Market Cap 366.44M
Revenue (ttm) 1.38M
Net Income (ttm) -83.78M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -6,071.01%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 2,719,200
Avg Vol 3,410,578
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 1.55B
Stochastic %K 44%
Beta -0.84
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target $2.00

Company Profile

Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company, focuses on developing personalized immune therapies for cancer. The company develops DCVax, a platform technology that uses activated dendritic cells to mobilize a patient's own immune system to attack cancer. Its lead product candidate is the DCVax-L, which has completed Phase III clinical trials to treat Glioblastoma multiforme brain cancer. The company also develops DCVax-Direct, that has completed Phase I clinical trials to treat inop...

Industry: Biotechnology
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 240 497 9024
Address:
4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 800, Bethesda, United States
Donnahue
Donnahue Dec. 14 at 6:06 AM
$NWBO https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/529104/eleventh-circuit-decision-in-george-v-griffin-case-no-24-13718-may-require-supreme-court-review-and-raises-questions-about-equal-application-of-federal-rules-to-large-financial-institutions
0 · Reply
sonar2stock
sonar2stock Dec. 14 at 5:57 AM
$NWBO I had won on $700 on two scratch off tickets, I hope I can get more in time, my credit union won't let me do wire transfers.
0 · Reply
RecklessRob1
RecklessRob1 Dec. 14 at 4:16 AM
$NWBO some might be shaking in their boots looking at the stock action and price wondering where there money has gone. Personally, I couldn’t care less after 4 years, 300K+ shares, and 50% average loss. This is more than an investment to me. This is the path towards the cure to cancer. Everything from management, and I mean everything (outside delays of course), coming from NWBO is positive. Nobody really knows what’s brewing in the background due to the quiet PR period, but the guidance in the SEC filings are quite informative. I know my investment is secure and I’m not finished buying. I’m here for the long haul… 🫡
2 · Reply
Jjscans
Jjscans Dec. 14 at 2:58 AM
0 · Reply
Jjscans
Jjscans Dec. 14 at 2:58 AM
0 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 14 at 2:50 AM
$NWBO Endless content flooding with long AI-generated manifesto's!
0 · Reply
TalonKarrde
TalonKarrde Dec. 14 at 2:39 AM
$NWBO 🧬 When Immune Instruction Fails — and How Dendritic Cells Decide Cancer Outcomes An $NWBO #DCVax Story About Immune Instruction For the past decade, cancer immunotherapy has largely been described as a story of force. Release inhibitory checkpoints. Redirect cytotoxic cells. Engineer immune effectors and allow them to attack. That story is not incorrect. It is incomplete. There is an upstream event that determines whether any of those downstream interventions can work at all. It is the moment when the immune system decides whether a threat warrants action, what kind of response should follow, and whether that response will be sustained long enough to matter. That moment is immune instruction. This essay explains immune instruction using the clearest possible evidence: human disease. It begins with a fact that surprises even many clinicians. There is a cancer in which the immune system’s teacher becomes the disease itself. Understanding that cancer makes modern immunotherapy intelligible in a way no abstract model can. And this is why it matters for dendritic-cell platforms such as $NWBO’s DCVax. Not because this argument depends on any single product, but because it clarifies, at a biological level, what dendritic-cell therapies are actually restoring. They are not simply stimulating immunity. They are re-establishing the control layer that determines whether immunity can be reliably executed. 👉 https://x.com/andrewcaravello/status/2000030959710724473?s=46
0 · Reply
TulipTree
TulipTree Dec. 14 at 2:14 AM
$NWBO @TalonKarrde You ask “Who am I” and 🥁🥁🥁You are shortvix1980 — Got it 😏
1 · Reply
pepinjax
pepinjax Dec. 14 at 1:19 AM
1 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:40 PM
$NWBO The same pattern, just dressed up as “thought leadership” instead of hype. It’s more polished, more subtle, but it’s still AI-assisted narrative construction designed to sound like regulatory, clinical, and strategic inevitability.
