Yieldmax Short Nvda Option Income Strategy ETF DIPS

— +— (—)

Valuation

Market cap
—
Revenue TTM
—
Net income TTM
—
PE ratio
—
Forward PE
—
Profit margin
—
Debt to equity
—

Trading

Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Day's range
—
Shares out
—
Stochastic %K
—
Beta
—
Analysts
—
Price target
—

Price

Company profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the Underlying Security,which is generally subject to participation in a portion of potential investment gains. The fund is non-diversified.

Latest news

Stocktwits

Dragon_Trader_67 Oct 16, 2:19 PM
$CRSH Today, in my Inverted Pairing System, ULTY was the baseline lowest percentage ETF. Took it a while to get there but all 8 of the ETFs eventually get down there so I can purchase more shares in all of them. For those that don't know, the Inverted Pairings System consists of CONY & FIAT, SLTY & ULTY, TSLY & CRSH and MSTY & WNTR. I also still follow NVDY & DIPS. This is my system and it works for me. So far, for the past 30-days my balance is up 7.42% vs the S&P 500 index at 2.16% and the DOW Jones Total Stock Market Index at a mere 1.75%. In the past 3 months, my balance is up 22.46% while the S&P 500 sits at 2.55% and the DOW at 1.84%. Year to Date: my balance is now up 74.24% with the S&P 500 at 14.16% and the DOW at 13.85%. For the past year, my balance has now grown 95.07% while the S&P500 languishes at 17.44% and the DOW coming in at 16.48%. My system wins every single category vs the major indexes and puts every 401k to shame. ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Oct 8, 12:26 PM
$CRSH When they happen, reverse splits by YieldMax ETFs get misunderstood a lot. They aren’t “magic fixes” or new alpha engines—they’re structural resets. Over time, call‑selling, capped upside, and aggressive distributions naturally push prices down and erode NAV. When that decay goes far enough, YieldMax steps in with a reverse split to restore price optics, maintain listing compliance, and reset the scoreboard. That reset feels like another cycle because it changes share count, price levels, dividend‑per‑share mechanics, and how quickly an ETF can slide back down the ladder again. So, while cyclic rates are market‑driven (volatility, option premiums, decay), reverse splits are issuer‑driven (rules, optics, structure). Different cause, similar impact: they interact with cycles, reshape pair dynamics, and refresh the environment for future decay and distributions. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
2 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Oct 2, 5:23 PM
$CRSH I've built an Inverted Pairings System where the outcome isn’t determined by hope, prediction, or market drama. It’s determined by weekly structure, symmetry, dividend consolidation, and mechanical accumulation. So, the song “whatever will be will be” isn’t resignation — it’s confidence. It’s my mindset as someone who knows the machine is already pointed in the right direction. I'm not waiting for the market to cooperate. I'm not relying on momentum or sentiment. I'm not exposed to the emotional swings that wreck most traders. I'm just executing the same disciplined cycle every week by purchasing the Baseline Lowest Percentage ETF weekly, and the results keep stacking. By the time December closes out, my year‑end numbers will simply reflect the math of the Inverted Pairings System structure — nothing more, nothing less. And that’s the beauty of it. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Oct 2, 4:52 PM
$CRSH My Inverted Pairings System continues to prove itself. Here are my balance performance results compared to the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index across multiple time frames. In the past 30 days, my balance increased 7.32% while the S&P 500 came in at -0.35% and the Dow at –0.74%. Over the past 3 months, my balance gained 22.34% versus 2.30% for the S&P 500 and 1.37% for the Dow. Year‑to‑date, my balance is up 74.07% compared to 12.75% for the S&P 500 and 12.63% for the Dow. Over the past 1 year, my balance rose 94.88% while the S&P 500 grew 15.74% and the Dow grew 15.28%. I could also provide my 3‑year and 5‑year results, but you simply wouldn’t believe those numbers. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Sep 21, 2:03 PM
$CRSH This morning I was compelled to rebalance my MSTY & WNTR holdings due to the continued surge of MSTY this morning. So, I sold shares of MSTY and used those funds to reinforce the WNTR share counts returning symetry to my ladder in the Inverted Pairings System. I took some profit from the MSTY shares I sold this morning and repurchased WNTR shares returning balance to my Inverted Pairings positions. I actually ended up with more total dividend paying shares, took a bit of profit from MSTY holdings but reapplied that amount of profit into back into my WNTR holdings gaining additional share count totals without disrupting my Inverted Pairings System at all. My WNTR position is now at the top rung of the system ladder while MSTY is now at the #2 ladder rung position with both balances back within 1% of each other. I honestly don't care which one sits on top. My actual objective this week: reinforce the baseline lowest percentage ETF Friday. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Sep 18, 2:12 PM
$CRSH Weekly Inverted Pairings System Update — Week 38 (2026): WNTR! This week’s Baseline Lowest Percentage ETF was WNTR, and I purchased shares strictly on the percentage‑based ladder's baseline lowest percentage ETF position that governs the Inverted Pairings System. The rotation increased my overall share counts, lowered the cost basis, increased dividends and maintained full structural symmetry across all inverted pairs. Below, the chart dynamics shows a deep oversold cluster with the RSI near 20, W%R at –100, and slowing downside momentum, validating the purchase. Today's expiring options chain data confirmed no short‑term downside risk being priced in, with stable IV across mid‑ and long‑dated expirations and no put‑side pressure. With structural weakness exhausted, WNTR should begin circling upward in the near term. Precision today builds strength tomorrow. 🦅$CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Sep 16, 1:33 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Weekly Pairing Strength fell (–1.60%). Pairing Strength softened slightly but remained structurally stable. THIS WEEK — Pair Strength Overall Total: 2.2092 (–1.60%) 1️⃣ SLTY 0.2175 / ULTY 0.2967 — 0.5142 (–1.71%) 2️⃣ CONY 0.2996 / FIAT 0.1816 — 0.4812 (–3.41%) 3️⃣ MSTY 0.2395 / WNTR 0.2350 — 0.4745 (–10.32%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1543 / TSLY 0.2127 — 0.3670 (–1.21%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2534 / NVDY 0.0889 — 0.3423 (+5.88%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.2451) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.3121 / WNTR 0.2169 — 0.5290 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2187 / ULTY 0.3044 — 0.5231 3️⃣ CONY 0.3405 / FIAT 0.1577 — 0.4982 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1562 / TSLY 0.2153 — 0.3715 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2222 / NVDY 0.1011 — 0.3233 Notable Shifts: SLTY/ULTY reclaimed #1. CONY/FIAT held #2. MSTY/WNTR dropped from #1 to #3. CRSH/TSLY stayed consistent at #4. DIPS/NVDY strengthened but remains #5 once again. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 replies
Dragon_Trader_67 Sep 11, 3:46 PM
$CRSH Weekly Inverted Pairings System Update — Week 37 (2026): SLTY! This week’s Baseline Lowest Percentage ETF purchase was SLTY, selected strictly through the percentage‑based ladder that governs the Inverted Pairings System. The weekly rotation reinforced SLTY and maintained full structural symmetry across all five inverted pairs. The system continues operating mechanically, with percentage rankings determining each rotation and all movement driven by the established rules of compounding and ladder integrity. Next Friday’s opening percentages will reveal the next baseline ETF for reinforcement, continuing the long‑term growth cycle, share count growth and balance growth. Until then, the Inverted Pairings System remains in disciplined birdwatching mode. “Precision today builds strength tomorrow.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 replies