Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the Underlying Security, which is generally subject to participation in a portion of potential investment gains. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 23 at 12:55 PM
$CRSH Weekly System Update — Low‑Percentage ETF Reinforcement in my Inverted Pairings System - ULTY Last Thursday, due to the holiday, I executed my weekly reinforcement by adding to the lowest‑percentage ETF in the ladder: ULTY. As always, this follows the percentage‑based rotation rules — identify the bottom‑rung ETF, reinforce it, and maintain the structure of the ladder going into the next week. No changes to the system, no deviations, just the same disciplined weekly cycle using the 1st of my bi-monthly IRA contributions & Group 1 dividends. The pairing chart continues to show the expected spread behavior between SLTY and ULTY, and the reinforcement keeps the ladder aligned for the upcoming dividend cycle and next week’s percentage recalculations. NOTE: Group 2 dividends from last week have rolled forward to this week, so those dividends will be added to both the Gp 1 & Gp 2 dividends incoming for this week. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 17 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review System strengthened this week: +9.47% total pairing strength increase week‑over‑week. (Last week total: 2.8975 → This week total: 3.1045) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2286) / WNTR (0.4702) — 0.6988 2️⃣ CONY (0.2858) / FIAT (0.4012) — 0.6870 3️⃣ SLTY (0.2506) / ULTY (0.3899) — 0.6405 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1220) / DIPS (0.4730) — 0.5950 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2792) / CRSH (0.2040) — 0.4832 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2117) / $WNTR (0.4896) — 0.7013 2️⃣ $SLTY (0.2840) / ULTY (0.3485) — 0.6325 3️⃣ CONY (0.2681) / $FIAT (0.3395) — 0.6076 4️⃣ TSLY (0.2681) / $CRSH (0.2090) — 0.4771 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1194) / $DIPS (0.3596) — 0.4790 Notable shifts: 4 of 5 pairs strengthened. NVDY/DIPS posted the largest gain (+0.1160). CONY/FIAT also surged (+0.0794). SLTY/ULTY firmed slightly. MSTY/WNTR dipped marginally but remains the top pair. TSLY/CRSH remains the weakest. Overall structure improved materially week‑over‑week.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 16 at 12:47 PM
$CRSH My Inverted Pairing System is now showing classic signs of maturity. These pairing are the system: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY & MSTY/WNTR. The pairings naturally begin clustering closer together and the percentage spreads contract. This is expected behavior. As shares become a smaller portion of the total, dividends grow yet smooth out volatility, and weekly reinforcement stabilizes the ladder rungs. The result is a tighter, predictable 10-rung ladder. Because of this compression, any one ETF can remain the lowest rung for multiple weeks in a row. Early on, the ladder is wide and noisy, so repeats are rare. As the system matures, repeats become normal and even desirable. A stable bottom rung means the compounding engine is becoming more efficient, more consistent, and harder to disrupt. I never have the need to sell shares; each week I simply purchase the lowest percentage ETF. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR “As the gaps shrink, the structure strengthens.”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:18 PM
$CRSH Applying the consolidated dividends from my Inverted Pairings System into MSTY for the past two weeks is already showing results. MSTY climbed my 10‑rung ETF percentage ladder from the #5 position all the way to #2, sitting right behind WNTR. All 10 of these inverted ETFs are cyclic. They rotate, reposition, and trade places across all rungs of the ladder as volatility shifts. I simply follow the math as it lays out each week. The system grows share counts without ever needing to sell shares, and the weekly dividends keep expanding as the share base expands. This structure is balance‑protective, it’s dividend‑growth‑driven, and it’s ongoing. The ladder tells me where the weakness is, the dividends reinforce it, and the compounding takes care of the rest. “Reinforce the weakness, and the strength will rise on its own.” $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:00 PM
