Market Cap 23.72M
Revenue (ttm) 1.08M
Net Income (ttm) -20.06M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -1,857.41%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 188,200
Avg Vol 1,832,044
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 32.92M
Stochastic %K 74%
Beta -0.57
Analysts Sell
Price Target $0.95
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 27 at 8:20 PM
$RFL Another bad sign is that the half dozen or so regular posters on the $CYTH board (OCBadger; MWT; et al) are strangely quiet or missing altogether on this one. And their comments, when made, are quite passive. Almost conciliatory. It was one thing to pump this compound and trial from $22 a share to pocket change before the acquisition burying it beneath a “real estate” holding company but, perhaps, they’ve been instructed not to do it again because a) the data is good? or b) the data is bad? Which makes more sense? Release the data before an equity raise Mr. Jonas. Not after! If that happens we know why they’re missing in action. I kinda already do.
3 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 26 at 11:07 PM
$ZVRA After FDA felt political pressure leading to Sarepta’s eteplirsen approval in which the sponsor refused to conduct a legit trial — and while in the midst of helping Orphazyme cobble together a stat-sig Phase 2/3 arimoclomol study by identifying 2-patients unresponsive to therapy and wondering where missing data from 4-patients was (SAE’s provoking the disappearance?) — they were working with $CYTH (now $RFL) on designing a study that would prove whether or not Trappsol-Cyclo was a safe & effective therapy for NPC patients. It is almost twice as large (104-patients). It is robust with well designed endpoints. And, given the problematic history of eteplirsen and arimoclomol, was unpartnered. No one believed such a study could readout stat-sig. I still don’t. But neither did FDA which simply asked for a study that could adequately demonstrate a relationship between therapy and the targeted outcome. Completely unfair to the new sponsor, Raphael! But a study embraced by FDA & EMA.
4 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 13 at 10:52 PM
$RFL Our only catalyst is CHMP’s rejection of the arimoclomol application by the end of July - September the odds of which increased after YARTEMLEA’s rejection in June. We saw a little disturbance of the topsoil in early trading today. Most everyone realizes the odds of TRANSPORT statistical success on the primaries is virtually nonexistent. The reasons are obvious. ▪️Big Pharma disinterest [evidenced by no partner] ▪️General market disinterest evidenced by the crashing share price of $CYTH from $22 to pocket change ▪️Failure to release Topline data as promised in 2025 ▪️This message board 🤣 Raphael desperately needs to shift the focus of the traditional investor to a new paradigm in rare disease studies - A well designed and executed trial in consultation with regional agencies that demonstrates an effective relationship between the MOA and targeted gene. ✔️ Arimoclomol’s rejection in the EU will reinforce that shift and be prominently featured in the TRANSPORT press release. ✔️
3 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 6 at 11:00 PM
If Google is right, it appears CEO Howard Jonas offloaded nearly 5m of his free shares in Raphael for $15M or so. Why free? In 2025 he was accredited with purchasing far more than that in $RFL during the merger with $CYTH which appeared bullish, yet, he admitted to not using his own money but, instead, using shares acquired in Cyclo Therapeutics during his “financing” of their operations which gave the appearance of bullishness. However, let’s focus on today as that’s all we have. Other explanations for his reduced stake here could be that… 1. Google made a mistake! And he still owns 19m shares. 2. The shares weren’t sold but transferred to a private party such as a family member. This wouldn’t require a S-4. 3. The shares weren’t sold but transferred to a buyer of one of his subsidiaries. If true, we could be receiving a PR about one or more of his subsidiaries being sold for in excess of the amount transferred to them in $RFL shares. Wishful thinking perhaps but possible.
2 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 2 at 2:47 PM
$RFL Allow me to dispel of few long myths on any board. #1 That CEO’s have a fiduciary responsibility to their investors. This one is so silly it makes me double over with laughter. Was it Scott Fines “fiduciary obligation” to secure a partner BEFORE running a large, phase-3 registration trial? Of course it was! Did he? No, he did not! #2 That by locking up our shares by using high limit orders, traders can’t use them to short the same stock we are long in. I do it all the time knowing full well it doesn’t matter. Naked shorting and dark pool trading suggests it’s almost as valid as big foot is real. And what about Howard’s 19.18 million shares? Are they unavailable to his Wall Street buddies? And how in the hell did he get that basket of common shares in the first place? Ah, those predatory financings of Scott Fines share printing racket known as $CYTH. Cut the crap! Put down the pom-poms and start thinking people! Still…
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 2 at 1:58 PM
$AMRN $CYTH $ZVRA I’m extremely close to closing my position here in $RFL Once the idiot longs return with their parked I.D.’s we know the hedge funds are locked and loaded to go short behind them because that’s where the money is — going short. P-3 data here is likely NOT STAT-SIG. However, as I’ve repeatedly suggested it DOESN’T HAVE TO BE. It’s not even the primary catalyst that has moved this share price sky high over the past month. I can support every facet of the above statement with TANGIBLE FACTS. Can you support the argument against that with something other than the “Beautiful Molecule” theory or the “they waited at 48-Weeks because the data was so good” nonsense/some sense theory? Please stop! Go back to sleep Cythians before the color we see today becomes the color we see everyday. I’m seeing red just responding to your passive rage.
0 · Reply
SinfulMeatStick
SinfulMeatStick Sep. 17 at 4:14 PM
$CYTH why is everyone still posting here? Cyth is now $RFL
1 · Reply
DottoreMK
DottoreMK May. 9 at 4:16 PM
0 · Reply
Miko_Vakilla
Miko_Vakilla Apr. 7 at 8:39 PM
$CYTH Form 15! $2.15 here we come. Let's go Mo!
1 · Reply
GDS_investing
GDS_investing Apr. 7 at 6:06 PM
$RFL money on the floor add here today for 5$+ $CYTH
0 · Reply
Latest News on CYTH
Cyclo Therapeutics Reports Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results

