Parkervision Inc (PRKR)

$0.13 +0.00 (0.37%)
Market Cap 19.94M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -7.43M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio -1.03
Volume 53,700
Avg Vol 102,934
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 148.25M
Stochastic %K 70%
Beta 2.54
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target $10.50

Company Profile

ParkerVision, Inc. designs, develops, and markets proprietary radio frequency technologies and integrated circuits for use in wireless communication products. The company was incorporated in 1989 and is based in Jacksonville, Florida.

Industry: Semiconductors
Sector: Technology
Phone: 904 732 6100
Address:
4446-1A Hendricks Avenue, Suite 354, Jacksonville, United States
Lynnis58
Lynnis58 Sep. 2 at 6:11 PM
$PRKR The Oversight Project looking for OBANA ERA FOIA' s Interesting https://itsyourgov.org/press/oversight-project-sues-for-disclosures-related-to-obama-era-targeting-of-the-holy-grail-of
2 · Reply
12067socrates
12067socrates Aug. 30 at 4:05 PM
$PRKR Tagging onto previous post, especially considering this was an expedited case. Longer this waits the better it feels for the jurisdiction question. If this gets past jurisdiction, odds feel greatly improved on some positive outcomes for reversing and remanding. Don’t think Qualcomm wants to go back in front of a jury.
3 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 28 at 12:02 AM
$PRKR The Federal Circuit oral argument was June 1 before Judges Prost, Chen & Stark. We’re now approaching 90 days with no decision. Looking at several recent cases from this SAME 3-judge panel: 1. VL Collective: 42 days (affirmed) 2. Amsted Rail: 53 days (affirmed) 3. Blue Gentian: 64 days (affirmed in part/ Reversed in part) 4. $PRKR vs $QCOM: 87 days and counting Even more interesting: Amsted was argued on the SAME DAY before the SAME PANEL and was decided July 24. This doesn’t mean ParkerVision wins. But it does suggest this may not be the simple, immediate “dismiss for lack of jurisdiction” outcome many assumed after oral arguments. Something is taking the panel more time here and could be jurisdiction, the merits, Rule 54, reassignment, disagreement between them, or simply drafting a more complex opinion. No way to know yet, but the delay is becoming interesting.
3 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 27 at 3:26 PM
$PRKR Tick-Tock
1 · Reply
Jupiterman69
Jupiterman69 Aug. 26 at 12:43 AM
$PRKR Thinking we’re getting close to a positive decision. They wouldn’t take this much time to just shut parkervision down. Especially since parkervision won the original case
1 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Aug. 19 at 8:49 PM
$PRKR Every green gives me hope, every red shows its preparation to be greener...
0 · Reply
12067socrates
12067socrates Aug. 14 at 10:52 PM
$PRKR F’ it, I’ve bought in on this. Upside is worth the downside gamble. Let’s go cafc… we’re waiting… gonna manifest that bullish vibe
0 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Aug. 13 at 9:37 PM
$PRKR I sincerely wish someone really knows something so it doesn't become no one knows anything...
0 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 10 at 10:03 PM
$PRKR someone knows something….
1 · Reply
cjanliam3e46
cjanliam3e46 Aug. 10 at 7:39 PM
$PRKR fingers crossed
0 · Reply
Latest News on PRKR
No data available.
Lynnis58
Lynnis58 Sep. 2 at 6:11 PM
$PRKR The Oversight Project looking for OBANA ERA FOIA' s Interesting https://itsyourgov.org/press/oversight-project-sues-for-disclosures-related-to-obama-era-targeting-of-the-holy-grail-of
2 · Reply
12067socrates
12067socrates Aug. 30 at 4:05 PM
$PRKR Tagging onto previous post, especially considering this was an expedited case. Longer this waits the better it feels for the jurisdiction question. If this gets past jurisdiction, odds feel greatly improved on some positive outcomes for reversing and remanding. Don’t think Qualcomm wants to go back in front of a jury.
3 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 28 at 12:02 AM
$PRKR The Federal Circuit oral argument was June 1 before Judges Prost, Chen & Stark. We’re now approaching 90 days with no decision. Looking at several recent cases from this SAME 3-judge panel: 1. VL Collective: 42 days (affirmed) 2. Amsted Rail: 53 days (affirmed) 3. Blue Gentian: 64 days (affirmed in part/ Reversed in part) 4. $PRKR vs $QCOM: 87 days and counting Even more interesting: Amsted was argued on the SAME DAY before the SAME PANEL and was decided July 24. This doesn’t mean ParkerVision wins. But it does suggest this may not be the simple, immediate “dismiss for lack of jurisdiction” outcome many assumed after oral arguments. Something is taking the panel more time here and could be jurisdiction, the merits, Rule 54, reassignment, disagreement between them, or simply drafting a more complex opinion. No way to know yet, but the delay is becoming interesting.
3 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 27 at 3:26 PM
$PRKR Tick-Tock
1 · Reply
Jupiterman69
Jupiterman69 Aug. 26 at 12:43 AM
$PRKR Thinking we’re getting close to a positive decision. They wouldn’t take this much time to just shut parkervision down. Especially since parkervision won the original case
1 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Aug. 19 at 8:49 PM
$PRKR Every green gives me hope, every red shows its preparation to be greener...
0 · Reply
12067socrates
12067socrates Aug. 14 at 10:52 PM
$PRKR F’ it, I’ve bought in on this. Upside is worth the downside gamble. Let’s go cafc… we’re waiting… gonna manifest that bullish vibe
0 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Aug. 13 at 9:37 PM
$PRKR I sincerely wish someone really knows something so it doesn't become no one knows anything...
0 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Aug. 10 at 10:03 PM
$PRKR someone knows something….
1 · Reply
cjanliam3e46
cjanliam3e46 Aug. 10 at 7:39 PM
$PRKR fingers crossed
0 · Reply
Jimmag
Jimmag Aug. 10 at 7:34 PM
$PRKR what's cooking?
0 · Reply
MrBill13
MrBill13 Aug. 10 at 7:18 PM
$PRKR
0 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Jul. 18 at 7:44 PM
$PRKR still holding...at an avg $0.35...
0 · Reply
microby
microby Jun. 9 at 8:51 AM
Texas and NXP had filed IPR petitions seeking a declaration of unpatentability against the now-inactive, expired patents and both IPRs were successful. It is inconceivable that Parker would take further action, which would ultimately require the CAFC to rule on the matter Maybe it's insignificant, Qualcomm? all in all, things aren't looking very promising for Parker right now, since taking further steps would, of course, require financial resources $PRKR
1 · Reply
raj12
raj12 Jun. 5 at 3:23 PM
$PRKR Don't you think Market or investors are overreacting as the there was no formal or final decision/verdict about the patents at all. Who knows what awaits next
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 9:59 AM
$PRKR https://www.ainvest.com/news/parkervision-legal-contradiction-qualcomm-force-trial-reopen-june-1-oral-argument-2604/
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 7:49 AM
$PRKR I smell a rat, am I right?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 7:48 AM
$PRKR If I lose, it's still my money. I did not borrow a cent from the Federal Reserve. But still, you are here, hounding, howling, and screaming, why?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 7:44 AM
$PRKR I did not borrow money from you fellas to buy shares of PRKR. I used my own. But still you are here, why? Something tells me something is not right here, am I right?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 7:43 AM
$PRKR We, the shareholders of PRKR, let alone PRKR, are not paying you, fellas, to badmouth PRKR nor glorify PRKR. But still, you are here, I wonder why?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 5 at 7:39 AM
$PRKR You fellas criticize as if you do not have any interest in PRKR, shares that is. But still you are here. Why? Shouldn't you be in the North Pole enjoying your Christmas Bonuses with the polar bears? Yet, you are still here. I wonder why?
0 · Reply
Jimmag
Jimmag Jun. 4 at 11:23 PM
$PRKR PUT A FORK IN IT
0 · Reply