Yieldmax Short Tsla Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH)

N/A +N/A (N/A)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the Underlying Security, which is generally subject to participation in a portion of potential investment gains. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 15 at 12:19 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 (+9.95%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 (-2.17%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 (-8.60%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 (-4.00%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 (-12.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2061/WNTR 0.4849 — 0.6910 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2460/ULTY 0.3384 — 0.5844 3️⃣ CONY 0.2794/FIAT 0.2723 — 0.5517 4️⃣ CRSH 0.20274/TSLY 0.2776 — 0.4850 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3343/NVDY 0.0971 — 0.4314 Notable shifts: System strength declined -9.88% this week. #1 MSTY/WNTR was the only strengthening pair, rising +9.95% as the system’s top anchor. #2 SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.17% but held the #2 rank. #3 CONY/FIAT continued its downward trend with an -8.60% drop. #4 CRSH/TSLY weakened -4.00%, mid‑tier. #5 DIPS/NVDY posted the largest decline at -12.48%. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH The corrections are simple actually for both ULTY & SLTY! From 2024–present, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. No other YieldMax pair shows this level of correlation. The core issue is structural: both ETFs rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. To fix this, YieldMax would need to reduce shared IV dependence, increase opposite directional delta, separate the option architectures, and prioritize price‑driven movement over premium harvesting. Until those changes happen, SLTY/ULTY will continue acting like correlated volatility products instead of the long/short pair implied in their filings. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:55 PM
$SLTY Across 2024–2025, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. This isn’t happening with the other YieldMax pairs, which generally behave directionally. The issue is structural: both SLTY and ULTY rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. That makes them function like correlated volatility products instead of true opposite exposure. Over the year, this has caused SLTY/ULTY to operate outside the directional parameters implied in their filings. If YieldMax intends these two to behave as a real inverted pair, the construction needs to be reworked. $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:19 PM
$CRSH Has anyone else noticed, that YieldMax lists SLTY as the short ETF and ULTY as the long ETF in an Inverted Pairing. Yet, over the past several months, they both move in unison more often than not as compared to the other listed Inverted ETFs. Since a short or long design as filed to the SEC must move the short position opposite the long position, it is time to start wondering if YieldMax is manipulating these 2 ETFs or if they are simply incompetent when it comes to managing the two ETFs in the manner they filed them with the SEC. It should be a rare occasion these 2 particular ETFs move in unison...not the rule. Personally, it has to be manipulation through incompetence. I like YieldMax, perhaps they need to reassign the idiot managing these two ETFs. Anyone else notice this particular discrepancy by YieldMax? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 1:39 PM
$SLTY Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Lowest‑Percentage ETF Purchase: SLTY @ $22.695 System Action: Reinforcement executed this morning as SLTY rotated to the lowest slot in the 10‑ETF ladder. Price remains near the lower band, consistent with system‑cycle behavior. System Notes: SLTY’s decline triggered this week’s mechanical buy. Like the other inverted ETFs, SLTY follows cyclic rotations, and this week it reached the structural low of its cycle. MACD is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, signaling early momentum stabilization. W%R sits deep in oversold territory, matching prior reset conditions. Price is holding just above the lower Bollinger Band, a mechanical buy zone within system rules. Money Flow has stabilized and KST is flattening. Rotation strengthens and maintains symmetry across the Inverted Pairings as the ladder rotates toward weakness. Weakness is where Inverted Pairings reset their strength. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 12:14 PM
$CRSH $DIPS $FIAT $SLTY $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 9 at 10:32 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairing System — Weekly Reinforcement Update, completing Week #28. Tomorrow completes Reinforcement Week #28, leaving 24 reinforcement windows still ahead this year. Each week, the lowest‑percentage baseline ETF gets lifted, tightening the ladder and reducing volatility drag. This disciplined structure is why the system keeps grinding upward: technical charting cycle‑exhaustion buys, expanding share counts, growing dividends, bi‑monthly contributions, and cash carried forward all work together to raise the baseline week after week. Twenty‑eight consecutive baseline lifts show exactly why the system continues to strengthen the overall account balance. Consistency beats prediction, and structure beats emotion. “Raise the baseline, and the ladder rises with it.” $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 8 at 4:06 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength Update THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.6910 (‑11.41%) 2️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.5517 (‑20.89%) 3️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.5844 (‑4.54%) 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.4850 (‑11.84%) 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4314 (‑9.63%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 3.1174) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.7801 2️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.6122 3️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.6975 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.5502 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4774 Notable shifts: (Holiday Shortened Week, less 20%) System strength fell ‑11.97%, with all five pairs weakening. The holiday‑shortened week reduced premium‑decay windows, but the size of the declines shows YieldMax failed to capture available volatility or optimize roll timing. CONY/FIAT saw the largest drop. MSTY/WNTR remains the top anchor. SLTY/ULTY slipped modestly. CRSH/TSLY and DIPS/NVDY both weakened, reflecting inconsistent execution across the inverted structures. We take what we get! $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY , $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 4 at 10:23 AM
$CRSH $DIPS $FIAT $SLTY $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 3 at 11:17 AM
$CRSH In my Inverted Pairings System, the baseline ETF is always the lowest‑percentage ETF among all 10 components: SLTY, ULTY, CONY, FIAT, DIPS, NVDY, CRSH, TSLY, MSTY, and WNTR. The baseline changes each week, but the reinforcement rule never does. Every dividend received, every contribution, and every dollar of carried‑forward cash is injected directly into that lowest‑percentage ETF, no matter which one holds the baseline position at the time. This consistent reinforcement raises the baseline every week, every month, every quarter, and every year—52 times annually, without interruption. By continuously lifting the system’s baseline ETF, total account balance growth becomes mechanical, predictable, and independent of market conditions. ‘Raise the floor, and the account balance grows constantly, it is indisputable.’ $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Latest News on CRSH
YieldMax® ETFs Announces Weekly Distributions for Group 2 ETFs