Nov 15, 2023, 8:05 AM EST - 2 years ago

Cyclo Therapeutics Reports Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results


Cyclo Therapeutics Provides Business Update

Sep 28, 2022, 2:02 PM EDT - 4 years ago

Cyclo Therapeutics Provides Business Update


Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 27 at 8:20 PM
$RFL Another bad sign is that the half dozen or so regular posters on the $CYTH board (OCBadger; MWT; et al) are strangely quiet or missing altogether on this one. And their comments, when made, are quite passive. Almost conciliatory. It was one thing to pump this compound and trial from $22 a share to pocket change before the acquisition burying it beneath a “real estate” holding company but, perhaps, they’ve been instructed not to do it again because a) the data is good? or b) the data is bad? Which makes more sense? Release the data before an equity raise Mr. Jonas. Not after! If that happens we know why they’re missing in action. I kinda already do.
3 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 26 at 11:07 PM
$ZVRA After FDA felt political pressure leading to Sarepta’s eteplirsen approval in which the sponsor refused to conduct a legit trial — and while in the midst of helping Orphazyme cobble together a stat-sig Phase 2/3 arimoclomol study by identifying 2-patients unresponsive to therapy and wondering where missing data from 4-patients was (SAE’s provoking the disappearance?) — they were working with $CYTH (now $RFL) on designing a study that would prove whether or not Trappsol-Cyclo was a safe & effective therapy for NPC patients. It is almost twice as large (104-patients). It is robust with well designed endpoints. And, given the problematic history of eteplirsen and arimoclomol, was unpartnered. No one believed such a study could readout stat-sig. I still don’t. But neither did FDA which simply asked for a study that could adequately demonstrate a relationship between therapy and the targeted outcome. Completely unfair to the new sponsor, Raphael! But a study embraced by FDA & EMA.
4 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 13 at 10:52 PM
$RFL Our only catalyst is CHMP’s rejection of the arimoclomol application by the end of July - September the odds of which increased after YARTEMLEA’s rejection in June. We saw a little disturbance of the topsoil in early trading today. Most everyone realizes the odds of TRANSPORT statistical success on the primaries is virtually nonexistent. The reasons are obvious. ▪️Big Pharma disinterest [evidenced by no partner] ▪️General market disinterest evidenced by the crashing share price of $CYTH from $22 to pocket change ▪️Failure to release Topline data as promised in 2025 ▪️This message board 🤣 Raphael desperately needs to shift the focus of the traditional investor to a new paradigm in rare disease studies - A well designed and executed trial in consultation with regional agencies that demonstrates an effective relationship between the MOA and targeted gene. ✔️ Arimoclomol’s rejection in the EU will reinforce that shift and be prominently featured in the TRANSPORT press release. ✔️
3 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 6 at 11:00 PM
