Market Cap 39.60M
Revenue (ttm) 39.35M
Net Income (ttm) -24.53M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -62.34%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.03
Volume 249,400
Avg Vol 282,620
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 56.34M
Stochastic %K 54%
Beta 2.11
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target $10.00

Company Profile

Kartoon Studios Inc., a content and brand management company, creates, produces, licenses, and broadcasts educational and multimedia animated content for children in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and internationally. It operates through two segments: Content Production and Distribution; and Media Advisory and Advertising Services. The company offers SuperKitties Season 2, a computer-generated animation shows for disney junior; Cocomelon that provides 3D animation videos of tradi...

Industry: Entertainment
Sector: Communication Services
Phone: 310 273 4222
Fax: 310 273 4202
Address:
190 North Canon Drive, 4th Floor, Beverly Hills, United States
Salvadors_poppy
Salvadors_poppy Apr. 25 at 7:01 PM
$TOON Everything hinges on the success of wtp… if they screw this one up …….
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:42 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 You say volume doesn’t show intent, but in trading, money IS intent. Moving 1.1M shares isn't 'storytelling,' it’s the market absorbing the hand-off. ​You talk about the 'cost of dilution' like it’s a Greek tragedy, but I’ll take a 7% float increase any day if it wipes out $1.4M in debt and secures solvency. You call it a 'shift in value,' I call it strategic balance sheet cleanup. ​As for the AI chirp... if the comment stung, maybe it’s because your bot failed to detect that my confidence doesn't come from 'stories,' but from loading at $0.53, well below your new $0.57 'reference price'. On Monday the price will talk. While you stick to your capitulation theory, I’ll stick to my plan: loading more if we touch the floor the creditors already validated. Enjoy your weekend, 'professor'! 😎📉
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:36 PM
$TOON @crs1 You call me naive, but you’re ignoring the facts: a company that wipes out $1.4M in debt and sets a conversion floor at $0.57 is in a much stronger position today than it was yesterday. ​You’re talking about Andy’s reputation from five years ago; I’m talking about the balance sheet today. If being 'naive' means understanding that solvency is the prerequisite for growth, then I’ll take my naivety over your resentment any day. It bothers you that I’m not panic-selling because you know if that $0.60 support holds, your 'bankruptcy' narrative falls apart. ​While you’re making moral judgments, I’m trading based on debt structure. See you Monday let’s see if your 'reality' can handle the technical support. 💎🚀
1 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 3:33 PM
$TOON “‘Institutional absorption’ based on one day of 1.1M volume? That’s not analysis—that’s storytelling. You’re treating volume like proof of smart money, when it could just as easily be exit liquidity. Volume tells you activity, not intent. And thanks for finally saying it plainly: 2.5M new shares. That’s the part you keep minimizing. You keep calling it ‘7%’ like that makes it small—but dilution isn’t judged by a label, it’s judged by impact on ownership and future supply. More shares outstanding = more overhead to clear. That’s just reality. Also, ‘$0.57 support’ because of a conversion price? That’s not how markets work. Creditors accepting shares at that level doesn’t obligate buyers to defend it—it just tells you where stock was issued. Balance sheet improved, sure. But you didn’t create value—you shifted it from creditors to shareholders. And the AI chirp? Weak deflection. If the argument was strong, you wouldn’t need to lean on that.
1 · Reply
crs1
crs1 Apr. 25 at 3:27 PM
$TOON this guy below is the living breathing definition of naive. Reality smacks him in the face and he tells you that's not what happened. "Andy is just being smart". This is what this crook does, he does not know how to make money, he lives on credit and other people's accomplishments. He is unqualified to be CEO of a publicly traded company. He has a responsibility to make investors money and he has not done that in half a decade at the very least. VVV
