BullDr1ver Posted - 2 weeks ago

$X $Y $CORZ

___dog___ Posted - 1 month ago

@SylvPalm3 grab em by the P*"$y

Esau815 Posted - 08/30/24

$AXDX Frankly it's not what the investors "want" it's what a buyer is willing to "pay". IMHO Perella likely made a presentation and said Wave right now is worth $X and with FDA approval we think that we can get $Y. Remember any acquirer is risk averse and is not likely to spend hundreds of millions for something that might not get FDA. The price goes up if someone other than BDX wants this. The only focus on present owners is really the two PE guys who kicked in the $15MM. Did they do this to make sure that they got their (combined with other converts) $70MM back? Or did Perella make a case than approved Wave could get more than $300MM in which case they would make money on the $7.20 convert price? Answer: Don't know.

NVDAMillionaire Posted - 2 months ago

$Y Alleghany Corporation (Y): A Diversified Conglomerate Navigating Challenges with Resilience http://beyondspx.com/2024/08/05/alleghany-corporation-y-a-diversified-conglomerate-navigating-challenges-with-resilience/

Esau815 Posted - 2 months ago

$AXDX AXDX indeed hit its milestone and promise that it completed 1,570 preclinical trials. They are about five weeks late starting clinical trials. Their goal of year end 510k submission remains intact. How is that a miss? Phillips did assure a distribution deal by "mid year". Obviously, he didn't like what was being offerend--and, more importantly, neither did the two major PE firms who own a majority of the shares through the convert. Indeed, they kicked in the extra $15MM--albeit with 16% interest and minimum 30% exit fee. Should note that these terms were far less onerous than the previous raise. Now we enter speculation land. My guess is that a Non BDX player said, "If you have an FDA approved product we can pay $X and get this through our Board--but you need FDA." So Wave is worth $X post FDA and $Y pre FDA and that difference is more than the $20MM that it'll cost them to jump through this hoop.

fjcicchetti Posted - 07/23/24

$TSLA I have a question for those who always say "diamond hands" or "buy the dip"... I've been curious about this for years, it's not just this stock, it's happened with every stock that's been hugely popular.......If the stock is absolutely tanking, why would you not sell and buy back in later? It's not like they're gonna run out of shares while it falls. Why not save yourself some money & sell at $X, then buy back in at $Y, saving yourself $5-$10 per share? You can be long, and not just hold through brutal stretches.

srinik23 Posted - 3 months ago

$VKTX Here is another factor - we are assuming VKTX worth $Y based on LLY/NVO - but at some point those multiples could compress too - so again another reason (imo) that BL should look to sell faster than later. Hoping he realizes $12b ($100ish) is not a terrible outcome especially if given in stock of a company that could 3-4x if this product gets to the end. GL GL to all

smarterthanyou Posted - 3 months ago

@chapelp @marianaparra @Cmon_man224444 I just replied to another post. This is it. bad terminology (on prior lockups) on a single timeline maybe (the practice is new) but they are locking up in preparation to pay the SEC The SEC wants $X. Ripple wants to pay $Y. Why not agree to settle at $Z and pay the SEC in XRP? Once news breaks, the SEC $Zs will go up 7x overnight. Less money and dilution for Ripple and the SEC gets the money they want and sell in to a spike.

smarterthanyou Posted - 3 months ago

@Cmon_man224444 @marianaparra bad terminology on a single timeline maybe (the practice is new) but they are locking up in preparation to pay the SEC The SEC wants $X. Ripple wants to pay $Y. Why not agree to settle at $Z and pay the SEC in XRP? Once news breaks, the SEC $Zs will go up 7x overnight. Less money and dilution for Ripple and the SEC gets the money they want and sell in to a spike.

AberamaGold Posted - 3 months ago

$AMC anyone else notice all the new accounts saying “I’ll sell at $X” and “wasn’t this at $Y last year”? Yeah… we get it. F**king frauds.

Ciufy Posted - 05/28/24

$NVAX Just watch what happened back in the years when this went to 300...that's why not all of us will be millionaires. Over 200% + in the last month and you cry for a -10-20% day? They fight hard to change the future...they can only delay it but not change it, HOLD ON, don't be a p...$y

BigCFinancial Posted - 5 months ago

@mark3rd Institution will put annorder in for X shares in a price range of $x - $y and go to a MM who will continue to accumulate those shares and then "sell" them to that "buyer" as a block These wont show up on L2

2030orbust Posted - 5 months ago

Love seeing the $10K invested in X stock is worth $Y currently. My prediction for $RKLB is $250K

swampwiz0 Posted - 5 months ago

@Tomasini I would imagine that the filing will point out that this last filing had required an expenditure of $Y that will no longer be an expense going forward. Unlike a lot of others, I think that being able to go unlisted is a good sign, as it means that CLVR managment is confident that ATM funding is no longer needed. And hopefully, there will be a statement that so long as CLVR is vastly undervalued, any profits in excess of the working capital needed will go to buying back stock.

Scrtidentity Posted - 5 months ago

@Steinadilo Congrats on the trade. Even though I question your sharing of your trading intentions, eg. looking to sell at $x or rebuy at $y (& generally don't think its a good idea esp on a low volume stock), I wanted to publicly congratulate you on the trade b/c you're a long time bull (at least this cycle) and it's often not easy to execute a contrary trade when your outlook changes (which is why most longs will simply sell the long and call it a day until an opportunity to rebuy presents itself). Not only that, but you went full confidence (expensive atm option vs cheaper otm). Well done. Alas, be cautious with these low volume options. You recently mentioned this was a somewhat new trade for you (puts). Buying options is difficult with liquid stocks (most don't realize you should really be an options seller.... and dealers don't want you knowing that either). It's even more difficult with illiquid stocks. You saw that with the big spreads and hefty premium.