Jul 8, 2026, 6:55 AM EDT - 7 days ago

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Weekly Distributions for Group 2 ETFs

AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY BABO BRKC CONY

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on ULTY, TSLY, LFGY, CRSH, YMAX, and Others

Jul 9, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on ULTY, TSLY, LFGY, CRSH, YMAX, and Others

LFGY TSLY ULTY YMAX

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on SNOY, ULTY, TSMY, CRSH, YMAX and Others

Jun 11, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on SNOY, ULTY, TSMY, CRSH, YMAX and Others

SNOY TSMY ULTY YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (101.76%), CRSH (100.89%), ULTY (76.45%), LFGY (65.07%), FEAT (61.22%), and Others

Apr 16, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (101.76%), CRSH (100.89%), ULTY (76.45%), LFGY (65.07%), FEAT (61.22%), and Others

LFGY TSLY ULTY

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (100.59%), ULTY (79.43%), TSLY (76.84%), LFGY (66.79%), SNOY (63.58%) and Others

Mar 19, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (100.59%), ULTY (79.43%), TSLY (76.84%), LFGY (66.79%), SNOY (63.58%) and Others

SNOY TSLY ULTY

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (75.93%), TSLY (62.77%), YBIT (60.33%), YMAX (56.92%), YMAG (39.10%) and Others

Feb 19, 2025, 6:21 AM EST - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (75.93%), TSLY (62.77%), YBIT (60.33%), YMAX (56.92%), YMAG (39.10%) and Others

TSLY YBIT YMAG YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (100.47%), CRSH (100.33%), YBIT (83.20%), YMAX (61.45%), YMAG (44.47%) and Others

Oct 2, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (100.47%), CRSH (100.33%), YBIT (83.20%), YMAX (61.45%), YMAG (44.47%) and Others

TSLY YBIT YMAG YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on PYPY (101.91%), MSTY (100.04%), FIAT (100.02%), CONY (91.83%), SQY (81.95%) and Others

Sep 5, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on PYPY (101.91%), MSTY (100.04%), FIAT (100.02%), CONY (91.83%), SQY (81.95%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY BABO CONY

YieldMax™ Launches Option Income Strategy ETF on Alibaba (BABA)

Aug 8, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ Launches Option Income Strategy ETF on Alibaba (BABA)

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DIPS

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (95.14%), TSLY (83.44%), CONY (75.83%), NVDY (64.52%), CRSH (61.10%) and Others

