Apr. 22 at 10:50 PM
$EBS I see what happened: since 80% of the share are owned by 'tutes', they rely on advisory firms on how to vote.
One was "FOR", the other was "AGAINST".
ISS was "AGAINST"
Basically, the board is saying: there's no point paying all this cash for salaries to management, when I can earn a higher return than the 'dilly' they propose.