$CRSH Any talk about Tesla merging with SpaceX is like it’s some kind of master plan. The truth is Musk already has all the flexibility he needs without ever combining them. He can shift his own capital, talent, and resources across his companies whenever he wants — it already functions like a mini-Berkshire Hathaway, just with rockets, EVs, satellites, AI, and robotics instead of insurance and railroads. They’re entrenched together because the missions overlap, the tech overlaps, and Musk sits at the center of all of it. But they should never be entwined together. A merger would create valuation chaos, regulatory cross‑contamination, national‑security conflicts, shareholder warfare, and nonstop accusations of corruption — real, implied, or assumed. Keeping Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink, xAI, and the rest separate is what protects them. Musk already gets the benefits of coordination without the liabilities of merging. Why change this structure. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 14 at 12:05 PM
$CRSH I’ve had people ask how my weekly rotation system works, so here’s the condensed version of the rules I follow every Monday. This keeps everything mechanical, emotionless, and consistent. You may need an AI program to decipher this. GRADUATING STOCK PRICE GROWTH SYSTEM • 1 position per account, rotated weekly • Sell both positions at/near Monday open • Add $5 to each account • Run Fidelity screener 8:35–8:45 AM CT using each account’s price window: Max = Sale Price + $5 Min = Max − 5% • Screener uses ONLY: 1) Price range 2) 1‑yr performance ≥ +10% • Sort high → low • Top 3 = #1 Brokerage, #2 Mutual Funds, #3 Backup • Safety gates: institutional net buying, insider net buying, no options‑market downside • Final step: chart confirmation (Daily + 1‑yr). Must show strength, momentum, and no topping/breakdown risk. • No exceptions. No overrides. No emotion. “If you can do this with 1 stock, you can do it with so many more than just one!" $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 12 at 1:57 PM
$CRSH Today’s consolidated dividend rotation was used to buy shares in MSTY again due to its continued weakness within the Inverted Pairings System after it remained in the lowest‑percentage position for a second consecutive week inside my continuing investments into the Inverted Pairings System. This marks the first back‑to‑back Friday reinforcement for any ETF. The double weekly injection again pushed it up the ladder into the 5th position today. All five structural pairings remain the backbone: TSLY/CRSH, ULTY/SLTY, NVDY/DIPS, MSTY/WNTR, CONY/FIAT. The entire cycle stays on rhythm. Share counts increased. Dividends deployed as planned and new shares will forever be paying additional dividends weekly. Cost basis reduced once again. The overall account balance has increased and is protected by both the long/short inversions of the pairings. Just another week building up the share counts using dividends, cash and contributions. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 10 at 12:29 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review This week the system shows a mild strengthening of +1.36% in combined dividend‑per‑share totals. Several pairs improved, with MSTY/WNTR taking the top spot. SLTY/ULTY softened slightly but remains structurally strong. Mid‑tier pairs firmed up, while the bottom two continue to lag. YieldMax’s weekly adjustments remain inconsistent, but overall structure held firm. 🔥 THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2117) / WNTR (0.4896) — 0.7013 2️⃣ SLTY (0.2840) / ULTY (0.3485) — 0.6325 3️⃣ CONY (0.2681) / FIAT (0.3395) — 0.6076 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1194) / DIPS (0.3596) — 0.4790 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2681) / CRSH (0.2090) — 0.4771 🧾 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ SLTY (0.3052) / ULTY (0.3960) — 0.7012 2️⃣ CONY (0.2791) / FIAT (0.3026) — 0.5817 3️⃣ MSTY (0.2459) / WNTR (0.3287) — 0.5746 4️⃣ TSLY (0.3506) / CRSH (0.1926) — 0.5432 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1313) / DIPS (0.3267) — 0.4580 $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 10 at 11:18 AM
