Yieldmax Short Tsla Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH)

N/A +N/A (N/A)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the common stock of Tesla, Inc. Its potential for gains from decreases in the share price of TSLA’s stock is limited. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 6:01 PM
$TSLA Leveraged ETFs (like TQQQ, SPXL, or TSLA-focused derivatives) must be disclosed if held by insiders in material amounts, especially if they influence voting power or market behavior. Musk’s Form 4 filing only disclosed direct TSLA common stock purchases via his revocable trust, with no mention of leveraged instruments. If he had used leveraged ETFs to amplify exposure, it would likely trigger additional scrutiny or disclosure, especially given the scale of his TSLA position and the timing of his promotional comments. Musk’s move was pure equity accumulation, not synthetic leverage—at least based on what’s been disclosed. If insider behavior has also occurred, this reinforces the importance of tracking direct ownership filings and watching for derivative exposure via 13D/13G or Form 144, which would surface if leveraged ETFs were involved. ($TSLY, $CRSH)
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 5:45 PM
$TSLA On Sept 12, 2025, Elon Musk quietly bought $1B worth of TSLA—2.57M shares via trust, split into 25 tranches. No volume spike. No public notice. On Sept 15, the Form 4 dropped. TSLA surged ~7%, netting Musk ~$66M in unrealized gains. That same day, Musk posted on X: “Up $69 to ~$420 as foretold in the prophecy”—after the move, not before. The board floated a $975B pay package, and Musk hyped robotaxis and humanoid bots. It was a coordinated pump—for his benefit and insider positioning. Retail traders who bought after the hype? They paid the premium. No edge. No advantage. IPO standards demand full disclosure. That obligation should continue as long as a company trades. Execs must declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The SEC allows this latency. That’s the real violation. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency. ($TSLY and $CRSH)
2 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 5:03 PM
$TSLA Elon Musk is now shorting his stock share price after making over 66 million in this fabricated run up of the stock. Sanctioned insider theft allowed by the SEC! Many people are about to get screwed because nothing at all with the negatives of $TSLA has changed. What a prick! $TSLY, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:51 PM
$CRSH Elon Musk bought $1B of TSLA on Sept 12—2.57M shares via trust, split into 25 tranches. No volume spike. No public notice. Filed Form 4 two days later. Legal? Technically. Transparent? Absolutely not. TSLA jumped to $410.26 by Sept 16, netting Musk ~$66M in unrealized gains. The market only reacted after the filing dropped. If IPO standards demand full disclosure, why do they vanish post-IPO? Execs should be required to declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The SEC allows this latency. That’s the real violation. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:44 PM
$CRSH Elon Musk quietly bought $1B worth of TSLA on Sept 12, 2025—2.57M shares split into 25 tranches via trust. No volume spike, no public notice. Filed Form 4 two days later. Legal under SEC rules, but the market was blind until after the move. IPO standards demand full transparency. That obligation shouldn’t vanish once a company goes public. It should be law: insiders must declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The IPO is not a one-time event—it’s a permanent contract with the public. AI can already monitor filings, volume anomalies, and trade latency. The tech is here. The accountability isn’t. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:09 PM
$CRSH The standards required at the time of an IPO—full transparency, executive disclosures, and public accountability—should not expire once a company goes public. They should be codified into law as permanent obligations for as long as that company remains listed on the SEC-regulated stock market. Executives and insiders must be required to declare all intended trades before execution, not just file reactive Form 4s days later. And the firms executing those trades must also disclose them in real time, with full attribution. The IPO isn’t a one-time event—it’s a gateway to public trust. That trust demands ongoing, enforceable standards, not selective enforcement or delayed filings. If a company wants access to public capital, it must accept public scrutiny. And if the SEC won’t enforce continuity of IPO-grade standards, then it’s time for investors to demand reform—through litigation, legislation, and AI-powered accountability. Disclosures must be continuous and must be mandatory!
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:01 PM
$CRSH It’s time to upgrade the rules. Any executive or insider of an IPO-declared company should be required to publicly declare all intended purchases or sales before any trade is executed—not after. The current system, which allows post-trade Form 4 filings up to two days later, creates an unfair advantage and erodes market trust. Furthermore, the brokerage firms executing these trades must also be required to disclose them in real time, with full attribution and timestamped transparency. No more stealth accumulation. No more trust-based opacity. If a company has gone public, its insiders should be held to public standards. The market deserves to know when those closest to the company are buying or selling—before the price moves, not after. AI systems can already monitor filings, volume anomalies, and trade latency. The technology exists. What’s missing is the regulatory will. If the SEC won’t enforce pre-trade declarations, then it’s time for investors to demand reform.
0 · Reply
thailandmonger
thailandmonger Sep. 12 at 6:10 PM
$CRSH Added, can't see many thinking of this one today when Elon is on a roll. It's all money and it's all good!!!!
0 · Reply
Brew69
Brew69 Sep. 12 at 3:52 PM
$CRSH EV Tax Credit is going away - September 30, 2025.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 12 at 12:36 PM
$TSLA Another senior Tesla engineer walks after 8 years—calls out Elon Musk directly. Says Musk’s leadership is “seriously compromised,” damaging Tesla’s energy mission and aligning with forces that slow the transition. Accuses Musk of misinformation, targeting minorities, and supporting climate deniers. 🧨 Major fracture inside $TSLA. A senior engineer just exited after 8 years, publicly calling Elon Musk’s leadership “seriously compromised.” Accusations include misinformation, climate denial alignment, and damage to Tesla’s energy mission. This isn’t a routine departure—it’s a direct hit to credibility from inside the walls. Expect sentiment erosion, institutional hesitation, and chart instability. This will also effect $TSLY and $CRSH each in turn.
1 · Reply
Latest News on CRSH
TSLY VS. CRSH: Both Long And Short Tesla Income ETFs Disappoint

