Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 4,000
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the common stock of MicroStrategy Incorporated (“MSTR”). The fund is non-diversified.

Lizette1
Lizette1 Aug. 11 at 7:38 PM
$MSTY $MARO 🐻 $WNTR 🐂✔👍 Aug 10, 2026 Coin Bureau https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2086686479716085842?s=20
0 · Reply
benxho
benxho Aug. 10 at 4:56 PM
0 · Reply
LocoRoco
LocoRoco Aug. 10 at 4:52 PM
$MSTR Buy the dips! Saylor knows what he's doing! $MSTY $WNTR $BTC.X
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 10 at 4:02 PM
$CRSH The Inverted Pairing System Dynamics I'm running my Inverted Pairing System like a 401k on steroids. Traditional 401k plans use a mix of equities and bonds, and many equity funds quietly blend in bond exposure anyway — just not the options‑driven income strategies we’re using here. My system replaces those conventional components with bond‑and‑options‑based ETFs that generate weekly dividends, effectively acting as the employer match. The rules force disciplined accumulation by buying whichever position sits at the lowest percentage each Friday. The system operates across four long/short pairings now: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. As prices shift, the weakest ETF becomes the weekly reinforcement point, lowering cost basis, increasing share count, and accelerating long‑term dividend throughput. Throughout each week, I just monitor "birdwatch" market behavior. What's a 401k to do? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 7 at 2:15 PM
$CRSH My weekly baseline low percentage reinforcement purchase today was in TSLY — added to the position at the open this morning. Price action on the advanced chart continues to respect the lower Bollinger band and the MA‑50 envelope, with momentum indicators (MACD, RSI, KST, %R) all sitting in deep‑oversold territory. That’s exactly where this ETF historically begins its next compression‑to‑expansion cycle. Trading Central’s technical sentiment is showing strong short‑term strength (2–6 weeks) even while mid‑term remains weak and long‑term neutral. That short‑term bar is the only one that matters for cycle‑based rotation — it aligns perfectly with the current compression zone on the chart. This was another simple elemental reinforcement intended to continue my overall account balance growth while adhering to the mechanical symmetry of my Inverted Pairings System. You can't fight fate...LOL! $CRSH, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 5:29 PM
$CRSH Effective today, I’ve removed DIPS and NVDY from my Inverted Pairings System and rebalanced my entire account. I now run four pairings: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. Cutting from 10 ETFs to 8 is a permanent ROE upgrade that boosts system efficiency and balance‑growth output by ~22–30%. I’ll still monitor DIPS and NVDY (as I do YQQQ and QDTY), but their weakened pairing strength and reduced YieldMax payouts slowed my balance‑growth rate and no longer meet system requirements. My ROE has been updated to reflect the four‑pair structure because these pairings deliver stronger balance‑growth potential based on the math. Still, the baseline low percentage ETF gets reinforced. Efficiency rises when the weakest variables are removed from the equation. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 2:58 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 32 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+1.86%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 (‑3.50%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 (+8.20%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 (+9.61%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 (+2.91%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2887 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 (‑9.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing Strength rose +1.86%. MSTY/WNTR dipped ‑3.50% but remains structurally stable. CRSH/TSLY added +8.20%, strong upward momentum. CONY/FIAT strengthened +9.61%, driven by FIAT’s surge. SLTY/ULTY improved +2.91%, a modest but positive move. DIPS/NVDY weakened ‑9.48%, with both sides lower. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 31 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Week 31 Baseline Low Percentage ETF Buy - ULTY Week 31’s baseline lowest‑percentage buy went to ULTY, and the 1‑Yr/Daily chart confirms the call. Price has tightened into a volatility coil, Bollinger Bands have narrowed, and downside momentum is fading. MACD’s negative drift is flattening, %R sits in the lower band where ULTY often begins mid‑channel recovery, and Money Flow has stabilized instead of bleeding lower. KST is curling upward, signaling early‑cycle shift. This is classic controlled weakness inside the Inverted Pairings System — exactly when the baseline ETF is supposed to be accumulated. “Weakness bought at the right moment becomes tomorrow’s strength.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 7:08 PM
