Pulsar Helium Inc (PSRHF)

$1.00 -0.01 (-0.85%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 98,610
Avg Vol 408,016
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 79%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Pulsar Helium Inc. engages in the identification, acquisition, exploration, and development of helium exploration projects in the United States of America and Greenland. The company's flagship project is the 100% owned Topaz Project covering an area of 3,132 acres and located in Minnesota, the United States of America. The company was formerly known as Pulsar Holdings Inc. and changed its name to Pulsar Helium Inc. in October 2022. Pulsar Helium Inc. was incorporated in 2022 and is headquartered...

Industry: Other Industrial Metals & Mining
Sector: Basic Materials
Address:
Rua Frederico Arouca, nº 251, 2º frente, Cascais, Portugal
Torgy
Torgy Aug. 23 at 3:44 AM
$PSRHF @Kingjake26 @Kingjake026 Same line, 2 different accounts… A double barreled bear, oh my!
1 · Reply
Kingjake026
Kingjake026 Aug. 23 at 12:05 AM
$PSRHF I looked into this. I will stay on the sidelines. I don’t like that the have over 200 million shares outstanding
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 22 at 11:11 PM
$PSRHF These forecasts are without selling (or getting a hefty royalty for) any He-3. Add that kind of premium in and look out above. So many deals to make behind closed doors. It will be nice to hear them as they come and get locked in. Yes, things have been very quiet on that front. But remember, it’s not like management can tell us squat about any deals until they are legal. So, we wait. And ponder about all this potential. On the bright side, September drilling is closing in fast.
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 22 at 10:53 PM
$PSRHF Before moving onto what share price might look like along the way to production, let's discuss Interlune. As many here may already know, Interlune's "Cold Capture" process has, according to several sources, achieved validation in the process of separating H-3 from a stream. As of now, the only negative issue is one of scale. Meaning, they can only (currently) handle slipstreams of industrial gas and taking on 940 liters per hour bulk output would (currently) overwhelm their system. And, yes, Interlune is that company that plans on getting their H-3 from the moon, commencing in 2029-2030. But, but, but...did you know that according to recent disclosures, they are contractually required to begin delivering H-3 to their buyers by 2028? Hmmm, interesting, huh? Who thinks the chances of Interlune making a deal of some sort with Pulsar is more than just a little likely? Can you say, "Co-location Joint Venture"? My "guess" is that they figure out how to scale up...before 2027 Q4.
0 · Reply
Kingjake26
Kingjake26 Aug. 22 at 8:09 PM
$PSRHF I looked into this. I will stay on the sidelines. I don’t like that the have over 200 million shares outstanding
1 · Reply
PengumanDan
PengumanDan Aug. 21 at 5:04 PM
$PSRHF hope yall are well .
1 · Reply
deusprimus1
deusprimus1 Aug. 21 at 6:27 AM
$PSRHF Polar Semi expansion complete by 2028. They will probably need some helium... https://electronics360.globalspec.com/article/22851/polar-semiconductor-from-captive-fab-to-national-asset The manufacturing facility is only 5 hours South of Babbitt
1 · Reply
Regard1plus1is5
Regard1plus1is5 Aug. 21 at 12:39 AM
$PSRHF that tight band has me interested. Close to a major break one way or another. I for one am overall
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 20 at 11:13 PM
$PSRHF Take this post for what it is: utilizing AI to project share price AFTER one year of full production based upon the 940 liters-per-hour plant capacity and considering ONLY H4 and CO2 output. Meaning, what "should" share price look like in either Q4 2028 or Q1 2029 depending on when they actually start producing on a daily basis and NOT taking ANY H3 into the projection. Conservative target: $9.96 at a 15x P/E multiple ($16.61 @ 25x P/E) based upon an estimated net EPS of .66. Premium (market shortage - like today) target: $14.81 at 15x P/E ($24.68 @ 25x) based upon an estimated net EPS of .99. So, there you have it: between $10 and $24 depending on multiples and market prices. Also, this considers today's share float without any further dilution and everything proceeding as currently planned. Please remember, this price target is for after one year's full production at the end of 2028. Next post: What might we see along the way? Go away haters, these are "projections only"!
0 · Reply
WinnerX2025
WinnerX2025 Aug. 20 at 9:07 PM
$PSRHF 1351 Watchers
0 · Reply
Latest News on PSRHF
No data available.
