Market Cap 118.04M
Revenue (ttm) 920,000.00
Net Income (ttm) -30.52M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -3,317.39%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.01
Volume 124,900
Avg Vol 218,942
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 52.00M
Stochastic %K 4%
Beta 0.29
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Rafael Holdings, Inc. primarily engages in holding interests in clinical and early-stage pharmaceutical companies, and medical devices in the United States and Israel. It operates in three segments, Healthcare, Infusion Technology, and Real Estate. The company engages in the development and commercialization of therapies that exploit the metabolic differences between normal cells and cancer cells. Its lead drug candidate is Trappsol Cyclo, which is in phase 3 clinical trial being evaluated for t...

Industry: Real Estate Services
Sector: Real Estate
Phone: 212 658 1450
Address:
520 Broad Street, Newark, United States
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 11 at 11:18 AM
$RFL just a friendly remind to anyone that stumbles along this ticker. Biotechnicity makes random stuff up to fit his FUD. He is a short tool *Will be posting this daily going forward.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 11:00 PM
$RFL MIPLYFFA, according to Google AI is on the CHMP Calendar of Events for this month. The meetings will take place July 20-23. A decision will be announced shortly thereafter. I expect TRANSPORT-NPC data to be released following that adjudication but not a day before. If rejected the narrative on a primary data point miss will emphasize the importance of a “well controlled pivotal trial” [TRANSPORT-NPC is stellar in that regard] which clearly reveals the relationship between the MOA and its target in addition to working with those agencies in the construct of that registration trial. If approved, the language will emphasize the opportunity available to a therapy, Trappsol-Cyclo, that is affirmed by MIPLYFFA’s approval despite a well-controlled Phase-3 effort. Happy weekend true retail longs.
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 10:15 PM
$RFL More B.S. posted today regarding SEC disclosure rules regarding material events, unfortunately, requires my response. To be clear, yes, there is a 4-day trading window requirement regarding material events, at least, when last I checked a decade ago. Now, unless those rules have been tightened, the poster unintentionally or intentionally omitted one very important fact. The 4-day trading window requirement exists UNLESS THE COMPANY DOES NOT INFORM ANY STAKEHOLDER OF THAT EVENT AT THAT TIME OR SUBSEQUENT TO DISCLOSURE. As an example, Orphazyme chose not to disclose the Phase-3 data of two Phase-3 trials in larger populations (ALS was one) because the primary endpoint miss was so bad it would have discouraged investors and biased FDA researchers during their MIPLYFFA Phase 2/3 deliberations. This is a FACT that company operatives on this board will omit when critiquing my posts regarding waiting until CHMP decides MIPLYFFA’s fate in Europe.
1 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 9:11 PM
$RFL Biotecnicity - "Interesting strategy — redefining your predictions after the fact and calling it a win. Let's be clear on what actually happened: the trial completed successfully, the NDA pathway is confirmed for H2 2026, and the stock has run nearly 200% in a month. That's the scoreboard. As for timing the data release around CHMP's MIPLYFFA decision — that's creative narrative building, but Rafael isn't running their NDA timeline around a competitor's European committee calendar. That's not how FDA submissions work. And your 'positive if rejected' logic on the infant Adrabetadex decision is a neat trick — heads I win, tails you lose. When every outcome conveniently validates your thesis, that's not analysis, that's just storytelling. 44 followers, 2,616 ideas, and still waiting for one to land. The data is coming — and it'll do the talking for all of us. 📋"
1 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 9:00 PM
$RFL I agree with this. Pumping or FUD really doesn't matter. People don't invest based on posts from this platform, or at least they shouldn't. What will make or break this is the data. What's coming, will come one way or another. No amount of bad FUD or pumping will help the outcome. Statisically this is likely a win. Still that doesn't always equate to a win. We will see at data release. That is the only thing that matters. Binary event.
1 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 8:55 PM
$RFL This is not how it works whatsoever. Material information is required per SEC to be shared with in certain time frames with investors. Saying they are waiting for another drug is not only stupid but its just bad FUD. The clock on data lock started 6/10. The estimated timelin for this type of study for FA is about 10 weeks. We could see Topline prior to that but it is not required.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 8:33 PM
$RFL Lastly, for today, when it was stated that Thursday and Friday was THE BIG DAY : Xmas Day, I stated emphatically that would not happen unless bad data was revealed after close — which I did not expect at this time. ✔️ Right again! Again, data will likely be revealed after CHMP’s decision on MIPLYFFA because it provides a salient talking point following a primary endpoint miss no matter how that pendulum swings. FDA’s decision on Adrabetadex in the infant population will only be positive if FDA rejects it which I expect they will. 🍻🥳😉😔😂💥🚽🤣🙂🧐🥂🥳🤪😰🥶😃
0 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 7:15 PM
$RFL But here's the thing — the trial is done. We're not debating hypotheticals anymore. Results are coming. At that point, the analysis either holds up or it doesn't. No amount of preemptive FUD — sorry, Reality 😉 — changes the data."
0 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 7:14 PM
$RFL BioTechnicity - "Appreciate the clinical vocabulary — always impressive when someone can dress up speculation in enough jargon to make it sound like certainty. A few observations though: The DMC recommending continuation in a rare disease trial with a small, hard-to-enroll population isn't a red flag — it's standard protocol. If they had safety concerns or saw futility, they'd have stopped it. They didn't. Dropout rates in a 96-week rare disease trial affecting a devastating, progressive neurological condition are indeed a challenge — one the company and investigators have been managing across 27 sites in 13 countries for years. That's not a revelation, that's a known variable they built the study around. As for the hearing loss label warning — if the drug gets approved and the worst thing on the label is a hearing loss warning for a disease that currently has zero approved treatments and kills children, that's not a negative. That's called a win.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 4:23 PM
$RFL This is becoming so much fun for me. Well worth the paper losses. Still waiting for one [just one] logical counter to any statement regarding this trial I have made. 1 😂😂😂
1 · Reply
Latest News on RFL
Rafael Holdings Slides: Investor presentation