0 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:15 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 I see your AI worked overtime on that 'TED Talk' about the float, but you still don’t get the basics. You call my 7% rounding 'Olympic-level,' but the math is simple: issuing 2.5M shares to kill $1.4M in debt is a strategic move, not a magic trick. ​You criticize me for using AI, but your reply is so bot-structured I can almost see the code. Does it bother you that my 'essays' have more logic than your fears? You say liquidity isn't proof, but the market doesn't push 1.1M in volume just for fun; that was institutional absorption whether you like it or not. ​Keep analyzing the 'cost' of dilution while I enjoy a company with a clean balance sheet. On Monday, we’ll see if your bot-analysis survives the reality check at the $0.57 support. Nice try sounding smart, but it’s obvious who uses technology to understand and who uses it to try and scare others! 🚀💎
1 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 2:59 PM
$TOON “‘Step zero: solvency’ — agreed. Now let’s try step one: who paid for it. Calling it ‘7% dilution’ is doing some Olympic-level rounding. $1.4M converted at ~$0.57 isn’t a footnote — it’s a meaningful increase in float, whether you dress it up or not. And no, it doesn’t ‘set a floor.’ It sets a reference price for creditors, not a guarantee for the market. If anything, it tells you exactly where supply can come from. ‘Liquidity = accumulation’ is another leap. Liquidity just means shares changed hands — it doesn’t tell you who’s buying vs who’s exiting. That’s narrative, not proof. Balance sheet improved? Sure. But pretending dilution has no cost is like saying a loan is free because your monthly payment went down. Also… the AI line is funny coming from someone writing essays about ‘conjunctions’ and emojis like it’s a TED Talk. End of the day: You removed debt by issuing shares. That’s fine. It’s common. But it’s not bullish magic — it’s a trade-off.
0 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 2:53 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 @AmarKap I see you guys teamed up to be my editors this weekend. Did you share the same AI prompt to see who could sound more condescending? 😂 ​Pelkie, you say I stopped at step one, but you’re skipping step zero: solvency. I’d take a 7% dilution that sets a floor at $0.57 over the company burning its cash to pay off old debts any day. You call the 1.1M volume 'liquidity' for exit, but you forget that same liquidity is what allows big players to build positions while you're busy staring at a dictionary. ​While (yes, AmarKap, 'while' again 😉) you guys analyze my conjunctions and my 6th-grade math, I’m analyzing how a debt-free company becomes a much hotter acquisition target. Keep using your bots to draft personal attacks; I’ll use Monday to watch the market absorb those shares. See you on the floor, not in grammar class! 🚀💎
0 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 2:44 PM
$TOON “‘Experts can’t do math’ — says the guy who stopped at step one 😂 Yeah, $0.57 conversion. Cool. Now finish the equation: more shares = less ownership. You didn’t find a ‘floor’ — you found the price creditors were willing to dump risk at. Calling dilution ‘free balance sheet cleanup’ is wild. Nothing was free — shareholders paid the bill, you just don’t want to admit it. And that ‘big players absorbing’ line? That’s the oldest bagholder cope in the book. One day of volume isn’t accumulation — it’s liquidity. If this was bullish, they’d raise at a premium. Instead they printed shares to survive. But yeah… keep flexing 6th grade math while ignoring the part that nukes your own position.” 📉🪦
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 10:50 AM
$TOON @AmarKap You criticize my 'eloquence' and love accusing others of using AI, but your replies look like they were pulled straight from a ChatGPT manual for frustrated bears. Is AI only okay when you use it to draft your sermons about 'slicing the pie'? 😂 ​Call my load a 'wheelbarrow' if you want, but averaging down at the $0.57 floor is real trading, not cheap literature. I’d rather buy shares in a company that just wiped $1.4M in debt off its books than sit around like you watching the rest of us trade. ​You claim to prefer companies that 'grow the pie,' but you seem to forget that to grow the pie, you first have to stop owing the baker for the flour. See you Monday; keep polishing your AI-generated lines while I keep polishing my gains at support. 🚀💎
1 · Reply
Latest News on TOON
Kartoon Studios Provides Business Update

Mar 31, 2026, 8:51 AM EDT - 25 days ago

Kartoon Studios Provides Business Update


Kartoon Studios Earnings Call Transcript: Q4 2024

Mar 31, 2025, 7:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Kartoon Studios Earnings Call Transcript: Q4 2024


Kartoon Channel! Growth Surges

Jul 11, 2024, 9:15 AM EDT - 1 year ago

Kartoon Channel! Growth Surges


Kartoon Studios Unveils ‘Gadget A.I.'

