, 11:19 AM EDT - 11 months ago

Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript


Merlintrader
Merlintrader Apr. 5 at 9:03 AM
$REPL https://www.merlintrader.com/repl-tvtx-grce-april2026-pdufa/
0 · Reply
ScopeDeskElite
ScopeDeskElite Apr. 5 at 8:57 AM
$REPL biotech company Replimune.
0 · Reply
PensionPulse
PensionPulse Apr. 5 at 3:06 AM
$IOVA This post is right but why do Baker Brothers and RTW own a big chunk of $REPL?
4 · Reply
Chuck9987
Chuck9987 Apr. 4 at 5:16 PM
$REPL as an iova investor I am honestly seeing how both companies are making strides to help patients live a better quality of life..lets remember someone you love could need these treatments..let's cheer the success of bothcompanies and keep revolutionizing cancer treatment.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:51 PM
$REPL Profit from large move in EITHER direction (neutral/volatility play) → Buy CALLS + PUTS together (long straddle or strangle) This is the classic “buy calls and puts” approach for a binary catalyst where direction is uncertain but magnitude is expected to be large. You profit from any swing > total premium paid (needs 40–60%+ move in either direction to overcome high IV and crush).
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:43 PM
$REPL While FDA decisions on resubmissions after a CRL carry inherent uncertainty (especially when the original pivotal data came from a single-arm study), the targeted addressing of prior concerns, alignment with an ongoing confirmatory trial, and the clear unmet need in a life-threatening condition collectively tilt toward a plausible path to approval on the April 10, 2026 target date. This remains a regulatory binary event with potential for extension or advisory committee input. In summary, the investment carries high risk—suitable primarily for portfolios that can tolerate substantial near-term volatility or outright capital loss. The April 10, 2026 decision represents a pivotal inflection with clear potential for material re-rating (positive) or de-rating (negative), driven predominantly by regulatory interpretation of existing evidence rather than new clinical data. Investors should weigh position sizing accordingly and consider the possibility of post-PDUFA dilution.
1 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:38 PM
$REPL Commercial and manufacturing readiness: Replimune has stated that commercial supply is already produced and the commercial organization is prepared for rapid engagement with key accounts if approved. This level of preparedness is typical when a sponsor has high confidence in a positive outcome following productive FDA engagement during review. Favorable risk-benefit profile with no new safety red flags: The combination has shown a manageable safety profile consistent with oncolytic viruses and PD-1 inhibitors (primarily local injection-site reactions and expected immune-related events), without the agency citing major toxicity issues in the CRL or subsequent communications.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:37 PM
$REPL Ongoing confirmatory evidence and regulatory signals: FDA meeting minutes indicated that the randomized Phase 3 IGNYTE-3 trial (currently enrolling 400 patients with overall survival as primary endpoint) could potentially support approval. The company has reported encouraging durable response data from the combination (e.g., objective response rate 33–34% with median duration of response approaching 2 years in relevant cohorts), which aligns with the need for meaningful clinical benefit in this setting.
1 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:36 PM
$REPL Prior complete response addressed through targeted resubmission: The initial July 2025 CRL focused primarily on the open-label Phase 2 IGNYTE trial not being deemed an “adequate and well-controlled” study for substantial evidence of effectiveness (due to heterogeneity in the patient population and lack of a clear control arm for isolating RP1’s contribution), with no safety concerns raised. The resubmission provided additional data and analyses to directly respond to these points, and the FDA formally accepted it as a complete response under a Class II timeline, confirming the filing was review-ready.
0 · Reply
MITCH1099
MITCH1099 Apr. 4 at 4:35 PM
$REPL Unmet clinical need in a refractory population: Patients with advanced melanoma who progress after PD-1 inhibition have limited effective options and face rapid disease progression with poor prognosis. RP1, an oncolytic HSV-1 viral immunotherapy, is designed to selectively replicate in tumor cells, lyse them, and stimulate a systemic anti-tumor immune response that can synergize with checkpoint inhibition like nivolumab. This mechanism addresses a genuine therapeutic gap where new, tolerable options are urgently needed.