$CRSH “I run an Inverted Pairings System built around five ETF pairs: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY, MSTY/WNTR. Declining valuations don’t hurt my strategy—they strengthen it. When an ETF drops, it eventually becomes the baseline low‑percentage position, and that’s where I accumulate the most shares possible at the lowest point in its technical cycle. More shares = more weekly dividends = more compounding. Reverse splits aren’t a problem either. They reset pricing, tighten symmetry, and immediately boost weekly pairing strength. That’s why I track pairings every week—the weakest pairing often signals the next structural shift. While others panic‑sell, I recycle dividends and reinforce the baseline ETF. One rises, a new baseline emerges, and the machine keeps compounding. As always: the system is the system.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 12:49 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System - Week 31 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+5.82%) Very stable once again! THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 (-3.94%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 (+31.34%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 (+1.16%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 (-1.42%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 (0.00%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.6439) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2231 / WNTR 0.4992 — 0.7223 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2371 / ULTY 0.3176 — 0.5547 3️⃣ CONY 0.2787 / FIAT 0.2741 — 0.5528 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1978 / TSLY 0.2385 — 0.4363 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2841 / NVDY 0.0937 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing System dividend strength rose +5.82%. MSTY/WNTR fell -3.94% but remains the top pair. CRSH/TSLY exploded +31.34%, jumping from 4th to 2nd. CONY/FIAT added +1.16% and held mid-pack. SLTY/ULTY slipped -1.42%, dropping from 2nd to 4th. DIPS/NVDY was flat at 0.00%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Aug. 11 at 7:38 PM
$MSTY $MARO 🐻 $WNTR 🐂✔👍 Aug 10, 2026 Coin Bureau https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2086686479716085842?s=20
0 · Reply
benxho
benxho Aug. 10 at 4:56 PM
0 · Reply
LocoRoco
LocoRoco Aug. 10 at 4:52 PM
$MSTR Buy the dips! Saylor knows what he's doing! $MSTY $WNTR $BTC.X
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 10 at 4:02 PM
$CRSH The Inverted Pairing System Dynamics I'm running my Inverted Pairing System like a 401k on steroids. Traditional 401k plans use a mix of equities and bonds, and many equity funds quietly blend in bond exposure anyway — just not the options‑driven income strategies we’re using here. My system replaces those conventional components with bond‑and‑options‑based ETFs that generate weekly dividends, effectively acting as the employer match. The rules force disciplined accumulation by buying whichever position sits at the lowest percentage each Friday. The system operates across four long/short pairings now: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. As prices shift, the weakest ETF becomes the weekly reinforcement point, lowering cost basis, increasing share count, and accelerating long‑term dividend throughput. Throughout each week, I just monitor "birdwatch" market behavior. What's a 401k to do? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 7 at 2:15 PM
$CRSH My weekly baseline low percentage reinforcement purchase today was in TSLY — added to the position at the open this morning. Price action on the advanced chart continues to respect the lower Bollinger band and the MA‑50 envelope, with momentum indicators (MACD, RSI, KST, %R) all sitting in deep‑oversold territory. That’s exactly where this ETF historically begins its next compression‑to‑expansion cycle. Trading Central’s technical sentiment is showing strong short‑term strength (2–6 weeks) even while mid‑term remains weak and long‑term neutral. That short‑term bar is the only one that matters for cycle‑based rotation — it aligns perfectly with the current compression zone on the chart. This was another simple elemental reinforcement intended to continue my overall account balance growth while adhering to the mechanical symmetry of my Inverted Pairings System. You can't fight fate...LOL! $CRSH, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 5:29 PM
$CRSH Effective today, I’ve removed DIPS and NVDY from my Inverted Pairings System and rebalanced my entire account. I now run four pairings: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. Cutting from 10 ETFs to 8 is a permanent ROE upgrade that boosts system efficiency and balance‑growth output by ~22–30%. I’ll still monitor DIPS and NVDY (as I do YQQQ and QDTY), but their weakened pairing strength and reduced YieldMax payouts slowed my balance‑growth rate and no longer meet system requirements. My ROE has been updated to reflect the four‑pair structure because these pairings deliver stronger balance‑growth potential based on the math. Still, the baseline low percentage ETF gets reinforced. Efficiency rises when the weakest variables are removed from the equation. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 2:58 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 32 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+1.86%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 (‑3.50%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 (+8.20%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 (+9.61%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 (+2.91%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2887 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 (‑9.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing Strength rose +1.86%. MSTY/WNTR dipped ‑3.50% but remains structurally stable. CRSH/TSLY added +8.20%, strong upward momentum. CONY/FIAT strengthened +9.61%, driven by FIAT’s surge. SLTY/ULTY improved +2.91%, a modest but positive move. DIPS/NVDY weakened ‑9.48%, with both sides lower. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 31 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Week 31 Baseline Low Percentage ETF Buy - ULTY Week 31’s baseline lowest‑percentage buy went to ULTY, and the 1‑Yr/Daily chart confirms the call. Price has tightened into a volatility coil, Bollinger Bands have narrowed, and downside momentum is fading. MACD’s negative drift is flattening, %R sits in the lower band where ULTY often begins mid‑channel recovery, and Money Flow has stabilized instead of bleeding lower. KST is curling upward, signaling early‑cycle shift. This is classic controlled weakness inside the Inverted Pairings System — exactly when the baseline ETF is supposed to be accumulated. “Weakness bought at the right moment becomes tomorrow’s strength.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 7:08 PM
