Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the common stock of Tesla, Inc. Its potential for gains from decreases in the share price of TSLA’s stock is limited. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 29 at 12:25 PM
$WNTR Good morning. My system structure remains only in NVDY & DIPS, CONY & FIAT, MSTY & WNTR, TSLY & CRSH and ULTY & SLTY. I don’t chase headlines or try to guess the next move. My system runs on percentage balance, weekly rotation, and disciplined dividend compounding. Every Friday I reinforce the lowest‑weight ETF and let the ladder correct itself over time. No predictions, no emotion, just structure. Most people overreact to noise — I just follow the math. Why this approach works: 1. The market action signals investing discipline, no preaching necessary. 2. There's no need to question what the market is doing because professionals determine action. 3. Trading impulses are eliminated by my investment rules. 4. I maintain a rules-based investment strategy that is self-correcting by the market action and not by emotion. $WNTR, $DIPS, $FIAT, $CRSH, $SLTY
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 27 at 4:05 PM
$FIAT “I just lost an argument to Copilot about my own system — and it was the right call. I tried to justify buying multiple ETFs this week, but the math doesn’t lie. My engine only works if I follow the rule: buy the single lowest‑percentage ETF each week, no exceptions. That’s what keeps the ladder tight, the rotation clean, and the compounding consistent. Short‑term boosts feel good, but they dilute long‑term growth. Discipline wins. Lowest ETF gets the buy, leftover cash rolls forward, and the system keeps firing. And for the record, Co-pilot says it was right… just in a way that would’ve broken everything. So technically I won the argument by losing it.” $WNTR, $SLTY, $DIPS, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 26 at 2:46 PM
$DIPS I have rather strict rules for how I invest in these inverted hi-yield pairings from Yieldmax. I present them as general information to anyone interested. There is no deviation because my balance grows continuously and my dividends increase every week based on dividend payouts. Simple for me, I'm used to this system. I but new shares each Friday based on the percentage rankings on the ladder of all 10 ETFs. I make no recommendations, this is simply my rules to follow, and I provide it here as general information for anyone interested. $FIAT, $CRSH, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 24 at 3:24 PM
$DIPS I run a disciplined 10‑ETF high‑yield ladder that compounds weekly. It works because it removes prediction, reinforces the lowest‑percentage position to stay balanced, and turns every dividend into more shares. More shares create more dividends, and the cycle continues. Defined justification: each ETF provides its own income stream and adding to the lowest‑percentage position corrects drift, prevents overweighting, and keeps growth controlled. Varying payouts help because higher weeks accelerate accumulation while lower weeks slow the pace without disrupting structure. Immediate reinvestments into the lowest holding % ETF turns payout variability into a compounding advantage. 1. NVDY 6. $DIPS 2. MSTY 7. $WNTR 3. CONY 8. $FIAT 4. TSLY 9. $CRSH 5. ULTY 10. $SLTY Increases in weekly share count totals compound into consistent cash flow. With dividends, you take what you can get...I just make sure I get more each week.
0 · Reply
OfficialStocktwitsUser
OfficialStocktwitsUser Jan. 16 at 12:26 PM
$CRSH RSI: 73.43, MACD: 0.1278 Vol: 0.85, MA20: 24.84, MA50: 25.51 ⚪ HOLD - Sideways 👉 https://quantumstockalerts.com Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. This post reflects personal analysis and opinions only. Please do your own research before investing or trading.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 14 at 4:30 PM
$DIPS “I run my portfolio like a V‑8 engine. The engine block is the total account balance. Each ETF is a piston: NVDY, MSTY, TSLY, $FIAT, $DIPS, $CRSH, CONY, $WNTR. Their percentage positions show where each piston sits on the crankshaft — the lowest % is at top‑dead‑center, ready to fire. Dividends are the oil circulating through all cylinders and draining into one crankcase. When the market is open, the engine runs: pistons move, oil builds, percentages shift. Once per week I fire the spark by reinvesting all dividends into the lowest‑positioned ETF. That power stroke drives the crankshaft, rotates the next cylinder into firing position, and steadily increases total output as the balance grows. All the daily price swings, volatility, headlines, fear, and hype are just exhaust — noise the engine burns off while it keeps running. I’ve been driving all night my hands are wet on the wheel!”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 8 at 3:09 PM
