Guanajuato Silver Ltd (GSVRF)

$0.60 +0.05 (8.95%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 1,855,700
Avg Vol 2,292,232
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 33%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Guanajuato Silver Company Ltd., a precious metals producer, engages in reactivating past producing mines in Mexico. It produces silver, gold, zinc, and lead deposits at the Topia mine. The company was formerly known as Vangold Mining Corp. and changed its name to Guanajuato Silver Company Ltd. in June 2021. Guanajuato Silver Company Ltd. was incorporated in 1978 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Industry: Silver
Sector: Basic Materials
Phone: 604 670 8460
Address:
999 Canada Place, Suite 578, Vancouver, Canada
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 5 at 5:26 PM
$GSVRF https://youtube.com/watch?v=rvBtfMkRKTs
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 4 at 2:38 PM
$GSVRF has smaller marketcap than $SVRSF this is absolutely wild
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 2 at 3:46 PM
$GSVRF based on the CEOs statements from third video below, they will keep announcing news and progressing with multitude of operations for the next few quarters, essentially getting better and better for the rest of the year. especially exploration, increasing bolanito's production capacity and underground integration with san ignacio, blending bolanitos and san ignacio ores for better milling efficiency, increasing gold production, slowly bringing pinguico into production, increasing capacity on all three mills to much higher percentages(processing much more ore), buying another mine(dilution risk if silver prices stay in the 70s level). the best thing is that they are a producer. not an explorer or a developer but a producer. they have 5 operating mines, there is essentially no risk here in regards to halted production(diversified assets) or some unexpected cost blowouts. everything is on track and on schedule. the valuation right now makes no sense with $17M debt and so many assets
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 1 at 7:45 AM
$GSVRF AI says the average price of silver in Q1 was $98.66. most miners, sold silver with average of $85. this incomplete quarter shows $76.5 average. so if we go by previous quarter and expect about 15% lower price, we should expect guanajuato to sell at $65. we know the bolanitos production was not fully projected in Q1 but in Q2 it will. so say they will do 400k ounces of silver, that should bring in 26M instead of 28M from Q1. i think the same will go for gold(higher production but lower price). so in the end, we should see very similar numbers to Q1, so no dip. which is a good news.
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 30 at 7:02 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pgxo8UFk2Q presentation from three weeks ago.
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 29 at 6:14 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiumOUU_3kk
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 7:39 PM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEXfDSZGR8w
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 1:55 PM
$GSVRF so to me it looks like the aisc/costs went up because a) bolanitos started requiring money for operations which they did not have in previous quarters. yes, the mine is producing but it also requires capital for operations. b) their other mines have increased opex because of the drill program. so it is included in the aisc. bolanitos and san ignacio are now being connected so there is increased opex just from that alone. c) they must be really drilling el cubo really hard as it's opex went up the most, 6.5x
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 11:05 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL-vD--rEK8
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 27 at 7:40 PM
$GSVRF they produced 616 445 AgEq in Q1. That is 2.4M AgEq per year. That is less than HALF of expected production of 5M AgEq. In 2025, they produced 1.8M Ag(they include Bolanits production despite not owning it in 2025), this year looks like 1.3M Ag. Not sure what to think.
0 · Reply
Latest News on GSVRF
No data available.
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 5 at 5:26 PM
$GSVRF https://youtube.com/watch?v=rvBtfMkRKTs
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 4 at 2:38 PM
$GSVRF has smaller marketcap than $SVRSF this is absolutely wild
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 2 at 3:46 PM
$GSVRF based on the CEOs statements from third video below, they will keep announcing news and progressing with multitude of operations for the next few quarters, essentially getting better and better for the rest of the year. especially exploration, increasing bolanito's production capacity and underground integration with san ignacio, blending bolanitos and san ignacio ores for better milling efficiency, increasing gold production, slowly bringing pinguico into production, increasing capacity on all three mills to much higher percentages(processing much more ore), buying another mine(dilution risk if silver prices stay in the 70s level). the best thing is that they are a producer. not an explorer or a developer but a producer. they have 5 operating mines, there is essentially no risk here in regards to halted production(diversified assets) or some unexpected cost blowouts. everything is on track and on schedule. the valuation right now makes no sense with $17M debt and so many assets
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie Jun. 1 at 7:45 AM
$GSVRF AI says the average price of silver in Q1 was $98.66. most miners, sold silver with average of $85. this incomplete quarter shows $76.5 average. so if we go by previous quarter and expect about 15% lower price, we should expect guanajuato to sell at $65. we know the bolanitos production was not fully projected in Q1 but in Q2 it will. so say they will do 400k ounces of silver, that should bring in 26M instead of 28M from Q1. i think the same will go for gold(higher production but lower price). so in the end, we should see very similar numbers to Q1, so no dip. which is a good news.
