Charlie's Holdings Inc (CHUC)

$0.27 0.00 (-0.22%)
Market Cap 74.43M
Revenue (ttm) 8.49M
Net Income (ttm) -4.16M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 25.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -49.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.05
Volume 32,700
Avg Vol 115,242
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 270.65M
Stochastic %K 65%
Beta 1.39
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Charlie's Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, formulates, markets, and distributes non-combustible nicotine-related and alternative alkaloid vapor products in the United States and internationally. The company offers nicotine-based disposable products under the Pacha, PACHAMAMA and SBX brands; e-liquid products; and nicotine salt products. It sells its products through distributors, specialty retailers, and third-party online resellers. Charlie's Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2014 an...

Industry: Tobacco
Sector: Consumer Defensive
Phone: 949 531 6855
Address:
1007 Brioso Drive, Costa Mesa, United States
DonutHole
DonutHole Apr. 25 at 8:59 AM
$CHUC From the TPE show...the age gated vape is real. Trying to get pics of the actual device.
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 10:18 PM
$CHUC @redbeamgold Your “pass through” read is sharp. Price holding while 2M+ shares change hands isn’t bearish, buyers absorbed every share without breaking the price. That’s demand. On the reverse split concern, I get it, most OTC splits end badly. But the data shows the ones that succeed all share the same profile: real revenue, clean financials, confirmed uplist catalyst. CHUC just checked all three for the first time. $20.9M revenue Clean audit Going concern removed The 1-for-50 maximum lands this stock well above the NYSE American floor with real cushion. This isn’t a distress split. It’s a graduation. Long $CHUC
0 · Reply
redbeamgold
redbeamgold Apr. 24 at 8:16 PM
$CHUC very interesting. Can’t decide if it’s good or bad. If someone has a lot of shares and wants to sell then you see the price fall and maybe even a step down stairs formation. If people are buying then the price goes up and up on massive multi day volume. But we kinda stayed the same. Kind of like a pass through selling of shares. And with our positive knowledge of good things ahead, why would anyone sell. Yahoo says we have 4% institutions. perhaps they are selling ahead of the reverse split. I think one can make a case either way that we are about to go up or significantly lower into the rs forcing the maximum rs. Isn’t it a saying that volume increases precede an event???
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 7:45 PM
$CHUC @DonutHole Yesterday: 1.2M shares traded, closed at $0.27 — nearly 15x the average daily volume of 84K. Today: 800K+ shares and the stock is at $0.248. Two days of historically high volume and it still moves like a penny stock with no floor. I’m not sure about the coincidence but this IS the argument for the uplist. Institutions don’t let 800K shares on a $60M market cap company dictate price like this. My personal view is that they go greater than 20:1 on the split. At current prices a 25:1 lands at $5.50, a 50:1 at $11. Either gives real cushion above the $3 NYSE American floor. The proxy wasn’t an accident. The volume isn’t either. $CHUC $MO $BTI
1 · Reply
Fargas
Fargas Apr. 24 at 7:33 PM
$CHUC prime example why we need to uplist. Go from .28 to .24 with in seconds with any swings . We would not see these crazy swings in seconds if we uplisted . Vote yes on the R/S how many more months and years are we going to go thru this ?
0 · Reply
captainzoltar
captainzoltar Apr. 24 at 7:27 PM
$CHUC down it goes, what Zoltar buys stock he makes it crash. Tiiimmmmbbbhurrrr
0 · Reply
dentist80
dentist80 Apr. 24 at 6:46 PM
$CHUC Yes to all!
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 5:27 PM
$CHUC Voted YES on all four proposals. To those voting no on the reverse split: you’re not protecting your shares, you’re blocking the uplist. No uplist means no institutions, no analyst coverage, no liquidity floor. The OTCQB with 0.24% of the float moving the price double digits every session stays your reality. Management cut their own salaries to get here. The least we can do is give them the tools. $MO $BTI
1 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 5:26 PM
$CHUC interesting that a short ( captainzoltar ) would buy shares just to vote against the uplist . That tells us that he is scared what will happen after the uplist takes place .
0 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 5:19 PM
$CHUC ALLY INVEST SECURITIES Thanks for voting!
0 · Reply
Latest News on CHUC
No data available.
DonutHole
DonutHole Apr. 25 at 8:59 AM
$CHUC From the TPE show...the age gated vape is real. Trying to get pics of the actual device.
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 10:18 PM
$CHUC @redbeamgold Your “pass through” read is sharp. Price holding while 2M+ shares change hands isn’t bearish, buyers absorbed every share without breaking the price. That’s demand. On the reverse split concern, I get it, most OTC splits end badly. But the data shows the ones that succeed all share the same profile: real revenue, clean financials, confirmed uplist catalyst. CHUC just checked all three for the first time. $20.9M revenue Clean audit Going concern removed The 1-for-50 maximum lands this stock well above the NYSE American floor with real cushion. This isn’t a distress split. It’s a graduation. Long $CHUC
0 · Reply
redbeamgold
redbeamgold Apr. 24 at 8:16 PM
$CHUC very interesting. Can’t decide if it’s good or bad. If someone has a lot of shares and wants to sell then you see the price fall and maybe even a step down stairs formation. If people are buying then the price goes up and up on massive multi day volume. But we kinda stayed the same. Kind of like a pass through selling of shares. And with our positive knowledge of good things ahead, why would anyone sell. Yahoo says we have 4% institutions. perhaps they are selling ahead of the reverse split. I think one can make a case either way that we are about to go up or significantly lower into the rs forcing the maximum rs. Isn’t it a saying that volume increases precede an event???