0 · Reply
Smellmahass
Smellmahass Apr. 4 at 3:35 PM
$REPL What would you do if you shorted this at 7 and must close short at 9? I believe in CRL but then dont have a choice if this is trading at 9 per share on Thursday. Must give it up. What would you do? I wish I bought puts but too late now. No cash.
1 · Reply
KombineSolderi
KombineSolderi Apr. 4 at 3:30 PM
$REPL "The FDA accepted the resubmission as a complete response to the July 2025 CRL, meaning the additional data/analyses addressed key deficiencies." While the FDA accepted the resubmission, this doesn't necessarily mean that all the deficiencies have been fully addressed. The agency could still have concerns about the quality or relevance of the additional data, and there may be remaining unresolved issues. The acceptance of a resubmission is a procedural step, but it doesn't guarantee approval, as the FDA will still need to review the new data in detail.
0 · Reply
WallStreetBuyDip
WallStreetBuyDip Apr. 4 at 6:44 AM
$REPL trading at $8.41, with a highest of $12.63 and a lowest of $2.81. Average volume stands at 4.2M, recent volume around 3.2M.
0 · Reply
BioCrazy1
BioCrazy1 Apr. 4 at 2:38 AM
0 · Reply
BioCrazy1
BioCrazy1 Apr. 4 at 2:28 AM
$REPL Not sure if there is a reading comprehension problem here. This is why I believe it will be approved. Read it slowly maybe a couple times. The last piece is the most important. The approval was overridden by one person who no longer works there.
0 · Reply
BioCrazy1
BioCrazy1 Apr. 4 at 2:23 AM
$REPL Steve has blocked me. He never answered my question and could not dispute what was in my post. If you have a different opinion than him he calls you names. People actually follow this child? He lost the debate took his ball and went home. Pathetic man child.
1 · Reply
Steve_TheBull_Rogers
Steve_TheBull_Rogers Apr. 4 at 2:16 AM
$REPL FYI @BioCrazy1 has no position in REPL and does not intend to take one!!! Yet hes now saying its 100% getting approved Dude is here for attention nothing more. Wasting everyone's time
1 · Reply
BioCrazy1
BioCrazy1 Apr. 4 at 1:44 AM
$REPL Steve is this your DD for your followers? Thats a deep dive bro!
1 · Reply
Steve_TheBull_Rogers
Steve_TheBull_Rogers Apr. 3 at 11:54 PM
$REPL Make up your mind. You were bearish now you're saying 100% approval People this should be a study in smooth brains using AI instead of researching the evidence
2 · Reply
BioCrazy1
BioCrazy1 Apr. 3 at 11:13 PM
$REPL The FDA accepted the resubmission as a complete response to the July 2025 CRL, meaning the additional data/analyses addressed key deficiencies. They submitted a briefing book with additional analyses and references to prior agency agreements, provided supplemental data addressing the CRL's concerns No new major safety flags have emerged publicly. Replimune reports ongoing "active engagement" with the FDA, commercial readiness (supply, team) is in place, and leadership expresses confidence in a potential launch if approved. High unmet need in this post-checkpoint failure population supports flexibility under accelerated approval with IGNYTE-3 confirmatory trial ongoing to verify benefit later. The main external voices urging the FDA to reconsider came from IGNYTE trial investigators and Patient advocacy groups. CBER staff supported approval. Richard Pazdur intervened and played a key role in the rejection. He's gone! 100% approval.
2 · Reply
cowneck_trader
cowneck_trader Apr. 3 at 7:56 PM
$IOVA before you get chubby on Baker Bros position in $REPL note this is an insignificant position for them <1% of their portfolio. Their model is to take large concentrated positions with little or no hedging and swing for the fences. REPL is a pimple on thier ass.
0 · Reply
IsabellaGBaby
IsabellaGBaby Apr. 3 at 12:26 PM
0 · Reply