$CRSH “I run an Inverted Pairings System built around five ETF pairs: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY, MSTY/WNTR. Declining valuations don’t hurt my strategy—they strengthen it. When an ETF drops, it eventually becomes the baseline low‑percentage position, and that’s where I accumulate the most shares possible at the lowest point in its technical cycle. More shares = more weekly dividends = more compounding. Reverse splits aren’t a problem either. They reset pricing, tighten symmetry, and immediately boost weekly pairing strength. That’s why I track pairings every week—the weakest pairing often signals the next structural shift. While others panic‑sell, I recycle dividends and reinforce the baseline ETF. One rises, a new baseline emerges, and the machine keeps compounding. As always: the system is the system.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 12:49 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System - Week 31 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+5.82%) Very stable once again! THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 (-3.94%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 (+31.34%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 (+1.16%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 (-1.42%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 (0.00%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.6439) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2231 / WNTR 0.4992 — 0.7223 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2371 / ULTY 0.3176 — 0.5547 3️⃣ CONY 0.2787 / FIAT 0.2741 — 0.5528 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1978 / TSLY 0.2385 — 0.4363 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2841 / NVDY 0.0937 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing System dividend strength rose +5.82%. MSTY/WNTR fell -3.94% but remains the top pair. CRSH/TSLY exploded +31.34%, jumping from 4th to 2nd. CONY/FIAT added +1.16% and held mid-pack. SLTY/ULTY slipped -1.42%, dropping from 2nd to 4th. DIPS/NVDY was flat at 0.00%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 24 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Week 30 - Baseline Low Percentage ETF Purchase Update Today’s Lowest‑Percentage Baseline ETF buy went into CONY, completing this week’s reinforcement cycle. CONY was the lowest slot on the 10‑ETF ladder, triggering the mechanical baseline purchase today. Price is pressing the lower Bollinger Band (21.01 / 19.87 / 18.72), matching typical reset behavior inside the system. System Notes: CONY triggered the mechanical buy of shares as it reached the structural low of its current cycle. Momentum shows early stabilization: MACD (‑0.4724 / ‑0.6023 / 0.1299) is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, indicating initial momentum flattening. Williams %R at ‑84.18 remains deep in oversold territory, consistent with prior reset conditions. Money Flow (‑0.19) reflects long‑cycle exhaustion, and KST (‑63.27 / ‑97.10) is flattening, signaling deceleration rather than continuation. This was an easy selection! ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 22 at 1:10 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System - Week 30 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+6.94%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.6439) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2231/WNTR 0.4992 — 0.7223 (-4.94%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2371/ULTY 0.3176 — 0.5547 (-2.97%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2787/FIAT 0.2741 — 0.5528 (+9.62%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1978/TSLY 0.2385 — 0.4363 (-6.29%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2841/NVDY 0.0937 — 0.3778 (+0.05%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing System strength rose +6.94%. MSTY/WNTR fell -4.94% as WNTR dropped sharply. SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.97%. CONY/FIAT led the week with +9.62% strength. CRSH/TSLY weakened -6.29%. DIPS/NVDY was flat at +0.05%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 21 at 3:02 PM
$CRSH My investing system for high‑yield dividend ETFs is the Inverted Pairings System, built on five inverted pairings: CONY & FIAT, CRSH & TSLY, DIPS & NVDY, MSTY & WNTR, and SLTY & ULTY. These ten ETFs rotate across a 10‑rung ladder based on percentages. All dividends are consolidated, spare change is added, bi‑monthly contributions are included, and the total is used to buy shares of whatever ETF is the weekly baseline low ETF. Each week, that baseline ETF moves up the ladder, growing my account balance, while the inversions protect it. Weekly purchases increase dividends, which further expand the balance. My percentages continue to beat both the DOW and S&P 500. I win! As of today: My 30‑day my balance is +10.39% vs DOW ‑0.82% and S&P 500 ‑0.70%. My 3-month balance is +20.35% vs DOW +4.87% and S&P 500 +4.99%. My YTD balance is +49.26% vs DOW +9.90% and S&P 500 +9.43%. I win across the