Apr 16, 2024, 9:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

Kartoon Studios Unveils ‘Gadget A.I.'


Kartoon Studios Launches “Stan Lee Presents” on YouTube

Apr 10, 2024, 11:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

Kartoon Studios Launches “Stan Lee Presents” on YouTube


Kartoon Studios Announces Kartoon Films

Jul 13, 2023, 9:15 AM EDT - 3 years ago

Kartoon Studios Announces Kartoon Films


Kartoon Studios Earnings Call Transcript: Q2 2022

Aug 17, 2022, 7:00 AM EDT - 4 years ago

Kartoon Studios Earnings Call Transcript: Q2 2022


Kartoon Studios Transcript: M&A Announcement

Oct 27, 2021, 10:30 AM EDT - 4 years ago

Kartoon Studios Transcript: M&A Announcement


Salvadors_poppy
Salvadors_poppy Apr. 25 at 7:01 PM
$TOON Everything hinges on the success of wtp… if they screw this one up …….
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:42 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 You say volume doesn’t show intent, but in trading, money IS intent. Moving 1.1M shares isn't 'storytelling,' it’s the market absorbing the hand-off. ​You talk about the 'cost of dilution' like it’s a Greek tragedy, but I’ll take a 7% float increase any day if it wipes out $1.4M in debt and secures solvency. You call it a 'shift in value,' I call it strategic balance sheet cleanup. ​As for the AI chirp... if the comment stung, maybe it’s because your bot failed to detect that my confidence doesn't come from 'stories,' but from loading at $0.53, well below your new $0.57 'reference price'. On Monday the price will talk. While you stick to your capitulation theory, I’ll stick to my plan: loading more if we touch the floor the creditors already validated. Enjoy your weekend, 'professor'! 😎📉
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:36 PM
$TOON @crs1 You call me naive, but you’re ignoring the facts: a company that wipes out $1.4M in debt and sets a conversion floor at $0.57 is in a much stronger position today than it was yesterday. ​You’re talking about Andy’s reputation from five years ago; I’m talking about the balance sheet today. If being 'naive' means understanding that solvency is the prerequisite for growth, then I’ll take my naivety over your resentment any day. It bothers you that I’m not panic-selling because you know if that $0.60 support holds, your 'bankruptcy' narrative falls apart. ​While you’re making moral judgments, I’m trading based on debt structure. See you Monday let’s see if your 'reality' can handle the technical support. 💎🚀
1 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 3:33 PM
$TOON “‘Institutional absorption’ based on one day of 1.1M volume? That’s not analysis—that’s storytelling. You’re treating volume like proof of smart money, when it could just as easily be exit liquidity. Volume tells you activity, not intent. And thanks for finally saying it plainly: 2.5M new shares. That’s the part you keep minimizing. You keep calling it ‘7%’ like that makes it small—but dilution isn’t judged by a label, it’s judged by impact on ownership and future supply. More shares outstanding = more overhead to clear. That’s just reality. Also, ‘$0.57 support’ because of a conversion price? That’s not how markets work. Creditors accepting shares at that level doesn’t obligate buyers to defend it—it just tells you where stock was issued. Balance sheet improved, sure. But you didn’t create value—you shifted it from creditors to shareholders. And the AI chirp? Weak deflection. If the argument was strong, you wouldn’t need to lean on that.
1 · Reply
crs1
crs1 Apr. 25 at 3:27 PM
$TOON this guy below is the living breathing definition of naive. Reality smacks him in the face and he tells you that's not what happened. "Andy is just being smart". This is what this crook does, he does not know how to make money, he lives on credit and other people's accomplishments. He is unqualified to be CEO of a publicly traded company. He has a responsibility to make investors money and he has not done that in half a decade at the very least. VVV