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 30 at 7:02 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pgxo8UFk2Q presentation from three weeks ago.
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 29 at 6:14 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiumOUU_3kk
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 7:39 PM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEXfDSZGR8w
2 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 1:55 PM
$GSVRF so to me it looks like the aisc/costs went up because a) bolanitos started requiring money for operations which they did not have in previous quarters. yes, the mine is producing but it also requires capital for operations. b) their other mines have increased opex because of the drill program. so it is included in the aisc. bolanitos and san ignacio are now being connected so there is increased opex just from that alone. c) they must be really drilling el cubo really hard as it's opex went up the most, 6.5x
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 28 at 11:05 AM
$GSVRF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL-vD--rEK8
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 27 at 7:40 PM
$GSVRF they produced 616 445 AgEq in Q1. That is 2.4M AgEq per year. That is less than HALF of expected production of 5M AgEq. In 2025, they produced 1.8M Ag(they include Bolanits production despite not owning it in 2025), this year looks like 1.3M Ag. Not sure what to think.
0 · Reply
Sunnybhargava
Sunnybhargava May. 27 at 7:28 PM
$GSVRF it’s a good earnings. They have a 89% increase revenue over last quarter. Gross profit 13.1 m compared to 21.8 m loss last quarter. Net income of 5.7 million. Cash in hand 30.5 million. After paying 30 million in cash for bolanitos mines. Looks good. 👍
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 27 at 5:44 PM
$GSVRF fyi avino produced 263k silver and 1.8k gold in q1.
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 27 at 4:06 PM
$GSVRF revenue 43.1M, i was expecting 50-60M. silver produced 331k, i was expecting 450k. gold produced 4.3k, i was expecting it IF it includes the 1.5k paid gold loan, but i doubt it. they should have produced 5.5k. ebitda 13.1M would be ok but the net income is only 5.7M. i was expecting at least 10M. they mined +58% and milled +69% which is bolanitos in action, BUT the grade fell by 31% for silver, under 100g/t. gold did better, due to bolanitos. avg price for silver was 84.45, i was expecting 85 to be in line with the industry, so it's not too bad. but gold was 4977 which is absolutely top of any miner out there in Q1. maybe top 3? cash fell from 44M to 30M so in one quarter they spent 14M. humongous red flag is AISC rising by 24% to over $53. that is very very bad. anyway, that amount of produced silver is just bad. they missed the mark by 100k ounces.
2 · Reply
NotRussianBot1
NotRussianBot1 May. 27 at 3:53 PM
$GSVRF https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/guanajuato-silver-delivers-record-revenue-112000857.html
1 · Reply
WallyandSilver
WallyandSilver May. 27 at 3:30 PM
$GSVRF I’ve got .427 ask seems like a buy to me
1 · Reply
WallyandSilver
WallyandSilver May. 27 at 2:23 PM
$GSVRF market cannot recognize value yet. I think in a year this will be $5 just need to be patient and accumulate with cash…
1 · Reply
vffer
vffer May. 27 at 1:39 PM
$GSVRF Up one penny on great ER?
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 27 at 7:00 AM
$GSVRF
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 26 at 6:00 AM
$GSVRF
1 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 25 at 6:49 AM
$GSVRF
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 24 at 1:50 PM
$GSVRF
0 · Reply
glengoolie
glengoolie May. 22 at 7:15 PM
$GSVRF Q1 ER will either make us rich or poor. Revaluation potential is humongous and very real, if they capitalised on Bolanitos synergies. https://x.com/TheGladiatorHC/status/2057723358578671816
3 · Reply