Market Cap 23.42M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -16.27M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 599,700
Avg Vol 1,997,810
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 60.07M
Stochastic %K 70%
Beta 3.57
Analysts Sell
Price Target $2.90

Company Profile

Intensity Therapeutics, Inc., a late-stage clinical biotechnology company, engages in the provision of treatment for the regional and systemic nature of cancer in the United States. Its lead product candidate includes INT230-6, which is in Phase 3 clinical studies for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma; and neoadjuvant and metastatic triple negative breast cancer which is in Phase 2 clinical trials. The company was incorporated in 2012 and is headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut.

Industry: Biotechnology
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 203 221 7381
Fax: 203 557 3023
Address:
1 Enterprise Drive, Suite 430, Shelton, United States
SBEEE
SBEEE Feb. 10 at 8:17 PM
$INTS same old pattern. Another day another post.
1 · Reply
longjohntrader
longjohntrader Feb. 10 at 7:45 PM
$INTS it's time to move...look at 0.39
0 · Reply
Atrain1189
Atrain1189 Feb. 10 at 6:39 PM
$INTS truly expecting this to be $1+ by end of March. It’s going to happen fast and may even retrace down to the $1 region before another moon mission
1 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 2:51 PM
$INTS Using very cautious math: $1B peak sales × 3 = $3B valuation $2B peak sales × 4 = $8B valuation And that’s just sarcoma, not breast cancer or platform expansion. Why sarcoma matters more than TNBC here TNBC: bigger market more competition combo-dependent Sarcoma: orphan fewer competitors monotherapy OS endpoint exclusivity pricing power Sarcoma is the foundation approval that unlocks everything else. Important reality check (so you stay grounded) This value only materialises if: Phase 3 shows statistically significant OS benefit Safety remains clean Payers accept pricing (very likely in orphan oncology) But even at 10–20% probability, the implied value is still massive relative to today. An FDA-approved orphan sarcoma drug treating even a fraction of 25,000 patients could justify multi-billion-dollar valuation — before considering breast cancer or platform expansion.
1 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 2:48 PM
$INTS hey claw hows these apples Typical orphan oncology pricing Approved orphan oncology drugs usually price at: $120K$250K per patient per year Often higher if: no alternatives survival benefit specialist-administered Let’s take a very conservative number: 👉 $150,000 per patient Revenue math (conservative) 25,000 patients × $150,000 = $3.75 BILLION per year That’s not fantasy — that’s normal orphan oncology economics. Even if uptake is slower 10,000 patients → $1.5B/year 5,000 patients → $750M/year Still enormous for a company INTS’ size. Market exclusivity multiplier With Orphan Drug exclusivity: 7 years protected in the US Plus patents, EU orphan protection, etc. Even discounting heavily: $1B/year × 7 years = $7B gross protected revenue window That’s why big pharma pays up before approval. What that means for valuation (rough rule of thumb) Biotech M&A and approvals often value oncology assets at: 3–6× peak sales (conservative) Or NPV of future cash flows
0 · Reply
MoneyClaw
MoneyClaw Feb. 10 at 2:46 PM
$INTS simple bull trap last few days. Some investors saw it but most ignored the signs.
0 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 1:56 PM
0 · Reply
Jdhunter819
Jdhunter819 Feb. 10 at 12:50 PM
0 · Reply
lamMBD
lamMBD Feb. 10 at 7:49 AM
$INTS seth your blocked! Just joined in December 2025! Lolol
0 · Reply
sethic
sethic Feb. 10 at 1:59 AM
$INTS im still bullish on INTS ya'll but be aware there is no evidence m&a is in works or even being considered in 6-12 month timeframe. most likely we r seeing covering and some buying reacting to overall market sentiment this week. careful going long or averaging down. this could be a bull trap.
1 · Reply
Latest News on INTS
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Pricing of Public Offering

Jun 11, 2025, 11:46 PM EDT - 8 months ago

Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Pricing of Public Offering


SBEEE
SBEEE Feb. 10 at 8:17 PM
$INTS same old pattern. Another day another post.
1 · Reply
longjohntrader
longjohntrader Feb. 10 at 7:45 PM
$INTS it's time to move...look at 0.39
0 · Reply
Atrain1189
Atrain1189 Feb. 10 at 6:39 PM
$INTS truly expecting this to be $1+ by end of March. It’s going to happen fast and may even retrace down to the $1 region before another moon mission
1 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 2:51 PM
$INTS Using very cautious math: $1B peak sales × 3 = $3B valuation $2B peak sales × 4 = $8B valuation And that’s just sarcoma, not breast cancer or platform expansion. Why sarcoma matters more than TNBC here TNBC: bigger market more competition combo-dependent Sarcoma: orphan fewer competitors monotherapy OS endpoint exclusivity pricing power Sarcoma is the foundation approval that unlocks everything else. Important reality check (so you stay grounded) This value only materialises if: Phase 3 shows statistically significant OS benefit Safety remains clean Payers accept pricing (very likely in orphan oncology) But even at 10–20% probability, the implied value is still massive relative to today. An FDA-approved orphan sarcoma drug treating even a fraction of 25,000 patients could justify multi-billion-dollar valuation — before considering breast cancer or platform expansion.
1 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 2:48 PM
$INTS hey claw hows these apples Typical orphan oncology pricing Approved orphan oncology drugs usually price at: $120K$250K per patient per year Often higher if: no alternatives survival benefit specialist-administered Let’s take a very conservative number: 👉 $150,000 per patient Revenue math (conservative) 25,000 patients × $150,000 = $3.75 BILLION per year That’s not fantasy — that’s normal orphan oncology economics. Even if uptake is slower 10,000 patients → $1.5B/year 5,000 patients → $750M/year Still enormous for a company INTS’ size. Market exclusivity multiplier With Orphan Drug exclusivity: 7 years protected in the US Plus patents, EU orphan protection, etc. Even discounting heavily: $1B/year × 7 years = $7B gross protected revenue window That’s why big pharma pays up before approval. What that means for valuation (rough rule of thumb) Biotech M&A and approvals often value oncology assets at: 3–6× peak sales (conservative) Or NPV of future cash flows
0 · Reply
MoneyClaw
MoneyClaw Feb. 10 at 2:46 PM
$INTS simple bull trap last few days. Some investors saw it but most ignored the signs.
0 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 10 at 1:56 PM
0 · Reply
Jdhunter819
Jdhunter819 Feb. 10 at 12:50 PM
0 · Reply
lamMBD
lamMBD Feb. 10 at 7:49 AM
$INTS seth your blocked! Just joined in December 2025! Lolol
0 · Reply
sethic
sethic Feb. 10 at 1:59 AM
$INTS im still bullish on INTS ya'll but be aware there is no evidence m&a is in works or even being considered in 6-12 month timeframe. most likely we r seeing covering and some buying reacting to overall market sentiment this week. careful going long or averaging down. this could be a bull trap.
1 · Reply
KTWRXY
KTWRXY Feb. 10 at 12:08 AM
$INTS will ints hit .50 this week?
0 · Reply
longjohntrader
longjohntrader Feb. 9 at 9:32 PM
$INTS x 10 in a month
1 · Reply
longjohntrader
longjohntrader Feb. 9 at 8:07 PM
$INTS it'time...today close 0.399
0 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 9 at 7:25 PM
$INTS Another thing I found is due to this data we know we had one pcr and too very close pcrs just using purely ints 6 Hmm
0 · Reply
lamMBD
lamMBD Feb. 9 at 4:38 PM
$INTS All just my opinion of course. I believe since we did not see any form 4's filed over the last couple of days, we are on the verge of some major news dropping very soon. Just once again my .38 cents!
0 · Reply
lamMBD
lamMBD Feb. 9 at 4:04 PM
$INTS Anyone not adding at these levels and are able to, gonna be kicking themselves real hard, very soon! Just my .375 cents! Lol..MBD
0 · Reply
ATGer
ATGer Feb. 9 at 3:59 PM
$INTS Another strong day. Moneyclaw found seething
1 · Reply
Eric1072
Eric1072 Feb. 9 at 3:40 PM
$INTS BUYERS crawling back in ... slowly but steady.
0 · Reply
RocketRetailer
RocketRetailer Feb. 9 at 3:29 PM
$INTS Industrial technology or services; performance tied to capex cycles.
0 · Reply
joel12365
joel12365 Feb. 8 at 11:21 PM
$INTS Lemme just share this
1 · Reply
DrAC99
DrAC99 Feb. 8 at 3:11 PM
$INTS Monday mover?? 👀
1 · Reply
IggieKooppa
IggieKooppa Feb. 7 at 5:30 PM
$INTS Q1 update por favor
1 · Reply