Grayscale Chainlink Trust [Link] (GLNK)

$27.42 -4.95 (-15.30%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 55,500
Avg Vol 30,556
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 10%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

c049356
c049356 Jul. 17 at 3:54 PM
$GLNK is this leveraged lol, or just a premium paid on exposure ? seems like way bigger moves than Van Eck's $VLNK
0 · Reply
_oracle_
_oracle_ Jul. 10 at 11:13 PM
$GLNK open up at $30?
0 · Reply
EWSage
EWSage Jul. 4 at 12:35 PM
$LINK.X $GLNK Going higher as expected!
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 25 at 11:18 AM
$GLNK $UNH $BULL guess these are the only ones to buy at this moment. Bottom play.
0 · Reply
ToadEsquireCapital
ToadEsquireCapital Jun. 20 at 7:19 PM
$GLNK why does this go up when LINK token goes down?
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 17 at 5:01 PM
$GLNK give me single digit again like 3 years ago!
0 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 16 at 3:45 PM
$GLNK accumulating this heavily.
0 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 11 at 10:06 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X $BULL told you guys. GLNK!!!
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 9 at 2:11 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X $BULL buy
1 · Reply
debbiekatz
debbiekatz May. 14 at 8:47 PM
$GLNK very nice at 22.40. posted this buy and hold stock at 14.71 for 52% gain so far.
1 · Reply
Latest News on GLNK
No data available.
c049356
c049356 Jul. 17 at 3:54 PM
$GLNK is this leveraged lol, or just a premium paid on exposure ? seems like way bigger moves than Van Eck's $VLNK
0 · Reply
_oracle_
_oracle_ Jul. 10 at 11:13 PM
$GLNK open up at $30?
0 · Reply
EWSage
EWSage Jul. 4 at 12:35 PM
$LINK.X $GLNK Going higher as expected!
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 25 at 11:18 AM
$GLNK $UNH $BULL guess these are the only ones to buy at this moment. Bottom play.
0 · Reply
ToadEsquireCapital
ToadEsquireCapital Jun. 20 at 7:19 PM
$GLNK why does this go up when LINK token goes down?
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 17 at 5:01 PM
$GLNK give me single digit again like 3 years ago!
0 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 16 at 3:45 PM
$GLNK accumulating this heavily.
0 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 11 at 10:06 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X $BULL told you guys. GLNK!!!
1 · Reply
WallGoodman
WallGoodman Jun. 9 at 2:11 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X $BULL buy
1 · Reply
debbiekatz
debbiekatz May. 14 at 8:47 PM
$GLNK very nice at 22.40. posted this buy and hold stock at 14.71 for 52% gain so far.
1 · Reply
debbiekatz
debbiekatz May. 12 at 2:15 PM
$GLNK at 20.99. keep swinging. posted 5/7 around 14.74
1 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 10 at 9:14 PM
$GLNK $BTC.X $LINK I bought at 12 dollars nobody but me bought
0 · Reply
IRed
IRed May. 9 at 1:55 PM
$GLNK Wonder if the premium will come back on this or its just gonna trade at Nav
2 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 8 at 9:51 PM
$GLNK $LINK $BTC.X I warned you all I said this etf went from 160-12 dollars I bought at 12 dollars omg do you understand how cheap I bought now it’s back to at least 140 during the pre bull run run up. I just taught you all how to make a quick 10x
0 · Reply
muskie69
muskie69 May. 8 at 3:01 PM
$GLNK Who are you fools?
0 · Reply
debbiekatz
debbiekatz May. 7 at 4:31 PM
$GLNK 14.74 watching. otc stock
1 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 7 at 2:30 PM
$LINK.X $GLNK $BTC.X trading exactly at NAV so enter a starter position
0 · Reply
IRed
IRed May. 7 at 1:40 PM
$BCHG $GXLM $GLNK "Now I understand" , that guy is an idiot.
1 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 6 at 10:57 PM
$GLNK 160-13 dollars is 95% down lol the whole time the price of $LINK.X was relatively stable $BTC.X this etf is criminal but with that said it’s got to be a buy right now
0 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 6 at 3:23 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X is there a reasonable long term price to go long? Is it 10 dollars?
1 · Reply
qubiclink
qubiclink May. 5 at 7:53 PM
$GLNK $LINK.X this is not an investable asset it was a 1 time pump and dump and its a slow rug since. Literally every altcoin has 1 pump and it’s slow rugged for life
2 · Reply