Jul 15, 2025, 9:05 AM EDT - 2 months ago

TSLY VS. CRSH: Both Long And Short Tesla Income ETFs Disappoint

TSLY

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on ULTY, TSLY, LFGY, CRSH, YMAX, and Others

Jul 9, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 2 months ago

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on ULTY, TSLY, LFGY, CRSH, YMAX, and Others

LFGY TSLY ULTY YMAX

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on SNOY, ULTY, TSMY, CRSH, YMAX and Others

Jun 11, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 3 months ago

YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on SNOY, ULTY, TSMY, CRSH, YMAX and Others

SNOY TSMY ULTY YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (101.76%), CRSH (100.89%), ULTY (76.45%), LFGY (65.07%), FEAT (61.22%), and Others

Apr 16, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 5 months ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (101.76%), CRSH (100.89%), ULTY (76.45%), LFGY (65.07%), FEAT (61.22%), and Others

LFGY TSLY ULTY

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (100.59%), ULTY (79.43%), TSLY (76.84%), LFGY (66.79%), SNOY (63.58%) and Others

Mar 19, 2025, 6:55 AM EDT - 6 months ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (100.59%), ULTY (79.43%), TSLY (76.84%), LFGY (66.79%), SNOY (63.58%) and Others

SNOY TSLY ULTY

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (75.93%), TSLY (62.77%), YBIT (60.33%), YMAX (56.92%), YMAG (39.10%) and Others

Feb 19, 2025, 6:21 AM EST - 7 months ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on CRSH (75.93%), TSLY (62.77%), YBIT (60.33%), YMAX (56.92%), YMAG (39.10%) and Others

TSLY YBIT YMAG YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (100.47%), CRSH (100.33%), YBIT (83.20%), YMAX (61.45%), YMAG (44.47%) and Others

Oct 2, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on TSLY (100.47%), CRSH (100.33%), YBIT (83.20%), YMAX (61.45%), YMAG (44.47%) and Others

TSLY YBIT YMAG YMAX

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on PYPY (101.91%), MSTY (100.04%), FIAT (100.02%), CONY (91.83%), SQY (81.95%) and Others

Sep 5, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on PYPY (101.91%), MSTY (100.04%), FIAT (100.02%), CONY (91.83%), SQY (81.95%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY BABO CONY

YieldMax™ Launches Option Income Strategy ETF on Alibaba (BABA)

Aug 8, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ Launches Option Income Strategy ETF on Alibaba (BABA)

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DIPS

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (95.14%), TSLY (83.44%), CONY (75.83%), NVDY (64.52%), CRSH (61.10%) and Others