1 · Reply
Latest News on NWBO
No data available.
Donnahue
Donnahue Dec. 14 at 6:06 AM
$NWBO https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/529104/eleventh-circuit-decision-in-george-v-griffin-case-no-24-13718-may-require-supreme-court-review-and-raises-questions-about-equal-application-of-federal-rules-to-large-financial-institutions
0 · Reply
sonar2stock
sonar2stock Dec. 14 at 5:57 AM
$NWBO I had won on $700 on two scratch off tickets, I hope I can get more in time, my credit union won't let me do wire transfers.
0 · Reply
RecklessRob1
RecklessRob1 Dec. 14 at 4:16 AM
$NWBO some might be shaking in their boots looking at the stock action and price wondering where there money has gone. Personally, I couldn’t care less after 4 years, 300K+ shares, and 50% average loss. This is more than an investment to me. This is the path towards the cure to cancer. Everything from management, and I mean everything (outside delays of course), coming from NWBO is positive. Nobody really knows what’s brewing in the background due to the quiet PR period, but the guidance in the SEC filings are quite informative. I know my investment is secure and I’m not finished buying. I’m here for the long haul… 🫡
2 · Reply
Jjscans
Jjscans Dec. 14 at 2:58 AM
0 · Reply
Jjscans
Jjscans Dec. 14 at 2:58 AM
0 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 14 at 2:50 AM
$NWBO Endless content flooding with long AI-generated manifesto's!
0 · Reply
TalonKarrde
TalonKarrde Dec. 14 at 2:39 AM
$NWBO 🧬 When Immune Instruction Fails — and How Dendritic Cells Decide Cancer Outcomes An $NWBO #DCVax Story About Immune Instruction For the past decade, cancer immunotherapy has largely been described as a story of force. Release inhibitory checkpoints. Redirect cytotoxic cells. Engineer immune effectors and allow them to attack. That story is not incorrect. It is incomplete. There is an upstream event that determines whether any of those downstream interventions can work at all. It is the moment when the immune system decides whether a threat warrants action, what kind of response should follow, and whether that response will be sustained long enough to matter. That moment is immune instruction. This essay explains immune instruction using the clearest possible evidence: human disease. It begins with a fact that surprises even many clinicians. There is a cancer in which the immune system’s teacher becomes the disease itself. Understanding that cancer makes modern immunotherapy intelligible in a way no abstract model can. And this is why it matters for dendritic-cell platforms such as $NWBO’s DCVax. Not because this argument depends on any single product, but because it clarifies, at a biological level, what dendritic-cell therapies are actually restoring. They are not simply stimulating immunity. They are re-establishing the control layer that determines whether immunity can be reliably executed. 👉 https://x.com/andrewcaravello/status/2000030959710724473?s=46
0 · Reply
TulipTree
TulipTree Dec. 14 at 2:14 AM
$NWBO @TalonKarrde You ask “Who am I” and 🥁🥁🥁You are shortvix1980 — Got it 😏
1 · Reply
pepinjax
pepinjax Dec. 14 at 1:19 AM
1 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:40 PM
$NWBO The same pattern, just dressed up as “thought leadership” instead of hype. It’s more polished, more subtle, but it’s still AI-assisted narrative construction designed to sound like regulatory, clinical, and strategic inevitability.
1 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:33 PM
$NWBO 4. The misuse of IL-12 rhetoric IL-12 is being used as a magic word. In reality: High IL-12 is double-edged Neurotoxicity risk in CNS contexts is real Regulatory agencies are extremely cautious Many IL-12 programs historically failed due to toxicity The post presents IL-12 as if it were an unambiguous good: “the key cytokine that drives T-cell activation” That is textbook-level oversimplification, not [clinical] reality. 5. The red flags that scream “AI pump content” Hallmarks include: Grandiose claims without data (“never before achieved in medicine”) Excessive emoji usage Long narrative arcs (“awakening the immune system”) Mixing grant-funded academic work with a certain company or companies Treating abstracts as outcomes Confident future tense (“will present”, “connects to”) No effect sizes, no confidence intervals, no caveats Real scientists do not write like this.