0 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 3:15 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 I see your AI worked overtime on that 'TED Talk' about the float, but you still don’t get the basics. You call my 7% rounding 'Olympic-level,' but the math is simple: issuing 2.5M shares to kill $1.4M in debt is a strategic move, not a magic trick. ​You criticize me for using AI, but your reply is so bot-structured I can almost see the code. Does it bother you that my 'essays' have more logic than your fears? You say liquidity isn't proof, but the market doesn't push 1.1M in volume just for fun; that was institutional absorption whether you like it or not. ​Keep analyzing the 'cost' of dilution while I enjoy a company with a clean balance sheet. On Monday, we’ll see if your bot-analysis survives the reality check at the $0.57 support. Nice try sounding smart, but it’s obvious who uses technology to understand and who uses it to try and scare others! 🚀💎
1 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 2:59 PM
$TOON “‘Step zero: solvency’ — agreed. Now let’s try step one: who paid for it. Calling it ‘7% dilution’ is doing some Olympic-level rounding. $1.4M converted at ~$0.57 isn’t a footnote — it’s a meaningful increase in float, whether you dress it up or not. And no, it doesn’t ‘set a floor.’ It sets a reference price for creditors, not a guarantee for the market. If anything, it tells you exactly where supply can come from. ‘Liquidity = accumulation’ is another leap. Liquidity just means shares changed hands — it doesn’t tell you who’s buying vs who’s exiting. That’s narrative, not proof. Balance sheet improved? Sure. But pretending dilution has no cost is like saying a loan is free because your monthly payment went down. Also… the AI line is funny coming from someone writing essays about ‘conjunctions’ and emojis like it’s a TED Talk. End of the day: You removed debt by issuing shares. That’s fine. It’s common. But it’s not bullish magic — it’s a trade-off.
0 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 2:53 PM
$TOON @pelkie85 @AmarKap I see you guys teamed up to be my editors this weekend. Did you share the same AI prompt to see who could sound more condescending? 😂 ​Pelkie, you say I stopped at step one, but you’re skipping step zero: solvency. I’d take a 7% dilution that sets a floor at $0.57 over the company burning its cash to pay off old debts any day. You call the 1.1M volume 'liquidity' for exit, but you forget that same liquidity is what allows big players to build positions while you're busy staring at a dictionary. ​While (yes, AmarKap, 'while' again 😉) you guys analyze my conjunctions and my 6th-grade math, I’m analyzing how a debt-free company becomes a much hotter acquisition target. Keep using your bots to draft personal attacks; I’ll use Monday to watch the market absorb those shares. See you on the floor, not in grammar class! 🚀💎
0 · Reply
pelkie85
pelkie85 Apr. 25 at 2:44 PM
$TOON “‘Experts can’t do math’ — says the guy who stopped at step one 😂 Yeah, $0.57 conversion. Cool. Now finish the equation: more shares = less ownership. You didn’t find a ‘floor’ — you found the price creditors were willing to dump risk at. Calling dilution ‘free balance sheet cleanup’ is wild. Nothing was free — shareholders paid the bill, you just don’t want to admit it. And that ‘big players absorbing’ line? That’s the oldest bagholder cope in the book. One day of volume isn’t accumulation — it’s liquidity. If this was bullish, they’d raise at a premium. Instead they printed shares to survive. But yeah… keep flexing 6th grade math while ignoring the part that nukes your own position.” 📉🪦
1 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 10:50 AM
$TOON @AmarKap You criticize my 'eloquence' and love accusing others of using AI, but your replies look like they were pulled straight from a ChatGPT manual for frustrated bears. Is AI only okay when you use it to draft your sermons about 'slicing the pie'? 😂 ​Call my load a 'wheelbarrow' if you want, but averaging down at the $0.57 floor is real trading, not cheap literature. I’d rather buy shares in a company that just wiped $1.4M in debt off its books than sit around like you watching the rest of us trade. ​You claim to prefer companies that 'grow the pie,' but you seem to forget that to grow the pie, you first have to stop owing the baker for the flour. See you Monday; keep polishing your AI-generated lines while I keep polishing my gains at support. 🚀💎