Jul 8, 2026, 7:00 AM EDT - 3 days ago

Rafael Holdings Slides: Investor presentation


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q3 2026

Jun 11, 2026, 7:45 AM EDT - 4 weeks ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q3 2026


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q3 2026

Jun 11, 2026, 7:45 AM EDT - 4 weeks ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q3 2026


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q2 2026

Mar 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT - 4 months ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q2 2026


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q2 2026

Mar 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT - 4 months ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q2 2026


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q1 2026

Dec 11, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 7 months ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q1 2026


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q1 2026

Dec 11, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 7 months ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q1 2026


Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 18, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 8 months ago

Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2025

Oct 29, 2025, 5:00 PM EDT - 9 months ago

Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2025


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q4 2025

Oct 29, 2025, 5:00 PM EDT - 9 months ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q4 2025


Rafael Holdings reports Q3 EPS (19c) vs ($1.36) last year

2025-06-11T11:05:50.000Z - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings reports Q3 EPS (19c) vs ($1.36) last year


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q3 2025

Jun 11, 2025, 7:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q3 2025


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q3 2025

Jun 11, 2025, 7:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q3 2025


Rafael Holdings Registration statement: Registration Filing

Apr 28, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Registration statement: Registration Filing


Rafael Holdings Registration statement: Registration Filing

Apr 18, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Registration statement: Registration Filing


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q2 2025

Mar 13, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q2 2025


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q2 2025

Mar 13, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q2 2025


Rafael Holdings reports Q1 EPS (37c) vs (15c) last year

2024-12-11T12:06:09.000Z - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings reports Q1 EPS (37c) vs (15c) last year


Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q1 2025

Dec 11, 2024, 7:00 AM EST - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Quarterly report: Q1 2025


Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q1 2025

Dec 11, 2024, 7:00 AM EST - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Earnings release: Q1 2025


Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 19, 2024, 7:00 AM EST - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2024

Nov 7, 2024, 7:00 AM EST - 1 year ago

Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2024


Rafael Holdings, Cyclo Therapeutics enter merger agreement

2024-08-22T10:52:19.000Z - 2 years ago

Rafael Holdings, Cyclo Therapeutics enter merger agreement

CYTH


Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 20, 2023, 7:00 AM EST - 2 years ago

Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 20, 2023, 7:00 AM EST - 2 years ago

Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2023

Oct 30, 2023, 8:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2023


Rafael Holdings announces up to $5M share repurchase program

2023-04-04T12:22:42.000Z - 3 years ago

Rafael Holdings announces up to $5M share repurchase program


Rafael Holdings reports Q1 EPS (22c) vs. ($5.88) last year

2022-12-13T12:21:32.000Z - 3 years ago

Rafael Holdings reports Q1 EPS (22c) vs. ($5.88) last year


Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 28, 2022, 7:00 AM EST - 3 years ago