Torgy
Torgy Aug. 23 at 3:44 AM
$PSRHF @Kingjake26 @Kingjake026 Same line, 2 different accounts… A double barreled bear, oh my!
1 · Reply
Kingjake026
Kingjake026 Aug. 23 at 12:05 AM
$PSRHF I looked into this. I will stay on the sidelines. I don’t like that the have over 200 million shares outstanding
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 22 at 11:11 PM
$PSRHF These forecasts are without selling (or getting a hefty royalty for) any He-3. Add that kind of premium in and look out above. So many deals to make behind closed doors. It will be nice to hear them as they come and get locked in. Yes, things have been very quiet on that front. But remember, it’s not like management can tell us squat about any deals until they are legal. So, we wait. And ponder about all this potential. On the bright side, September drilling is closing in fast.
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 22 at 10:53 PM
$PSRHF Before moving onto what share price might look like along the way to production, let's discuss Interlune. As many here may already know, Interlune's "Cold Capture" process has, according to several sources, achieved validation in the process of separating H-3 from a stream. As of now, the only negative issue is one of scale. Meaning, they can only (currently) handle slipstreams of industrial gas and taking on 940 liters per hour bulk output would (currently) overwhelm their system. And, yes, Interlune is that company that plans on getting their H-3 from the moon, commencing in 2029-2030. But, but, but...did you know that according to recent disclosures, they are contractually required to begin delivering H-3 to their buyers by 2028? Hmmm, interesting, huh? Who thinks the chances of Interlune making a deal of some sort with Pulsar is more than just a little likely? Can you say, "Co-location Joint Venture"? My "guess" is that they figure out how to scale up...before 2027 Q4.
0 · Reply
Kingjake26
Kingjake26 Aug. 22 at 8:09 PM
$PSRHF I looked into this. I will stay on the sidelines. I don’t like that the have over 200 million shares outstanding
1 · Reply
PengumanDan
PengumanDan Aug. 21 at 5:04 PM
$PSRHF hope yall are well .
1 · Reply
deusprimus1
deusprimus1 Aug. 21 at 6:27 AM
$PSRHF Polar Semi expansion complete by 2028. They will probably need some helium... https://electronics360.globalspec.com/article/22851/polar-semiconductor-from-captive-fab-to-national-asset The manufacturing facility is only 5 hours South of Babbitt
1 · Reply
Regard1plus1is5
Regard1plus1is5 Aug. 21 at 12:39 AM
$PSRHF that tight band has me interested. Close to a major break one way or another. I for one am overall
1 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 20 at 11:13 PM
$PSRHF Take this post for what it is: utilizing AI to project share price AFTER one year of full production based upon the 940 liters-per-hour plant capacity and considering ONLY H4 and CO2 output. Meaning, what "should" share price look like in either Q4 2028 or Q1 2029 depending on when they actually start producing on a daily basis and NOT taking ANY H3 into the projection. Conservative target: $9.96 at a 15x P/E multiple ($16.61 @ 25x P/E) based upon an estimated net EPS of .66. Premium (market shortage - like today) target: $14.81 at 15x P/E ($24.68 @ 25x) based upon an estimated net EPS of .99. So, there you have it: between $10 and $24 depending on multiples and market prices. Also, this considers today's share float without any further dilution and everything proceeding as currently planned. Please remember, this price target is for after one year's full production at the end of 2028. Next post: What might we see along the way? Go away haters, these are "projections only"!
0 · Reply
WinnerX2025
WinnerX2025 Aug. 20 at 9:07 PM
$PSRHF 1351 Watchers
0 · Reply
GatorMcKlusky
GatorMcKlusky Aug. 20 at 5:57 PM
$PSRHF
0 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 20 at 5:16 PM
$PSRHF Watch Big Sky Industries (was U.S. Energy) ticker BSIN, as they approach production. They have moved from $1 to $1.42 today in the last two months alone. While they have way fewer shares outstanding, their helium supply is laughable in content compared to Topaz. However, they are getting closer to revenue creating production and are being rewarded.
