Dec. 4 at 11:22 PM
$LEXX Point #1: The MTA was extended so PharmaCo can review the data, yes. However that does not mean the MTA is for use of Dehydra with GLP for PharmaCo. Using AI generative information to counter my concern seems disingenuous.
This is further reinforced by how AI references the CEO's letter in point 2. AI is claiming that because Lex is focusing on GLP, and that the MTA is also mentioned, the MTA must be for that. However, this is not indicated in the CEO's letter. CEO simply mentions both facts without associating them.
Point #3 I do not even understand how that AI came up with that as no evidence indicates that the MTA was for PharmaCo to test Lex IP with GLP. That evidence doesnt exist and if it did you wouldnt be using AI to try to counter my concern that the MTA doesnt have to do with GLP1.