board! $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 17 at 2:06 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Today’s Lowest‑Percentage Baseline ETF buy went into TSLY @$25.53, completing this week’s reinforcement cycle. TSLY has now moved from the lowest slot of the 10‑ETF ladder up to the #3 slot on my ladder, maintaining alignment with the Inverted Pairings framework. Price remains near the lower Bollinger Band, matching typical reset behavior inside the system. System Notes: TSLY triggered the mechanical buy as it reached the structural low of its current cycle. Momentum shows early stabilization: MACD is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, indicating initial momentum flattening. Williams %R remains deep in oversold territory, consistent with prior reset conditions. Money Flow has steadied, and KST is flattening, signaling long‑cycle deceleration rather than continuation. This rotation reinforces the system by allocating into weakness — the core principle of the structure. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Jul. 17 at 1:55 PM
$WNTR ❄️⛄️💀
1 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Jul. 17 at 1:53 PM
$WNTR ❄️🤗🥳
1 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Jul. 17 at 1:33 PM
$WNTR ❄️
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 15 at 12:19 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 (+9.95%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 (-2.17%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 (-8.60%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 (-4.00%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 (-12.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2061/WNTR 0.4849 — 0.6910 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2460/ULTY 0.3384 — 0.5844 3️⃣ CONY 0.2794/FIAT 0.2723 — 0.5517 4️⃣ CRSH 0.20274/TSLY 0.2776 — 0.4850 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3343/NVDY 0.0971 — 0.4314 Notable shifts: System strength declined -9.88% this week. #1 MSTY/WNTR was the only strengthening pair, rising +9.95% as the system’s top anchor. #2 SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.17% but held the #2 rank. #3 CONY/FIAT continued its downward trend with an -8.60% drop. #4 CRSH/TSLY weakened -4.00%, mid‑tier. #5 DIPS/NVDY posted the largest decline at -12.48%. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH The corrections are simple actually for both ULTY & SLTY! From 2024–present, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. No other YieldMax pair shows this level of correlation. The core issue is structural: both ETFs rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. To fix this, YieldMax would need to reduce shared IV dependence, increase opposite directional delta, separate the option architectures, and prioritize price‑driven movement over premium harvesting. Until those changes happen, SLTY/ULTY will continue acting like correlated volatility products instead of the long/short pair implied in their filings. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:55 PM
$SLTY Across 2024–2025, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. This isn’t happening with the other YieldMax pairs, which generally behave directionally. The issue is structural: both SLTY and ULTY rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. That makes them function like correlated volatility products instead of true opposite exposure. Over the year, this has caused SLTY/ULTY to operate outside the directional parameters implied in their filings. If YieldMax intends these two to behave as a real inverted pair, the construction needs to be reworked. $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:19 PM
$CRSH Has anyone else noticed, that YieldMax lists SLTY as the short ETF and ULTY as the long ETF in an Inverted Pairing. Yet, over the past several months, they both move in unison more often than not as compared to the other listed Inverted ETFs. Since a short or long design as filed to the SEC must move the short position opposite the long position, it is time to start wondering if YieldMax is manipulating these 2 ETFs or if they are simply incompetent when it comes to managing the two ETFs in the manner they filed them with the SEC. It should be a rare occasion these 2 particular ETFs move in unison...not the rule. Personally, it has to be manipulation through incompetence. I like YieldMax, perhaps they need to reassign the idiot managing these two ETFs. Anyone else notice this particular discrepancy by YieldMax? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Jul. 13 at 1:30 AM
$WNTR https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/bitcoin-bear-market-may-end-134412151.html "Exchange-traded funds have cut both ways this year. They drained billions of dollars during June before turning positive in early July. That two-way flow shows how institutional access now shapes each move. Regression Points to a $47,000 Bitcoin Bottom A linear regression captures this softening trend. Fitting the three past drawdowns produces the line y = 65.58 minus 12.97x. The slope points steadily toward smaller losses. The model projects the next final-quarter decline at roughly 26.6%. That figure extends the pattern seen since 2014. It implies the current bear ending should be the mildest yet. The math itself stays simple. The regression draws the best straight line through the three past drops. Its downward slope of about 13 points per cycle captures the easing trend. Three data points form a small sample. The regression, therefore, offers a directional guide rather than a precise guarantee. It frames a likely magnitude, not a certain outcome."
0 · Reply