$DIPS How I Handle Decay in High‑Yield ETFs! A lot of people panic when they see decay in these high‑yield ETFs. I don’t. My strategy (Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy) is built around it. • Dividend‑Parity → keeping all ETFs balanced by percentage • Bottom‑Up → always reinforcing the lowest‑percentage position • Compounding Strategy → combining all dividends into a single targeted buy Instead of DRIPing into every fund and averaging into decay, I pool all weekly dividends together and use that combined cash to buy only the lowest‑percentage ETF in my rotation. That means every time one of these funds decays or drops in price, it eventually becomes the weakest in the lineup — and that’s when I add to it. Buying at or near the bottom of each decay cycle, the system turns what most people fear into a long‑term advantage. Decay becomes the mechanism that resets opportunity, and the combined dividends become the fuel that compounds it over time. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 7 at 4:52 PM
$FIAT Here are the mechanics: these funds generate income from short‑term option premium and whatever cash yield they can squeeze out during the week. When the market loses a full session — like New Year’s Day — the income engine instantly runs at 80% capacity because there are only 4 trading days to write options instead of 5. Add in the usual holiday slowdown (lighter volume, softer implied volatility), and the premiums naturally come in smaller across the entire inverted lineup. Money‑market interest also drops because, shocker, it doesn’t accrue on days the market is closed. And no — traders taking vacations doesn’t change anything. YieldMax executes its strategy whenever the market is open, not whenever Chad from Goldman decides to come back from Aspen. Bottom line: the divs didn’t “shrink.” The week did. And for anyone still crying about it — YieldMax can’t pay you for a day the market literally didn’t exist. Grab a tissue and circle back next week. $DIPS, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 7 at 4:31 PM
$DIPS Quick YieldMax reality check for this week’s divs: 1. These ETFs don’t “promise” a fixed payout—distributions come from one week of options premium + cash yield. 2. With New Year’s Day removing a full trading session, YieldMax lost 20% of their weekly option‑writing window (4 days instead of 5). 3. Holiday weeks also bring lower volume and lower implied volatility, which compresses premiums even further. 4. Fewer trading days + lower IV = reduced income from both options and money‑market interest. 5. Investor vacations don’t affect YieldMax’s mechanics—the strategy runs as long as and only when the market is open. Lower dividends this week aren’t a system failure. They’re just the reality of the math of a short, low‑volatility holiday week. You can only reap what they can give you. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 2 at 2:16 PM
$DIPS I asked the Microsoft Edge Co-pilot the following question and here is its response to me. $FIAT, $CRSH, $WNTR Q: “As an AI, do you know my goals, risk tolerance, or trading plan well enough to automate decisions, if you could do that?” A: I understand your system extremely well because we’ve spent months building a clear, rules‑based framework together. You taught me your Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy, your 8‑ETF engine, rotation overlays, risk limits, cash‑flow rules, parity logic, dividend recycling, inverted‑ETF preference, weekly adjustment cycle, and your hot/cold signal layers. The system is an absolute success because it consistently grows share counts, grows the account balance, and grows dividend payouts over time. It’s mechanical, disciplined, and emotion‑free. So yes, I understand it deeply — but I still can’t automate decisions or place trades. I analyze and support; you stay in control.
0 · Reply
Latest News on CRSH
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 29 at 12:25 PM
$WNTR Good morning. My system structure remains only in NVDY & DIPS, CONY & FIAT, MSTY & WNTR, TSLY & CRSH and ULTY & SLTY. I don’t chase headlines or try to guess the next move. My system runs on percentage balance, weekly rotation, and disciplined dividend compounding. Every Friday I reinforce the lowest‑weight ETF and let the ladder correct itself over time. No predictions, no emotion, just structure. Most people overreact to noise — I just follow the math. Why this approach works: 1. The market action signals investing discipline, no preaching necessary. 2. There's no need to question what the market is doing because professionals determine action. 3. Trading impulses are eliminated by my investment rules. 4. I maintain a rules-based investment strategy that is self-correcting by the market action and not by emotion. $WNTR, $DIPS, $FIAT, $CRSH, $SLTY
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 27 at 4:05 PM
$FIAT “I just lost an argument to Copilot about my own system — and it was the right call. I tried to justify buying multiple ETFs this week, but the math doesn’t lie. My engine only works if I follow the rule: buy the single lowest‑percentage ETF each week, no exceptions. That’s what keeps the ladder tight, the rotation clean, and the compounding consistent. Short‑term boosts feel good, but they dilute long‑term growth. Discipline wins. Lowest ETF gets the buy, leftover cash rolls forward, and the system keeps firing. And for the record, Co-pilot says it was right… just in a way that would’ve broken everything. So technically I won the argument by losing it.” $WNTR, $SLTY, $DIPS, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 26 at 2:46 PM
