Mbak Energy Solutions Inc (MBAK)

$0.00 0.00 (N/A)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 1,576,800
Avg Vol 2,421,460
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 56%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. engages in the development, manufacturing and commercialization of non fossil fuel energy products. Its products include lithium, sodium, and solid state batteries and battery manufacturing and supply chain equipment for industrial, medical, portable electronics and EV application. It also manufactures and sells E-Taxi bikes. MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. was formerly knowns as Alternet Systems, Inc. and changed its name to MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. in June 2025. MBAK En...

Industry: Recreational Vehicles
Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Phone: 508 356 5433
Address:
Wilmington Trade Center Building 3, 3940 US Highway 421N, Wilmington, United States
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 30 at 3:58 PM
$MBAK Notice how '@OTC_Watchdog' calls themselves a 'watchdog,' but 100% of their post history is hyper-focused on $MBAK? Real market watchdogs cover the entire OTC. You don't spend 40 hours a week pulling dockets, digging up corporate registries in South Africa, and tracking website badge refresh timers on a single sub-penny stock out of 'public service.' You have a short position or an axe to grind. Keep writing essays—the long-term investors are watching the actual physical infrastructure build. You see a pattern of "excuses" because you expect a high-voltage industrial turnaround to run on the frictionless timeline of a software app. I see an emerging market infrastructure play navigating the grueling, messy middle phase: hardware manufactured, regulatory lab infrastructure being built, and grid compliance being secured. Time will show which read was right. Don't invest what you're not willing to lose!
3 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 30 at 1:04 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — you hold millions of shares and have capital on the line. You've said so yourself. That is precisely why every piece of negative information gets a positive spin by you. Badges expire on timers. Addresses are administrative. Deliveries are certification delays. Communication silence is strategic. The pattern is always explainable, always temporary, always about to resolve. This is not analysis. This is the natural response of someone who cannot afford to reach the obvious conclusion. You were asked one question across multiple posts: where in this documented pattern do you find confidence that a single customer will ever take physical delivery and make a verified payment? You have not answered it. Instead you questioned my motives to deflect.
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 29 at 10:04 PM
$MBAK@otc_watchdog I honestly don’t know what your personal interest or motive is with this company. You spend hours every single day writing detailed essays, dissecting $15 domain redirects, tracking postal mail, and cataloging administrative timers on a micro-cap stock you claim to be "Bearish" on. If you don't hold a position and don't believe in the company, why are you devoting so much of your life to it? Most people who dislike a penny stock simply sell, walk away, and focus on better setups. The sheer volume of your posts makes it obvious you have an agenda—whether that's short-side sentiment manipulation, board clout, or just an odd obsession. Unlike you, I am an actual investor in $MBAK. I hold millions of shares. I have actual capital on the line, which means I look at the complete picture—both the messy back-office realities and the underlying macro fundamentals.
2 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 29 at 1:08 PM
$MBAK @Mangood You have an explanation for every individual data point. Badges expire on timers. Addresses are administrative oversights. Deliveries are delayed by certification cycles. Communication is being managed strategically. Taken individually, each explanation might sound plausible. But step back and look at the pattern: a company that has missed every announced delivery deadline, certified false director information to a government body under penalty of perjury, provided a non-existent address to a federal court, reported $3 million in revenue with zero cash received from customers, had its profile badges removed, and whose Chairman has now stated that she will communicate the legal minimum to shareholders. At what point do the individual explanations stop and the pattern begin? And the question you haven't answered in any post: where in this picture do you find confidence that any customer will ever take physical delivery of a single BESS unit and make a verifiable payment?
0 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 29 at 1:22 AM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ You are taking automated OTC Markets 6-month profile timers and returned postal mail to paint a narrative of immediate collapse. Is MBAK’s corporate administration and PR hygiene frustratingly slow? Yes. Falling into Pink Limited due to reporting lags and letting profile verification badges temporarily expire shows a back office that needs serious tightening. If a company verified its profile in January 2026, that badge automatically drops off in July 2026 unless the company pays the renewal fee and re-verifies. It is a scheduled expiration timer, not an OTC Markets enforcement action. However, equating administrative paperwork delays to a fake company ignores the actual physical assets: the completed 55 MWh BESS hardware sitting in warehouse staging and the massive structural demand in the Indian energy market. The administrative tags clear when paperwork is filed; the true valuation will be determined when the hardware moves.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 28 at 7:33 PM
$MBAK Two badges removed from MBAK's OTC Markets profile today. Independent Directors — gone. MBAK announced three independent directors via press releases in January and April 2026. The Wyoming annual report filed June 3 — signed by Michelle Boos under penalty of perjury — listed two directors only: Boos and Han. None of the three appeared. Company Verified Profile — gone. Court correspondence sent to the address Boos provided to the federal court was returned by USPS: "NO SUCH NUMBER — UNABLE TO FORWARD." OTC Markets does not remove these designations without review. MBAK has been Pink Limited for three months. Its Chairman stated in writing she will communicate "the minimum required by law." It is currently not meeting even that standard. Has a single customer taken physical delivery of BESS units? Has a single customer payment been received?
0 · Reply
Gonefishin365
Gonefishin365 Jul. 27 at 7:25 PM
$MBAK well crap, we just stuck now? Couple of dumpers today.
0 · Reply
SmisH
SmisH Jul. 23 at 6:09 PM
$MBAK I need this to be .25 and I'll be out, k
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Jul. 18 at 3:44 AM
$MBAK Is anyone here who had ALYI before the MBAK conversion? I had ALYI when they had REVOLT tokens and Boto Cycle promises . . . Just curious what happened to all these promises . . .
3 · Reply
SmisH
SmisH Jul. 15 at 12:58 PM
$MBAK 🖕💩🖕
0 · Reply
Latest News on MBAK
No data available.
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 30 at 3:58 PM
$MBAK Notice how '@OTC_Watchdog' calls themselves a 'watchdog,' but 100% of their post history is hyper-focused on $MBAK? Real market watchdogs cover the entire OTC. You don't spend 40 hours a week pulling dockets, digging up corporate registries in South Africa, and tracking website badge refresh timers on a single sub-penny stock out of 'public service.' You have a short position or an axe to grind. Keep writing essays—the long-term investors are watching the actual physical infrastructure build. You see a pattern of "excuses" because you expect a high-voltage industrial turnaround to run on the frictionless timeline of a software app. I see an emerging market infrastructure play navigating the grueling, messy middle phase: hardware manufactured, regulatory lab infrastructure being built, and grid compliance being secured. Time will show which read was right. Don't invest what you're not willing to lose!
3 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 30 at 1:04 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — you hold millions of shares and have capital on the line. You've said so yourself. That is precisely why every piece of negative information gets a positive spin by you. Badges expire on timers. Addresses are administrative. Deliveries are certification delays. Communication silence is strategic. The pattern is always explainable, always temporary, always about to resolve. This is not analysis. This is the natural response of someone who cannot afford to reach the obvious conclusion. You were asked one question across multiple posts: where in this documented pattern do you find confidence that a single customer will ever take physical delivery and make a verified payment? You have not answered it. Instead you questioned my motives to deflect.
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 29 at 10:04 PM
$MBAK@otc_watchdog I honestly don’t know what your personal interest or motive is with this company. You spend hours every single day writing detailed essays, dissecting $15 domain redirects, tracking postal mail, and cataloging administrative timers on a micro-cap stock you claim to be "Bearish" on. If you don't hold a position and don't believe in the company, why are you devoting so much of your life to it? Most people who dislike a penny stock simply sell, walk away, and focus on better setups. The sheer volume of your posts makes it obvious you have an agenda—whether that's short-side sentiment manipulation, board clout, or just an odd obsession. Unlike you, I am an actual investor in $MBAK. I hold millions of shares. I have actual capital on the line, which means I look at the complete picture—both the messy back-office realities and the underlying macro fundamentals.
2 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 29 at 1:08 PM
$MBAK @Mangood You have an explanation for every individual data point. Badges expire on timers. Addresses are administrative oversights. Deliveries are delayed by certification cycles. Communication is being managed strategically. Taken individually, each explanation might sound plausible. But step back and look at the pattern: a company that has missed every announced delivery deadline, certified false director information to a government body under penalty of perjury, provided a non-existent address to a federal court, reported $3 million in revenue with zero cash received from customers, had its profile badges removed, and whose Chairman has now stated that she will communicate the legal minimum to shareholders. At what point do the individual explanations stop and the pattern begin? And the question you haven't answered in any post: where in this picture do you find confidence that any customer will ever take physical delivery of a single BESS unit and make a verifiable payment?
0 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jul. 29 at 1:22 AM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ You are taking automated OTC Markets 6-month profile timers and returned postal mail to paint a narrative of immediate collapse. Is MBAK’s corporate administration and PR hygiene frustratingly slow? Yes. Falling into Pink Limited due to reporting lags and letting profile verification badges temporarily expire shows a back office that needs serious tightening. If a company verified its profile in January 2026, that badge automatically drops off in July 2026 unless the company pays the renewal fee and re-verifies. It is a scheduled expiration timer, not an OTC Markets enforcement action. However, equating administrative paperwork delays to a fake company ignores the actual physical assets: the completed 55 MWh BESS hardware sitting in warehouse staging and the massive structural demand in the Indian energy market. The administrative tags clear when paperwork is filed; the true valuation will be determined when the hardware moves.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jul. 28 at 7:33 PM
$MBAK Two badges removed from MBAK's OTC Markets profile today. Independent Directors — gone. MBAK announced three independent directors via press releases in January and April 2026. The Wyoming annual report filed June 3 — signed by Michelle Boos under penalty of perjury — listed two directors only: Boos and Han. None of the three appeared. Company Verified Profile — gone. Court correspondence sent to the address Boos provided to the federal court was returned by USPS: "NO SUCH NUMBER — UNABLE TO FORWARD." OTC Markets does not remove these designations without review. MBAK has been Pink Limited for three months. Its Chairman stated in writing she will communicate "the minimum required by law." It is currently not meeting even that standard. Has a single customer taken physical delivery of BESS units? Has a single customer payment been received?