Rafael Holdings Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2022

Oct 31, 2022, 8:00 AM EDT - 4 years ago

Rafael Holdings Annual report: Q4 2022


TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 11 at 11:18 AM
$RFL just a friendly remind to anyone that stumbles along this ticker. Biotechnicity makes random stuff up to fit his FUD. He is a short tool *Will be posting this daily going forward.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 11:00 PM
$RFL MIPLYFFA, according to Google AI is on the CHMP Calendar of Events for this month. The meetings will take place July 20-23. A decision will be announced shortly thereafter. I expect TRANSPORT-NPC data to be released following that adjudication but not a day before. If rejected the narrative on a primary data point miss will emphasize the importance of a “well controlled pivotal trial” [TRANSPORT-NPC is stellar in that regard] which clearly reveals the relationship between the MOA and its target in addition to working with those agencies in the construct of that registration trial. If approved, the language will emphasize the opportunity available to a therapy, Trappsol-Cyclo, that is affirmed by MIPLYFFA’s approval despite a well-controlled Phase-3 effort. Happy weekend true retail longs.
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 10:15 PM
$RFL More B.S. posted today regarding SEC disclosure rules regarding material events, unfortunately, requires my response. To be clear, yes, there is a 4-day trading window requirement regarding material events, at least, when last I checked a decade ago. Now, unless those rules have been tightened, the poster unintentionally or intentionally omitted one very important fact. The 4-day trading window requirement exists UNLESS THE COMPANY DOES NOT INFORM ANY STAKEHOLDER OF THAT EVENT AT THAT TIME OR SUBSEQUENT TO DISCLOSURE. As an example, Orphazyme chose not to disclose the Phase-3 data of two Phase-3 trials in larger populations (ALS was one) because the primary endpoint miss was so bad it would have discouraged investors and biased FDA researchers during their MIPLYFFA Phase 2/3 deliberations. This is a FACT that company operatives on this board will omit when critiquing my posts regarding waiting until CHMP decides MIPLYFFA’s fate in Europe.
1 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 9:11 PM
$RFL Biotecnicity - "Interesting strategy — redefining your predictions after the fact and calling it a win. Let's be clear on what actually happened: the trial completed successfully, the NDA pathway is confirmed for H2 2026, and the stock has run nearly 200% in a month. That's the scoreboard. As for timing the data release around CHMP's MIPLYFFA decision — that's creative narrative building, but Rafael isn't running their NDA timeline around a competitor's European committee calendar. That's not how FDA submissions work. And your 'positive if rejected' logic on the infant Adrabetadex decision is a neat trick — heads I win, tails you lose. When every outcome conveniently validates your thesis, that's not analysis, that's just storytelling. 44 followers, 2,616 ideas, and still waiting for one to land. The data is coming — and it'll do the talking for all of us. 📋"
1 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 9:00 PM
$RFL I agree with this. Pumping or FUD really doesn't matter. People don't invest based on posts from this platform, or at least they shouldn't. What will make or break this is the data. What's coming, will come one way or another. No amount of bad FUD or pumping will help the outcome. Statisically this is likely a win. Still that doesn't always equate to a win. We will see at data release. That is the only thing that matters. Binary event.
1 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 8:55 PM
$RFL This is not how it works whatsoever. Material information is required per SEC to be shared with in certain time frames with investors. Saying they are waiting for another drug is not only stupid but its just bad FUD. The clock on data lock started 6/10. The estimated timelin for this type of study for FA is about 10 weeks. We could see Topline prior to that but it is not required.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 8:33 PM
$RFL Lastly, for today, when it was stated that Thursday and Friday was THE BIG DAY : Xmas Day, I stated emphatically that would not happen unless bad data was revealed after close — which I did not expect at this time. ✔️ Right again! Again, data will likely be revealed after CHMP’s decision on MIPLYFFA because it provides a salient talking point following a primary endpoint miss no matter how that pendulum swings. FDA’s decision on Adrabetadex in the infant population will only be positive if FDA rejects it which I expect they will. 🍻🥳😉😔😂💥🚽🤣🙂🧐🥂🥳🤪😰🥶😃
0 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 7:15 PM
$RFL But here's the thing — the trial is done. We're not debating hypotheticals anymore. Results are coming. At that point, the analysis either holds up or it doesn't. No amount of preemptive FUD — sorry, Reality 😉 — changes the data."
0 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 7:14 PM