Aug 6, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (95.14%), TSLY (83.44%), CONY (75.83%), NVDY (64.52%), CRSH (61.10%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DIPS

YieldMax™ Launches Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT)

Jul 10, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ Launches Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT)

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (101.60%), NVDY (101.58%), CONY (90.37%), YBIT (83.67%), TSLY (70.99%) and Others

Jul 3, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (101.60%), NVDY (101.58%), CONY (90.37%), YBIT (83.67%), TSLY (70.99%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (106.33%), NVDY (101.82%), CONY (84.85%), YBIT (81.00%), AIYY (78.90%) and Others

Jun 5, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 years ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (106.33%), NVDY (101.82%), CONY (84.85%), YBIT (81.00%), AIYY (78.90%) and Others

AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO FBY

Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 15 at 12:19 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 (+9.95%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 (-2.17%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 (-8.60%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 (-4.00%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 (-12.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2061/WNTR 0.4849 — 0.6910 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2460/ULTY 0.3384 — 0.5844 3️⃣ CONY 0.2794/FIAT 0.2723 — 0.5517 4️⃣ CRSH 0.20274/TSLY 0.2776 — 0.4850 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3343/NVDY 0.0971 — 0.4314 Notable shifts: System strength declined -9.88% this week. #1 MSTY/WNTR was the only strengthening pair, rising +9.95% as the system’s top anchor. #2 SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.17% but held the #2 rank. #3 CONY/FIAT continued its downward trend with an -8.60% drop. #4 CRSH/TSLY weakened -4.00%, mid‑tier. #5 DIPS/NVDY posted the largest decline at -12.48%. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH The corrections are simple actually for both ULTY & SLTY! From 2024–present, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. No other YieldMax pair shows this level of correlation. The core issue is structural: both ETFs rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. To fix this, YieldMax would need to reduce shared IV dependence, increase opposite directional delta, separate the option architectures, and prioritize price‑driven movement over premium harvesting. Until those changes happen, SLTY/ULTY will continue acting like correlated volatility products instead of the long/short pair implied in their filings. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:55 PM
$SLTY Across 2024–2025, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. This isn’t happening with the other YieldMax pairs, which generally behave directionally. The issue is structural: both SLTY and ULTY rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. That makes them function like correlated volatility products instead of true opposite exposure. Over the year, this has caused SLTY/ULTY to operate outside the directional parameters implied in their filings. If YieldMax intends these two to behave as a real inverted pair, the construction needs to be reworked. $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:19 PM
$CRSH Has anyone else noticed, that YieldMax lists SLTY as the short ETF and ULTY as the long ETF in an Inverted Pairing. Yet, over the past several months, they both move in unison more often than not as compared to the other listed Inverted ETFs. Since a short or long design as filed to the SEC must move the short position opposite the long position, it is time to start wondering if YieldMax is manipulating these 2 ETFs or if they are simply incompetent when it comes to managing the two ETFs in the manner they filed them with the SEC. It should be a rare occasion these 2 particular ETFs move in unison...not the rule. Personally, it has to be manipulation through incompetence. I like YieldMax, perhaps they need to reassign the idiot managing these two ETFs. Anyone else notice this particular discrepancy by YieldMax? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 1:39 PM
$SLTY Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Lowest‑Percentage ETF Purchase: SLTY @ $22.695 System Action: Reinforcement executed this morning as SLTY rotated to the lowest slot in the 10‑ETF ladder. Price remains near the lower band, consistent with system‑cycle behavior. System Notes: SLTY’s decline triggered this week’s mechanical buy. Like the other inverted ETFs, SLTY follows cyclic rotations, and this week it reached the structural low of its cycle. MACD is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, signaling early momentum stabilization. W%R sits deep in oversold territory, matching prior reset conditions. Price is holding just above the lower Bollinger Band, a mechanical buy zone within system rules. Money Flow has stabilized and KST is flattening. Rotation strengthens and maintains symmetry across the Inverted Pairings as the ladder rotates toward weakness. Weakness is where Inverted Pairings reset their strength. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 12:14 PM