0 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 20 at 4:42 PM
$PSRHF Adding to the post about TGB, Florence is not your typical copper mine. Utilizing the “in-situ” method similar in uranium mining, the project is 100% “green”: no open pit, no heavy equipment, no hydrocarbons. Everything is done underground by simply rinsing the ore field with a .05% hydrogen peroxide solution and ultimately electro whining the stream to separate 99% pure copper cathode. The C1 to obtain the copper? $1.11 per pound. With copper currently at $6.50, due the math and multiply by 85M (annual production starting next Q, full ramp) to understand the company will be profiting over $400M per year from this one mine for the next 22 years. But, but, but…naysayers were aplenty all along the way. Lots of small investors bailed, even though the science and numbers were proven, yet they bailed and missed a 10x+. You see, their share price was .27 cents during Covid and $1.08 in 10/23. Not an exact analogy to Pulsar but close. The potential here is staggering.
0 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 20 at 4:04 PM
$PSRHF Can anyone stand with me and say, “Amen!”? This article is why we invest in Pulsar. Double your pleasure, double your fun. Super sized capital return on investment. This is why management changed the playbook at the end of the first quarter: Why waste 4-6 weeks of salable product and all of the associated costs to test wells 3-7 on a very tight budget? Instead, we test whilst we drill actual production ready wells, capturing the product and raising more money to pay for CapEx. The market exploded due to the S of H / Iran “war”, so management moved accordingly. I’ve always stated we still have a long way to go, hence current share price. But the closer we get to revenue creating production, the higher share price will go. Basic stuff but very explanatory and predictable. Big investors know they can wait and watch before buying in, watching to ensure management gets the process done correctly. However, timing the market is always tricky.
1 · Reply
LeaperM75
LeaperM75 Aug. 20 at 3:20 PM
$PSRHF we are pinned to .98-$1.01 and have been for a month. It doesn't take much intellect to attach this price action with PR stating negotiations extension uo to 9/30 to realize the market and investors are waiting for the next piece of intel to make moves. And, move she shall...UP! With good news of course...
0 · Reply
lnglottery
lnglottery Aug. 20 at 12:03 PM
$PSRHF https://www.openpr.com/news/4607530/helium-prices-2026-tracker-report-shows-spot-prices-above
0 · Reply
TR_Actual
TR_Actual Aug. 20 at 11:32 AM
$PSRHF
0 · Reply
djones4396
djones4396 Aug. 19 at 8:47 PM
$PSRHF Staying true to my own advice and posting realtime here along the way, another 20k of those shares purchased today in the U.S. market @ .98 went my way. Moving from 820k to 840k shares owned in Pulsar, my original goal of hitting the 1M mark is only 160k shares away. The .98’ish floor (.9755) continues to hold for several weeks now. Feeling pretty confident the shorters, skeptics and haters will stay around long enough to hit the mark. Only problem is I’m going to have to breakdown and sell some TGB shares to get the needed cash on hand. Didn’t want to touch my last 100k shares of TGB but hey, when the market moves you need to stay nimble. TGB (was Taseko, now Trekor) is a similar story to Pulsar (kinda sorta) in that the share price meandered around $1 until their Florence mine neared completion. Many doubted the viability of Florence for years. Went off smooth as silk. Shares are now $8.75, from $1.08 on 10/23. The idea is for Pulsar to have a similar track.
1 · Reply
Vectormanic
Vectormanic Aug. 19 at 5:16 PM
$PSRHF Today it's Candel Therapeutics on the run... Soon it's Pulsar's time to rise up like helium always does. 🤞🙏
1 · Reply
DataJim
DataJim Aug. 19 at 4:30 PM
$PSRHF https://x.com/fabricedav68127/status/2089332231764349177?s=46 The synergy between pulsar and $AMFN should not be overlooked. Pulsar is a good hedge for those that don’t trust American Fusion management because it will succeed even if American Fusion doesn’t. I trust Brandenburg and David so most my eggs are in the American Fusion basket, but I am building a position in pulsar too.
1 · Reply
GimmeMyMonions
GimmeMyMonions Aug. 18 at 4:13 PM
$PSRHF Wadup gaaaaangtas!!!
0 · Reply
Musky49
Musky49 Aug. 18 at 1:55 PM
$PSRHF Fusion Roadmap Page 32 says alternative reactor designs may be lower cost than Tokamaks, specifically calling out Aneutronic fuels such as Helium 3 and Boron 11. https://x.com/ashtonforbes/status/2089035710032457848?s=46
0 · Reply