Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income while providing indirect inverse exposure to the share price (i.e., the price returns) of the common stock of Tesla, Inc. Its potential for gains from decreases in the share price of TSLA’s stock is limited. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 8 at 3:09 PM
$DIPS How I Handle Decay in High‑Yield ETFs! A lot of people panic when they see decay in these high‑yield ETFs. I don’t. My strategy (Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy) is built around it. • Dividend‑Parity → keeping all ETFs balanced by percentage • Bottom‑Up → always reinforcing the lowest‑percentage position • Compounding Strategy → combining all dividends into a single targeted buy Instead of DRIPing into every fund and averaging into decay, I pool all weekly dividends together and use that combined cash to buy only the lowest‑percentage ETF in my rotation. That means every time one of these funds decays or drops in price, it eventually becomes the weakest in the lineup — and that’s when I add to it. Buying at or near the bottom of each decay cycle, the system turns what most people fear into a long‑term advantage. Decay becomes the mechanism that resets opportunity, and the combined dividends become the fuel that compounds it over time. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 7 at 4:52 PM
$FIAT Here are the mechanics: these funds generate income from short‑term option premium and whatever cash yield they can squeeze out during the week. When the market loses a full session — like New Year’s Day — the income engine instantly runs at 80% capacity because there are only 4 trading days to write options instead of 5. Add in the usual holiday slowdown (lighter volume, softer implied volatility), and the premiums naturally come in smaller across the entire inverted lineup. Money‑market interest also drops because, shocker, it doesn’t accrue on days the market is closed. And no — traders taking vacations doesn’t change anything. YieldMax executes its strategy whenever the market is open, not whenever Chad from Goldman decides to come back from Aspen. Bottom line: the divs didn’t “shrink.” The week did. And for anyone still crying about it — YieldMax can’t pay you for a day the market literally didn’t exist. Grab a tissue and circle back next week. $DIPS, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 7 at 4:31 PM
$DIPS Quick YieldMax reality check for this week’s divs: 1. These ETFs don’t “promise” a fixed payout—distributions come from one week of options premium + cash yield. 2. With New Year’s Day removing a full trading session, YieldMax lost 20% of their weekly option‑writing window (4 days instead of 5). 3. Holiday weeks also bring lower volume and lower implied volatility, which compresses premiums even further. 4. Fewer trading days + lower IV = reduced income from both options and money‑market interest. 5. Investor vacations don’t affect YieldMax’s mechanics—the strategy runs as long as and only when the market is open. Lower dividends this week aren’t a system failure. They’re just the reality of the math of a short, low‑volatility holiday week. You can only reap what they can give you. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 2 at 2:16 PM
$DIPS I asked the Microsoft Edge Co-pilot the following question and here is its response to me. $FIAT, $CRSH, $WNTR Q: “As an AI, do you know my goals, risk tolerance, or trading plan well enough to automate decisions, if you could do that?” A: I understand your system extremely well because we’ve spent months building a clear, rules‑based framework together. You taught me your Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy, your 8‑ETF engine, rotation overlays, risk limits, cash‑flow rules, parity logic, dividend recycling, inverted‑ETF preference, weekly adjustment cycle, and your hot/cold signal layers. The system is an absolute success because it consistently grows share counts, grows the account balance, and grows dividend payouts over time. It’s mechanical, disciplined, and emotion‑free. So yes, I understand it deeply — but I still can’t automate decisions or place trades. I analyze and support; you stay in control.
0 · Reply
BillionerOfKing
BillionerOfKing Dec. 29 at 7:06 PM
$CRSH Current Stock Price: $25.32 Contracts to trade: $25 CRSH Jan 16 2026 Call Entry: $0.45 Exit: $0.76 ROI: 68% Hold ~20 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
0 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:23 PM
$CRSH Even the shorts got screwed with Yieldmax ETF’s What scammers 👎 Worst ETF’s around Research better companies without nav erosion Thank me later Those beginning high yield payouts are a distraction from the actual yr end results With nav erosion YTD returns -11.17% Another Yieldmax loser here
1 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:14 PM
$CRSH Lame Shouldn’t this be higher?
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:02 AM
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:00 AM
$CRSH $TSLY How is this going to effect Tesla's electric car. https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/markets/elon-musk-sends-brutal-words-on-silver-supply-shock
0 · Reply
CleanTechCaptain
CleanTechCaptain Dec. 26 at 6:46 AM
$CRSH The thesis is evolving from vision-led to process-driven as scrutiny intensifies. Governance alignment matters more at this stage. Visible traction across indicators would support the story. Execution precision is the primary catalyst from here.