1 · Reply
AmarKap
AmarKap Apr. 25 at 8:13 AM
$TOON Looks like you were wrong about this huh @WarriorBill? The price never got to 80 cents did it Mr. We-All-Knew?? 😂😂
1 · Reply
AmarKap
AmarKap Apr. 25 at 7:37 AM
$TOON This guy is so full of himself…”we all knew” he says…prove it old timer…show me post after post of people here who knew it was coming in April 2026 and capped at 80ish cents…and that $1.3m or whatever DEBT was soon going to get repaid using diluted shares. Did you post about it recently or were you too engaged with your AI friend? Tell us o wise @WarriorBill …when is the next event…what will be the pumped price be, the capped amount and when will it be executed? You should know as it isn’t Rocket Science…
0 · Reply
focafoca99
focafoca99 Apr. 25 at 5:59 AM
$TOON filed a new 8-k https://www.rapidticker.com/news/toon-sec-filing-cd9752
0 · Reply
neimuso
neimuso Apr. 25 at 5:46 AM
$TOON I see a lot of 'experts' crying about dilution while failing basic math. Let’s look at the actual filing: The agreement specifies 1.75 shares for every $1 of debt. ​Do the math: $1 / 1.75 = $0.5714 per share. ​This isn't a 'dump'; it’s a debt-clearing move where the creditor (CCI) accepted shares at a valuation of $0.57 to wipe out $1.4M in liabilities. That price is nearly identical to my original load at $0.53. ​While you guys are busy writing comedy scripts and screaming about Andy, the company just built a concrete floor at $0.57 and cleaned its balance sheet for free. Yesterday’s 1.1M volume already showed that the big players are absorbing the noise. ​Keep your 'doom and gloom' stories for the weekend. On Monday, when the market finishes swallowing these shares and the debt is gone, we’ll see who actually knows how to read an 8-K and who’s just here for the 'entertainment.' My position is protected; yours is just noise. 💎🚀
2 · Reply
AmarKap
AmarKap Apr. 25 at 3:13 AM
$TOON So Andy/TOON still broke AF. Can't even pay their bills. But Andy can take almost 3/4 of million-dollar salary a year. F*ck this company and their useless CEO. Even Captain Nemo bailed it seems. I don't see any of his posts today.
1 · Reply
crs1
crs1 Apr. 25 at 2:11 AM
$TOON Hey new orange fish avatar guy, are you paying attention yet? This how a corrupt CEO works - announces this new dilution late on a Friday.. He's a dishonest chickensh*t con man. Kartoon Studios To Issue 2,553,047 Shares To Continuation Capital To Settle $1,143,884 And $315,000 Debts Kartoon Studios, Inc. (the "Company") entered into an Agreement (the "Agreement") with Continuation Capital, Inc. ("CCI") wherein the Company agreed t... Apr 24, 2026, 4:06 PM ET
0 · Reply
WarriorBill
WarriorBill Apr. 24 at 11:33 PM
$TOON huh? Your AI malfunctioned. They got paid a 75% premium to take shares over cash, not $1.75 per share.
1 · Reply
Dumb_trader01
Dumb_trader01 Apr. 24 at 10:54 PM
$TOON What? "Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. The information set forth under Item 1.01 above of this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.02. The Shares will be issued at a rate of 1.75 shares per dollar of the Company’s obligation, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act." Debtors agreed to be paid at $1.75 per share while sp is below $.80 when this agreement took place? Scumbag AH is some master scam artist lol
0 · Reply
Blueberry76
Blueberry76 Apr. 24 at 10:21 PM
$TOON When do they report earnings?
1 · Reply
Waco4505
Waco4505 Apr. 24 at 9:19 PM
$TOON same old same old with this garbage. More dilution. Hope everyone sold before the bell
0 · Reply
Salvadors_poppy
Salvadors_poppy Apr. 24 at 8:09 PM
$TOON More Dilution…
1 · Reply
WarriorBill
WarriorBill Apr. 24 at 7:46 PM
$TOON instead of crying about TOON share your successes elsewhere, I'll start SMH. I know most of the folks here have great portfolios outside of Andy, lets start the weekend right looking st our wins.
1 · Reply