Market Cap 34.68M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -14.47M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio -1.03
Volume 151,900
Avg Vol 147,518
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 119.57M
Stochastic %K 71%
Beta 2.21
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target $10.50

Company Profile

ParkerVision, Inc. designs, develops, and markets radio frequency technologies and integrated circuits for use in wireless communication products. The company was incorporated in 1989 and is based in Jacksonville, Florida.

Industry: Semiconductors
Sector: Technology
Phone: 904 732 6100
Address:
4446-1A Hendricks Avenue, Suite 354, Jacksonville, United States
lostmybuttwithparker
lostmybuttwithparker Jul. 7 at 8:26 PM
$PRKR need some positive energy here!!!
1 · Reply
redbugs
redbugs Jul. 1 at 1:55 AM
$PRKR This company is dead folks. Recent court rulings killing their case against Qualcomm. Dilution to survive incoming. Glad I sold and took profit at 55 cents. Was going to reenter the stock when court date announced but the way things are going no way. Qualcomm is draining the company dry. Qualcomm may throw the company a few bones to end the case. Who knows. Bankruptcy is inevitable I think.
1 · Reply
GhostAlphaTrading
GhostAlphaTrading Jun. 30 at 5:46 PM
0 · Reply
davis8uni
davis8uni Jun. 26 at 11:52 AM
0 · Reply
DonCorleone77
DonCorleone77 Jun. 26 at 11:24 AM
$PRKR $QCOM ParkerVision asks court to delay patent infringement trial against Qualcomm ParkerVision (PRKR) issued a statement regarding recent motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in its over 11-year patent infringement lawsuit against Qualcomm (QCOM). On June 25, 2025, ParkerVision filed a Rule 54(b) motion asking the district court to enter final judgment of noninfringement on its receiver claims and sever and stay all remaining claims pending an appeal of the court's 2025 claim construction order. The 2025 claim construction order was issued in May 2025 after the district court granted Qualcomm's request for yet a third claim construction, on claim terms that had previously been undisputed. Qualcomm's request for a third claim construction, which was initially denied by the district court, and then allowed on a motion for reconsideration, followed ParkerVision's successful appeal of the district court's 2022 summary judgment order on these same patent claims. In September 2024, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the 2022 summary judgment order and remanded the case back to district court. The 2025 claim construction order prevents the Company from asserting its receiver claims. An entry of final judgment by the court on the receiver claims, as requested, would allow ParkerVision to immediately appeal the 2025 claim construction ruling and avoid the inefficiency of potentially holding two separate trials, one for the remaining transmitter claims and, a second one for the receiver claims, if the CAFC again reverses the district court. Qualcomm has filed a motion for partial summary judgment of noninfringement of the receiver claims based on this 2025 claim construction order; however, Qualcomm is not seeking entry of final judgment under Rule 54(b).
0 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Jun. 24 at 10:31 AM
$PRKR I am right or did $QCOM miss their deadline to file for summary judgment? Could someone confirm? I thought was June 23
1 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 19 at 9:05 AM
$PRKR Me too. I am waiting anxiously for the trial date to add to my existing portfolio.
0 · Reply
redbugs
redbugs Jun. 18 at 5:29 PM
$PRKR Looking to buy back in but not until a court date is announced. No rush.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 18 at 3:18 PM
$PRKR I am still here and I have not sold a single share of PRKR.
1 · Reply
lostmybuttwithparker
lostmybuttwithparker Jun. 18 at 2:19 PM
$PRKR did everyone sell and leave me here alone?
4 · Reply
Latest News on PRKR
No data available.
lostmybuttwithparker
lostmybuttwithparker Jul. 7 at 8:26 PM
$PRKR need some positive energy here!!!
1 · Reply
redbugs
redbugs Jul. 1 at 1:55 AM
$PRKR This company is dead folks. Recent court rulings killing their case against Qualcomm. Dilution to survive incoming. Glad I sold and took profit at 55 cents. Was going to reenter the stock when court date announced but the way things are going no way. Qualcomm is draining the company dry. Qualcomm may throw the company a few bones to end the case. Who knows. Bankruptcy is inevitable I think.
1 · Reply
GhostAlphaTrading
GhostAlphaTrading Jun. 30 at 5:46 PM
0 · Reply
davis8uni
davis8uni Jun. 26 at 11:52 AM
0 · Reply
DonCorleone77
DonCorleone77 Jun. 26 at 11:24 AM
$PRKR $QCOM ParkerVision asks court to delay patent infringement trial against Qualcomm ParkerVision (PRKR) issued a statement regarding recent motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in its over 11-year patent infringement lawsuit against Qualcomm (QCOM). On June 25, 2025, ParkerVision filed a Rule 54(b) motion asking the district court to enter final judgment of noninfringement on its receiver claims and sever and stay all remaining claims pending an appeal of the court's 2025 claim construction order. The 2025 claim construction order was issued in May 2025 after the district court granted Qualcomm's request for yet a third claim construction, on claim terms that had previously been undisputed. Qualcomm's request for a third claim construction, which was initially denied by the district court, and then allowed on a motion for reconsideration, followed ParkerVision's successful appeal of the district court's 2022 summary judgment order on these same patent claims. In September 2024, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the 2022 summary judgment order and remanded the case back to district court. The 2025 claim construction order prevents the Company from asserting its receiver claims. An entry of final judgment by the court on the receiver claims, as requested, would allow ParkerVision to immediately appeal the 2025 claim construction ruling and avoid the inefficiency of potentially holding two separate trials, one for the remaining transmitter claims and, a second one for the receiver claims, if the CAFC again reverses the district court. Qualcomm has filed a motion for partial summary judgment of noninfringement of the receiver claims based on this 2025 claim construction order; however, Qualcomm is not seeking entry of final judgment under Rule 54(b).
0 · Reply
InfiBB
InfiBB Jun. 24 at 10:31 AM
$PRKR I am right or did $QCOM miss their deadline to file for summary judgment? Could someone confirm? I thought was June 23
1 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 19 at 9:05 AM
$PRKR Me too. I am waiting anxiously for the trial date to add to my existing portfolio.
0 · Reply
redbugs
redbugs Jun. 18 at 5:29 PM
$PRKR Looking to buy back in but not until a court date is announced. No rush.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 18 at 3:18 PM
$PRKR I am still here and I have not sold a single share of PRKR.
1 · Reply
lostmybuttwithparker
lostmybuttwithparker Jun. 18 at 2:19 PM
$PRKR did everyone sell and leave me here alone?
4 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 13 at 2:47 AM
$PRKR Is there NO VALUE TO JUSTICE upon which the US Constitution and the Founding Fathers FOUGHT FOR? If this were North Korea or Somalia or Libya, I would perfectly understand. But this is the United States of America.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 13 at 2:41 AM
$PRKR This is what I call GROSS MISTREATMENT of JUSTICE and the ABUSE of the US Legal System, upon which the US Constitution and the Founding Fathers fought for.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 13 at 2:35 AM
$PRKR I would recommend that the US Justice Department investigate this matter with a fine-tooth comb and not to leave any stone unturned.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 13 at 2:32 AM
$PRKR There seemed to be a concerted effort to deny PRKR, the JUSTICE it deserved, even when the FACTS and TRUTH are in plain sight for all to see and judge. Why is that so?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 11 at 3:37 PM
$PRKR In all honesty, I would understand if this case were TRIED in North Korea. But this is the USA; how on earth could this judge get it 100% wrong and in plain sight and on the first take?
0 · Reply
allsystemsgo
allsystemsgo Jun. 11 at 10:28 AM
$PRKR the markman ruling will be reversed. Either judge will do it or the appeals court. PRKR can ask for an emergency ruling from the appeals court which is pretty fast In the appeals court slap down of the DC judge last fall it included this sentence “fact finding in connection with claim construction is for the trial court to perform, subject to appellate review for clear error” issue in contention is whether the claims in this case are the same as the first trial (which prkr lost due to the other corrupt judge). In the first case it was ruled that the signal was down converted at or after the capacitor (not true but ruled that way) This is the so called generating limitation. Qcoms whole argument is that they down convert at a switch before the capacitor The claims in this case do not use the word generated like case 1 Ok so the DC judge had to contort himself to somehow equate the claims here to case 1 Claim 24 of 940 patent describes a UFT to down convert said signal
1 · Reply
lostmybuttwithparker
lostmybuttwithparker Jun. 11 at 1:09 AM
$PRKR any thoughts. This is getting really old
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 3 at 11:52 PM
$PRKR Now that the TRUTH has been exposed. No more TROLLS spreading LIES about PRKR.
0 · Reply
netfliximeannetlist
netfliximeannetlist Jun. 2 at 2:42 PM
$PRKR wow that judge is totally corrupt, how he is not being investigated is shameful. Qualcomm have obviously told him to reach that idea with the CC no way he comes to that conclusion himself just no way! read the statement put out by prkr today its such shameful corruption its so ridiculous
1 · Reply
ncarb
ncarb Jun. 2 at 2:14 PM
$PRKR nice little trade. Bought another 10k at .29 last week for a quick 25% gain. Brings total to 70k. Ten bagger after trial would be lovely.
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 1 at 11:03 PM
$PRKR Do you know that ever since this article from FancyPants999 came out, those trolls who have been trying to paint negative pictures of PRKR seem to disappear almost instantaneously, am I right?
0 · Reply
Salahuddin_Ayyubi
Salahuddin_Ayyubi Jun. 1 at 4:09 AM
$PRKR Even the appeals if any, would not change the legal outcome
0 · Reply