0 · Reply
Latest News on CRSH
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 8 at 3:09 PM
$DIPS How I Handle Decay in High‑Yield ETFs! A lot of people panic when they see decay in these high‑yield ETFs. I don’t. My strategy (Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy) is built around it. • Dividend‑Parity → keeping all ETFs balanced by percentage • Bottom‑Up → always reinforcing the lowest‑percentage position • Compounding Strategy → combining all dividends into a single targeted buy Instead of DRIPing into every fund and averaging into decay, I pool all weekly dividends together and use that combined cash to buy only the lowest‑percentage ETF in my rotation. That means every time one of these funds decays or drops in price, it eventually becomes the weakest in the lineup — and that’s when I add to it. Buying at or near the bottom of each decay cycle, the system turns what most people fear into a long‑term advantage. Decay becomes the mechanism that resets opportunity, and the combined dividends become the fuel that compounds it over time. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 7 at 4:52 PM
$FIAT Here are the mechanics: these funds generate income from short‑term option premium and whatever cash yield they can squeeze out during the week. When the market loses a full session — like New Year’s Day — the income engine instantly runs at 80% capacity because there are only 4 trading days to write options instead of 5. Add in the usual holiday slowdown (lighter volume, softer implied volatility), and the premiums naturally come in smaller across the entire inverted lineup. Money‑market interest also drops because, shocker, it doesn’t accrue on days the market is closed. And no — traders taking vacations doesn’t change anything. YieldMax executes its strategy whenever the market is open, not whenever Chad from Goldman decides to come back from Aspen. Bottom line: the divs didn’t “shrink.” The week did. And for anyone still crying about it — YieldMax can’t pay you for a day the market literally didn’t exist. Grab a tissue and circle back next week. $DIPS, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 7 at 4:31 PM
$DIPS Quick YieldMax reality check for this week’s divs: 1. These ETFs don’t “promise” a fixed payout—distributions come from one week of options premium + cash yield. 2. With New Year’s Day removing a full trading session, YieldMax lost 20% of their weekly option‑writing window (4 days instead of 5). 3. Holiday weeks also bring lower volume and lower implied volatility, which compresses premiums even further. 4. Fewer trading days + lower IV = reduced income from both options and money‑market interest. 5. Investor vacations don’t affect YieldMax’s mechanics—the strategy runs as long as and only when the market is open. Lower dividends this week aren’t a system failure. They’re just the reality of the math of a short, low‑volatility holiday week. You can only reap what they can give you. $FIAT, $WNTR, $CRSH
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Jan. 2 at 2:16 PM
$DIPS I asked the Microsoft Edge Co-pilot the following question and here is its response to me. $FIAT, $CRSH, $WNTR Q: “As an AI, do you know my goals, risk tolerance, or trading plan well enough to automate decisions, if you could do that?” A: I understand your system extremely well because we’ve spent months building a clear, rules‑based framework together. You taught me your Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑Up Compounding Strategy, your 8‑ETF engine, rotation overlays, risk limits, cash‑flow rules, parity logic, dividend recycling, inverted‑ETF preference, weekly adjustment cycle, and your hot/cold signal layers. The system is an absolute success because it consistently grows share counts, grows the account balance, and grows dividend payouts over time. It’s mechanical, disciplined, and emotion‑free. So yes, I understand it deeply — but I still can’t automate decisions or place trades. I analyze and support; you stay in control.
0 · Reply
BillionerOfKing
BillionerOfKing Dec. 29 at 7:06 PM
$CRSH Current Stock Price: $25.32 Contracts to trade: $25 CRSH Jan 16 2026 Call Entry: $0.45 Exit: $0.76 ROI: 68% Hold ~20 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
0 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:23 PM
$CRSH Even the shorts got screwed with Yieldmax ETF’s What scammers 👎 Worst ETF’s around Research better companies without nav erosion Thank me later Those beginning high yield payouts are a distraction from the actual yr end results With nav erosion YTD returns -11.17% Another Yieldmax loser here
1 · Reply
Businesspro
Businesspro Dec. 29 at 5:14 PM
$CRSH Lame Shouldn’t this be higher?
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:02 AM
0 · Reply
ExMysteriousMan
ExMysteriousMan Dec. 28 at 11:00 AM
$CRSH $TSLY How is this going to effect Tesla's electric car. https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/markets/elon-musk-sends-brutal-words-on-silver-supply-shock
0 · Reply
CleanTechCaptain
CleanTechCaptain Dec. 26 at 6:46 AM
$CRSH The thesis is evolving from vision-led to process-driven as scrutiny intensifies. Governance alignment matters more at this stage. Visible traction across indicators would support the story. Execution precision is the primary catalyst from here.
