Dec. 1 at 11:30 PM
$RLMLF Reposted Hotcopper…
‘These are very good results — genuinely strong for an early-stage gold discovery.
Not average at all.
Here’s why:
1. Extremely long, continuous intercepts
In gold exploration, anything like 50–100m of continuous mineralisation is normally considered impressive.
RML is reporting:
197.5m @ 1.26 g/t HH-GG25-001C
253m @ 1.50 g/t HH-GG25-003C
265m @ 0.60 g/t HH-GG25-002C
240.8m @ 0.64 g/t HH-GG25-004C
283.5m @ 0.36 g/t HH-GG25-005C
207.2m @ 0.42 g/t HH-GG25-007C
These are outstanding for intrusion-related systems. Many gold deposits are economic at ~0.5 g/t if near-surface and bulk mineable. RML’s results are:
Near surface
Very long widths
Many ending in mineralisation (open at depth)
Spread over 600m of strike already
In this style of system, width + continuity matter more than spiky high-grade.
2. Presence of higher-grade “shoots”
Inside the broad zones, you also have:
111.9m @ 2.31 g/t
18.3m @ 3.98 g/t
Peak sample 5.91 g/t
3. Open in all directions’