$CRSH I play chess the same way I trade with the Inverted Pairings System. First thing I do is delete the volatility pieces — queen and knights. Once those are gone, higher‑rated players stop looking higher‑rated. Their mobility dies, their tactics vanish, and I grind them down with structure. Same way I strip degrading price ranges out of my portfolio with inverted positioning. My ETF system is identical: remove noise, remove decay, lock down structure, and let balance growth + compounding dividends do the killing while everyone else reacts. Rule is the same in chess or markets: eliminate volatility, eliminate decay, control the structure — everything else gets wiped out on schedule. Increasing dividend growth, no sells ever required, constant share growth, balance grows with the strengthening of the weakest position…the lowest‑percentage ETF. When you remove the chaos, the structure wins the war. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 8 at 2:41 PM
$CRSH I’ve been running a new weekly single‑stock rotation in my Brokerage Stocks and Mutual Funds accounts, and it’s turned into a surprisingly fun Monday routine. Every Monday I sell last week’s 1 share, add $5.00 of fresh cash to each account, and then replace that share with a new stock based on a screener I built that adjusts to the +$5.00 increase the buying power. On average, my weekly rotations have been netting around 3–5% before rolling into the next Monday cycle. Nothing complicated — just a simple, mechanical process that keeps things interesting. Both accounts will eventually act as two separate feed streams into my IRA, and on the last trading day of this calendar year I’ll be selling out both accounts and moving the feeder money into the IRA Inverted Pairings to continue the long‑term plan. As the saying goes: small steps done every week will outrun big steps done once in a while. It's just a fun simple easy game I now play. LOL ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Latest News on CRSH
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 23 at 12:55 PM
$CRSH Weekly System Update — Low‑Percentage ETF Reinforcement in my Inverted Pairings System - ULTY Last Thursday, due to the holiday, I executed my weekly reinforcement by adding to the lowest‑percentage ETF in the ladder: ULTY. As always, this follows the percentage‑based rotation rules — identify the bottom‑rung ETF, reinforce it, and maintain the structure of the ladder going into the next week. No changes to the system, no deviations, just the same disciplined weekly cycle using the 1st of my bi-monthly IRA contributions & Group 1 dividends. The pairing chart continues to show the expected spread behavior between SLTY and ULTY, and the reinforcement keeps the ladder aligned for the upcoming dividend cycle and next week’s percentage recalculations. NOTE: Group 2 dividends from last week have rolled forward to this week, so those dividends will be added to both the Gp 1 & Gp 2 dividends incoming for this week. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 17 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review System strengthened this week: +9.47% total pairing strength increase week‑over‑week. (Last week total: 2.8975 → This week total: 3.1045) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2286) / WNTR (0.4702) — 0.6988 2️⃣ CONY (0.2858) / FIAT (0.4012) — 0.6870 3️⃣ SLTY (0.2506) / ULTY (0.3899) — 0.6405 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1220) / DIPS (0.4730) — 0.5950 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2792) / CRSH (0.2040) — 0.4832 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2117) / $WNTR (0.4896) — 0.7013 2️⃣ $SLTY (0.2840) / ULTY (0.3485) — 0.6325 3️⃣ CONY (0.2681) / $FIAT (0.3395) — 0.6076 4️⃣ TSLY (0.2681) / $CRSH (0.2090) — 0.4771 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1194) / $DIPS (0.3596) — 0.4790 Notable shifts: 4 of 5 pairs strengthened. NVDY/DIPS posted the largest gain (+0.1160). CONY/FIAT also surged (+0.0794). SLTY/ULTY firmed slightly. MSTY/WNTR dipped marginally but remains the top pair. TSLY/CRSH remains the weakest. Overall structure improved materially week‑over‑week.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 16 at 12:47 PM