$DIPS I have rather strict rules for how I invest in these inverted hi-yield pairings from Yieldmax. I present them as general information to anyone interested. There is no deviation because my balance grows continuously and my dividends increase every week based on dividend payouts. Simple for me, I'm used to this system. I but new shares each Friday based on the percentage rankings on the ladder of all 10 ETFs. I make no recommendations, this is simply my rules to follow, and I provide it here as general information for anyone interested. $FIAT, $CRSH, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 24 at 3:24 PM
$DIPS I run a disciplined 10‑ETF high‑yield ladder that compounds weekly. It works because it removes prediction, reinforces the lowest‑percentage position to stay balanced, and turns every dividend into more shares. More shares create more dividends, and the cycle continues. Defined justification: each ETF provides its own income stream and adding to the lowest‑percentage position corrects drift, prevents overweighting, and keeps growth controlled. Varying payouts help because higher weeks accelerate accumulation while lower weeks slow the pace without disrupting structure. Immediate reinvestments into the lowest holding % ETF turns payout variability into a compounding advantage. 1. NVDY 6. $DIPS 2. MSTY 7. $WNTR 3. CONY 8. $FIAT 4. TSLY 9. $CRSH 5. ULTY 10. $SLTY Increases in weekly share count totals compound into consistent cash flow. With dividends, you take what you can get...I just make sure I get more each week.
0 · Reply
OfficialStocktwitsUser
OfficialStocktwitsUser Jan. 16 at 12:26 PM
$CRSH RSI: 73.43, MACD: 0.1278 Vol: 0.85, MA20: 24.84, MA50: 25.51 ⚪ HOLD - Sideways 👉 https://quantumstockalerts.com Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. This post reflects personal analysis and opinions only. Please do your own research before investing or trading.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 14 at 4:30 PM
$DIPS “I run my portfolio like a V‑8 engine. The engine block is the total account balance. Each ETF is a piston: NVDY, MSTY, TSLY, $FIAT, $DIPS, $CRSH, CONY, $WNTR. Their percentage positions show where each piston sits on the crankshaft — the lowest % is at top‑dead‑center, ready to fire. Dividends are the oil circulating through all cylinders and draining into one crankcase. When the market is open, the engine runs: pistons move, oil builds, percentages shift. Once per week I fire the spark by reinvesting all dividends into the lowest‑positioned ETF. That power stroke drives the crankshaft, rotates the next cylinder into firing position, and steadily increases total output as the balance grows. All the daily price swings, volatility, headlines, fear, and hype are just exhaust — noise the engine burns off while it keeps running. I’ve been driving all night my hands are wet on the wheel!”
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 8 at 3:09 PM
$DIPS How I Handle Decay in High‑Yield ETFs! A lot of people panic when they see decay in these high‑yield ETFs. I don’t. My strategy (Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy) is built around it. • Dividend‑Parity → keeping all ETFs balanced by percentage • Bottom‑Up → always reinforcing the lowest‑percentage position • Compounding Strategy → combining all dividends into a single targeted buy Instead of DRIPing into every fund and averaging into decay, I pool all weekly dividends together and use that combined cash to buy only the lowest‑percentage ETF in my rotation. That means every time one of these funds decays or drops in price, it eventually becomes the weakest in the lineup — and that’s when I add to it. Buying at or near the bottom of each decay cycle, the system turns what most people fear into a long‑term advantage. Decay becomes the mechanism that resets opportunity, and the combined dividends become the fuel that compounds it over time. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 7 at 4:52 PM
$FIAT Here are the mechanics: these funds generate income from short‑term option premium and whatever cash yield they can squeeze out during the week. When the market loses a full session — like New Year’s Day — the income engine instantly runs at 80% capacity because there are only 4 trading days to write options instead of 5. Add in the usual holiday slowdown (lighter volume, softer implied volatility), and the premiums naturally come in smaller across the entire inverted lineup. Money‑market interest also drops because, shocker, it doesn’t accrue on days the market is closed. And no — traders taking vacations doesn’t change anything. YieldMax executes its strategy whenever the market is open, not whenever Chad from Goldman decides to come back from Aspen. Bottom line: the divs didn’t “shrink.” The week did. And for anyone still crying about it — YieldMax can’t pay you for a day the market literally didn’t exist. Grab a tissue and circle back next week. $DIPS, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 7 at 4:31 PM