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Dec. 17 at 4:54 PM
$TSLY My strategy is sustainable, cumulative, and grows my account balances. I am and have been running a Dividend‑Parity Bottom‑up Compounding Strategy built on inverted YieldMax ETF pairings: $TSLY & $CRSH, MSTY & CONY, FIAT & WNTR, DIPS & NVDY. This system is built around parity across these pairs and a bottom‑up dividend cumulative reinvestment cycle. Dividends aren’t passive income — they’re recycled into the lowest positions first, compounding share growth from the ground up each and every week. On top of that, I do add outside capital twice a month, further accelerating compounding. Growth is increased share counts and portfolio balance is the objective with the priority being overall balance growth of the account. This is my strategy alone, and it works for me. So simple really and yet profitable too. I've experimented with other strategies, and this one has not failed once.
1 · Reply
jim6669jim
jim6669jim Nov. 28 at 4:36 PM
$CRSH YM announced a 10: 1 split on Dec 2.
0 · Reply
geniuscali
geniuscali Nov. 21 at 4:01 PM
$CRSH such a turn of an etf . Price barely moves when tsla drops
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Nov. 19 at 6:57 AM
$AIYY $CRSH $DIPS $FIAT https://x.com/YieldMaxETFs/status/1990848741301969131?s=20
0 · Reply
Lizette1
Lizette1 Nov. 15 at 7:44 PM
0 · Reply
BillionerOfKing
BillionerOfKing Nov. 11 at 2:34 PM
$CRSH Current Stock Price: $2.87 Contracts to trade: $5 CRSH Nov 21 2025 Call Entry: $0.03 Exit: $0.05 ROI: 70% Hold ~29 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
0 · Reply
bigdogmike
bigdogmike Nov. 5 at 10:00 PM
$CRSH .0326 this week
0 · Reply
newVerizons
newVerizons Nov. 4 at 5:07 PM
$CRSH this is a good idea! Tsla could crash BIG
0 · Reply
newVerizons
newVerizons Nov. 4 at 12:05 PM
$CRSH good idea now!! Ha
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Oct. 29 at 8:22 PM
$TSLY I would assume the inversion between $TSLY and $CRSH pricewise is basically correct, but there is no way there is any form of inversion to the dividend payouts by Yieldmax for these 2 ETFs. Not when $TSLY went up in price while its dividend payout declines and when $CRSH went down in price and its dividend payout increased. It has to be the 10/90-day avg. volume of 44M / 32M for TSLY and the 10/90-day avg. volume of 626K / 439K for CRSH. Just a tad bit of a difference there I'd say. I'd say Yieldmax also knows this and they saved a ton of money reducing the TSLY dividend by 46.45% even though the share price went up 7.76%. This is inversion at its finest hour! ;-)
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Oct. 29 at 7:12 PM
$TSLY Yieldmax stated that when they moved to these weekly dividend payouts that they would be based on how the weekly performance of each ETF went. So, the share price of $TSLY went up 7.76% this past week. Yet the dividend payment will go down -46.45% from last week from .1652 to .1128 per share. The bonds & money market investments didn't change, so it has to be the execution of their options trades for the deduction. Same question for $CRSH. The per share price dropped 6.56% over the past week, yet the dividend will rise this week to .0444 from last weeks .0398 dividend. That's an increase in the payment by 11.56%. In one case (TSLY), the share price went up but the dividend dropped. In the other case (CRSH), the share price dropped 7.21% but the dividend increased 11.56%. I just don't get how this methodology fits the mold of week to week share price movements to dividend payouts. Maybe I am simply over-analyzing this entire process. Could be. ;-)
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_66
Dragon_Trader_66 Oct. 27 at 12:45 PM
$FIAT For those out there wondering about either $FIAT or $CRSH share prices and whether they will have reverse splits soon. Here are the current rules regard those two in particular, but these rules do apply to most ETFs listed with the SEC. Regulatory Mandates & Exchange Rules • Reverse splits are not mandated by the SEC, but exchanges like Nasdaq and NYSE enforce listing standards: • If an ETF trades below $1.00 for 30 days, it receives a deficiency notice. • The issuer then has 180 days to regain compliance, often via a reverse split. • If compliance isn’t regained, a second 180-day period may be granted, but new rules restrict repeated reverse splits within a year. • TSLY, another YieldMax ETF, recently executed a 1-for-2 reverse split to maintain compliance—a precedent that FIAT and CRSH could follow if their prices deteriorate further.
2 · Reply