Aug 6, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (95.14%), TSLY (83.44%), CONY (75.83%), NVDY (64.52%), CRSH (61.10%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DIPS

YieldMax™ Launches Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT)

Jul 10, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ Launches Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT)

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (101.60%), NVDY (101.58%), CONY (90.37%), YBIT (83.67%), TSLY (70.99%) and Others

Jul 3, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (101.60%), NVDY (101.58%), CONY (90.37%), YBIT (83.67%), TSLY (70.99%) and Others

ABNY AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (106.33%), NVDY (101.82%), CONY (84.85%), YBIT (81.00%), AIYY (78.90%) and Others

Jun 5, 2024, 6:55 AM EDT - 1 year ago

YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Monthly Distributions on MSTY (106.33%), NVDY (101.82%), CONY (84.85%), YBIT (81.00%), AIYY (78.90%) and Others

AIYY AMDY AMZY APLY CONY DISO FBY

Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 6:01 PM
$TSLA Leveraged ETFs (like TQQQ, SPXL, or TSLA-focused derivatives) must be disclosed if held by insiders in material amounts, especially if they influence voting power or market behavior. Musk’s Form 4 filing only disclosed direct TSLA common stock purchases via his revocable trust, with no mention of leveraged instruments. If he had used leveraged ETFs to amplify exposure, it would likely trigger additional scrutiny or disclosure, especially given the scale of his TSLA position and the timing of his promotional comments. Musk’s move was pure equity accumulation, not synthetic leverage—at least based on what’s been disclosed. If insider behavior has also occurred, this reinforces the importance of tracking direct ownership filings and watching for derivative exposure via 13D/13G or Form 144, which would surface if leveraged ETFs were involved. ($TSLY, $CRSH)
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 5:45 PM
$TSLA On Sept 12, 2025, Elon Musk quietly bought $1B worth of TSLA—2.57M shares via trust, split into 25 tranches. No volume spike. No public notice. On Sept 15, the Form 4 dropped. TSLA surged ~7%, netting Musk ~$66M in unrealized gains. That same day, Musk posted on X: “Up $69 to ~$420 as foretold in the prophecy”—after the move, not before. The board floated a $975B pay package, and Musk hyped robotaxis and humanoid bots. It was a coordinated pump—for his benefit and insider positioning. Retail traders who bought after the hype? They paid the premium. No edge. No advantage. IPO standards demand full disclosure. That obligation should continue as long as a company trades. Execs must declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The SEC allows this latency. That’s the real violation. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency. ($TSLY and $CRSH)
2 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 5:03 PM
$TSLA Elon Musk is now shorting his stock share price after making over 66 million in this fabricated run up of the stock. Sanctioned insider theft allowed by the SEC! Many people are about to get screwed because nothing at all with the negatives of $TSLA has changed. What a prick! $TSLY, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:51 PM
$CRSH Elon Musk bought $1B of TSLA on Sept 12—2.57M shares via trust, split into 25 tranches. No volume spike. No public notice. Filed Form 4 two days later. Legal? Technically. Transparent? Absolutely not. TSLA jumped to $410.26 by Sept 16, netting Musk ~$66M in unrealized gains. The market only reacted after the filing dropped. If IPO standards demand full disclosure, why do they vanish post-IPO? Execs should be required to declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The SEC allows this latency. That’s the real violation. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:44 PM
$CRSH Elon Musk quietly bought $1B worth of TSLA on Sept 12, 2025—2.57M shares split into 25 tranches via trust. No volume spike, no public notice. Filed Form 4 two days later. Legal under SEC rules, but the market was blind until after the move. IPO standards demand full transparency. That obligation shouldn’t vanish once a company goes public. It should be law: insiders must declare trades before execution, and brokerages must disclose them in real time. The IPO is not a one-time event—it’s a permanent contract with the public. AI can already monitor filings, volume anomalies, and trade latency. The tech is here. The accountability isn’t. Time for reform. Time for real-time transparency.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:09 PM
