Plyzer Technologies Inc (PLYZ)

$0.00 0.00 (N/A)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 89,500
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Plyzer Technologies Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides custom, real-time, cloud-based business intelligence solutions for brands to analyze critical online price and market data. Its customizable dashboard enables country, regional and local sales, production, and logistics operations to adapt to prevailing market conditions. The company was formerly known as ZD Ventures Corporation and changed its name to Plyzer Technologies Inc. in March 2017. Plyzer Technologies Inc. was founded in 2005...

Industry: Software - Infrastructure
Sector: Technology
Phone: 416-860-0211
Address:
47 Avenue Road, Suite 200, Toronto, Canada
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 11 at 10:17 AM
$PLYZ VOLUME 89,500 at .0001
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 10:01 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 9:32 AM
$PLYZ
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 2:23 AM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 9 at 4:56 PM
$PLYZ DelToro, I have to be honest here and state that you make somevvalid argument here but you also should recognize that since neither side has the full knowledge of whatbis going on then how can someone calls this bullish?!! The distressed assets is you good argument i just hope they didn't g8vecaway everything, Time in the end will tell all who ends up being right about this ticker My ONLY wish is rhat I am wrong about this because I am too much invested in this plyz....I loved their product and thats why I scooped up trucks loads... We'll see DelToro brother
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 9 at 3:01 PM
$PLYZ Volume: 4,399,999
1 · Reply
DelToro
DelToro Feb. 9 at 2:30 PM
$PLYZ The contingent equity — the $500K optionality. This was never about “maybe we get assets back.” This is about restructuring a distressed asset, where 100% of a distressed base is often worth less than a minority stake with defined rights, protections, and future participation. Just because we don’t have full visibility into every term does not mean anyone was “scammed.” Honest question: Why keep repeating “theft / scam / fraud” while also acknowledging that, without updated filings, we don’t know the current percentages or terms? If the facts aren’t yet known, labeling it criminal is a conclusion without evidence. Plyzer Sources: https://www.einpresswire.com/newsroom/plyzer_tech/?promo=4700 https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1334589 (( 💀 )) vs (( 💎 ))
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 7 at 6:58 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 7 at 6:41 PM
$PLYZ OK then if we use your same logic of " CONTINGENCY EQUITY" part, lol This means the 85% of the assets basically diluted or "sold" are no longer part of plyz. The contingency condition ISN'T A GARRANTEE of getting assets back.. Its simply a maybe if certain conditions happen then a possible trigger would put this contingency in play but again we had a 💯 of a company assets and we 9nly have 14% and a MAYBE..... THIS SETUP AIN'T BULLISH IT'S MORE LIKE BULLSHIT, LOL Respectfully that is Until and unless that contingency is 💯 clear to us there is nothing to be bullish about We got SCAMMED FOR 85% of our assets Any Questions,
1 · Reply
DelToro
DelToro Feb. 6 at 8:59 PM
$PLYZ Factual discussions are based on evidence. What’s on record is a disclosed structure (14.7% + contingent equity rights). What we don’t have are updated filings modifying those terms. So asking anyone to “prove the assets are the same” (or “prove they changed”) is impossible for both bulls and bears without new disclosures. Value ≠ raw percentage. A 14.7% stake with contingent rights and the ability to invest more can be highly profitable. Please laugh all you want, but none of your claims are backed by evidence, filings, or enforcement actions. Calling it “theft” without proof is misleading.. “So what are they selling?” In a restructuring, it’s not about what’s sold—it’s about what’s being built. ((💀)) vs ((💎))
1 · Reply
Latest News on PLYZ
No data available.
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 11 at 10:17 AM
$PLYZ VOLUME 89,500 at .0001
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 10:01 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 9:32 AM
$PLYZ
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 10 at 2:23 AM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 9 at 4:56 PM
$PLYZ DelToro, I have to be honest here and state that you make somevvalid argument here but you also should recognize that since neither side has the full knowledge of whatbis going on then how can someone calls this bullish?!! The distressed assets is you good argument i just hope they didn't g8vecaway everything, Time in the end will tell all who ends up being right about this ticker My ONLY wish is rhat I am wrong about this because I am too much invested in this plyz....I loved their product and thats why I scooped up trucks loads... We'll see DelToro brother
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 9 at 3:01 PM
$PLYZ Volume: 4,399,999
1 · Reply
DelToro
DelToro Feb. 9 at 2:30 PM
$PLYZ The contingent equity — the $500K optionality. This was never about “maybe we get assets back.” This is about restructuring a distressed asset, where 100% of a distressed base is often worth less than a minority stake with defined rights, protections, and future participation. Just because we don’t have full visibility into every term does not mean anyone was “scammed.” Honest question: Why keep repeating “theft / scam / fraud” while also acknowledging that, without updated filings, we don’t know the current percentages or terms? If the facts aren’t yet known, labeling it criminal is a conclusion without evidence. Plyzer Sources: https://www.einpresswire.com/newsroom/plyzer_tech/?promo=4700 https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1334589 (( 💀 )) vs (( 💎 ))
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 7 at 6:58 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 7 at 6:41 PM
$PLYZ OK then if we use your same logic of " CONTINGENCY EQUITY" part, lol This means the 85% of the assets basically diluted or "sold" are no longer part of plyz. The contingency condition ISN'T A GARRANTEE of getting assets back.. Its simply a maybe if certain conditions happen then a possible trigger would put this contingency in play but again we had a 💯 of a company assets and we 9nly have 14% and a MAYBE..... THIS SETUP AIN'T BULLISH IT'S MORE LIKE BULLSHIT, LOL Respectfully that is Until and unless that contingency is 💯 clear to us there is nothing to be bullish about We got SCAMMED FOR 85% of our assets Any Questions,
1 · Reply
DelToro
DelToro Feb. 6 at 8:59 PM
$PLYZ Factual discussions are based on evidence. What’s on record is a disclosed structure (14.7% + contingent equity rights). What we don’t have are updated filings modifying those terms. So asking anyone to “prove the assets are the same” (or “prove they changed”) is impossible for both bulls and bears without new disclosures. Value ≠ raw percentage. A 14.7% stake with contingent rights and the ability to invest more can be highly profitable. Please laugh all you want, but none of your claims are backed by evidence, filings, or enforcement actions. Calling it “theft” without proof is misleading.. “So what are they selling?” In a restructuring, it’s not about what’s sold—it’s about what’s being built. ((💀)) vs ((💎))
1 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 6 at 3:55 PM
$PLYZ OK. Since there an actual discussion of the issue then can anyone here prove that thevexact same assets plyz started with are still the same or have they actually been "reduced" to just under 15% of what it was... This is in the filings... So if one invests in a hole watermelon and finds out it just a slice of it what do you call that? Redirecting those assets, shift8ng them or.... It does not matter what you call it theft or otherwise those assets ARE NO LONGER THERE FOR PLYZ SO what are they selling,lol?!!
0 · Reply
DelToro
DelToro Feb. 6 at 2:30 PM
$PLYZ Correcto — there is no direct mention of PLYZ in those materials, and that alone does not establish theft or illegality. PLYZ has been on the Expert Market since 2021, which limits public disclosures and retail access while a company restructures. During that period, we’ve seen consistent prints at .000001 — prices most retail accounts cannot access. As I’ve said repeatedly, evidence matters. What exists today are public disclosures describing an asset transaction, retained contingent equity rights, and a documented framework between PLYZ and Upshelf. https://www.einpresswire.com/newsroom/plyzer_tech/?promo=4700 Disagreeing with the structure is fair. Labeling it “theft” without a court filing, SEC action, or enforcement record is not. https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1334589 Until such evidence appears, these remain allegations — not facts. Evidence first. Emotions Late (( 💀 )) vs (( 💎 ))
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 5 at 11:17 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
Brendan70
Brendan70 Feb. 5 at 8:28 PM
$PLYZ What a clown show
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 5 at 6:16 PM
$PLYZ LOL, There's NO mention of "PLYZ " connection anywhere. Those are the new entaties that emerged from the the assets sale, theft of plyz's assets and they're being pushed here on this plyz board!! Misleading at the very least until there is a clear evidence fr9m plyz or upshelf that they are somehow connected and what are the percentages,lol Until then, it's just a pump of an empty shell < 15% ?!!!!
0 · Reply
hey_wassup_hello
hey_wassup_hello Feb. 5 at 11:05 AM
$PLYZ @Gonefishin365 Hopefully soon. PXMIZE is live, hosting legacy Plyzer infrastructure. Akru is operational, and Shivangi Kapoor is advising PXMIZE leadership on “acquisition readiness”, per her LinkedIn. Recent private exit: Nennisiwok / Damm. Insiders hold sizable stakes. Watching for filings, PXMIZE, and Akru closely.
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 5 at 10:51 AM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 4 at 10:10 PM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
RSI38
RSI38 Feb. 4 at 3:33 PM
$PLYZ This will not move as its now effectively an empty plyz shell that hD its Zmaun assets sold , transfered and sold t9 another company which now has nothing to do with this empty shell called plyz,lol Enjoy the 75% loss of main assets and its still bullish,lol MM, EM guys shufflin hands is all
1 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 4 at 3:14 PM
$PLYZ VOLUME 4K
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 4 at 10:54 AM
$PLYZ
0 · Reply
SOLAR2
SOLAR2 Feb. 3 at 8:51 PM
$PLYZ VOLUME 4,535,000
0 · Reply