$CRSH $DIPS $FIAT $SLTY $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 9 at 10:32 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairing System — Weekly Reinforcement Update, completing Week #28. Tomorrow completes Reinforcement Week #28, leaving 24 reinforcement windows still ahead this year. Each week, the lowest‑percentage baseline ETF gets lifted, tightening the ladder and reducing volatility drag. This disciplined structure is why the system keeps grinding upward: technical charting cycle‑exhaustion buys, expanding share counts, growing dividends, bi‑monthly contributions, and cash carried forward all work together to raise the baseline week after week. Twenty‑eight consecutive baseline lifts show exactly why the system continues to strengthen the overall account balance. Consistency beats prediction, and structure beats emotion. “Raise the baseline, and the ladder rises with it.” $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 8 at 4:06 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength Update THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.6910 (‑11.41%) 2️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.5517 (‑20.89%) 3️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.5844 (‑4.54%) 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.4850 (‑11.84%) 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4314 (‑9.63%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 3.1174) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.7801 2️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.6122 3️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.6975 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.5502 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4774 Notable shifts: (Holiday Shortened Week, less 20%) System strength fell ‑11.97%, with all five pairs weakening. The holiday‑shortened week reduced premium‑decay windows, but the size of the declines shows YieldMax failed to capture available volatility or optimize roll timing. CONY/FIAT saw the largest drop. MSTY/WNTR remains the top anchor. SLTY/ULTY slipped modestly. CRSH/TSLY and DIPS/NVDY both weakened, reflecting inconsistent execution across the inverted structures. We take what we get! $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY , $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 4 at 10:23 AM
$CRSH $DIPS $FIAT $SLTY $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 3 at 11:17 AM
$CRSH In my Inverted Pairings System, the baseline ETF is always the lowest‑percentage ETF among all 10 components: SLTY, ULTY, CONY, FIAT, DIPS, NVDY, CRSH, TSLY, MSTY, and WNTR. The baseline changes each week, but the reinforcement rule never does. Every dividend received, every contribution, and every dollar of carried‑forward cash is injected directly into that lowest‑percentage ETF, no matter which one holds the baseline position at the time. This consistent reinforcement raises the baseline every week, every month, every quarter, and every year—52 times annually, without interruption. By continuously lifting the system’s baseline ETF, total account balance growth becomes mechanical, predictable, and independent of market conditions. ‘Raise the floor, and the account balance grows constantly, it is indisputable.’ $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 2 at 3:21 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Lowest‑Percentage ETF purchase this Week: CRSH System Action: Share accumulation executed at $9.12 this morning and now it has skyrocketed upward to 20.66. System Notes: CRSH rotated to the lowest position within the 10‑ETF ladder this week, triggering a mechanical reinforcement under the rules. With the holiday‑compressed schedule, today became the only valid execution window, and the system directed the weekly buy toward the weakest percentage ETF. This week’s rotation strengthens the CRSH/TSLY pairing, reinforces structural symmetry, and positions CRSH for the next compounding cycle. The ladder continues to behave as expected, with rotation flowing toward weakness while maintaining balance across all five inverted pairs. Notable: MSTY upward pricing movement has it now sitting at near the top position of the ladder after multiple recent weekly purchases. “Strike while the iron is hot.” $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 1 at 1:42 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Strength Update THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 3.1174) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.7801 (+2.20%) 2️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.6975 (+16.03%) 3️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.6122 (‑3.57%) 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.5502 (+11.48%) 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4774 (+10.88%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.9235) 1️⃣ MSTY/WNTR — 0.7633 2️⃣ SLTY/ULTY — 0.6349 3️⃣ CONY/FIAT — 0.6011 4️⃣ CRSH/TSLY — 0.4936 5️⃣ DIPS/NVDY — 0.4306 Notable shifts: System strength rose +6.63%, driven by broad gains across 4 of 5 pairs. CONY/FIAT delivered the week’s strongest jump, signaling renewed payout momentum. CRSH/TSLY and DIPS/NVDY posted solid structural improvements. MSTY/WNTR widened its lead as the system’s top anchor. SLTY/ULTY slipped slightly but remains stable within Group 1. “The power of the pairings always exceeds that of any lone ETF!” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 29 at 8:49 PM
