Market Cap 3.71B
Revenue (ttm) 32.22M
Net Income (ttm) -131.76M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin -408.94%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.02
Volume 12,900
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 71.36M
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta 1.22
Analysts Hold
Price Target $52.00

Company Profile

Churchill Capital Corp XI does not have significant operations. It intends to effect a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The company was incorporated in 2025 and is based in New York, New York.

Industry: Shell Companies
Sector: Financial Services
Phone: 212 380 7500
Address:
640 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, United States
Shrewd_Firefly
Shrewd_Firefly Sep. 12 at 3:21 PM
$CCXI Adding on the way down, sometimes you just feel like it's that kind of ticker, can't explain it.. maybe bias from previous rallies in similar thematic names i.e QuantumScape/OKLO...
0 · Reply
vu_jade
vu_jade Sep. 11 at 10:47 PM
$CCXI that was an ugly day
1 · Reply
Oceanavekid
Oceanavekid Sep. 11 at 9:10 PM
$CCXI not at all stressed The spac merger isn’t even completed yet. Still very early for any robotics company.
1 · Reply
al300z
al300z Sep. 11 at 6:39 PM
$CCXI lol, exhibit A: $LCID which was a garbage spac that is down 99%
0 · Reply
DeMoose
DeMoose Sep. 11 at 6:19 PM
$CCXI someone wants in lower. Just guessing but I bet there is a merger date announced next week.
0 · Reply
JMoneyGrip1
JMoneyGrip1 Sep. 11 at 4:37 PM
$CCXI what's the current NAV price here? Anyone? Thx.
0 · Reply
stockman4200
stockman4200 Sep. 11 at 4:35 PM
$CCXI some frustration here, i get it. just have to be patient
0 · Reply
ROFLMAOO
ROFLMAOO Sep. 11 at 2:47 PM
$CCXI damn never thought churchill would do a garbage spac a damn shame
0 · Reply
dudebob
dudebob Sep. 10 at 11:25 PM
$RTAC did ~2.8M volume today. 👀 Could easily just be arbs, but definitely caught my eye. RTACW warrants saw a little action too for the riskier side. Still no target announced. Five names I keep circling just for fun: • Poolside AI • Accrete AI • Saronic • Fireblocks • Pulse Space RTAC is targeting U.S. crypto/blockchain, data security & dual-use tech, generally $500M$5B EV. Poolside especially has an interesting Lauren Selig connection, although its reported valuation makes it a stretch. Probably arbs… or worth watching? What’s everyone’s guess? $INFQ $CCXI $QBTS $RGTI - want to hear opinions from other successful SPACs.
1 · Reply
Cryptojoe9
Cryptojoe9 Sep. 10 at 10:00 PM
$CCXI almost there 🤫
0 · Reply
Latest News on CCXI
Shrewd_Firefly
Shrewd_Firefly Sep. 12 at 3:21 PM
$CCXI Adding on the way down, sometimes you just feel like it's that kind of ticker, can't explain it.. maybe bias from previous rallies in similar thematic names i.e QuantumScape/OKLO...
0 · Reply
vu_jade
vu_jade Sep. 11 at 10:47 PM
$CCXI that was an ugly day
1 · Reply
Oceanavekid
Oceanavekid Sep. 11 at 9:10 PM
$CCXI not at all stressed The spac merger isn’t even completed yet. Still very early for any robotics company.
1 · Reply
al300z
al300z Sep. 11 at 6:39 PM
$CCXI lol, exhibit A: $LCID which was a garbage spac that is down 99%
0 · Reply
DeMoose
DeMoose Sep. 11 at 6:19 PM
$CCXI someone wants in lower. Just guessing but I bet there is a merger date announced next week.
0 · Reply
JMoneyGrip1
JMoneyGrip1 Sep. 11 at 4:37 PM
$CCXI what's the current NAV price here? Anyone? Thx.
0 · Reply
stockman4200
stockman4200 Sep. 11 at 4:35 PM
$CCXI some frustration here, i get it. just have to be patient
0 · Reply
ROFLMAOO
ROFLMAOO Sep. 11 at 2:47 PM
$CCXI damn never thought churchill would do a garbage spac a damn shame
0 · Reply
dudebob
dudebob Sep. 10 at 11:25 PM
$RTAC did ~2.8M volume today. 👀 Could easily just be arbs, but definitely caught my eye. RTACW warrants saw a little action too for the riskier side. Still no target announced. Five names I keep circling just for fun: • Poolside AI • Accrete AI • Saronic • Fireblocks • Pulse Space RTAC is targeting U.S. crypto/blockchain, data security & dual-use tech, generally $500M$5B EV. Poolside especially has an interesting Lauren Selig connection, although its reported valuation makes it a stretch. Probably arbs… or worth watching? What’s everyone’s guess? $INFQ $CCXI $QBTS $RGTI - want to hear opinions from other successful SPACs.
1 · Reply
Cryptojoe9
Cryptojoe9 Sep. 10 at 10:00 PM
$CCXI almost there 🤫
0 · Reply
future__investor
future__investor Sep. 10 at 9:56 PM
$CCXI filled a smidge more to the swing Nvidia Halos for robotics
0 · Reply
Oceanavekid
Oceanavekid Sep. 10 at 9:16 PM
$CCXI short term pain for long term gains
0 · Reply
HaraldOkhair10
HaraldOkhair10 Sep. 10 at 8:43 PM
$MESH am I the only person that saw this headline? Seems like easy $$ $SMR $CCXI https://www.kalkine.com/news/announcements/meshflow-acquisition-corp-signs-business-combination-deal-with-hgp-intelligent-energy
0 · Reply
al300z
al300z Sep. 10 at 3:11 PM
$CCXI that S4 looks AWFUL. No wonder they are trying to rush to SPAC... going concern.. https://www.humanoidsdaily.com/news/agility-s-numbers-are-in-1-8m-in-sales-a-138m-loss-and-a-backlog-owed-to-an-insider
1 · Reply
al300z
al300z Sep. 10 at 2:58 PM
$CCXI read the newest filing. ouch. glta!
1 · Reply
Ma410
Ma410 Sep. 10 at 1:21 PM
$CCXI hmmmm
0 · Reply
Keepplaying
Keepplaying Sep. 9 at 9:40 PM
$CCXI no, because I already loaded 🙂
1 · Reply
Cryptojoe9
Cryptojoe9 Sep. 9 at 7:39 PM
$CCXI can we drop to $10-11 😤🚀🐂
0 · Reply
Keepplaying
Keepplaying Sep. 9 at 7:31 PM
$CCXI does anyone know if there are takeaways from these conferences that Agility Robotics is participating: Citi Global TMT Conference Date: September 8-10, 2026 Location: New York, New York ‍ Jefferies Global Industrials Conference Date: September 9-10, 2026 Location: New York, New York
0 · Reply
dudebob
dudebob Sep. 9 at 5:24 PM
Big commons volume on pre-DA spacs, $RTAC and also Tom Lee’s $FCRS … Anyone following or holding commons/warrants? 👀 Thoughts from $CCXI $INFQ $PSQL ? 🤔
1 · Reply
trader365
trader365 Sep. 9 at 3:04 PM
$USAR and $CCXI long.
0 · Reply
trader365
trader365 Sep. 9 at 3:03 PM
$CCXI BTD
0 · Reply