$CRSH The standards required at the time of an IPO—full transparency, executive disclosures, and public accountability—should not expire once a company goes public. They should be codified into law as permanent obligations for as long as that company remains listed on the SEC-regulated stock market. Executives and insiders must be required to declare all intended trades before execution, not just file reactive Form 4s days later. And the firms executing those trades must also disclose them in real time, with full attribution. The IPO isn’t a one-time event—it’s a gateway to public trust. That trust demands ongoing, enforceable standards, not selective enforcement or delayed filings. If a company wants access to public capital, it must accept public scrutiny. And if the SEC won’t enforce continuity of IPO-grade standards, then it’s time for investors to demand reform—through litigation, legislation, and AI-powered accountability. Disclosures must be continuous and must be mandatory!
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 16 at 4:01 PM
$CRSH It’s time to upgrade the rules. Any executive or insider of an IPO-declared company should be required to publicly declare all intended purchases or sales before any trade is executed—not after. The current system, which allows post-trade Form 4 filings up to two days later, creates an unfair advantage and erodes market trust. Furthermore, the brokerage firms executing these trades must also be required to disclose them in real time, with full attribution and timestamped transparency. No more stealth accumulation. No more trust-based opacity. If a company has gone public, its insiders should be held to public standards. The market deserves to know when those closest to the company are buying or selling—before the price moves, not after. AI systems can already monitor filings, volume anomalies, and trade latency. The technology exists. What’s missing is the regulatory will. If the SEC won’t enforce pre-trade declarations, then it’s time for investors to demand reform.
0 · Reply
thailandmonger
thailandmonger Sep. 12 at 6:10 PM
$CRSH Added, can't see many thinking of this one today when Elon is on a roll. It's all money and it's all good!!!!
0 · Reply
Brew69
Brew69 Sep. 12 at 3:52 PM
$CRSH EV Tax Credit is going away - September 30, 2025.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 12 at 12:36 PM
$TSLA Another senior Tesla engineer walks after 8 years—calls out Elon Musk directly. Says Musk’s leadership is “seriously compromised,” damaging Tesla’s energy mission and aligning with forces that slow the transition. Accuses Musk of misinformation, targeting minorities, and supporting climate deniers. 🧨 Major fracture inside $TSLA. A senior engineer just exited after 8 years, publicly calling Elon Musk’s leadership “seriously compromised.” Accusations include misinformation, climate denial alignment, and damage to Tesla’s energy mission. This isn’t a routine departure—it’s a direct hit to credibility from inside the walls. Expect sentiment erosion, institutional hesitation, and chart instability. This will also effect $TSLY and $CRSH each in turn.
1 · Reply
Tecet
Tecet Sep. 12 at 12:34 PM
$TSLA $TSLY $CRSH to address your concerns regarding technical indicators, Tesla just needs to go into consolidation for a few sessions. There is no need to sell off. Action also can continue grinding higher despite overbought conditions (look up gold, is overbought for 6+ months). Overall, any dip is buy oportunity. Speaking from experience, it is rare to see sell off after breakout from several weeks long pattern, and we had 2 of them in the last few weeks. Geting out from triangle, breach of downtrend, and now from channel/wedge probing last high from May atm.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 12 at 12:13 PM
$TSLA 🚫 Breakdown in progress. No volume integrity. No catalyst. Technicals are deteriorating fast—Williams %R deep in overbought, MACD greenout confirmed, and float behavior is erratic. This isn’t momentum—it’s manufactured noise. For the reasons stated here...have no interest in being a bag holder in $TSLA or $TSLY and if I did consider buying anything it would probably $CRSH. But even that is a hold. ADX spiking above 35 signals unsustainable trend strength, while MFI > 70 confirms exhaustion. Price action is disconnected from any real setup. 📉 Standing down. This chart is radioactive until proven otherwise
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 11 at 9:09 PM
$TSLA Retail Behavior Today ($TSLA Options Expiry) and they didn't even know it effecting both the $TSLY, $CRSH and other ETF's using TSLA as the underlying stock. Period! Are you holding the bag? ;-) • Over 120,000 contracts traded on the $360 call expiring Friday, making up 9.1% of TSLA’s total options volume. That’s not random—it’s a concentrated bet. • 60% of trades were flagged as retail-sized, meaning smaller accounts were active. • But here’s the catch: implied volatility dropped nearly 12% during the surge. That suggests professional sellers were capping the upside, while retail chased momentum.
