Aug. 18 at 1:36 AM
$AIM For newer
$AIM shareholders, I’m resharing this thread as one example of how @phantajuicy and @uuddlrlr approach this ticker.
We’ve seen plenty of their negative commentary over time, which is perfectly fine — everyone is entitled to be bearish.
But in this case, I asked a very simple question: What is the source for presenting the old May 7
$0.48 warrant exercise as a new financing?
Days later: still no answer, no filing, no source.
Both repeatedly describe themselves as
$AIM shareholders, so I’ll let newer readers look at the original post/thread and decide for themselves how much weight they want to give these accounts. 😏
