Barrick Mining Corp B

$39.69 +0.43 (1.10%)

Valuation

Market cap
71,316,160,000
Revenue TTM
$16,956,000,000
Net income TTM
$4,993,000,000
PE ratio
12.77
Forward PE
10.90
Profit margin
29.45%
Debt to equity
0.13

Trading

Volume
8,234,803
Avg volume
8,497,308
Day's range
$38.87 – $39.73
Shares out
1,645,884,000
Stochastic %K
58%
Beta
0.51
Analysts
Strong Sell
Price target
$52.00

Price

Company profile

Barrick Mining Corporation engages in the exploration, development, production, and sale of mineral properties. It explores for gold, copper, silver, and energy materials. The company was formerly known as Barrick Gold Corporation and changed its name to Barrick Mining Corporation in May 2025. Barrick Mining Corporation was founded in 1983 and is based in Toronto, Canada.

Industry
Gold
Sector
Basic Materials
Phone
416 861 9911
Website
https://www.barrick.com
Address
Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower, Suite 3700 161 Bay Street, Toronto, Canada

Latest news

Stocktwits

DidYouReadThis Oct 29, 1:17 PM
$BRK.B $CVX $B $AAPL
3 replies
FatDuck3 Oct 29, 5:38 AM
$GLD $JNUG $B $SLV $GDX After the midterms it will be chaotic for many reasons The U.S. has told several Gulf Arab countries to be prepared for a short, intense military campaign after the U.S. midterm elections, people briefed on the conversations said… Trump hasn’t decided to go ahead but is leaning toward a large postelection attack that could target Iranian infrastructure and nuclear sites, people familiar with his thinking said. Day 243 on the war with Iran & cost is at $47 billion
0 replies
np_stocks Oct 28, 8:20 PM
$B back to $50+
0 replies
FatDuck3 Oct 28, 7:09 PM
$SLV $JNUG $B $GLD $GDX Those credit default swaps costs are melting up for a reason Despite the significant investments ploughed into artificial intelligence it has provided “zero payoff” to corporate America outside of technology, according to Apollo's Chief Economist Torsten Slok “Mainstream corporate America is pulling back and starting to view token spending not as a source of growth but as a cost center that weighs on margins,” Slok said. MIT study last year found ~95% of companies were getting no measurable return on gen AI despite $30-40B spent. Take a look at those CDS & check on the prices - CoreWeave: The cost of insuring against a default on its debt has surged to more than 11% a yr. That signals serious concern among investors about the company’s ability to manage its debt - Oracle: Its 5-yr debt-insurance cost rose to 3.22%, more than double the 1.44% recorded at the start of 2026. Investors are becoming much more concerned about its credit risk More in replies
4 replies
FatDuck3 Oct 28, 6:09 PM
$JNUG $GLD $SLV $B $GDX Reality: This is will eventually be the 1's who get left "high & dry" when this all gets played out. About 70%‼️: The share of federal debt held by private investors, including hedge funds, banks & mutual funds, according to the report. That share is near its highest level since 1990. Foreign investors are adding less U.S. govt debt & as central banks bring more & more of their physical GOLD home. This is occurring, de-dollarization govts, businesses & investors reduce their reliance on the dollar more broadly in trade, reserves & international finance. The liabilities are becoming greater & greater, soon too great to simple dismiss financially The article describes a meaningful change in how the U.S. finances its govt debt. Traditional foreign buyers, particularly in Asia, are purchasing substantially less than a yr earlier, while private investors are playing a LARGER role. Remember what Ken Griffin explained a few yrs back? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-28/us-friendly-nations-slash-treasury-purchases-by-60-led-by-asia
0 replies
FatDuck3 Oct 28, 5:08 PM
$SLV $GLD $JNUG $B $GDX Sept. U.S. trade deficit in goods was $134.9 billion, September 2026 appears to be the highest September goods trade deficit on RECORD. Trump's central trade-policy promises was that his tariffs would reduce the U.S. trade deficit but again its going in the wrong direction & for US consumers it means higher prices called by decreased PURCHASING POWER so that $5K Trump "bonus" is will be diminished by the time folks ever receive the check & check IS A STIMULUS The international trade deficit was $134.9 billion in September, up $2.8 billion from $132.1 billion in August. Exports of goods for September were $209.2 billion, $5.3 billion more than August exports. Imports of goods for September were $344.1 billion, $8.1 billion more than August imports. 2025 - $82.7 billion trade deficit & 63% higher then 2026 2024 - $108.2 billion trade deficit & 25% higher then 2026 2023- $85.8 billion trade deficit & 57% higher then 2026 https://www.census.gov/econ/indicators/current/index.html
1 replies
rsmracks Oct 28, 11:12 AM
$B $SBSW $CDE $GDX $GDXJ Even with higher input costs, miners are going to shine. Miners remain undervalued and the disconnect won’t last forever. I’m still looking forward to Q3 and Q4 earnings within the entire sector. https://x.com/tavicosta/status/2115286795026124988?s=46
1 replies
FatDuck3 Oct 27, 11:45 PM
$GLD $B $SLV $JNUG $GDX ❌UBS RAISES BRENT CRUDE FORECAST TO $110 A BARREL FOR YEAR END❌ Higher prices may be here to stay. W/oil prices for 2027 hovering $100 a barrel, we could be facing even higher costs for gas, groceries, electricity, shipping & everyday goods—putting even more pressure on American families. Meanwhile, the AI boom is driving huge demand for electricity, copper, power lines & other essential infrastructure. The world still depends on the physical things needed to keep everything running. The crisis around the Strait of Hormuz is also exposing how vulnerable global energy supplies can be, pushing countries to find more reliable sources of power. This may be more than a temporary spike in oil prices. It could mean higher inflation & much tighter household budgets for a lot longer than anyone suspected. @ an October 14 rally in Bullhead City, Arizona, Trump said: “Our country is making more money than it’s ever made because of the fact that oil is so high.”
1 replies