Apr. 14 at 5:52 PM
$NRED.CSE Pre-drill copper setups in BC rarely show both grade and geophysics this early
Wilmac reports 0.639% Cu (avg, 3 surface exposures) tied to porphyry alteration, plus IP anomalies on 5 of 10 lines in 2025, with full grid completion in 2026. A second target (Plume) extends 4 km SSW with no IP coverage yet
Direct peer comparison at the same stage:
$VCUFF Vizsla Copperview M5 → 3.5 km² IP anomaly, no surface copper data (covered by overburden)
Wilmac → IP + mapped surface copper mineralization
One is pure geophysics. The other already shows copper at surface with matching IP response
Step-up comps:
Thira started at 0.18% Cu (edge hit) → later 0.51% CuEq over 237 m
$KDKCF Kodiak MPD early surface: 0.38-0.55% Cu → now 439M+ tonnes at ~0.32-0.39% CuEq
Wilmac’s 0.639% Cu surface average exceeds both early-stage reference points, pre-drill
Surface data ≠ resource, but across BC porphyry juniors, Wilmac currently shows stronger early copper indications than most peers at the same stage