$CRSH My Inverted Pairing System is now showing classic signs of maturity. These pairing are the system: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY & MSTY/WNTR. The pairings naturally begin clustering closer together and the percentage spreads contract. This is expected behavior. As shares become a smaller portion of the total, dividends grow yet smooth out volatility, and weekly reinforcement stabilizes the ladder rungs. The result is a tighter, predictable 10-rung ladder. Because of this compression, any one ETF can remain the lowest rung for multiple weeks in a row. Early on, the ladder is wide and noisy, so repeats are rare. As the system matures, repeats become normal and even desirable. A stable bottom rung means the compounding engine is becoming more efficient, more consistent, and harder to disrupt. I never have the need to sell shares; each week I simply purchase the lowest percentage ETF. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR “As the gaps shrink, the structure strengthens.”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:18 PM
$CRSH Applying the consolidated dividends from my Inverted Pairings System into MSTY for the past two weeks is already showing results. MSTY climbed my 10‑rung ETF percentage ladder from the #5 position all the way to #2, sitting right behind WNTR. All 10 of these inverted ETFs are cyclic. They rotate, reposition, and trade places across all rungs of the ladder as volatility shifts. I simply follow the math as it lays out each week. The system grows share counts without ever needing to sell shares, and the weekly dividends keep expanding as the share base expands. This structure is balance‑protective, it’s dividend‑growth‑driven, and it’s ongoing. The ladder tells me where the weakness is, the dividends reinforce it, and the compounding takes care of the rest. “Reinforce the weakness, and the strength will rise on its own.” $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 15 at 4:00 PM
$CRSH Any talk about Tesla merging with SpaceX is like it’s some kind of master plan. The truth is Musk already has all the flexibility he needs without ever combining them. He can shift his own capital, talent, and resources across his companies whenever he wants — it already functions like a mini-Berkshire Hathaway, just with rockets, EVs, satellites, AI, and robotics instead of insurance and railroads. They’re entrenched together because the missions overlap, the tech overlaps, and Musk sits at the center of all of it. But they should never be entwined together. A merger would create valuation chaos, regulatory cross‑contamination, national‑security conflicts, shareholder warfare, and nonstop accusations of corruption — real, implied, or assumed. Keeping Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink, xAI, and the rest separate is what protects them. Musk already gets the benefits of coordination without the liabilities of merging. Why change this structure. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 14 at 12:05 PM
$CRSH I’ve had people ask how my weekly rotation system works, so here’s the condensed version of the rules I follow every Monday. This keeps everything mechanical, emotionless, and consistent. You may need an AI program to decipher this. GRADUATING STOCK PRICE GROWTH SYSTEM • 1 position per account, rotated weekly • Sell both positions at/near Monday open • Add $5 to each account • Run Fidelity screener 8:35–8:45 AM CT using each account’s price window: Max = Sale Price + $5 Min = Max − 5% • Screener uses ONLY: 1) Price range 2) 1‑yr performance ≥ +10% • Sort high → low • Top 3 = #1 Brokerage, #2 Mutual Funds, #3 Backup • Safety gates: institutional net buying, insider net buying, no options‑market downside • Final step: chart confirmation (Daily + 1‑yr). Must show strength, momentum, and no topping/breakdown risk. • No exceptions. No overrides. No emotion. “If you can do this with 1 stock, you can do it with so many more than just one!" $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 12 at 1:57 PM
$CRSH Today’s consolidated dividend rotation was used to buy shares in MSTY again due to its continued weakness within the Inverted Pairings System after it remained in the lowest‑percentage position for a second consecutive week inside my continuing investments into the Inverted Pairings System. This marks the first back‑to‑back Friday reinforcement for any ETF. The double weekly injection again pushed it up the ladder into the 5th position today. All five structural pairings remain the backbone: TSLY/CRSH, ULTY/SLTY, NVDY/DIPS, MSTY/WNTR, CONY/FIAT. The entire cycle stays on rhythm. Share counts increased. Dividends deployed as planned and new shares will forever be paying additional dividends weekly. Cost basis reduced once again. The overall account balance has increased and is protected by both the long/short inversions of the pairings. Just another week building up the share counts using dividends, cash and contributions. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 10 at 12:29 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review This week the system shows a mild strengthening of +1.36% in combined dividend‑per‑share totals. Several pairs improved, with MSTY/WNTR taking the top spot. SLTY/ULTY softened slightly but remains structurally strong. Mid‑tier pairs firmed up, while the bottom two continue to lag. YieldMax’s weekly adjustments remain inconsistent, but overall structure held firm. 🔥 THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ MSTY (0.2117) / WNTR (0.4896) — 0.7013 2️⃣ SLTY (0.2840) / ULTY (0.3485) — 0.6325 3️⃣ CONY (0.2681) / FIAT (0.3395) — 0.6076 4️⃣ NVDY (0.1194) / DIPS (0.3596) — 0.4790 5️⃣ TSLY (0.2681) / CRSH (0.2090) — 0.4771 🧾 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ SLTY (0.3052) / ULTY (0.3960) — 0.7012 2️⃣ CONY (0.2791) / FIAT (0.3026) — 0.5817 3️⃣ MSTY (0.2459) / WNTR (0.3287) — 0.5746 4️⃣ TSLY (0.3506) / CRSH (0.1926) — 0.5432 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1313) / DIPS (0.3267) — 0.4580 $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 10 at 11:18 AM
$CRSH I play chess the same way I trade with the Inverted Pairings System. First thing I do is delete the volatility pieces — queen and knights. Once those are gone, higher‑rated players stop looking higher‑rated. Their mobility dies, their tactics vanish, and I grind them down with structure. Same way I strip degrading price ranges out of my portfolio with inverted positioning. My ETF system is identical: remove noise, remove decay, lock down structure, and let balance growth + compounding dividends do the killing while everyone else reacts. Rule is the same in chess or markets: eliminate volatility, eliminate decay, control the structure — everything else gets wiped out on schedule. Increasing dividend growth, no sells ever required, constant share growth, balance grows with the strengthening of the weakest position…the lowest‑percentage ETF. When you remove the chaos, the structure wins the war. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 8 at 2:41 PM
$CRSH I’ve been running a new weekly single‑stock rotation in my Brokerage Stocks and Mutual Funds accounts, and it’s turned into a surprisingly fun Monday routine. Every Monday I sell last week’s 1 share, add $5.00 of fresh cash to each account, and then replace that share with a new stock based on a screener I built that adjusts to the +$5.00 increase the buying power. On average, my weekly rotations have been netting around 3–5% before rolling into the next Monday cycle. Nothing complicated — just a simple, mechanical process that keeps things interesting. Both accounts will eventually act as two separate feed streams into my IRA, and on the last trading day of this calendar year I’ll be selling out both accounts and moving the feeder money into the IRA Inverted Pairings to continue the long‑term plan. As the saying goes: small steps done every week will outrun big steps done once in a while. It's just a fun simple easy game I now play. LOL ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 5 at 11:07 PM
$CRSH MSTY: What’s Actually Inside the ETF (And Why It Still Made Money) I purchased MSTY today in my Inverted Pairings System. People keep looking at MSTY’s price and assuming the fund lost money. That’s not how this structure works. Here are the actual MSTY basket weights: 40.71% U.S. Treasury Bills, 11.94% cash & equivalents, 47.15% MSTR call options (5× at 9.43%), 0.11% other assets. Over 52% of the fund earns interest daily. T‑bills + cash = steady, guaranteed yield. The options are deep OTM, so they mostly expire worthless, meaning YieldMax keeps the premium and theta decay as income. So even if MSTY’s market price dropped, the fund still generated interest, collateral yield, weekly option premium, and time decay. Market price ≠ fund income. Buying back shares lower works in your favor because you’re getting the same income engine at a cheaper price, which means more future distributions per dollar. Mechanical, not emotional. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 5 at 1:45 PM