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 7:45 PM
$CHUC @DonutHole Yesterday: 1.2M shares traded, closed at $0.27 — nearly 15x the average daily volume of 84K. Today: 800K+ shares and the stock is at $0.248. Two days of historically high volume and it still moves like a penny stock with no floor. I’m not sure about the coincidence but this IS the argument for the uplist. Institutions don’t let 800K shares on a $60M market cap company dictate price like this. My personal view is that they go greater than 20:1 on the split. At current prices a 25:1 lands at $5.50, a 50:1 at $11. Either gives real cushion above the $3 NYSE American floor. The proxy wasn’t an accident. The volume isn’t either. $CHUC $MO $BTI
1 · Reply
Fargas
Fargas Apr. 24 at 7:33 PM
$CHUC prime example why we need to uplist. Go from .28 to .24 with in seconds with any swings . We would not see these crazy swings in seconds if we uplisted . Vote yes on the R/S how many more months and years are we going to go thru this ?
0 · Reply
captainzoltar
captainzoltar Apr. 24 at 7:27 PM
$CHUC down it goes, what Zoltar buys stock he makes it crash. Tiiimmmmbbbhurrrr
0 · Reply
dentist80
dentist80 Apr. 24 at 6:46 PM
$CHUC Yes to all!
0 · Reply
jorgegb
jorgegb Apr. 24 at 5:27 PM
$CHUC Voted YES on all four proposals. To those voting no on the reverse split: you’re not protecting your shares, you’re blocking the uplist. No uplist means no institutions, no analyst coverage, no liquidity floor. The OTCQB with 0.24% of the float moving the price double digits every session stays your reality. Management cut their own salaries to get here. The least we can do is give them the tools. $MO $BTI
1 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 5:26 PM
$CHUC interesting that a short ( captainzoltar ) would buy shares just to vote against the uplist . That tells us that he is scared what will happen after the uplist takes place .
0 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 5:19 PM
$CHUC ALLY INVEST SECURITIES Thanks for voting!
0 · Reply
Marci911
Marci911 Apr. 24 at 5:08 PM
$CHUC Ah, there's the head and mast sticking out of the water! Captain Zoltar can swim... and yet he chose Chuc... Welcome!
1 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 5:05 PM
$CHUC I know that Henry knows what he is doing . I trust CHUC management , They have the most skin in the game .
0 · Reply
captainzoltar
captainzoltar Apr. 24 at 5:05 PM
$CHUC captain Zoltar bought 100 shares to vote no and no on #3 and #4 . No to reverse turd split. Weeeee
1 · Reply
Marci911
Marci911 Apr. 24 at 5:05 PM
$CHUC I'm sure the majority supports Henry and voted YES. Because they know exactly what Henry is planning and what's happening right now! The investors also have enormous trust in Henry! I wonder why these people who voted NO are invested in Charlie's? Charlie's is a company that needs the trust of its investors! Everyone else who doesn't trust him should sell today and find another investment. I just don't understand these people... They invest but don't trust him... It's a contradiction.
1 · Reply
Marci911
Marci911 Apr. 24 at 4:58 PM
$CHUC Thanks to the investors who understand that we need to use the RS tool in an emergency...Henry wants to be sure! So that we finally have a fixed time for the uplist! And now to the people who still haven't understood!!! Show respect to those who brought us here! Don't hinder their work and don't put obstacles in the way of these hardworking people! Do you really think Henry and the entire Chuc team don't know what they're doing? And you have to tell them how the company should do its job? I'll say it again! For those in the back row: The RS will only be used if it's truly needed! But the uplist has to happen! You all have no idea what's at stake! Use your brains! Why do we need the uplist? To be noticed! Vote YES, let Henry do his job. He knows better. His entire fortune is in the company. He would only be hurting himself. Believe me! I know what I'm talking about..I'm saying it clearly! NO UPLIST, NO RICHES! Why has the volume increased so much? Thank you for your understanding.
0 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 4:40 PM
$CHUC vote absolutely yes and necessary for R/S
0 · Reply
Marci911
Marci911 Apr. 24 at 4:31 PM
$CHUC Many are surely wondering what's happening right now =) I think...=)))))) There are investors who know something. Just a guess! It could be that something is happening behind the scenes. Maybe it's not allowed to be made public yet? Maybe, maybe. It's driving me crazy not knowing... =) But I can handle it lol... If you've invested in Chuc with a larger sum, I can already congratulate you today! YOU made it. Oh. Yes, just a guess from me. Greetings to our Captain Zoltar, who seems to have sunk... Poor guy.
0 · Reply
MadDogs
MadDogs Apr. 24 at 4:18 PM
$CHUC voted No on R/S. 💪🤠
0 · Reply
redbeamgold
redbeamgold Apr. 24 at 4:14 PM
$CHUC For,For,Against,Against
0 · Reply
Fargas
Fargas Apr. 24 at 4:12 PM
$CHUC yes for me on the R/S can’t get where we need to be if we remain a penny stock .
1 · Reply
timr12
timr12 Apr. 24 at 4:11 PM
$CHUC someone just made a 89,769 share buy , immediately followed by a 50,000 share buy . something must be brewing ! If your not in yet or don't have the total you want , now is the time to act before FOMO takes over .
0 · Reply
FatherFauci
FatherFauci Apr. 24 at 4:08 PM
$CHUC RUN!!! They just put forth a vote to authorize another R/S. Hasn't even been long since the last one.
3 · Reply