AussieDream Posted - 5 months ago

$VXRT Spankee Wankee thinks can play all for fools yet again. 24 hours of pretending to be dissatisfied and against the vote, then a complete u-turn. Who didn’t see that coming ? Volume of posts has increased to try garner support and credibility, quoting true value numbers of $x then $y, when reality Vaxart sells for only 70 cents, hopefully just for now. Scare tactics talk of what a no vote might bring, everything this guy tries is so transparent. Let Vaxart speak and tell the truth, if not, they deserve to fail

Newageinvestor Posted - 04/30/24

@pirateangel113 I'll play along, If you're saying that the contract was worth $10 million in revenue to CorMedix over the life of the contract (5 years), I would view that as a pretty healthy contract given the size/number of ARC's serviced inpatient facilities (100) and operated outpatient clinics (18). I believe thought that the contract, identified as a "5-year Commercial Supply Contract", would be structured as a tiered pricing model with a lower cost of goods triggered based on milestones achieved. ie. first 1,000 vials at $X dollars, second 1,000 vials at $Y dollars, etc. There wouldn't necessarily be a dollar amount placed on the contract as the usage is unknown outside of historical trends. So no commitment on spend by ARC. In exchange, ARC has agreed to "implement DefenCath throughout their organization" per Joe T., and CorMedix was given approval to provide a press release, which I don't foresee being the case with every contract that they sign. My two cents. :)

_The_One_ Posted - 04/25/24

$VXRT Many of you know that I invest in real estate, businesses, stocks. Part of that investing process includes valuation. Professionally placing a value on something to determine its true worth before dropping $$$ into it. In my local market there are several real estate scammers. They contact property owners and tell them "we will buy property X from you for $Y" In the case of $Y the offer is AWAYS about 30% less than the appraised value of the property. Their goal is to prey on people who are struggling and need cash to later flip the property for 30% profit. Every time they approach me with their bullshit offers, I tell them to pound sand and block their # or email. In our case, Vaxart is the house worth $3B minimum. You are the owner. And the scammer is the MM and hedge fund. But they aren't trying to offer you even a 30% discount. They are offering you a price that is 5% FMV.

NeedsImprovement Posted - 6 months ago

@godsvanity Yeah like my wife knows I have $X invested in stocks, and I know she has $Y invested in stocks, and we together have $Z invested in stable things. We kind of just assume that $X and $Y aren’t things we can 100% plan around accessing. I just think it’s helpful to keep discussion to that level because we want to have a general sense of risk but I don’t want to get into the weeds and start being critical of the specific trading actions. So far it’s worked out.

ThomasLD Posted - 7 months ago

$AUPH A privately negotiated share repurchase is another way to buyback shares. Maybe that is why we did see any huge purchase shares for every trading day. Would it be possible, example Otsuka put on paper to show that they have been purchasing shares at $x (even though on reality Otsuka did not buy any shares on open market) and AUPH will buyback their shares back at $y > $x. That way, Otsuka will make money ($y -$x) = +$Z? Then Otsuka will buy Aurinia out for $w Billions such as $2B+?

stu Posted - 02/25/24

@SteelCo @bennybc @speakmannameonlyonce I am realistic as well, not throwing out any SP targets for a potential BO. I've read posts here where the posts read "MW won't sell for less than $X or less than $Y..." Not sure how they know what MW wants as a target SP.

bigalpee Posted - 11 months ago

@labranded21kr @StocktwitsSuxx that's not a short though, is it? You sold shares at $x with the intent to repurchase at $y; what's your theory on entry and exit at GEVO?

MarketBeatInsiderTrades Posted - 11 months ago

Yellow Pages Insider GoldenTree Asset Management LP Sells C$1,120.00 in $Y www.marketbeat.com/stocks/TSE/Y/insider-trades/

MarketBeatInsiderTrades Posted - 11 months ago

Yellow Pages Insider GoldenTree Asset Management LP Sells C$104,160.00 in $Y www.marketbeat.com/stocks/TSE/Y/insider-trades/

MarketBeatInsiderTrades Posted - 10/24/23

Yellow Pages Insider GoldenTree Asset Management LP Sells C$28,225.00 in $Y www.marketbeat.com/stocks/TSE/Y/insider-trades/

Riviantastic Posted - 09/27/23

@BloomQ makes sense. A bull call spread would be buying 3 calls at various strike prices (at the money, $x higher, and $y higher). Given the current market, I'm buying calls that are way out in the future to be extra careful. There are a ton of people buying far more aggressive calls for this year or 2024 which I'm not doing

oaksapollo Posted - 1 year ago

$ETON From $5.88 to $4.63 in 2 days, makes me a little nervous they're going to try to raise money here. They don't need to, but sometimes management has a little success, they start thinking "if only I had $X instead of $Y, we could do this deal or that deal." Come on ETON live within your means, that's what got you here.

scott52 Posted - 1 year ago

@jobix @SocioCobb Any buyer could always structure a deal so that the risk of approval is minimized by a contingent value right (CVR). They pay $X for the pipeline plus $Y as a CVR payable only if the FDA approves the melanoma treatment. BMS bought Celgene with a CVR that only paid out if three drugs met approvals by a certain date. One got pushed back, missed the deadline but ultimately got approved, and the CVR expired worthless. Pissed me off:-)

LongTermInvestor84 Posted - 1 year ago

$AMC $Y ... hey, wagie, this POS will never skyrocket. The stonk was diluted with the APE conversion and the reverse split. Go back to the grill, wojak. You're never going to get out of the rat race 🤡🖕🐀💩🐀💩