1 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:31 PM
$NWBO Calling this: “one of the most significant immunotherapy milestones ever recorded” is pure hype, not science. At SNO, abstracts like this are presented every year — most do not translate into durable clinical benefit. 3. The DCVax conflation is scientifically wrong The post claims: “the same immune engine that powers both DCVax-L and DCVax-Direct” This is false for a lot of reasons: DCVax-L Tumor-lysate loaded Peripheral administration Different maturation protocol No intrathecal delivery No IL-12 release testing at infusion DCVax-Direct Intratumoral injection Distinct biological intent Still not equivalent to aDC1/cDC1 intrathecal delivery aDC1/cDC1 trials Defined Type-1 polarization Measured IL-12 competence Different antigen logic Different route (CSF) Different regulatory framework Shared conceptual biology but not a shared clinical product. This is like claiming CAR-T is TIL is bispecific antibodies because they all involve T cells.
0 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:30 PM
$NWBO 1. The core tactic: lineage laundering This post is doing lineage laundering — taking a legitimate academic aDC1/cDC1 intrathecal trial and rhetorically attaching it to NWBO/DCVax branding without evidence of: shared manufacturing shared protocols shared regulatory filings shared clinical data shared IP implementation in the trial itself Key warning sign: “In Bosch’s DCVax terminology, these are the ‘teacher cells’ — the same immune engine that powers both DCVax-L and DCVax-Direct.” This is not a scientific statement. It is marketing language. There is no such thing as “Bosch’s DCVax terminology” in immunology. 2. What is actually true (and limited) Yes: aDC1/cDC1 biology exists Kalinski-type maturation cocktails are real Intrathecal DC delivery for LMD is innovative Early safety and immune readouts are scientifically interesting But critically: First-in-human Small N No survival data No comparator No clinical efficacy claims possible
1 · Reply
None_
None_ Dec. 13 at 10:28 PM
$NWBO Interesting early academic work in intrathecal dendritic cell delivery for LMD. However, this is a first-in-human safety/immune-activation study with no survival data and no demonstrated clinical efficacy. There is no evidence that this trial uses DCVax-L or DCVax-Direct manufacturing, protocols, or regulatory submissions, and equating academic aDC1 biology with commercial DCVax products is not [scientifically] justified. Promising biology is not a validated therapy!
0 · Reply
Pennywarehouse
Pennywarehouse Dec. 13 at 9:21 PM
0 · Reply
Kevintmoney
Kevintmoney Dec. 13 at 9:04 PM
$NWBO Good afternoon, pay attention to "MIST" on Monday. They drew down the stock Friday, halted it after hours until AH closed, then released FDA approval when no one can buy!!! Thats the way to do it ladies and gentlemen. I do not have a position, just paying attention and hoping all their Shorts are squirming all weekend!!
2 · Reply
yensid
yensid Dec. 13 at 8:38 PM
3 · Reply
pepinjax
pepinjax Dec. 13 at 7:31 PM
0 · Reply
psushakes
psushakes Dec. 13 at 5:59 PM
$NWBO yet again….what’s an extension of your life worth?
2 · Reply
Bajamike
Bajamike Dec. 13 at 5:59 PM
$NWBO Some may get it others well ? https://x.com/search?q=%24nwbo&src=recent_search_click&f=live#:~:text=Andrew%20Caravello%2C%20DO,and%20regulatory%20evidence.
0 · Reply
TalonKarrde
TalonKarrde Dec. 13 at 5:26 PM
$NWBO DCVax® Murcidencel: When the Generic Name Is the Platform ➡️ https://x.com/andrewcaravello/status/1999890825459765298?s=46
0 · Reply
Bajamike
Bajamike Dec. 13 at 5:07 PM
$NWBO Just another day Closer GLTA
0 · Reply