$CRSH I am pleased I bought all those MSTY shares with my weekly consolidated dividends 3 out of the past 4 weeks. ;-) Could be a sweet dividend payout this week so I can buy more of whatever ETF is the lowest percentage this week in my Inverted Pairing System. "Market goes down, I win. Market goes up, I win. Market stays even, once again I win!" ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 29 at 3:12 PM
$CRSH For the week I’m birdwatching the flow on the ETFs and the chatter on these 10 boards. The system itself is basically on autopilot. Tomorrow brings the Group 1 declarations, Wednesday brings Group 2, and those two lock in the weekly dividend mass for recalibration. I’ll also drop in the second monthly tranche contribution, which finalizes the cash pool for the week. Once dividends hit and cash is known, percentages update automatically. By Friday, the system mechanically selects the lowest‑percentage ETF for the weekly reinforcement buy. That’s the entire rotation cycle: declarations → cash update → percentage recalibration → Friday buy → recalibration again. No emotion, no drift, no exceptions. It’s simply the Inverted Pairings System running on schedule. Since my systems rules are sound, the results take care of themselves. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 26 at 3:37 PM
$CRSH I know some may be wondering! Here are my balance growth numbers compared to the S&P 500 Index and the DOW Jones Total Stock Market Index. My focus is, has and will always be about my overall balance growth. My numbers: 1 month = +6.79%, 3 months = +18.91%, YTD = +37.48% & 1 year = +34.04% S&P 500 numbers: 1 month = negative -1.44%, 3 months = +11.93%, YTD = +8.11% & 1 year = +22.24% DOW Jones numbers: 1 month = negative -0.80%, =12.35%, YTD = +8.94% & 1 year = +22.95% I win every time. My balance grows, my dividend payouts increase, and my contributions are predetermined bi-monthly for every year. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 26 at 1:51 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Purchase Update Lowest‑percentage ETF this week: MSTY System action: Accumulation executed MSTY rotated once again into the lowest position in the 10 ETF ladder, triggering a required purchase and accumulation under the Inverted Pairings ruleset. This continues the system’s mandate to reinforce the weakest percentage component, lower the overall basis, and expand future income output. MSTY is currently in an extended downsizing phase, and this same structure appeared from October through December 2025, where a prolonged decline eventually resolved with a strong rebound once the cycle completed. The current setup mirrors that earlier pattern: extended weakness, system‑driven accumulation, and improved forward efficiency as the next rotation approaches. The system remains fully mechanical—buying weakness, strengthening the pairing balance, lowering cost basis and positioning MSTY for the next cyclic upturn. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
DontStepOnRake
DontStepOnRake Jun. 25 at 4:44 PM
$CRSH I have missed update by @Dragon_Trader_67 this week but find it very valuable, here is my attempt for this week: System softened this week: -5.83% total pairing strength decrease week-over-week. (Last week total: 3.1045 → This week total: 2.9235) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.1883) / WNTR (0.5750) — 0.7633 2️⃣ SLTY (0.2532) / ULTY (0.3817) — 0.6349 3️⃣ CONY (0.2598) / FIAT (0.3413) — 0.6011 4️⃣ TSLY (0.2667) / CRSH (0.2269) — 0.4936 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1005) / DIPS (0.3301) — 0.4306 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2286) / $WNTR (0.4702) — 0.6988 2️⃣ CONY (0.2858) / $FIAT (0.4012) — 0.6870 3️⃣ $SLTY (0.2506) / ULTY (0.3899) — 0.6405 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1220) / $DIPS (0.4730) — 0.5950 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2792) / $CRSH (0.2040) — 0.4832 Notable shifts: 2 pairs strengthened, while 3 weakened. MSTY/WNTR surged to a new high (+0.0645) and widened its lead as the strongest inverted pair, driven almost entirely by WNTR's exceptional increase. TSLY/CRSH improved modestly (+0.0104)
2 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 23 at 12:55 PM
