Valuation
- Market cap
- 50,047,000
- Revenue TTM
- $0
- Net income TTM
- $-8,480,000
- PE ratio
- 0.00
- Forward PE
- —
- Profit margin
- 0.00%
- Debt to equity
- 0.00
Trading
- Volume
- 51,900
- Avg volume
- 128,934
- Day's range
- $0.58 – $0.61
- Shares out
- 83,411,000
- Stochastic %K
- 7%
- Beta
- 1.81
- Analysts
- Strong Sell
- Price target
- $2.96
Company profile
Medicenna Therapeutics Corp., a clinical-stage immunotherapy company, engages in the development and commercialization of Superkines and empowered Superkines for the treatment of cancer, inflammation, and immune-mediated diseases. It develops bizaxofusp, an interleukin- 4 (IL-4) targeted therapy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The company also develops MDNA11, an interleukin-2 (IL-2) to activate anti-can...
Show more
Medicenna Therapeutics Corp., a clinical-stage immunotherapy company, engages in the development and commercialization of Superkines and empowered Superkines for the treatment of cancer, inflammation, and immune-mediated diseases. It develops bizaxofusp, an interleukin- 4 (IL-4) targeted therapy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The company also develops MDNA11, an interleukin-2 (IL-2) to activate anti-cancer immune cells over immunosuppressive Tregs; and MDNA113, a tumor-targeting and activatable bifunctional anti-PD-1-IL-2 superkine for cancer. In addition, its preclinical products are MDNA209, an IL-2/IL-15 antagonist for autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and graft versus host diseases, including transplant rejection; and MDNA413, an IL-4/IL-13 antagonist to inflammatory, asthma, and atopic dermatitis, as well as other allergic diseases. Medicenna Therapeutics Corp. is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
- Industry
- Biotechnology
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Phone
- 416-964-5442
- Website
- https://www.medicenna.com
- Address
- 2 Bloor Street West, Suite 903 7th Floor, Toronto, Canada
Latest news
No headlines yet.
Stocktwits
rudazur2
Oct 10, 9:37 PM
$MDNAF we will see only intestinal data from mdna11 at sitc ?
2 replies
DIJG
Oct 9, 2:09 PM
$MDNAF oncology doesn’t always follow common sense bcos biology in living tissue is not always linear. If a drug works at 60 µg, you’d assume it works even better at 90 µg —This is the story of MDNA11. All known MDNA11 responses all came at 60 µg, below the RP2D of 90 µg. In other field, that would be a breakthrough. In pharma, it’s dismissed as a fluke until you repeat it at your selected RP2D. Regulators and BD teams don’t accept dose escalation signals those who did with Synthrox &Nektar can tell the story. Everything ultimately lives or dies at the dose you choose as RP2D.heading into SITC with a level of clarity per the title is a relief
0 replies
boomshiva
Oct 8, 8:54 PM
$MDNAF I blame Canadians for the sell-off right at the close! lol
0 replies
DIJG
Oct 8, 3:08 PM
$MDNAF A clinical program generally needs 3 layers of validation before it can credibly “break out”: (1) Biological / Mechanistic Validation (2) Safety & Tolerability Validation (3) Clinical Efficacy Validation — the true breakout trigger
The 1st 2 almost never move a stock in a durable way. You get a spike, then a sell off, we've seen this 3x with MDNA because mechanism and safety alone are not enough to bring in the big players —who anchor a valuation. They wait for the only thing that matters
MDNA11 already checks the 1st 2 boxes. But lacks the most important validation: clinical proof of efficacy. That’s why the approved SITC title — explicitly emphasizing clinical efficacy — is so telling. It signals that Mdna's finally ready to address the 1 missing pillar.
If SITC delivers confirmed, durable tumor shrinkage at therapeutic dose, MDNA11 transitions from “scientifically interesting” to “clinically undeniable.” That's the moment the MDNA becomes investable for serious capital & pharma
0 replies
Itsybitsybeanbag
Oct 6, 7:35 PM
$MDNAF
So which one of the four of us bought today … ?? Surely no one else is watching?
5 replies
rudazur2
Oct 6, 5:49 PM
$MDNAF how much time since we had more than 400k volume ? 😂😂😂
1 replies