$CRSH Today’s consolidated dividend rotation was used to buy shares in MSTY after it moved into the lowest‑percentage position in my continuing investments into the Inverted Pairings System. MSTY moved up the ladder but just a couple rungs. I had no contributions scheduled this week, so I used only dividends and carried forward cash on hand. Still, I take and use what I get with dividends. All five structural pairings remain the backbone: TSLY/CRSH, ULTY/SLTY, NVDY/DIPS, MSTY/WNTR, CONY/FIAT. Symmetry tightened. Cycle stays on rhythm. Share counts increased. Dividends deployed as planned and new shares will forever be paying additional dividends weekly. Cost basis reduced once again. The overall account balance has increased and is protected by the long/short inversions of the pairings. Just another week building up the share counts using dividends and contributions. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 4 at 11:50 AM
$CRSH This week my consolidated dividend buying strength slipped 4.7%, but the bottom ETFs on the ladder dropped more than 12% since my last rotation. That divergence isn’t a flaw — it’s the design. This is the Inverted Pairing System, built around five permanent ETF pairings: NVDY/DIPS, TSLY/CRSH, MSTY/WNTR, CONY/FIAT, and ULTY/SLTY. Dividends are tied to share count, not price, so when price decays faster than the income engine, real buying power expands — new dividend paying shares are essentially free to me. Most traders only see the red; the system sees the opportunity. Tomorrow’s consolidated payout across all 10 ETFs converts into more units per dollar because the ETFs on the ladder weakened faster than the dividend pool. That’s the asymmetry the machine waits for. Emotional traders get shaken here. Mechanical systems compound here. At the open, the lowest rung will reveal itself — and that’s when my share‑growth advantage is harvested. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jun. 3 at 12:32 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Review This week’s inverted pairings showed across‑the‑board weakening, (-4.47% overall) with every pair posting a lower combined dividend‑per‑share total than last week. Rankings stayed the same, but all five softened — including the top pair SLTY/ULTY. YieldMax seems to have failed with their options trading skills IAW their SEC filed prospectus' on long/short ETFs. 🔥 THIS WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ SLTY (0.3052) / ULTY (0.3960) — 0.7012 2️⃣ CONY (0.2791) / FIAT (0.3026) — 0.5817 3️⃣ MSTY (0.2459) / WNTR (0.3287) — 0.5746 4️⃣ TSLY (0.3506) / CRSH (0.1926) — 0.5432 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1313) / DIPS (0.3267) — 0.4580 📉 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength 1️⃣ SLTY (0.3159) / ULTY (0.3946) — 0.7105 2️⃣ CONY (0.3345) / FIAT (0.3071) — 0.6416 3️⃣ MSTY (0.2979) / WNTR (0.3100) — 0.6079 4️⃣ TSLY (0.3880) / CRSH (0.1943) — 0.5823 5️⃣ NVDY (0.1247) / DIPS (0.3255) — 0.4502 $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 29 at 1:41 PM
$CRSH Today’s consolidated dividend rotation was used to buy shares in CONY after it moved into the lowest‑percentage position in my continuing investments into the Inverted Pairings System. CONY now sits on the #2 highest rung of the ladder. This week's 2nd tranche contributions helped do that after another not so great dividend payout week from our friends at YieldMax. Still, I take and use what I get. All five structural pairings remain the backbone: TSLY/CRSH, ULTY/SLTY, NVDY/DIPS, MSTY/WNTR, CONY/FIAT. Symmetry tightened. Cycle stays on rhythm. Share counts increased. Dividends deployed as planned and will forever be paying additional dividends weekly. Cost basis reduced. The overall balance has increased and is protected by the long/short inversions of the pairings. Just another week building up the share counts using dividends and contributions. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 29 at 12:51 PM
$CRSH I am running 2 new experimental systems in 2 accounts not associated to my Inverted Pairings Strategy: It's called the "Graduating Stock Price Growth Strategy" across 2 other taxable accounts. This system is fully mechanical with "Balance Growth" as the standard using only stocks! 10 Rules of ROE: Rules of Engagement done weekly each last trading day. 1.Each account holds 10 stocks only near same valuations. 2. Weekly: Sell the lowest‑percentage stock. 3. Add $5 to each account after the sale. 4. New buy price window = (sale price + $5) down to (max − $0.25). 5. Require 1‑yr performance ≥ +10%. 6. Screener uses only those 2 conditions to identify +% stable stocks. 7. Sort results by price, highest → lowest. 8. Top stock goes to Brokerage acct; 9. 2nd goes to Mutual Funds acct. 10. Buy 1 new stock in each account. This system forces upward graduation, weekly quality upgrades, and steady balance growth through disciplined inflow + rotation. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT ,$SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 28 at 11:11 AM
