Market Cap 46.76M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -58.77M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 14,596
Avg Vol 46,180
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 18.70M
Stochastic %K 47%
Beta 0.48
Analysts Strong Sell
Price Target $20.50

Company Profile

Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage ophthalmology biotech company, engages in developing therapies for the treatment of neovascular retinal diseases. Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. was formerly known as Theia Therapeutics, Inc. and changed its name to Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. in May 2024. The company was incorporated in 2019 and is based in Palo Alto, California.

Industry: Biotechnology
Sector: Healthcare
Address:
628 Middlefield Road, Palo Alto, United States
stockanalysis_
stockanalysis_ Jun. 25 at 11:04 PM
After Hours Losers: $RVPH $UK $OLLI $ZVSA $KLRS View the entire list here: https://stockanalysis.com/markets/afterhours/?ref=saveontrading
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:31 PM
$KLRS realistic re-rating scenario for KLRS: Stock re-rates from ~$2.50 to $6–10 on strong data. Market cap could jump to $300M$500M, still conservative vs comps. Room to grow further as Phase 2 progresses or partnership/M&A interest emerges.
1 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:29 PM
$KLRS | Company | Program | Stage | Peak Valuation | Key Result Driver | | **Kodiak (KOD)** | KSI-301 | Phase 1b | **\$4B** | Strong durability + early fluid reduction | | **Regenxbio** | RGX-314 | Phase 2 | \$2.5B+ | Gene therapy for AMD with early signal | | **Outlook Thera** | ONS-5010 | Pre-Phase 3 | \$700M+ | Repurposed Avastin with regulatory path | Implication: If TH103 shows durability >12 weeks with comparable CST fluid reduction to aflibercept, it could easily support a $500M$1.5B valuation, based on historical comps. Markets often price in 25–50% of the total rNPV after strong Phase 1 data → that’s $100M$150M uplift in market cap, or $5$8/share upside (vs. KLRS ~$2.50/share today). In 2020, Kodiak Sciences (KOD) went from ~$500M to $3B+ market cap after Phase 1b durability data. Similar upside occurred for Regenxbio when suprachoroidal delivery of RGX-314 entered trials.
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:05 PM
$KLRS Category Estimate Data Timing Mid-Nov to late Dec 2025 (Q4) Readout Content Safety, PK/PD, retinal thickness changes Success Indicators Safe at 5–10mg, ≥8-week intraocular half-life, fluid reduction via OCT Primary “Success” Criteria: (80%-85% chance) Clean safety profile No dose-limiting toxicities or serious intraocular inflammation. Well tolerated at doses ≥5–10 mg. Clear, prolonged PK signal Drug persists in the eye significantly longer than aflibercept or ranibizumab (e.g., ≥8–10 weeks of measurable presence). Retinal fluid reduction A measurable drop in central subfield thickness (CST) in ≥50% of patients at therapeutic doses. Ideally, show effect lasting beyond 8 weeks from a single injection. Evidence of dose-response
1 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 2:55 PM
$KLRS Simplified Risk-Adjusted NPV (rNPV) Scenario Peak Sales Probability NPV (12.5% DR, $M) Risk-Adjusted Base case $750M 22% ~$950M $209M High case (Vabysmo-level uptake) $1.5B 10% ~$1.5B $150M Low case (limited data) $250M 30% ~$250M $75M Blended rNPV range: $150M$225M, or ~$8–12/share fully diluted. Compare that to KLRS’s current EV (negative) and stock price (~$2.50), and you’re looking at an asymmetric upside trade.
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 20 at 5:26 PM
$KLRS Did some quick analysis on TH-103 % chances for positve data through approval Clinical Milestone Probability Ladder for TH103 Stage Industry Base Rate (Biologics - Ophthalmology) Adjusted Probability (TH103) Key Risk Factors Phase 1 Safety/PK ~70–75% 80–85% Fully human, receptor trap; low immunogenicity risk; good class safety. Phase 1B Efficacy Signal ~55–60% 60–70% Unproven in humans, but strong preclinical VEGF suppression and retention. Phase 1/2 Combined ~50–55% 55–65% Signal must show durable VEGF inhibition and at least parity to aflibercept. Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept ~40–45% 50–55% Human data must support extended durability and vision outcomes. Phase 3 Pivotal ~65–70% (if it gets here) 70–75% Established regulatory pathway and efficacy bar; clear benefit needed. FDA Approval ~85–90% (for Phase 3-completed biologics) 85–90% If Phase 3 succeeds, path to approval is fairly reliable.
2 · Reply
stockanalysis_
stockanalysis_ Jun. 25 at 11:04 PM
After Hours Losers: $RVPH $UK $OLLI $ZVSA $KLRS View the entire list here: https://stockanalysis.com/markets/afterhours/?ref=saveontrading
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:31 PM
$KLRS realistic re-rating scenario for KLRS: Stock re-rates from ~$2.50 to $6–10 on strong data. Market cap could jump to $300M$500M, still conservative vs comps. Room to grow further as Phase 2 progresses or partnership/M&A interest emerges.
1 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:29 PM
$KLRS | Company | Program | Stage | Peak Valuation | Key Result Driver | | **Kodiak (KOD)** | KSI-301 | Phase 1b | **\$4B** | Strong durability + early fluid reduction | | **Regenxbio** | RGX-314 | Phase 2 | \$2.5B+ | Gene therapy for AMD with early signal | | **Outlook Thera** | ONS-5010 | Pre-Phase 3 | \$700M+ | Repurposed Avastin with regulatory path | Implication: If TH103 shows durability >12 weeks with comparable CST fluid reduction to aflibercept, it could easily support a $500M$1.5B valuation, based on historical comps. Markets often price in 25–50% of the total rNPV after strong Phase 1 data → that’s $100M$150M uplift in market cap, or $5$8/share upside (vs. KLRS ~$2.50/share today). In 2020, Kodiak Sciences (KOD) went from ~$500M to $3B+ market cap after Phase 1b durability data. Similar upside occurred for Regenxbio when suprachoroidal delivery of RGX-314 entered trials.
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 3:05 PM
$KLRS Category Estimate Data Timing Mid-Nov to late Dec 2025 (Q4) Readout Content Safety, PK/PD, retinal thickness changes Success Indicators Safe at 5–10mg, ≥8-week intraocular half-life, fluid reduction via OCT Primary “Success” Criteria: (80%-85% chance) Clean safety profile No dose-limiting toxicities or serious intraocular inflammation. Well tolerated at doses ≥5–10 mg. Clear, prolonged PK signal Drug persists in the eye significantly longer than aflibercept or ranibizumab (e.g., ≥8–10 weeks of measurable presence). Retinal fluid reduction A measurable drop in central subfield thickness (CST) in ≥50% of patients at therapeutic doses. Ideally, show effect lasting beyond 8 weeks from a single injection. Evidence of dose-response
1 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 23 at 2:55 PM
$KLRS Simplified Risk-Adjusted NPV (rNPV) Scenario Peak Sales Probability NPV (12.5% DR, $M) Risk-Adjusted Base case $750M 22% ~$950M $209M High case (Vabysmo-level uptake) $1.5B 10% ~$1.5B $150M Low case (limited data) $250M 30% ~$250M $75M Blended rNPV range: $150M$225M, or ~$8–12/share fully diluted. Compare that to KLRS’s current EV (negative) and stock price (~$2.50), and you’re looking at an asymmetric upside trade.
0 · Reply
WallStArb
WallStArb Jun. 20 at 5:26 PM
$KLRS Did some quick analysis on TH-103 % chances for positve data through approval Clinical Milestone Probability Ladder for TH103 Stage Industry Base Rate (Biologics - Ophthalmology) Adjusted Probability (TH103) Key Risk Factors Phase 1 Safety/PK ~70–75% 80–85% Fully human, receptor trap; low immunogenicity risk; good class safety. Phase 1B Efficacy Signal ~55–60% 60–70% Unproven in humans, but strong preclinical VEGF suppression and retention. Phase 1/2 Combined ~50–55% 55–65% Signal must show durable VEGF inhibition and at least parity to aflibercept. Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept ~40–45% 50–55% Human data must support extended durability and vision outcomes. Phase 3 Pivotal ~65–70% (if it gets here) 70–75% Established regulatory pathway and efficacy bar; clear benefit needed. FDA Approval ~85–90% (for Phase 3-completed biologics) 85–90% If Phase 3 succeeds, path to approval is fairly reliable.
2 · Reply