$CRSH Weekly System Update — Low‑Percentage ETF Reinforcement in my Inverted Pairings System - ULTY Last Thursday, due to the holiday, I executed my weekly reinforcement by adding to the lowest‑percentage ETF in the ladder: ULTY. As always, this follows the percentage‑based rotation rules — identify the bottom‑rung ETF, reinforce it, and maintain the structure of the ladder going into the next week. No changes to the system, no deviations, just the same disciplined weekly cycle using the 1st of my bi-monthly IRA contributions & Group 1 dividends. The pairing chart continues to show the expected spread behavior between SLTY and ULTY, and the reinforcement keeps the ladder aligned for the upcoming dividend cycle and next week’s percentage recalculations. NOTE: Group 2 dividends from last week have rolled forward to this week, so those dividends will be added to both the Gp 1 & Gp 2 dividends incoming for this week. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 17 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review System strengthened this week: +9.47% total pairing strength increase week‑over‑week. (Last week total: 2.8975 → This week total: 3.1045) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2286) / WNTR (0.4702) — 0.6988 2️⃣ CONY (0.2858) / FIAT (0.4012) — 0.6870 3️⃣ SLTY (0.2506) / ULTY (0.3899) — 0.6405 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1220) / DIPS (0.4730) — 0.5950 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2792) / CRSH (0.2040) — 0.4832 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2117) / $WNTR (0.4896) — 0.7013 2️⃣ $SLTY (0.2840) / ULTY (0.3485) — 0.6325 3️⃣ CONY (0.2681) / $FIAT (0.3395) — 0.6076 4️⃣ TSLY (0.2681) / $CRSH (0.2090) — 0.4771 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1194) / $DIPS (0.3596) — 0.4790 Notable shifts: 4 of 5 pairs strengthened. NVDY/DIPS posted the largest gain (+0.1160). CONY/FIAT also surged (+0.0794). SLTY/ULTY firmed slightly. MSTY/WNTR dipped marginally but remains the top pair. TSLY/CRSH remains the weakest. Overall structure improved materially week‑over‑week.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 16 at 12:47 PM
$CRSH My Inverted Pairing System is now showing classic signs of maturity. These pairing are the system: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY & MSTY/WNTR. The pairings naturally begin clustering closer together and the percentage spreads contract. This is expected behavior. As shares become a smaller portion of the total, dividends grow yet smooth out volatility, and weekly reinforcement stabilizes the ladder rungs. The result is a tighter, predictable 10-rung ladder. Because of this compression, any one ETF can remain the lowest rung for multiple weeks in a row. Early on, the ladder is wide and noisy, so repeats are rare. As the system matures, repeats become normal and even desirable. A stable bottom rung means the compounding engine is becoming more efficient, more consistent, and harder to disrupt. I never have the need to sell shares; each week I simply purchase the lowest percentage ETF. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR “As the gaps shrink, the structure strengthens.”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:18 PM
$CRSH Applying the consolidated dividends from my Inverted Pairings System into MSTY for the past two weeks is already showing results. MSTY climbed my 10‑rung ETF percentage ladder from the #5 position all the way to #2, sitting right behind WNTR. All 10 of these inverted ETFs are cyclic. They rotate, reposition, and trade places across all rungs of the ladder as volatility shifts. I simply follow the math as it lays out each week. The system grows share counts without ever needing to sell shares, and the weekly dividends keep expanding as the share base expands. This structure is balance‑protective, it’s dividend‑growth‑driven, and it’s ongoing. The ladder tells me where the weakness is, the dividends reinforce it, and the compounding takes care of the rest. “Reinforce the weakness, and the strength will rise on its own.” $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:00 PM
$CRSH Any talk about Tesla merging with SpaceX is like it’s some kind of master plan. The truth is Musk already has all the flexibility he needs without ever combining them. He can shift his own capital, talent, and resources across his companies whenever he wants — it already functions like a mini-Berkshire Hathaway, just with rockets, EVs, satellites, AI, and robotics instead of insurance and railroads. They’re entrenched together because the missions overlap, the tech overlaps, and Musk sits at the center of all of it. But they should never be entwined together. A merger would create valuation chaos, regulatory cross‑contamination, national‑security conflicts, shareholder warfare, and nonstop accusations of corruption — real, implied, or assumed. Keeping Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink, xAI, and the rest separate is what protects them. Musk already gets the benefits of coordination without the liabilities of merging. Why change this structure. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply