Market Cap 7.08B
Revenue (ttm) 5.29B
Net Income (ttm) 191.54M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 23.81
Forward PE 21.01
Profit Margin 3.62%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.22
Volume 627,900
Avg Vol 808,230
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 158.27M
Stochastic %K 73%
Beta -0.13
Analysts Strong Sell
Price Target $59.00

Company Profile

PACS Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities in the United States. It also provides senior care and independent living facilities. The company engages in the acquisition, ownership, and leasing of health care-related properties. PACS Group, Inc. was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Industry: Medical Care Facilities
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 801 447 9829
Website: pacs.com
Address:
90 S. 400 W, Suite 700, Salt Lake City, United States
TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 10 at 1:05 AM
$ODD $PACS $FSLY $HIMS Oddity tech fair valuation based on Normalization of revenue in 2027 based on PE ratio, Price sales ratio or multiples and EV/Ebitda: 42-50$ 12-18 month base target. Rationale: 1. P/E valuation The cleanest way to value ODD isn’t on depressed 2026 earnings. I would use normalized 2027 earnings. Suppose the recovery produces approximately $2.00–$2.50 EPS in 2027. Given ODDITY’s historical 20%+ growth profile, I think a normalized 18–22× P/E is reasonable—not the very high multiple it might deserve during hypergrowth, but higher than a stagnant beauty company. 2. P/E fair value: ~$40$45 in a reasonable recovery. For context, ODDITY already earned $2.21 adjusted EPS in 2025. So $2.00–$2.25 isn’t assuming that ODD suddenly becomes dramatically more profitable than it has ever been. 2. Price-to-sales valuation This produces an interesting result. Before the current problems, ODD frequently carried a market capitalization around $2–3B. For example, it ended 2025 around $40/share and approximately $2.3B market cap. If 2027 revenue recovers to approximately $850–900M: 2.0× sales → $1.7–1.8B 2.5× → $2.1–2.25B 3.0× → $2.55–2.70B Assuming roughly 50–55M shares after the company’s substantial 2026 repurchases, that implies roughly: $34–36 at 2× $42–45 at 2.5× $50–54 at 3× That is important because ODDITY historically produced 70%+ gross margins and ~20%+ adjusted EBITDA margins, which normally deserves considerably more than a distressed consumer-company sales multiple. 3. EV/EBITDA This may be my preferred method. Suppose normalized 2027 revenue reaches $875M and EBITDA margin recovers to 20%. That gives: $875M × 20% = ~$175M EBITDA Apply: 10× EBITDA = $1.75B EV 12× = $2.10B EV 14× = $2.45B EV The balance sheet complicates the exact equity bridge because ODDITY raised exchangeable-note capital after 2025, so I wouldn’t simply treat all reported cash as excess cash. But even without giving ODDITY full credit for its liquidity, 12–14× normalized EBITDA supports a valuation substantially above the distressed valuation implied by the current stock price. Why I think ~$42 is reasonable This isn’t dependent on ODDITY returning to 50% growth. In 2023 it generated $509M revenue / $107M EBITDA. In 2024 that became $647M / $150M. And in 2025 it reached $810M / $163M. Then the advertising/CAC problem hit IL MAKIAGE. Q1 2026 revenue dropped 26% and adjusted EBITDA went to -$7M, despite management saying the underlying issue was a dislocation in customer acquisition rather than disappearance of demand. Management also bought back approximately 6.1M shares for $82.3M during Q1, reducing Class A shares outstanding by about 10.6%. So I see the investment thesis as: $16–17 today → ~$30–35 partial recovery → ~$40–45 normalized recovery → $50–60+ if ODD returns to its historical growth/margin profile. 12–18 month base target would therefore be around $42, rather than the $50+ bull case. The biggest thing I’d watch now is CAC/CPA normalization at IL MAKIAGE. If the Q3 improvement management just guided to actually materializes and EBITDA begins recovering simultaneously, I’d be much more comfortable moving fair value toward $45–50.
1 · Reply
JFavabean
JFavabean Sep. 9 at 8:00 PM
$PACS WEIRD. I WONDER WHY ITS FINALLY WAKING UP!
0 · Reply
TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 9 at 5:01 PM
$ODD $PACS $FSLY The best turn around story in my opinion ODD. Following PACS and FSLY turn around
0 · Reply
thetraderB
thetraderB Sep. 9 at 2:44 PM
$PACS Entry Alert! With todays red-selling break and entry into the "In-Between" zone - I am long $PACS again! Been watching this like a hawk waiting for my ideal entry. Entry: $43.05 Stop Loss: $41 Targets: $47.20, $50
1 · Reply
TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 9 at 1:17 PM
$ODD 17$ is the new baseline. Ive seen this kind of turn around with $FSLY $PACS This is a buy and hold till next year. It wont be 17$ next year.
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 8 at 1:57 PM
$PACS JPM finally updated its model and I eventually got the Truist price target (they are now the Street high). Median price target sitting at $59.
1 · Reply
QES
QES Sep. 3 at 10:11 PM
$PACS 137,812 shares... again, someone is very active on PACS.
1 · Reply
thetraderB
thetraderB Sep. 3 at 4:43 PM
$PACS Still one of my absolute favorite charts in the market rn. See previous posts for more detail - but simply look at this chart and you'll understand why. When price enters the "in-between" (red circle on daily chart), that's where we want to be entering longs.
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 3 at 1:59 PM
$PACS starting to feel egregious. We’re only $1 or so above where the share price was in early January. Especially in light of very solid operating results and two large deals.
2 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 3 at 11:53 AM
$PACS I do wonder if doing occasional secondary offerings would be a "better" way to offload large amounts of shares. The upsides as I see it are 1) it would eliminate the constant dribbling out of registration and sale filings and 2) it meaningfully and immediately lowers the % ownership of the two co founders who own over 2/3 of this business combined. Their ownership in and of itself may be a gating item for some investors given the amount of control they have. I believe the downsides of a secondary are 1) they are typically done at a discount to market value and 2) sometimes investors perceive the agreed upon offering price as near-term fair value given it was an agreed upon offering with institution(s) and not just a regular way open market sale
0 · Reply
Latest News on PACS
Pacs Group price target raised to $58 from $47 at JPMorgan

2026-09-04T12:36:18.000Z - 10 days ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $58 from $47 at JPMorgan


Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $48 at Oppenheimer

2026-08-10T12:26:31.000Z - 5 weeks ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $48 at Oppenheimer


Pacs Group price target raised to $60 from $57 at UBS

2026-08-06T12:43:05.000Z - 5 weeks ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $60 from $57 at UBS


Pacs Group price target raised to $62 from $52 at Truist

2026-08-06T12:40:16.000Z - 5 weeks ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $62 from $52 at Truist


Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $52 at RBC Capital

2026-08-06T11:11:59.000Z - 5 weeks ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $52 at RBC Capital


PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q2 2026

Aug 5, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 5 weeks ago

PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q2 2026


PACS Group Quarterly report: Q2 2026

Aug 5, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 5 weeks ago

PACS Group Quarterly report: Q2 2026


PACS Group Earnings release: Q2 2026

Aug 5, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 5 weeks ago

PACS Group Earnings release: Q2 2026


PACS Group Slides: Q2 2026

Aug 5, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 5 weeks ago

PACS Group Slides: Q2 2026


Pacs Group reports Q2 adjusted EPS 63c, consensus 56c

2026-08-04T20:42:27.000Z - 5 weeks ago

Pacs Group reports Q2 adjusted EPS 63c, consensus 56c


PACS Group, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

Aug 4, 2026, 4:30 PM EDT - 5 weeks ago

PACS Group, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results


Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $50 at UBS

2026-07-08T12:56:50.000Z - 2 months ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $57 from $50 at UBS


PACS Group Transcript: AGM 2026

Jun 10, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT - 3 months ago

PACS Group Transcript: AGM 2026


Pacs Group price target raised to $52 from $50 at Truist

2026-05-18T12:18:22.000Z - 3 months ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $52 from $50 at Truist


Pacs Group price target raised to $48 from $42 at Oppenheimer

2026-05-13T11:58:22.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $48 from $42 at Oppenheimer


Pacs Group rises 24.1%

2026-05-12T19:03:01.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group rises 24.1%


Pacs Group rises 20.5%

2026-05-12T17:57:17.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group rises 20.5%


PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q1 2026

May 12, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q1 2026


PACS Group Quarterly report: Q1 2026

May 12, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Quarterly report: Q1 2026


PACS Group Earnings release: Q1 2026

May 12, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Earnings release: Q1 2026


PACS Group Slides: Q1 2026

May 12, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Slides: Q1 2026


Pacs Group  reports Q1 EPS 50c, consensus 41c

2026-05-11T23:51:37.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group reports Q1 EPS 50c, consensus 41c


PACS Group, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2026 Results

May 11, 2026, 4:30 PM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2026 Results


PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy filing

Apr 28, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy filing


PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy filing

Apr 28, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT - 4 months ago

PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy filing


Pacs Group co-founder, CFO Mark Hancock to retire

2026-04-27T20:42:55.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group co-founder, CFO Mark Hancock to retire


Pacs Group names Carey Hendrickson CFO

2026-04-27T20:42:37.000Z - 4 months ago

Pacs Group names Carey Hendrickson CFO


Pacs Group price target raised to $42 from $40 at Oppenheimer

2026-03-04T12:53:06.000Z - 6 months ago

Pacs Group price target raised to $42 from $40 at Oppenheimer


PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q4 2025

Feb 26, 2026, 5:30 PM EST - 6 months ago

PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q4 2025


PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2025

Feb 26, 2026, 5:30 PM EST - 6 months ago

PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2025


PACS Group Earnings release: Q4 2025

Feb 26, 2026, 5:30 PM EST - 6 months ago

PACS Group Earnings release: Q4 2025


PACS Group Slides: Q4 2025

Feb 26, 2026, 5:30 PM EST - 6 months ago

PACS Group Slides: Q4 2025


PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2025

Feb 26, 2026, 5:30 PM EST - 6 months ago

PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2025


PACS Group Announces Business Updates

Dec 1, 2025, 4:15 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Announces Business Updates


PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Nov 25, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q3 2025

Nov 19, 2025, 5:30 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Earnings Call Transcript: Q3 2025


PACS Group Earnings release: Q3 2025

Nov 19, 2025, 5:30 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Earnings release: Q3 2025


PACS Group Quarterly report: Q3 2025

Nov 19, 2025, 5:30 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Quarterly report: Q3 2025


PACS Group Slides: Q3 2025

Nov 19, 2025, 5:30 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group Slides: Q3 2025


PACS Group, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2025 Results

Nov 19, 2025, 4:30 PM EST - 9 months ago

PACS Group, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2025 Results


PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2024

Mar 28, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

PACS Group Annual report: Q4 2024


TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 10 at 1:05 AM
$ODD $PACS $FSLY $HIMS Oddity tech fair valuation based on Normalization of revenue in 2027 based on PE ratio, Price sales ratio or multiples and EV/Ebitda: 42-50$ 12-18 month base target. Rationale: 1. P/E valuation The cleanest way to value ODD isn’t on depressed 2026 earnings. I would use normalized 2027 earnings. Suppose the recovery produces approximately $2.00–$2.50 EPS in 2027. Given ODDITY’s historical 20%+ growth profile, I think a normalized 18–22× P/E is reasonable—not the very high multiple it might deserve during hypergrowth, but higher than a stagnant beauty company. 2. P/E fair value: ~$40$45 in a reasonable recovery. For context, ODDITY already earned $2.21 adjusted EPS in 2025. So $2.00–$2.25 isn’t assuming that ODD suddenly becomes dramatically more profitable than it has ever been. 2. Price-to-sales valuation This produces an interesting result. Before the current problems, ODD frequently carried a market capitalization around $2–3B. For example, it ended 2025 around $40/share and approximately $2.3B market cap. If 2027 revenue recovers to approximately $850–900M: 2.0× sales → $1.7–1.8B 2.5× → $2.1–2.25B 3.0× → $2.55–2.70B Assuming roughly 50–55M shares after the company’s substantial 2026 repurchases, that implies roughly: $34–36 at 2× $42–45 at 2.5× $50–54 at 3× That is important because ODDITY historically produced 70%+ gross margins and ~20%+ adjusted EBITDA margins, which normally deserves considerably more than a distressed consumer-company sales multiple. 3. EV/EBITDA This may be my preferred method. Suppose normalized 2027 revenue reaches $875M and EBITDA margin recovers to 20%. That gives: $875M × 20% = ~$175M EBITDA Apply: 10× EBITDA = $1.75B EV 12× = $2.10B EV 14× = $2.45B EV The balance sheet complicates the exact equity bridge because ODDITY raised exchangeable-note capital after 2025, so I wouldn’t simply treat all reported cash as excess cash. But even without giving ODDITY full credit for its liquidity, 12–14× normalized EBITDA supports a valuation substantially above the distressed valuation implied by the current stock price. Why I think ~$42 is reasonable This isn’t dependent on ODDITY returning to 50% growth. In 2023 it generated $509M revenue / $107M EBITDA. In 2024 that became $647M / $150M. And in 2025 it reached $810M / $163M. Then the advertising/CAC problem hit IL MAKIAGE. Q1 2026 revenue dropped 26% and adjusted EBITDA went to -$7M, despite management saying the underlying issue was a dislocation in customer acquisition rather than disappearance of demand. Management also bought back approximately 6.1M shares for $82.3M during Q1, reducing Class A shares outstanding by about 10.6%. So I see the investment thesis as: $16–17 today → ~$30–35 partial recovery → ~$40–45 normalized recovery → $50–60+ if ODD returns to its historical growth/margin profile. 12–18 month base target would therefore be around $42, rather than the $50+ bull case. The biggest thing I’d watch now is CAC/CPA normalization at IL MAKIAGE. If the Q3 improvement management just guided to actually materializes and EBITDA begins recovering simultaneously, I’d be much more comfortable moving fair value toward $45–50.
1 · Reply
JFavabean
JFavabean Sep. 9 at 8:00 PM
$PACS WEIRD. I WONDER WHY ITS FINALLY WAKING UP!
0 · Reply
TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 9 at 5:01 PM
$ODD $PACS $FSLY The best turn around story in my opinion ODD. Following PACS and FSLY turn around
0 · Reply
thetraderB
thetraderB Sep. 9 at 2:44 PM
$PACS Entry Alert! With todays red-selling break and entry into the "In-Between" zone - I am long $PACS again! Been watching this like a hawk waiting for my ideal entry. Entry: $43.05 Stop Loss: $41 Targets: $47.20, $50
1 · Reply
TheBullishTrade
TheBullishTrade Sep. 9 at 1:17 PM
$ODD 17$ is the new baseline. Ive seen this kind of turn around with $FSLY $PACS This is a buy and hold till next year. It wont be 17$ next year.
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 8 at 1:57 PM
$PACS JPM finally updated its model and I eventually got the Truist price target (they are now the Street high). Median price target sitting at $59.
1 · Reply
QES
QES Sep. 3 at 10:11 PM
$PACS 137,812 shares... again, someone is very active on PACS.
1 · Reply
thetraderB
thetraderB Sep. 3 at 4:43 PM
$PACS Still one of my absolute favorite charts in the market rn. See previous posts for more detail - but simply look at this chart and you'll understand why. When price enters the "in-between" (red circle on daily chart), that's where we want to be entering longs.
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 3 at 1:59 PM
$PACS starting to feel egregious. We’re only $1 or so above where the share price was in early January. Especially in light of very solid operating results and two large deals.
2 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 3 at 11:53 AM
$PACS I do wonder if doing occasional secondary offerings would be a "better" way to offload large amounts of shares. The upsides as I see it are 1) it would eliminate the constant dribbling out of registration and sale filings and 2) it meaningfully and immediately lowers the % ownership of the two co founders who own over 2/3 of this business combined. Their ownership in and of itself may be a gating item for some investors given the amount of control they have. I believe the downsides of a secondary are 1) they are typically done at a discount to market value and 2) sometimes investors perceive the agreed upon offering price as near-term fair value given it was an agreed upon offering with institution(s) and not just a regular way open market sale
0 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 3 at 11:49 AM
$PACS as a few of us have noted over the last couple of weeks... a lot of mgmt / board selling happening. It is not ideal, but we will have to live with it. I do not believe (in this case) the selling indicates that PACS is at / approaching fair value... context for selling matters
0 · Reply
QES
QES Sep. 2 at 8:25 PM
$PACS I see someone bought 127,026 shares, at $43.09, at 16:02:00. That is nearly $5.5 million. AI (Perplexity) says: A few things worth noting about that specific line: Size (127,026 shares) x $43.09 ≈ $5.47 million notional — a sizable single print, likely an institutional block trade or part of the closing auction/imbalance, not a retail order. The XNYS tag confirms NYSE was the exchange of execution/reporting for that print, consistent with what we discussed about XNYS being the NYSE's market identifier code. The 16:00:02 timestamp (just after the 4:00 PM close) is typical of the NYSE closing-auction print, where accumulated buy/sell imbalances get matched in one large trade — that's the most common reason you'd see an unusually large single-line size like this compared to the surrounding trades of just a few hundred shares.
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Sep. 2 at 1:45 PM
$PACS well, they’ve now blown away their 20 facility target for M&A this year. Imbedding a crazy amount of future growth
1 · Reply
OpenOutcrier
OpenOutcrier Sep. 2 at 12:15 PM
$PACS (+3.2% pre) PACS Group to acquire 32 Florida nursing facilities from $OHI Omega https://ooc.bz/l/113023
0 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Sep. 1 at 8:33 PM
$PACS another big acquisition
0 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Sep. 1 at 4:50 PM
$PACS any time this stock is up around $1, it proceeds to sell off those gains within the next hour or two. So lame.
1 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Aug. 28 at 4:43 PM
$PACS ouch this keeps slowly getting beaten down.
0 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Aug. 27 at 7:33 PM
0 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Aug. 25 at 2:14 PM
$PACS coming up on exactly 2 months since the last acquisition (which was huge), wonder if we’ll see more soon. I would imagine they are working out deals in parallel, and they mentioned on the earnings call there would be more acquisitions this year and only about 3 months left in the year.
0 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Aug. 20 at 9:08 PM
$PACS 2nd time this week it dumped really hard in the last hour
1 · Reply
DrabCrab5
DrabCrab5 Aug. 18 at 4:30 PM
$PACS we remain ~20% undervalued vs. ENSG as of today, and ~30% off ENSG's pre short report price of approx $215 (see below valuation side by side). I think you can reasonably say $50 - $55 is near-term fair value, and that $55 - $60 is absolutely achievable over the next couple of quarters... especially if current estimates prove to be conservative (which they almost definitionally will based on what we know) and they have solid guidance for 2027. Beyond $60 in the next 6 months gets a little more hazy. A lot likely depends on what happens with ENSG... if ENSG trades up from here that gives PACS more room to run without closing the current valuation gap. If ENSG is flat, we have to assume the market is willing to close the valuation gap further, or perhaps value PACS at a higher multiple than ENSG. Not impossible, but I would not underwrite that as a base case given ENSG's strong operating profile, slightly cleaner balance sheet, dividend, and lack of gov't investigation.
1 · Reply
Smokesdrugs
Smokesdrugs Aug. 18 at 3:43 PM
$PACS undervalued
0 · Reply