Sep. 1 at 5:22 PM
$SHOP The jurisdictional shield is gone, APES, and the desk has not repriced it:
Briskin, 9th Cir. en banc, No. 22-15815: Shopify held subject to specific personal jurisdiction in California for consumer PII practices, Apr 2025. A foreign-chartered issuer that argued it was a passive conduit now answers in a California forum on data handling.
That is not one case. That is a template every plaintiff firm in the USA now runs.
Stack Sezzle on it. D. Minn., MTD granted in part 11 May 2026 - tying dismissed without prejudice, monopolisation, attempted monopolisation and restraint of trade proceed. Two live venues, two discovery pipes into payments and privacy at once.
Twenty years implementing on this stack. My read: the legal surface widened faster than the disclosure did. Price the tail, not the GMV headline.
$CMRC $ORCL