$RFL BioTechnicity - "Appreciate the clinical vocabulary — always impressive when someone can dress up speculation in enough jargon to make it sound like certainty. A few observations though: The DMC recommending continuation in a rare disease trial with a small, hard-to-enroll population isn't a red flag — it's standard protocol. If they had safety concerns or saw futility, they'd have stopped it. They didn't. Dropout rates in a 96-week rare disease trial affecting a devastating, progressive neurological condition are indeed a challenge — one the company and investigators have been managing across 27 sites in 13 countries for years. That's not a revelation, that's a known variable they built the study around. As for the hearing loss label warning — if the drug gets approved and the worst thing on the label is a hearing loss warning for a disease that currently has zero approved treatments and kills children, that's not a negative. That's called a win.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 4:23 PM
$RFL This is becoming so much fun for me. Well worth the paper losses. Still waiting for one [just one] logical counter to any statement regarding this trial I have made. 1 😂😂😂
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 4:08 PM
$RFL We’re still waiting…. Don’t be afraid to offer your first intelligent assessment. I won’t bite. Hard.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 4:04 PM
$RFL Still waiting for an intelligent response. Anyone? 😂
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 3:58 PM
$RFL This will be trading below the merger price of $1.28 (if I remember correctly) upon data release. In late 2027 on approval it will trade between $4 and $6.
0 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 3:50 PM
$RFL @Biotechnicity I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt on your back and forth posts but it's clear you are just a short spreading FUD. I never really have understood people that do this. It's a lot of energy for small returns. It's also just a crappy role to play. I have seen it on several other tickers... shorts brag about their 10 to 20k profits. While I'm bring millions home betting on the right horse. Sometimes I get it wrong but many times I don't. Again man.... just don't see the why here. It's just a much harder route for less profits.
2 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 3:39 PM
$RFL Is this what you’re trying to bury @northmark1 ? You really need to let it sink in.
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 3:31 PM
$RFL Is there any poster not affiliated in some way with this company or its financiers on this board. Or is this just another frightened (of the truth) rube?
0 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 3:26 PM
$RFL The catalyst we were watching — trial completion and topline data — is here. The stock has already made a strong move up from the $1.20 range to nearly $3.80, so some of the upside has been captured. The next major milestones are the topline results readout and the NDA submission, both expected H2 2026. Those will be the next big inflection points. The cash runway concern is real, so keep an eye on any capital raise announcements. This is not financial advice of course — but it's an exciting moment for RFL holders! 🎯
1 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 3:25 PM
$RFL The company plans to submit a New Drug Application (NDA) in the latter half of 2026, aiming to transition into a commercial-stage biotechnology firm amidst high unmet needs in the NPC market.
1 · Reply
northmark1
northmark1 Jul. 10 at 3:23 PM
$RFL Big news — and this is exactly what we were waiting for! Here's the full update: 🔬 The Big One — Phase 3 Trial Complete On June 10, 2026, Rafael Holdings announced the completion of the last patient last visit for the pivotal Phase 3 TransportNPC™ study evaluating Trappsol® Cyclo™ for the treatment of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C. That's the finish line for the trial itself. With 94 patients studied across 27 sites in 13 countries, the TransportNPC study is the most comprehensive, controlled pivotal study regarding patient size, global footprint, duration and clinical outcomes of an investigational therapy for NPC. Additionally, 10 patients were enrolled in a single-arm sub-study treating newborns to 3 years of age.
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 3:04 PM
$RFL Exaggerations on message boards are fields fertilized by bulls. It isn’t called 🐻💩 it’s 🐂💩 for a reason. 1. This study will (likely 😉) not readout stat-sig. The data monitoring committee recommends continuance primarily for this reason. In larger populations of patients such as oncology studies they often recommend adding patients in order to counterbalance an underperforming active arm or over-performing placebo. The clinical term is “increasing power.” In a rare disease setting with such a small population that simply isn’t possible. [not FUD — Reality] 2. Consequently, when results are released, they will reference cholesterol removing MOA prominently pictured in the presentation. 3. Dropouts will be a major issue. One look at how many patients remained on the earlier P1/2 study past 48-weeks is evidence of that. Decreasing study power is no way to achieve stat-sig. 4. If approved, hearing loss will likely be a warning on label. As predicted: no PR this morning. Good day
1 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 10 at 2:27 PM
$RFL Happy Christmas everyone! Courtesy of @CaseOfTheYips1
0 · Reply
TheSuper
TheSuper Jul. 10 at 1:41 PM
$RFL I know I owe some concrete posting on why. Just hard why on my trip... I cant say I wasnt getting more nervous with the price action but after some modeling and further DD I feel even better about my position. I think there is some FUD on this board.
1 · Reply