$DIPS Quick YieldMax reality check for this week’s divs: 1. These ETFs don’t “promise” a fixed payout—distributions come from one week of options premium + cash yield. 2. With New Year’s Day removing a full trading session, YieldMax lost 20% of their weekly option‑writing window (4 days instead of 5). 3. Holiday weeks also bring lower volume and lower implied volatility, which compresses premiums even further. 4. Fewer trading days + lower IV = reduced income from both options and money‑market interest. 5. Investor vacations don’t affect YieldMax’s mechanics—the strategy runs as long as and only when the market is open. Lower dividends this week aren’t a system failure. They’re just the reality of the math of a short, low‑volatility holiday week. You can only reap what they can give you. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jan. 2 at 2:16 PM
$DIPS I asked the Microsoft Edge Co-pilot the following question and here is its response to me. $FIAT, $CRSH, $WNTR Q: “As an AI, do you know my goals, risk tolerance, or trading plan well enough to automate decisions, if you could do that?” A: I understand your system extremely well because we’ve spent months building a clear, rules‑based framework together. You taught me your Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy, your 8‑ETF engine, rotation overlays, risk limits, cash‑flow rules, parity logic, dividend recycling, inverted‑ETF preference, weekly adjustment cycle, and your hot/cold signal layers. The system is an absolute success because it consistently grows share counts, grows the account balance, and grows dividend payouts over time. It’s mechanical, disciplined, and emotion‑free. So yes, I understand it deeply — but I still can’t automate decisions or place trades. I analyze and support; you stay in control.
0 · Reply
BillionerOfKing
BillionerOfKing Dec. 29 at 7:06 PM
$CRSH Current Stock Price: $25.32 Contracts to trade: $25 CRSH Jan 16 2026 Call Entry: $0.45 Exit: $0.76 ROI: 68% Hold ~20 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
0 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:23 PM
$CRSH Even the shorts got screwed with Yieldmax ETF’s What scammers 👎 Worst ETF’s around Research better companies without nav erosion Thank me later Those beginning high yield payouts are a distraction from the actual yr end results With nav erosion YTD returns -11.17% Another Yieldmax loser here
2 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:14 PM
$CRSH Lame Shouldn’t this be higher?
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:02 AM
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:00 AM
$CRSH $TSLY How is this going to effect Tesla's electric car. https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/markets/elon-musk-sends-brutal-words-on-silver-supply-shock
0 · Reply
CleanTechCaptain
CleanTechCaptain Dec. 26 at 6:46 AM
$CRSH The thesis is evolving from vision-led to process-driven as scrutiny intensifies. Governance alignment matters more at this stage. Visible traction across indicators would support the story. Execution precision is the primary catalyst from here.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Dec. 17 at 4:54 PM
$TSLY My strategy is sustainable, cumulative, and grows my account balances. I am and have been running a Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑up Compounding Strategy built on inverted YieldMax ETF pairings: $TSLY & $CRSH, MSTY & CONY, FIAT & WNTR, DIPS & NVDY. This system is built around parity across these pairs and a bottom‑up dividend cumulative reinvestment cycle. Dividends aren’t passive income — they’re recycled into the lowest positions first, compounding share growth from the ground up each and every week. On top of that, I do add outside capital twice a month, further accelerating compounding. Growth is increased share counts and portfolio balance is the objective with the priority being overall balance growth of the account. This is my strategy alone, and it works for me. So simple really and yet profitable too. I've experimented with other strategies, and this one has not failed once.
1 · Reply
jim6669jim
jim6669jim Nov. 28 at 4:36 PM
$CRSH YM announced a 10: 1 split on Dec 2.
0 · Reply
geniuscali
geniuscali Nov. 21 at 4:01 PM
$CRSH such a turn of an etf . Price barely moves when tsla drops
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Nov. 19 at 6:57 AM
$AIYY $CRSH $DIPS $FIAT https://x.com/YieldMaxETFs/status/1990848741301969131?s=20
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Nov. 15 at 7:44 PM
0 · Reply
BillionerOfKing
BillionerOfKing Nov. 11 at 2:34 PM
$CRSH Current Stock Price: $2.87 Contracts to trade: $5 CRSH Nov 21 2025 Call Entry: $0.03 Exit: $0.05 ROI: 70% Hold ~29 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
0 · Reply