0 · Reply
Gonefishin365
Gonefishin365 Jul. 27 at 7:25 PM
$MBAK well crap, we just stuck now? Couple of dumpers today.
0 · Reply
SmisH
SmisH Jul. 23 at 6:09 PM
$MBAK I need this to be .25 and I'll be out, k
1 · Reply
Rayof808
Rayof808 Jul. 18 at 3:44 AM
$MBAK Is anyone here who had ALYI before the MBAK conversion? I had ALYI when they had REVOLT tokens and Boto Cycle promises . . . Just curious what happened to all these promises . . .
3 · Reply
SmisH
SmisH Jul. 15 at 12:58 PM
$MBAK 🖕💩🖕
0 · Reply
Yogie26
Yogie26 Jul. 15 at 10:23 AM
$MBAK This looks painful
1 · Reply
SmisH
SmisH Jul. 11 at 4:57 AM
$MBAK 🖕💩🖕
0 · Reply
Justcantwin1
Justcantwin1 Jul. 10 at 3:14 PM
$MBAK Every day is a new level of disappointment!
0 · Reply
hoIdmybags
hoIdmybags Jul. 8 at 2:01 AM
$MBAK so whatever happened to the EV bike ? the scam changed trajectories ? lol
3 · Reply
Taz69
Taz69 Jul. 3 at 5:21 AM
$MBAK Accumulate cheapies...Jimmydog is going to get vaporized!
0 · Reply
Christo66
Christo66 Jul. 1 at 12:07 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ just so we’re clear, I requested you furnish this forum with your primary reasons for your disdain of Chairwoman Boos, MBAK as a company, and the incessant, borderline obsessive postings whereas you’ve chosen ihub and ST as your personal amphitheaters for your musings. To date my request has gone ignored. So I ask again. Why are you here? What is your beef? Please do tell, for all of us uneducated, underrepresented, and less than capable of making intelligent decisions on what to do with our monies…
2 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 10:39 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — correct. Zambian energy ministers don't use Contact Us pages. But MBAK's retail investors do. The website wasn't built for project financiers — it was cited in MBAK's own press release to establish legitimacy for shareholders. The question isn't how Letsatsi communicates with ministry officials. The question is why MBAK directed its investors to a website that redirects to Indonesian gambling — and why nobody has fixed it even after public exposure. The website was built for you. Not for Zambian ministry officials.
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 9:57 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Honestly, your obsession with this company is gonna get you sick. You are trying so hard to force a conspiracy theory that you are completely applying consumer retail logic to industrial B2B infrastructure. Do you honestly believe a Zambian energy minister or a project finance lawyer logs onto a public WordPress site to check the "Contact Us" tab? No. They communicate through dedicated, secure corporate email networks, encrypted data rooms, bank-to-bank SWIFT portals, and direct phone lines to the executive team. The public website has zero utility to the actual people funding a $57.5M project. Letsatsi Power’s "customers" aren't retail consumers trying to buy products online with a credit card. Their customers are Zambian state ministry officials, utility grid directors, and institutional project financiers.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 9:25 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — agreed. Sophisticated companies get hacked too. But they also fix it within hours, because customers notify them, staff notices, and their business depends on it. A hacked website is an IT problem. A hacked website nobody fixes even after public exposure is evidence of no active operations: no customers to complain, no staff to notice, no business to protect.
0 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 7:32 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Sophisticated domain hijacking, malicious DNS redirection, and WordPress database injections happen to multi-billion dollar conglomerates, government entities, and small businesses alike. When an enterprise website gets compromised and redirects to an offshore gambling link like a slot site, it means their third-party web hosting server or IT registrar was breached. It is a digital security failure, not a sign that the physical company or its underlying grid contracts don't exist It shows their back-office IT support is asleep at the wheel. But using a hijacked website to claim that a physical energy storage manufacturing pipeline is fake is a massive logical leap.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 1:11 PM
$MBAK On March 25, 2026, MBAK named LETSATSI Power South Africa as its exclusive partner for a $57.5M Zambian BESS project. Today their website redirects to an Indonesian slot machine platform: https://letsatsipower.com/news-update/ Click "News Updates." "Our Team." "Contact Us." All three redirect to DEPOBOS88. Lucky Spin. Minimum deposit Rp 10,000. 18+ only. A real energy company executing a $57.5M project with international lenders would notice their website redirecting to online gambling within hours. This has been broken and unmonitored for weeks. Does this look like a company that has ordered, paid, and is currently waiting to receive a delivery of products from MBAK out of China for a $57.5M project?
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 24 at 3:22 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Your critique is entirely valid—Africa should be the near-term catalyst while India builds its moat. The silence isn't a sign of a fake market; it’s the classic symptom of an over-leveraged startup supply chain where a delay at the primary anchor destination causes a temporary cash and logistics freeze across the minor lanes. The thesis hasn't broken, but the operational execution is entirely bottlenecked at the origin point. We are waiting to see if management can decouple the African logistics lane and monetize it independently while India grinds through the NABL accreditation process.
1 · Reply