Market Cap 11.62M
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) -29.56M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio -2.27
Volume 164,400
Avg Vol 1,552,070
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 15.80M
Stochastic %K 16%
Beta 0.89
Analysts Sell
Price Target $10.50

Company Profile

CalciMedica, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, develops therapeutics for illnesses caused by inflammatory and immunologic processes and direct cellular damage. Its lead product candidate comprises Auxora, an intravenous formulated small molecule calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channel inhibitors for the treatment of acute pancreatitis, asparaginase-induced pancreatic toxicity, and acute kidney injury, as well as severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The company also develops Auxora...

Industry: Biotechnology
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 858 952 5500
Address:
505 Coast Boulevard South, Suite 307, La Jolla, United States
66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 21 at 1:38 AM
$CALC Another 13G representing 1.5 million shares. CVI/Heights capital can be active traders and do hedge, but the disclosed position is common shares. That doesn’t typically indicate a hedge,but rather a long equity position. All seems pretty positive to me, plus they’ve further reduced the immediately available float in the near term, even if they may ultimately be a little less “sticky” than an Alafi. GL
0 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 20 at 6:43 PM
$CALC any life on this forum?
1 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 18 at 12:38 AM
$CALC I can't wait for this thing to get back to $1.08. Wasted so many months here in nothingville
0 · Reply
66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 17 at 8:51 PM
$CALC Agreed. Last Friday’s 13D confirmed that they are. Sanderling, Alafi, and Aisling are established biotech venture investors whose investment horizons are generally longer than typical retail traders or short-term hedge funds. Avenue is a somewhat different situation because its exposure includes convertible/warrant-related securities, but they’re still sticky holders. These holders are less likely to actively trade around short-term price movements or sell into upward momentum, which likely reduces the effective tradable float relative to the headline float. Tight tight! ✊🏻 GL
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 17 at 5:19 PM
$CALC we dont deserve being trading at these levels, FDA has done a huge damage and generated a price distortion. Institucional investors should be aware of this situation and take advantage of it
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 17 at 5:17 PM
$CALC trust!
0 · Reply
topstockalerts
topstockalerts Jul. 17 at 1:42 PM
$CALC every dip getting scooped… kinda telling
0 · Reply
MrBlockchain
MrBlockchain Jul. 17 at 12:44 PM
0 · Reply
66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 17 at 1:56 AM
$CALC Capital protection and managed exposure are my watchwords here. Unless a reverse split is accompanied by a catalyst that causes the market to revalue the company higher, it only solves the bid-price issue and leaves the MVLS deficiency unresolved. If they have no major catalyst before their September compliance deadline, their practical options narrow. They’ve can generate an increase in market capitalization through positive business or clinical developments, complete a strategic transaction (merger, acquisition, licensing, etc.) that materially increases their value, or obtain additional time through the Nasdaq hearing process. They haven’t done an R/S since 2023, so the likelihood they can get an extension, probably two, is high. The MVLS isn’t so easy. So I have to believe they have something in the works we’ll learn about shortly. Again, capital protection and managed exposure. GL
1 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 16 at 7:52 PM
$CALC Of course, the market may initially react negatively simply because reverse splits have historically been associated with underperforming biotechnology companies. Many investors and quantitative trading strategies respond to the headline without considering the specific circumstances of each company. In CalciMedica's case, however, the context is different. The company has already raised capital, insiders have demonstrated confidence by participating in the financing, and the key value drivers over the coming months are expected to be clinical and regulatory developments rather than another financing event.
3 · Reply
Latest News on CALC
CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy filing

Jul 13, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT - 7 days ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy filing


CalciMedica announces $49M private placement

2026-06-24T11:11:04.000Z - 26 days ago

CalciMedica announces $49M private placement


CalciMedica Quarterly report: Q1 2026

May 12, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT - 2 months ago

CalciMedica Quarterly report: Q1 2026


CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing

Mar 3, 2026, 7:00 AM EST - 4 months ago

CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing


CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing

Nov 13, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 8 months ago

CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing


CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Jun 9, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Apr 30, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Apr 29, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 1 year ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


CalciMedica Secures Credit Facility for Up to $32.5 Million

Mar 5, 2025, 7:00 AM EST - 1 year ago

CalciMedica Secures Credit Facility for Up to $32.5 Million


CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Jul 16, 2024, 8:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing

Jul 16, 2024, 8:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

CalciMedica Proxy statement: Proxy Filing


CalciMedica Set to Join Russell Microcap® Index

Jul 1, 2024, 8:00 AM EDT - 2 years ago

CalciMedica Set to Join Russell Microcap® Index


CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing

Jan 31, 2024, 7:00 AM EST - 2 years ago

CalciMedica Registration statement: Registration Filing


66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 21 at 1:38 AM
$CALC Another 13G representing 1.5 million shares. CVI/Heights capital can be active traders and do hedge, but the disclosed position is common shares. That doesn’t typically indicate a hedge,but rather a long equity position. All seems pretty positive to me, plus they’ve further reduced the immediately available float in the near term, even if they may ultimately be a little less “sticky” than an Alafi. GL
0 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 20 at 6:43 PM
$CALC any life on this forum?
1 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 18 at 12:38 AM
$CALC I can't wait for this thing to get back to $1.08. Wasted so many months here in nothingville
0 · Reply
66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 17 at 8:51 PM
$CALC Agreed. Last Friday’s 13D confirmed that they are. Sanderling, Alafi, and Aisling are established biotech venture investors whose investment horizons are generally longer than typical retail traders or short-term hedge funds. Avenue is a somewhat different situation because its exposure includes convertible/warrant-related securities, but they’re still sticky holders. These holders are less likely to actively trade around short-term price movements or sell into upward momentum, which likely reduces the effective tradable float relative to the headline float. Tight tight! ✊🏻 GL
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 17 at 5:19 PM
$CALC we dont deserve being trading at these levels, FDA has done a huge damage and generated a price distortion. Institucional investors should be aware of this situation and take advantage of it
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 17 at 5:17 PM
$CALC trust!
0 · Reply
topstockalerts
topstockalerts Jul. 17 at 1:42 PM
$CALC every dip getting scooped… kinda telling
0 · Reply
MrBlockchain
MrBlockchain Jul. 17 at 12:44 PM
0 · Reply
66Caprice327
66Caprice327 Jul. 17 at 1:56 AM
$CALC Capital protection and managed exposure are my watchwords here. Unless a reverse split is accompanied by a catalyst that causes the market to revalue the company higher, it only solves the bid-price issue and leaves the MVLS deficiency unresolved. If they have no major catalyst before their September compliance deadline, their practical options narrow. They’ve can generate an increase in market capitalization through positive business or clinical developments, complete a strategic transaction (merger, acquisition, licensing, etc.) that materially increases their value, or obtain additional time through the Nasdaq hearing process. They haven’t done an R/S since 2023, so the likelihood they can get an extension, probably two, is high. The MVLS isn’t so easy. So I have to believe they have something in the works we’ll learn about shortly. Again, capital protection and managed exposure. GL
1 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 16 at 7:52 PM
$CALC Of course, the market may initially react negatively simply because reverse splits have historically been associated with underperforming biotechnology companies. Many investors and quantitative trading strategies respond to the headline without considering the specific circumstances of each company. In CalciMedica's case, however, the context is different. The company has already raised capital, insiders have demonstrated confidence by participating in the financing, and the key value drivers over the coming months are expected to be clinical and regulatory developments rather than another financing event.
3 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 16 at 7:51 PM
$CALC For that reason, announcing a reverse stock split after the private placement should not automatically be interpreted as a signal of another imminent financing round. The dilution has already occurred, and the company has already strengthened its cash position. If the reverse split is ultimately implemented, it would appear to be primarily a technical measure to maintain Nasdaq listing compliance rather than a step taken to facilitate another capital raise. Going forward, I believe the factors that are likely to have a much greater impact on CalciMedica's valuation are: The FDA's feedback regarding the pivotal program for Auxora. Progress toward initiating the pivotal trial. Additional clinical or regulatory milestones. Potential strategic partnerships or business development opportunities. In my view, these catalysts are far more important to the company's long-term value than the reverse split itself.
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 16 at 7:50 PM
$CALC One point that I believe is often overlooked in the discussion around CalciMedica's proposed reverse stock split is the sequence of events. In general, a reverse split is viewed negatively because investors assume it is a precursor to future dilution. The typical reasoning is that a company performs a reverse split to increase its share price, making it easier to raise capital through a subsequent equity offering. However, that logic does not fully apply to CalciMedica. CalciMedica has already completed its private placement, meaning that the market has already priced in the associated dilution. Furthermore, this financing was supported by insiders, with members of management and the Board increasing their ownership in the company. Insider participation is generally interpreted as a vote of confidence, since those with the greatest knowledge of the business chose to invest additional capital.
0 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 16 at 7:05 PM
$CALC "Tutes" and insiders would get screwed alongside the rest of the shareholder base if they move forward with the proposed reverse stock split.
1 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 16 at 5:10 PM
$CALC huh? That makes ZERO sense
0 · Reply
MUBSN
MUBSN Jul. 16 at 3:18 PM
$CALC this is more than a consolidation
1 · Reply
Super_Marioo
Super_Marioo Jul. 16 at 2:54 PM
$CALC - normally I would have reloaded between 70c-79c but the reverse split announcement has spooked investors and has changed my strategy. I will just monitor for now.
2 · Reply
SUGONDEEZNUTS
SUGONDEEZNUTS Jul. 16 at 1:59 PM
$CALC damn..
0 · Reply
keokeostwiz
keokeostwiz Jul. 16 at 5:02 AM
$CALC Momentum does not start at the breakout.....it starts during consolidation
0 · Reply
mrtmermer80
mrtmermer80 Jul. 15 at 6:10 PM
$CALC Our time will come, no doubt about it. It might take little longer than We want or anticipated but it will come. Just my opinion, there is minimum risk at these levels. I already own tons of shares and my average is cheaper than current SP but I will add more if these goes down another %10.
0 · Reply
Butterflies5
Butterflies5 Jul. 15 at 5:31 PM
$CALC extremely depressing holding this stock for nearly a year after the initial collapse
1 · Reply
SUGONDEEZNUTS
SUGONDEEZNUTS Jul. 15 at 11:34 AM
$CALC buying the dip. i don't think management will want an rs they are in the negatives right now..
1 · Reply
NLEBRON3
NLEBRON3 Jul. 14 at 9:08 PM
$CALC watching from the bench
0 · Reply