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 11 at 6:11 PM
$CRSH 🔹 Expiration Status • No direct options expiration for $CRSH this week—next scheduled is Sept 19. • However, $CRSH is indirectly affected by $TSLA’s expiration volatility due to its inverse exposure. 🔹 NAV Sensitivity • $TSLA’s directional surge from call sweeps and gamma compression creates NAV distortion risk for CRSH. • $CRSH’s NAV may decline sharply if TSLA rallies into expiration, especially if dealers unwind short hedges. • Containment logic active, with slippage watch elevated. • No fill acceleration—remain defensive and symmetrical. • NAV distortion flag triggered for post-close review
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 11 at 1:57 PM
$TSLA 🔥 IBOGF: The trash can stock with rocket fuel. Trading at $0.014, but forecasted to explode +428% short-term, +4,800% long-term. No board, no hype—just raw volatility. $TSLY offers yield. IBOGF offers ignition. $TSLY = erosion masked as income. IBOGF = microcap chaos with asymmetric upside. (Not even listed on Stocktwits. $CRSH? Already bleeding. $TSLA? Overextended. My trash can stock - IBOGF? Just waking up. ⚠️ Protocol alert: If you're not screening for volatility, you're trading blind. IBOGF isn’t safe—it’s tactical. And that’s exactly why it matters.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 11 at 1:36 PM
$TSLA All I can say is🚨 $TSLA trades at $349.80, but the narrative is rotting—margin compression, delivery decay, and political friction. Analysts are split between $19 and $500. That’s not conviction—it’s chaos. $TSLY? Yield trap. RSI neutral, MACD fading, ADX weak. Income masked as erosion. CRSH? Synthetic put bleeding out. -73% YoY. Death Cross confirmed. ⚠️ Reversal risk rising: TSLA RSI divergence, $TSLY float decay, $CRSH exhaustion. Volatility snapback imminent. If you're chasing yield, you're already late.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 10 at 2:21 PM
$TSLA 📊 TSLA / TSLY / CRSH – Tactical Ledger Update (9/10) Today’s tape offered clean reads across all three tickers. $TSLA held its upward drift with controlled volatility, allowing $TSLY to extract premium with minimal slippage. $CRSH showed expected erosion post-dividend, but containment protocols held firm. Our slot-based ledger flagged no breaches—symmetry intact, overlays aligned, and compounding logic confirmed. No directional bias, just volatility harvested. 📘 Tactical takeaway: Process > prediction. Execution > emotion.
0 · Reply
thailandmonger
thailandmonger Sep. 10 at 2:18 AM
$TSLA Run a "robotaxi" into the inner city hoods and see if it comes back. Let a self driving 18 wheel semi with no driver go through the Sierra Nevada mountains in a snow storm. What fantasy world are some of you people living in? I loaded up on $CRSH , just my money and my opinion!
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 9 at 11:16 PM
$TSLA Today, $TSLA showed its usual range behavior—watched the direction and percentage movement, but no action taken. $TSLY held steady with no issues worth flagging. $CRSH stayed within containment, spreads a bit wider but nothing triggered. Ledger’s tight, no drift across the board. Enjoying the structure more than the result tonight—system’s working as designed. Shutting it down for the night. Back tomorrow with fresh tape and clean eyes.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 9 at 2:54 PM
$TSLA “$TSLA’s stuck in a range tighter than my IRA budget after a $CRSH payout. $TSLY’s yield still looks like bait, but the trap’s sprung. $CRSH? That ETF’s paying like it owes me child support. Until the charts break formation, I’m just logging the chop and waiting for a breach. Volatility’s the mission—direction’s just noise.”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 9 at 2:11 PM
$TSLA “$TSLA’s India campaign feels like launching a Model S into a monsoon—beautiful but not built for the terrain. $TSLY’s yield still looks like dessert before dinner, and $CRSH? That’s the ETF equivalent of shorting the chef and still getting fed. Volatility is the entrée. I’m just here to plate it.”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Sep. 8 at 2:12 PM
$TSLY Both $TSLY and $CRSH are range bound looks like. Which probably means $TSLA is also range bound. Which is ok but boring all the way around. Looks like the morning GAP has no continuation today either direction. Alas, a stock is considered range-bound when its price oscillates between a defined support level (the floor) and resistance level (the ceiling) over a period of time—without breaking out in either direction. It’s like watching a ping-pong match where the ball never leaves the table.
0 · Reply