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 28 at 12:59 AM
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 27 at 10:41 PM
I do hope people are thinking about this! It's surprising nobody is talking about this, but if Musk rolls Tesla into a SpaceX IPO, every TSLA‑linked financial instrument is affected. TSLA stock can’t survive a merger into a new entity. Shares would convert into SpaceX at a set exchange ratio and TSLA would be delisted. All TSLA options (calls/puts) would be cash‑settled or converted under OCC corporate‑action rules. Leveraged TSLA products (2x/3x ETFs, inverse ETFs, YieldMax funds, synthetic covered‑call ETFs) would be forced to convert, liquidate, or suspend creations depending on whether SpaceX lists options. TSLA‑based closed‑end funds, structured notes, and warrants would also be revalued or terminated. Even high‑yield TSLA income products must legally restructure. Not predicting anything, but these are the actual mechanics if Tesla is absorbed into SpaceX. $TSLA, $TSLY & $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 27 at 10:24 PM
$TSLY It’s surprising this isn’t being discussed more, but a SpaceX IPO could have major structural implications for TSLA itself if Musk follows through on comments about rolling Tesla into the new entity. If TSLA is absorbed, it cannot remain a standalone publicly traded stock. Legally, a merger into SpaceX would trigger a full corporate action: TSLA shares would convert into SpaceX shares at a set exchange ratio, TSLA would be delisted from Nasdaq, and all TSLA options would be cash‑settled or converted. If SpaceX IPOs without absorbing Tesla, nothing changes for TSLA. If SpaceX IPOs first and a merger happens later, TSLA trades normally until the merger date, then converts and disappears. Not predicting anything, but these are the actual mechanics TSLA must follow if Musk consolidates his companies. $TSLY & $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 27 at 10:16 PM
$TSLY It’s surprising nobody is discussing this, but a SpaceX IPO could force structural changes to YieldMax’s TSLA‑based ETFs (TSLY & CRSH). If Musk folds Tesla into SpaceX, TSLA may stop existing as a standalone underlying. Legally, single‑stock option‑income ETFs must track a live, listed stock with listed options. That leaves three real outcomes: (1) Conversion – if SpaceX lists options, YieldMax can amend the prospectus and convert TSLY/CRSH into SpaceX‑based versions, preserving continuity. (2) Liquidation – if SpaceX has no options, YieldMax must close the funds and return NAV to holders. (3) Temporary suspension – creations/redemptions can freeze while regulators finalize the new structure. Not predicting anything, but these are the actual mechanics YieldMax must follow if Tesla is absorbed. What will YieldMax do? $TSLY & $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 May. 27 at 12:45 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System weekly review. This week’s structure came in stronger overall than last week, with multiple pairs showing meaningful upward movement inside the mechanical framework. Below are the comparisons. We always simply take what we get! 📅 THIS WEEK — Pair Strength Rankings (1 → 5) 1. SLTY (0.3159) / ULTY (0.3946) — 0.7105 2. CONY (0.3345) / FIAT (0.3071) — 0.6416 3. MSTY (0.2979) / WNTR (0.3100) — 0.6079 4. TSLY (0.3880) / CRSH (0.1943) — 0.5823 5. NVDY (0.1247) / DIPS (0.3255) — 0.4502 📅 LAST WEEK — Pair Strength Rankings (1 → 5) 1. SLTY (0.3221) / ULTY (0.3947) — 0.7168 2. CONY (0.3427) / FIAT (0.2959) — 0.6386 3. MSTY (0.3136) / WNTR (0.3048) — 0.6184 4. TSLY (0.2862) / CRSH (0.2123) — 0.4985 5. NVDY (0.1354) / DIPS (0.2697) — 0.4053 Movement Notes: • SLTY/ULTY holds #1 • CONY/FIAT moves up into #2 • MSTY/WNTR slips to #3 • TSLY/CRSH strengthens but stays #4 • NVDY/DIPS improves but remains #5 $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply