Market Cap 0.00
Revenue (ttm) 3.82M
Net Income (ttm) -3.91M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -102.36%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 14,257,808
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 0.00
Stochastic %K 0%
Beta -0.80
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target $0.16

Company Profile

Blue Sphere Corporation operates as a developer and independent power producer in the clean energy production and waste to energy markets. The company focuses on projects related to the acquisition, construction, and development of biogas facilities in the United States, Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Israel. It also focuses on soil amendments, compost, and other by-products. The company was formerly known as Jin Jie Corp. and changed its name to Blue Sphere Corporation in Febru...

Industry: Utilities - Renewable
Sector: Utilities
Phone: 704-909-2806
Address:
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor, Charlotte, United States
CHillDaddy
CHillDaddy Apr. 6 at 5:12 PM
0 · Reply
catapeed
catapeed Apr. 3 at 3:31 PM
$BLSP One of my favorites....
1 · Reply
AB31
AB31 Apr. 3 at 3:25 AM
$BLSP Welp Ray blocked me again… Dude literally unblocked me, got hit with facts about his fairytales and years of pumping, then couldn’t handle it and ran straight back to the block button. At this point it’s obvious he’s just pumping and hoping no one questions it. The second you bring receipts, he folds. All hype until someone calls him out.. typical coward.
3 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Apr. 1 at 10:36 PM
$BLSP This answers the post below. Catapeed and I had a lengthy exchange, and he realized that we are talking about 2 different scenarios. So in a flailing effort, he decided to make an OP to "scare" everyone. Here are the facts: You’re mixing up the old operating company with the Nevada shell. The $56M liabilities belonged to the dissolved subsidiaries — the Delaware receiver already separated those years ago. The public shell has no active debt, no officers, no board, no claimants. Nevada custodianships for abandoned shells aren’t the $200K contested cases you’re describing. BLSP is uncontested and debt‑free — the exact low‑cost category under NRS 78.347. Reimbursement doesn’t come from “existing assets.” It comes after reinstatement through new capital, merger funding, or sale of the shell — which is how every Nevada revival works. Your examples (Spotlight, GOFF) involved active companies with insiders and disputes. BLSP is a clean, abandoned shell. Different universe entirely.
1 · Reply
catapeed
catapeed Apr. 1 at 9:53 PM
$BLSP Reality Check for BLSP Shareholders Some argue a Nevada custodianship under NRS 78.347 lets shareholders revive a defunct corporation and get reimbursed for costs. Here’s the math: BLSP reported liabilities: ~$56M BLSP assets/cash: ~$0 Typical custodianship costs for a small abandoned company: Court & filing fees: $400$1,000 Attorney fees: $25K$100K (can go $200K+ if contested) Admin, corporate filings, mailing: $3K$12K Total realistic shareholder out-of-pocket:35k –$200K+ Bottom line: Even if the law allows “reimbursement,” a company with no assets cannot pay anyone. All expenses come from shareholders’ pockets, and there’s no guarantee the revived company will generate revenue — past examples like Spotlight Innovation and GOFF Corp. show that revival often means paperwork compliance, not business turnaround.K
0 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Apr. 1 at 8:42 PM
0 · Reply
MerDeNoms
MerDeNoms Mar. 31 at 9:53 PM
$BLSP this shit is still here?! Lol. Wow. And people still imagining breaking even huh...
2 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 30 at 9:26 PM
$BLSP (my reply to his comment below, for those who Rayster has blocked) Rayster knows a lot about waste-to-energy but is a novice when it cimes to abandonment issues. He can continue to focus on the "failure" aspect, which he is totally accurate on. But unless he knows the legal background for abandonment cases, he really is not the right person to give advice on it. The right person to comment on such cases is a securities attorney, and we have one.
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 30 at 7:34 PM
0 · Reply
Rayster
Rayster Mar. 30 at 2:13 PM
$BLSP 808 continues to post and believe that somehow BLPS will now be taken over by a company and that the current BLSP shareholders will be benefited by this takeover. As an old business guy, this one of the more NUTTY posts he has come up with, and he has come some really KOOKY posts. Many of folks that were on this channel have long since fled as all of LL808 posted plans turned out exactly as I as well as a few others indicted they would, as in COMPLETE FAILURE. LL808 was a prolific pumper after he saw the truth. BLSP failed. Bad Bplan shitty leadership, no money and poor execution. It happens all the time, in fact more businesses fail than survive. Capitalism separates the "Wheat from the Chaff" pretty quickly. It is savage.
3 · Reply
Latest News on BLSP
No data available.
CHillDaddy
CHillDaddy Apr. 6 at 5:12 PM
0 · Reply
catapeed
catapeed Apr. 3 at 3:31 PM
$BLSP One of my favorites....
1 · Reply
AB31
AB31 Apr. 3 at 3:25 AM
$BLSP Welp Ray blocked me again… Dude literally unblocked me, got hit with facts about his fairytales and years of pumping, then couldn’t handle it and ran straight back to the block button. At this point it’s obvious he’s just pumping and hoping no one questions it. The second you bring receipts, he folds. All hype until someone calls him out.. typical coward.
3 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Apr. 1 at 10:36 PM
$BLSP This answers the post below. Catapeed and I had a lengthy exchange, and he realized that we are talking about 2 different scenarios. So in a flailing effort, he decided to make an OP to "scare" everyone. Here are the facts: You’re mixing up the old operating company with the Nevada shell. The $56M liabilities belonged to the dissolved subsidiaries — the Delaware receiver already separated those years ago. The public shell has no active debt, no officers, no board, no claimants. Nevada custodianships for abandoned shells aren’t the $200K contested cases you’re describing. BLSP is uncontested and debt‑free — the exact low‑cost category under NRS 78.347. Reimbursement doesn’t come from “existing assets.” It comes after reinstatement through new capital, merger funding, or sale of the shell — which is how every Nevada revival works. Your examples (Spotlight, GOFF) involved active companies with insiders and disputes. BLSP is a clean, abandoned shell. Different universe entirely.
1 · Reply
catapeed
catapeed Apr. 1 at 9:53 PM
$BLSP Reality Check for BLSP Shareholders Some argue a Nevada custodianship under NRS 78.347 lets shareholders revive a defunct corporation and get reimbursed for costs. Here’s the math: BLSP reported liabilities: ~$56M BLSP assets/cash: ~$0 Typical custodianship costs for a small abandoned company: Court & filing fees: $400$1,000 Attorney fees: $25K$100K (can go $200K+ if contested) Admin, corporate filings, mailing: $3K$12K Total realistic shareholder out-of-pocket:35k –$200K+ Bottom line: Even if the law allows “reimbursement,” a company with no assets cannot pay anyone. All expenses come from shareholders’ pockets, and there’s no guarantee the revived company will generate revenue — past examples like Spotlight Innovation and GOFF Corp. show that revival often means paperwork compliance, not business turnaround.K
0 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Apr. 1 at 8:42 PM
0 · Reply
MerDeNoms
MerDeNoms Mar. 31 at 9:53 PM
$BLSP this shit is still here?! Lol. Wow. And people still imagining breaking even huh...
2 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 30 at 9:26 PM
$BLSP (my reply to his comment below, for those who Rayster has blocked) Rayster knows a lot about waste-to-energy but is a novice when it cimes to abandonment issues. He can continue to focus on the "failure" aspect, which he is totally accurate on. But unless he knows the legal background for abandonment cases, he really is not the right person to give advice on it. The right person to comment on such cases is a securities attorney, and we have one.
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 30 at 7:34 PM
0 · Reply
Rayster
Rayster Mar. 30 at 2:13 PM
$BLSP 808 continues to post and believe that somehow BLPS will now be taken over by a company and that the current BLSP shareholders will be benefited by this takeover. As an old business guy, this one of the more NUTTY posts he has come up with, and he has come some really KOOKY posts. Many of folks that were on this channel have long since fled as all of LL808 posted plans turned out exactly as I as well as a few others indicted they would, as in COMPLETE FAILURE. LL808 was a prolific pumper after he saw the truth. BLSP failed. Bad Bplan shitty leadership, no money and poor execution. It happens all the time, in fact more businesses fail than survive. Capitalism separates the "Wheat from the Chaff" pretty quickly. It is savage.
3 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 29 at 2:42 AM
$BLSP I have updated both Rayster and AB31 on what's been happening. Let's see if they might want to begin a wholesome dialogue on behalf of everyone else out there. Any difference between me and Rayster & AB31 has been over past back-and-forth posts, each with a valid goal in mind: mine, to keep shareholders united; Rayster/AB31, to pronounce BLSP as dead and buried. I think we both had valid objectives, and we have all been here for years. Rayster and AB31 were right about BLSP, and yet our unity has opened up doors that were never open before. Let's see where our dialogue goes from here. We have put up a good "fight" -- now it's time for shareholders to have the final say . . .
1 · Reply
Rayster
Rayster Mar. 29 at 12:36 AM
$BLSP ...LL808 continues to post worthless information. BLSP is dead, the ticker is dead. How can anyone make all of this shit up. They guy needs to take a break. Damn this a good hobby.
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 28 at 11:44 PM
$BLSP For total clarity, here has been our 5-year timeline: 2022: 300 DRS to force BLSP to file reports -– they ignored us 2023: Reporting BLSP to SEC -– we were waiting for action . . . 2024: Prassas cases (long-term focus) + SEC action, but in 2024 the SEC was directed to stop all action involving procedural (filing) violations, so we were dealt a serious blow 2025: Waiting for Prassas progress (very slow because of Leonite -- Delaware case will start mid-2026) 2026: abandonment BREAKTHROUGH case ! Why is the abandonment case so strong: #1: because we have such a strong shareholder unity Thank you for your continued support ! It may soon pay off ! ! !
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 28 at 7:06 AM
$BLSP It's funny that we are all trying to make the best of a rare opportunity, and then there are people who just can't handle what we are doing. I don't want to block anyone, but I say this as I assume that there is no animosity meant in anything we are trying to do. Those who don't want to follow our efforts are welcome to go elsewhere. I think Rayster has held a justifiable grudge against the waste-to-energy industry, as he seems to have had bad experiences in the past. And I sympathize with his sentiments and feel that he is justified in his resentment. But then there are some who have no moral compass and are just in it for ego. I think you know who this is. All he can do is troll, and it's so clear. Rayster is a person I could have a long talk with because he makes sense. He is bitter, but had we not found a way to maker this turn out, we would all be bitter. But what's up with people who are self-inflated and cannot converse on a level of integrity?
3 · Reply
AB31
AB31 Mar. 28 at 6:46 AM
$BLSP This guy is a straight lying coward!! What about calling it a “mega company”, telling people to buy to push the price up, using the court case as a reason not to sell. Then there’s the “phoenix rising” the “rainbow” all the talk about hidden assets and then it was “too big to fail” 😂 That’s not analysis. That’s hype. You can deny it, but the pattern is obvious, you’ve been promoting it the whole time.. take accountability. Here’s an example..
0 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 28 at 5:44 AM
$BLSP Based on the verified OS timeline and Nevada law, approximately 9.06B shares appear likely to be invalidated. There is a detailed analytical report confirming this (available by request) . . .
0 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 28 at 5:09 AM
$BLSP Authorized Shares: 14,000,000,000 03/23/2026 Outstanding Shares: 9,778,744,881 03/23/2026 Float: 721,240,325 12/31/2018 Do you realize what this means ? ! ! ! It speaks VOLUMES about why we have such a strong case ! ! !
0 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 28 at 3:08 AM
$BLSP It's funny how some people begrudge me for trying to keep us shareholders in unity so that we could pursue the malfeasance by BLSP execs. They would rather that we folded our cards and conceded that we were screwed. But we have turned the tables on BLSP execs and also on the "bears" by showing that perseverance can pay off. So for those who say that BLSP was a sucker-stock, I can beat that: They were not even licensed. So everything we bought was not even legal to begin with. And that is why we have such a clear-cut case about to be filed. Criticize me all you want, bears, because I don't give up if there's still a fight left. And in this case, we are now winning. So for the bears, time to SHUT UP and watch us do our work. 2026 will be a year to remember, and it will be all good for shareholders who have stayed united.
2 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 27 at 11:45 PM
$BLSP Excellent ending to a very exciting week for BLSP. There have been major developments, and many long-time skeptics are seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. Be expecting more developments in the coming days. Thanks for all the supportive discussion, especially those that have sought further details of our progress. Healthy discussion with serious questions is the key to progress.
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 27 at 8:30 AM
$BLSP @catapeed Receivership isn’t magic — it’s law. And Nevada law is very clear: • Invalid shares don’t survive. If shares were issued while the company was revoked, without officers, without a board, or without legal authority, they’re void or voidable. The receiver doesn’t “pick winners.” The statute wipes out illegitimate issuances. • Claims don’t count unless they’re filed and proven. A creditor has to show up, document the debt, and survive court scrutiny. If they don’t file, the claim doesn’t exist for the estate. Period. • The $56M number is ancient history. Old filings ≠ current liabilities. In abandoned shells, most “debts” evaporate because counterparties disappear, can’t prove enforceability, or never file a claim. • Insolvent operating company ≠ insolvent shell. Once the business died, you’re left with a revoked corporate shell. The receiver’s job is to determine what’s real, not to assume every decade‑old line item is still alive. (cont.)
3 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Mar. 27 at 7:59 AM
$BLSP @catapeed A few key points missing here: • The “billions of shares” issue is exactly what Nevada receivership fixes. A court‑appointed receiver can cancel illegitimate issuances and rebuild a verified cap table. Our coalition has already documented abandonment, improper activity, and prepared the reconstruction framework. • The debt/liability narrative doesn’t match the actual findings. No creditors have appeared, no claims have been validated, and in abandoned‑shell cases most historical liabilities don’t survive review. The receiver—not message‑board speculation—determines what is real. • A court‑supervised wind‑down is not the default outcome for abandoned Nevada corporations. These cases routinely result in reinstatement, cleanup, and marketing of the shell because the shell itself is the asset. A clean, court‑validated Nevada shell with a lawful cap table and no toxic notes is exactly what reverse‑merger candidates pay for. (continued)
3 · Reply
AB31
AB31 Mar. 27 at 5:25 AM
$BLSP Call it “abandoned” if you want but for any normal shareholder who values time and money BLSP has been a loss and most regret ever touching it. This was a company with no real operations being pushed as something massive. Ray called it a “mega company” and consistently hyped it giving shareholders false hope instead of accountability. There’s a difference between fighting for your rights after being burned and continuing to defend the same situation that caused the damage. shareholders aint in this cause everything is going great lol they’re in it because they’re significantly down and hoping for a miracle exit. That’s not a strategy that’s desperation. You can pursue legal action and still admit the truth that this was a massive POS, it cost people money and it should never have been promoted the way it was by you. Be a man, show some courage and admit you were wrong!
1 · Reply