If Google is right, it appears CEO Howard Jonas offloaded nearly 5m of his free shares in Raphael for $15M or so. Why free? In 2025 he was accredited with purchasing far more than that in $RFL during the merger with $CYTH which appeared bullish, yet, he admitted to not using his own money but, instead, using shares acquired in Cyclo Therapeutics during his “financing” of their operations which gave the appearance of bullishness. However, let’s focus on today as that’s all we have. Other explanations for his reduced stake here could be that… 1. Google made a mistake! And he still owns 19m shares. 2. The shares weren’t sold but transferred to a private party such as a family member. This wouldn’t require a S-4. 3. The shares weren’t sold but transferred to a buyer of one of his subsidiaries. If true, we could be receiving a PR about one or more of his subsidiaries being sold for in excess of the amount transferred to them in $RFL shares. Wishful thinking perhaps but possible.
2 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 2 at 2:47 PM
$RFL Allow me to dispel of few long myths on any board. #1 That CEO’s have a fiduciary responsibility to their investors. This one is so silly it makes me double over with laughter. Was it Scott Fines “fiduciary obligation” to secure a partner BEFORE running a large, phase-3 registration trial? Of course it was! Did he? No, he did not! #2 That by locking up our shares by using high limit orders, traders can’t use them to short the same stock we are long in. I do it all the time knowing full well it doesn’t matter. Naked shorting and dark pool trading suggests it’s almost as valid as big foot is real. And what about Howard’s 19.18 million shares? Are they unavailable to his Wall Street buddies? And how in the hell did he get that basket of common shares in the first place? Ah, those predatory financings of Scott Fines share printing racket known as $CYTH. Cut the crap! Put down the pom-poms and start thinking people! Still…
0 · Reply
Biotechnicity
Biotechnicity Jul. 2 at 1:58 PM
$AMRN $CYTH $ZVRA I’m extremely close to closing my position here in $RFL Once the idiot longs return with their parked I.D.’s we know the hedge funds are locked and loaded to go short behind them because that’s where the money is — going short. P-3 data here is likely NOT STAT-SIG. However, as I’ve repeatedly suggested it DOESN’T HAVE TO BE. It’s not even the primary catalyst that has moved this share price sky high over the past month. I can support every facet of the above statement with TANGIBLE FACTS. Can you support the argument against that with something other than the “Beautiful Molecule” theory or the “they waited at 48-Weeks because the data was so good” nonsense/some sense theory? Please stop! Go back to sleep Cythians before the color we see today becomes the color we see everyday. I’m seeing red just responding to your passive rage.
0 · Reply
SinfulMeatStick
SinfulMeatStick Sep. 17 at 4:14 PM
$CYTH why is everyone still posting here? Cyth is now $RFL
1 · Reply
DottoreMK
DottoreMK May. 9 at 4:16 PM
0 · Reply
Miko_Vakilla
Miko_Vakilla Apr. 7 at 8:39 PM
$CYTH Form 15! $2.15 here we come. Let's go Mo!
1 · Reply
GDS_investing
GDS_investing Apr. 7 at 6:06 PM
$RFL money on the floor add here today for 5$+ $CYTH
0 · Reply
StreetSlap
StreetSlap Apr. 6 at 7:03 AM
$ANVS $CYTH $CEIN $IMUX $PTPI Lol Nah...great retail hunters, great scammers, but Maria just set the bar to a new low 🐍💃🏻
1 · Reply
ForestFoxes
ForestFoxes Apr. 6 at 12:27 AM
$ANVS $CYTH $CEIN $IMUX $PTPI @StreetSlap🤯 ⁿᵒ ʷᵃʸ ... 🤨 ᵃʳᵉ ʸᵒᵘ ᵗᵉˡˡᶦⁿᵍ ᵐᵉ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ᵗʰᵒˢᵉ ᶜᴱᴼˢ ... ᵃˡˢᵒ ʰᵉˡᵈ ᵃ ᴾᵃᵗᶦᵉⁿᵗˢ' ᴸᶦᵛᵉ ᶠᵒʳᵘᵐ and, told patients and their families to "BUY Stock!" and "That's the ONLY out of it!" 💔 Did those other CEOs also use fiery language in their chat with patients and families with references to Hell repeated??? 🔥🐍😈🔥
1 · Reply
StreetSlap
StreetSlap Apr. 5 at 9:56 PM
$ANVS Golden rule ! Saw that so many times...$CYTH (Scott Fine) $CEIN (James Doris) $IMUX (Daniel Vitt) $PTPI (Fady Boctor) just to name a few
0 · Reply